US Funds Restoration of "Global" Islamic Sites

Lamarr

Star
Registered
Yahoo News

Associated Press
Aug 24, 2010


WASHINGTON – The good will tour of the Middle East by the imam behind the proposed mosque near ground zero is just part of the U.S. government's efforts to reach out to the Muslim world.

This year, the Obama administration will spend nearly $6 million to restore 63 historic and cultural sites, including mosques and minarets, in 55 nations, according to State Department documents.

Under a program established by Congress in 2001, the department will fund at least five projects in as many countries at a cost of more than $271,000.

The contributions include $76,135 for the 16th century Grand Mosque in Tongxin, China, and $67,500 for the 18th century Golden Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan. An additional $62,169 will be spent on restoring a 19th century minaret in Mauritania's ancient city of Tichitt; $50,437 for the Sundarwala Burj, a 16th century Islamic Monument in New Delhi, and $15,450 to restore the 18th century Gobarau Minaret in Katsina, Nigeria.

The amount spent on mosque restoration projects is a fraction of the total in the 2010 Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation, which also will fund projects to restore Christian and Buddhist sites as well as museums, forts and palaces.

Since 2001, the U.S. government has spent almost $26 million on the program to fund about 640 cultural preservation projects in more than 100 countries.

"The fund has demonstrated America's respect for the world's cultural heritage," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said last month in announcing the 2010 projects. "Cultural heritage serves as a reminder of historical experiences and achievements of humanity. Ancient structures and objects offer important lessons for us today."
 
That's very smart diplomacy. I just hope the Obama Administration does a better job of trumpeting itself in this over there than they do here.
 
That's very smart diplomacy. I just hope the Obama Administration does a better job of trumpeting itself in this over there than they do here.

Is it possible to have "extremely smart" diplomacy that doesn't put the bill on cash-strapped taxpayers?
 
I disagree.

I teach my sons the same principle: nothing of this life is free.
 
I disagree.

I teach my sons the same principle: nothing of this life is free.

perhaps you could tell me what exactly, are we recieving for our $6 million of borrowed money? (cause you know the nation is $13 trill in debt)
 
I disagree.

I teach my sons the same principle: nothing of this life is free.

and just as my pops taught me, if we don't have the money, we must do without

And pops was, is, and never will be in debt!
 
Last edited:
Just wondering if these same questions were being raised when Bush transformed a surplus into a defeciet. Or when he was giving his pals the no bid contracts for the 2 wars he started.

Or are they just now relevant questions because Obama is in office and is trying to restore not only our country but our country's reputation.

Just seems awful funny to me that now we have alot of questions and desires to take "our country" back.
 
Just wondering if these same questions were being raised when Bush transformed a surplus into a defeciet. Or when he was giving his pals the no bid contracts for the 2 wars he started.

Sure Bush transformed a "surplus" into a deficit, shame on him. If that action is seen as a negative, How can 1 justify creating a larger deficit (than Bush) in the name of "restoring the countries reputation"?

oh, Blackwater's still gettin paid, they just recieved a new contract from Pres Obama! Dyncorp & Halliburton too

Or are they just now relevant questions because Obama is in office and is trying to restore not only our country but our country's reputation.

It's only a relevant question because we've been pursuing the same policy, since 2001, to fund these projects and have very little to show as a return on our investment to improve relations.

Since 2001, the U.S. government has spent almost $26 million on the program to fund about 640 cultural preservation projects in more than 100 countries.

Just seems awful funny to me that now we have alot of questions and desires to take "our country" back.

At one time, this nation was the world's largest creditor. Now we are the world's largest debtor, something changed along the way. That must be rectified first, and it won't be solved by accumulating more debt!

who knows, Maybe we shoulda been tryin to take our country back since Clinton signed NAFTA. Or, maybe when "W" led us to an unjustified war in Iraq to enforce UN mandates, who knows?

Free trade with all, entangling alliances with NONE!
 
Back
Top