US attorney general quotes Bible to defend separating families

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
US attorney general quotes Bible to defend separating families


_102040926_hi047459879-1.jpg



US Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been criticised for citing Bible scripture to back up the Trump administration's immigration policy.

At an event in Indiana, Mr Sessions was defending the practice of separating undocumented immigrant families apprehended at the border.

He quoted the New Testament and said having children does not shield border-crossing migrants from prosecution.

The Bible verse was once used to justify US slavery, said critics.


Mr Sessions said on Thursday:

"I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes.


"Our policy that can result in short-term separation of families is not unusual or unjustified."
White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders would not comment directly on Mr Sessions' remarks, but added "it's very biblical to enforce the law".

.


 
US Attorney General Jeff Sessions . . . . citing Bible scripture to back up the Trump administration's immigration policy . . . said "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes.

"Our policy that can result in short-term separation of families is not unusual or unjustified."


May I remind him of passages from The Letter From The Birmingham Jail

king.jpg


Where on Good Friday 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. led a nonviolent march through the streets of Birmingham, Ala., to draw attention to the injustices of segregation. Arrested for marching without a permit, King composed “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in response to eight white ministers who criticized the timing of the civil rights demonstrations -- arguing that not only was civil disobedience justified in the face of UNJUST LAWS, but necessary and even patriotic. As King stated:


. . . there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "An unjust law is no law at all." Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust?

A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God.

An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.

Any law that uplifts human personality is just.

Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.

All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an "I - it" relationship for the "I - thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. So segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, but it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Isn't segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, an expression of his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness?

So I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court because it is morally right, and
I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances because they are morally wrong.


Let us turn to a more concrete example of just and unjust laws.

An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself. This is difference made legal. On the other hand, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow, and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal.

Let me give another explanation. An unjust law is a code inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating because it did not have the unhampered right to vote. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up the segregation laws was democratically elected? Throughout the state of Alabama all types of conniving methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties without a single Negro registered to vote, despite the fact that the Negroes constitute a majority of the population. Can any law set up in such a state be considered democratically structured?
These are just a few examples of unjust and just laws. There are some instances when a law is just on its face and unjust in its application. For instance, I was arrested Friday on a charge of parading without a permit. Now, there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust.

Of course, there is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience. It was seen sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar because a higher moral law was involved. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks before submitting to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire.
.​
 
Reading bible passages near the anniversary date of the Congressional shootings...
 
FACT CHECK OF THE DAY


Republicans Misplace Blame for Splitting Families at the Border

The White House and prominent Republicans in Congress cited a 1997 court settlement to justify separating migrant children from parents who illegally enter the United States. But the settlement did not require the government to break up families, and the practice has spurred protests against the Trump administration, a rebuke from the United Nations and a court challenge.

By Linda Qiu
June 14, 2018


WHAT WAS SAID

“The separation of illegal alien families is the product of the same legal loopholes that Democrats refuse to close. And these laws are the same that have been on the books for over a decade. The president is simply enforcing them.”

— Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, to reporters on Thursday.


“What’s happening at the border in the separation of parents and their children is because of a court ruling.”

— Speaker Paul D. Ryan, at a news conference on Thursday.​


THE FACTS

This is misleading.
Hundreds of migrant children have been separated from their parents at the border since October, but there is no decades-old law or court decision that requires this.

Ms. Sanders, Mr. Ryan and Mr. Grassley are referring to a class-action lawsuit that was initially brought against the Reagan administration, as Flores v. Meese, and settled under the Clinton administration in 1997, as Flores v. Reno.

The Flores settlement required immigration officials to “place each detained minor in the least restrictive setting appropriate” — for example, providing food, water and toilets. The government also agreed to release immigrant children “without unnecessary delay” under an established preference ranking for custody.

After a surge of families from Central America began arriving at the United States’ southwestern border in 2014, the Obama administration opened family detention centers. That prompted more lawsuits, which argued that doing so had breached the Flores settlement by not releasing children swiftly.​


In 2016, the Ninth Circuit of Appeals ruled that the Flores settlement “unambiguously applies both to minors who are accompanied and unaccompanied by their parents.” It also overturned a Federal District Court’s decision that the government must also release the parents.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a “zero tolerance” policy in April, stating that “our goal is to prosecute every case that is brought to us” — thus leading to the detention of migrant parents.

In other words, without the Trump administration’s new enforcement policy, the Flores settlement — and subsequent rulings clarifying its scope — alone would not have caused family separation at the border.

As The New York Times reported last month:

Spurred on by the president, Attorney General Jeff Sessions last month announced a “zero tolerance” policy in which people who cross the border illegally are to be subject to criminal prosecution. On Tuesday, the administration officials argued that the two directives, taken together, essentially left them with no option other than to take children from their parents at the border.

Under Flores, the government has three options:
(1) releasing families together;
(2) passing a law that would allow for family detention; or
(3) breaking up the families.

The Trump administration has so far chosen the third option.

Source: Flores settlement text, Ninth Circuit of Appeals, The New York Times, Congressional Research Service, office of Representative Paul D. Ryan


Linda Qiu is a fact-check reporter, based in Washington. She came to the Times in 2017 from the fact-checking service PolitiFact. @ylindaqiu


SOURCE: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/us/politics/fact-check-republicans-family-separations-border.html


.
 
JUST IN:
President Trump signs executive order on keeping families together




75561fa2-b8a3-41d8-9cf2-d781e3f5ec63.jpg




President Trump has signed an executive order “about keeping families together while ensuring we have a powerful border."

"We are keeping families together," Trump said from the Oval Office while flanked by DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Vice President Mike Pence.

"This will solve that problem. At the same time, we are keeping a very powerful border and it continues to be a zero tolerance. We have zero tolerance for people who enter our country illegally," he said.


What just happened:

President Donald Trump officially reversed his debunked argument that he had no authority to stop separations of undocumented immigrant families at the border.

Trump's climbdown came after he faced intense pressure from across the political spectrum and from religious, political and world leaders to halt the separations, which produced days of heart-rending news coverage of crying children some of whom were kept in cage-like detention centers.


https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-n...separation/h_736e0a322bf643474f887e8077d1454b


.
 
woman-child-auction-block-feat-1529441574.jpg


Separating Migrant Families Is Barbaric. It’s Also What the U.S. Has Been Doing to People of Color for Hundreds of Years

https://theintercept.com/2018/06/20...migration-history-slavery-mass-incarceration/

Like most of you reading this, I am deeply appalled at what I see happening right now in the United States — immigrant children being snatched away from their parents and sent to separate detention centers, often locked in cages with strangers, with no real idea of when they’ll ever be reunited with their families. It’s an abomination.

But I often see two troubling responses to this crisis that show just how aloof and asleep millions of Americans are right now.

The first is a statement that goes something like this: This is not the America I know and love. The second is a question, rooted in the same ignorance, that goes something like this: How could this ever happen in the United States?

What’s happening right now in our country is, without question, a human rights catastrophe. Yet every deeply entrenched mechanism used in these policies and the spirit fueling this catastrophe are as American as Facebook and Disneyland.

Let me break it down. At least five troubling factors are at play here. All five were fully and completely present before this current crisis ever began. They set the tone and created the culture in which something so heinous could ever take place.

This has happened here before. It has happened millions of times across the years.
First, this has happened here before. In fact, it has happened millions of times across the years in this country. Africans forced into slavery in this country were routinely separated from their children — not only in being transported to the Americas, but then repeatedly at the auction block. Not thousands, but millions — of mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, parents and children, brothers and sisters — were all forcefully separated from each other. And this was no brief period of this nation’s history, but a feature of the institution of slavery that existed in the United States for nearly 250 years.

Not only were enslaved African children routinely separated from their families, but so too were Native Americans in this country. From the late 1800s all the way until the 1970s, children were routinely taken from Native American homes by force and sent to barbaric “Indian schools,” where their hair was cut and their names and culture stripped away. Many of them never saw their families again.

What might be most shocking, though, is the way the U.S. — today, in the present — separates so many families whose stories go unremarked upon. I’m talking about the crisis of mass incarceration in America, of which the crackdown on immigrants is but one horrific piece.

Right now, as you read this, hundreds of thousands of adults and children, disproportionately black and Latino, are in jails all over this country – not because they’ve been convicted of a crime, but because they cannot afford cash bail. Many of them will languish in jail not for days or weeks, but for months and years without ever being convicted of a crime. In fact, about 65 percent of people in local jails in this country on any given day have not been convicted of a crime. They are in jail simply because they cannot afford bail. They, too, are separated from their families.

You’d have a hard time finding an extended period of American history where children and parents of color weren’t forcefully separated from one another by the white power structure in this country. It’s woefully and painfully normal. And it’s because it’s so normal that it is so easy for it to happen again and again in this country. This nation has mastered separating parents and children. Pretending otherwise is to offer a revisionist history.

It should come as no surprise, then, that so many on the right — those who would bristle at acknowledging, let alone apologizing for, this history — are embracing a policy of forced family separation.

On Monday night, Fox News’s Laura Ingraham said, with a smug smile, that the immigrant children being held in detention centers are “essentially in summer camp.” This, in spite of the reality that the leading doctors and medical groups across the country have said that forcefully separating children from their parents in detention centers causes “irreparable harm” to the children. This, in spite of the gut-wrenching audio obtained by ProPublica of detained children sobbing and wailing for their parents while they are mocked by guards.

Nearly 60 percent of Republicans approve the practice of separating immigrant children from their parents at the border. And it’s not hard to understand why.

At the root of the current human rights crisis at American borders is white supremacy and bigotry.
For years now, Donald Trump has dehumanized border-crossing Latinos every chance he gets — routinely calling them animals, murderers, and rapists. He reduced entire nations of color to being “shithole countries.” On Monday, he reiterated this, saying immigrants were coming from “the most dangerous places in the world.”

This essential step — of reducing immigrants to a subhuman status — must not be overlooked. It happened throughout the transatlantic slave trade. It happened throughout the genocide of Native Americans. It happened throughout the Holocaust. It happened throughout the Rwandan genocide. It happens today with victims of police brutality.

Whenever a people group suffers unspeakable horrors and oppression, the people in power first reduce and dehumanize them — making it such that the conscience of the people in power is fully at ease during the oppression. This is how Ingraham could compare the detention centers to “summer camps”: She has convinced herself that the United States is doing these subhuman children a favor.

At the root of the current human rights crisis at American borders is white supremacy and bigotry. Trump does not have a problem with immigrants. His mother was an immigrant from Scotland. His grandparents were all immigrants. His first wife, Ivana, was an immigrant from what is now the Czech Republic; Trump’s children with her — Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric — have an immigrant parent. Trump’s third wife, Melania, is an immigrant from Slovenia. She just became a citizen in 2006. His son with her, Barron, has an immigrant parent. So no, Trump doesn’t hate immigrants. But he does seem to hate immigrants of color. And this distinction is essential.

Melania Trump’s parents are benefactors of what Trump and the right call “chain migration.” They are in the United States legally because of their relationship to her. Trump and conservatives rail against this policy — but his parents and grandparents and in-laws all benefited from it. If the right wing hated immigrants, Trump would probably be among the least-liked public figures in the country. But many of those on the right — like everyone here but Native Americans — are all descendants of immigrants themselves. Their problem is not with immigrants; it’s with immigrants of color, be they from Mexico or the Americas or any of the nations listed in Trump’s Muslim ban.

White supremacy and bigotry drive so many American policies. Trump’s senior policy adviser Stephen Miller has shown bigoted tendencies since high school. And now he is said to be the chief author of both the Muslim ban and the new policy of separating immigrant children from their parents. We are living in the age where hate crimes are on the rise in the United States. White supremacists are running for office in record numbers.



A 2-year-old Honduran asylum-seeker cries as her mother is searched and detained near the U.S.-Mexico border on June 12, 2018, in McAllen, Texas.

Photo: John Moore/Getty Images


There are two more essential factors are at play in what we see happening at our border right now. We need to talk about these things to really understand what’s going on, to see how we got to this point.
The first is the reality that the United States is the incarceration nation. No nation in the entire world incarcerates more people than we do. We routinely have somewhere around 2.3 million people in jail and prison on any given day, and at least 10.6 million are put into jails and prisons every year. The United States has criminalized poverty, forcing people into jail if they cannot afford to pay the most basic fees, whether traffic tickets, court fines, or cash bail. The United States has criminalized drug addiction, sending millions of people to jail and prison over the generations for simple drug possession. This nation has criminalized mental illness. Two million people with a mental illness are jailed in this nation each year.

It was only a matter of time until people seeking asylum at America’s borders were also criminalized and warehoused. It’s what this nation does.
It was only a matter of time until people seeking asylum at America’s borders were also criminalized and warehoused. It’s what this nation does. Instead of solving our most difficult problems, we increase police forces, build more jails and prisons, including tent cities if necessary, and arrest people — especially people of color.

Lastly — and this is key — what we see happening right now at America’s borders has everything to do with profiteering and the privatization of America’s jails and prisons. It’s a huge multibillion-dollar industry. Our nation has publicly traded companies whose business it is to profit off of mass incarceration — and there is a profit margin on building and running emergency holding facilities and tent cities like we see being formed right now to detain immigrant children and families. Not only are these places being staffed and secured, but the food, the cleaning crews, and the supplies all have an exorbitant cost.

The same conservatives who campaign on cutting costs and reducing deficits then have no problem at all spending multiple billions of dollars on mass incarceration. Executives from the private prison industry have seen their profits explode under Trump and he has been rewarded handsomely with six-figure donations from their executives. In this country, when you see evil, you can almost always follow the money trail.

What’s happening right now is awful. Period. No ifs, ands, or buts. It didn’t come out of nowhere, though. It came right from the American playbook. This nation has routinely mistreated and abused people of color for hundreds of years — and has willfully separated millions of families, sometimes permanently, for sport and profit, on this soil. Speak out against it. Organize against it. But just know that what you are seeing has deep roots.

Top image: “Woman and child on auction block,” from the New York Public Library Digital Collections.
 
062018_trump-may-1529513747.jpg


https://theintercept.com/2018/06/20...isit-deeply-disturbing-images-caged-children/

U.K. Won’t Cancel Trump’s Visit Despite “Deeply Disturbing” Images of Caged Children

Donald Trump is still welcome to visit Britain next month, Prime Minister Theresa May said on Wednesday, despite widespread revulsion at what she called “deeply disturbing” images of children being held in “what appear to be cages” along America’s border with Mexico.

Theresa May says images of caged children in U.S. are 'deeply disturbing' https://t.co/VgxwMnl8u8 pic.twitter.com/lc44zDuDEg

— Reuters UK (@ReutersUK) June 20, 2018

May, who is pursuing a trade deal with the United States to mitigate the looming economic catastrophe of Brexit, has generally been reluctant to criticize Trump, but in the House of Commons on Wednesday she was forced to address the American president’s abduction of immigrant children.

“President Trump has locked up 2,000 little children in cages and is refusing to release them unless he’s allowed to build a wall,” Gavin Shuker of the opposition Labour party pointed out during Prime Minster’s Questions. “What does this man have to do to have the invitation she has extended revoked?” he asked.

Watch the MP @gavinshuker who listed the recent actions of @realDonaldTrump , including locking up children in cages, and then asked the Prime Minister what it would take for the President's invitation to Britain to be revoked. pic.twitter.com/dMaLx0R3lE

— ITV News Anglia (@itvanglia) June 20, 2018

In May’s response, she referred to Trump only by his title, and suggested that her meeting with the president of the United States would be an opportunity to raise the issue with him. “When we disagree with the United States,” the prime minister said, “we tell them so.”

May was accused of hypocrisy by some Britons who recall that, in her prior role as Britain’s home secretary, she had hired vans to drive the streets threatening to jail undocumented immigrants.

People chatting about Trump’s visit to Britain like “What’s May gonna say?” As if this wasn’t a thing: pic.twitter.com/1Ju117P2wl

— Leslie Byron Pitt (@Afrofilmviewer) June 19, 2018

Faced with the prospect of mass protests already being planned for London and Edinburgh, few details have been released ahead of Trump’s “working visit” to his mother’s homeland, scheduled for July 13. But outrage has been stoked this week over the images and audio of abducted children circulating online, Trump’s repeated lies about a refugee crime wave in Germany, his decision to withdraw from the U.N. Human Rights Council, and his use of the word “infest” to equate immigrants to vermin.

I wonder if, when Donald Trump meets Theresa May and the Queen next month, he'll still be running concentration camps, asks @mrjamesob. pic.twitter.com/GLobJU43J6

— LBC (@LBC) June 20, 2018


Don't let this obscenity be met with silence.

Take to the streets when Donald Trump comes to Britain on 13th July. https://t.co/zK8jERfOE2pic.twitter.com/s8WfwQo7Dg

— Owen Jones? (@OwenJones84) June 20, 2018


Theresa May's silence is deafening as she fails to call out Donald Trump and condemn his cruel, inhumane and despicable actions. I am disgusted that our government will roll out the red carpet for him next month. The thing about integrity is that you can only lose it once. pic.twitter.com/kWFVQMRy93

— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 19, 2018


I don’t want @realDonaldTrump infesting my country! Join the protests on July 13th. https://t.co/igy5YgiyUY

— Pete Sinclair (@pete_sinclair) June 20, 2018


He lies about crime in Britain, he lies about crime in Germany, he lies about and defends his cruel, inhumane, barbaric policy of separating babies and children at the border, a new low even for him, and in less than four weeks, @theresa_may will roll out the red carpet. Really? https://t.co/Y9PyeMrSAD

— Ed Miliband (@Ed_Miliband) June 18, 2018


Pretty clear which way this lot are heading now.
The idea of trump being welcomed here next month is abhorrent.
if enough people in the UK feel that way there must be something we can do? https://t.co/qH74csD6Qq

— james richardson (@acjimbo) June 19, 2018


Trump is coming to Scotland but we don't want him here. National demo in Edinburgh on 14th July. See you all there. https://t.co/kHo5uwHCPr #ScotlandAgainstTrump

— ScotlandAgainstTrump (@TrumpProtest24) June 11, 2018

Among those who expressed disgust at the images from inside the U.S. internment camps were Trump’s friend Piers Morgan and Lord Sugar, the star of the British version of “The Apprentice.”

agreed this is terrible https://t.co/v4x6MSyMJm

— Lord Sugar (@Lord_Sugar) June 20, 2018

Sugar, perhaps channeling Trump too much, was also forced to apologize on Wednesday for posting a racist tweet, in which he joked that African soccer players taking part in the World Cup were also selling cheap sunglasses and handbags on the pitch.

Very troubled after seeing @Lord_Sugar racist tweet. I will be writing to the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards and the @BBC calling for an immediate investigation. Racism has no place in Parliament or society. Swift action must be taken. pic.twitter.com/43aXhBYUyi

— (((Dawn Butler MP))) (@DawnButlerBrent) June 20, 2018

Top Photo: British Prime Minister Theresa May with President Donald Trump at the White House in January 2017, when she invited him to visit Britain.
 
Back
Top