UPDATE: Donald Trump Takes Office as the 47th US President


I live in a small MAGA town.
I know MAGA people. I drink with them. I talk to them. I study them.

They’re not the loud Twitter yappers, at least most of them. They’re quieter. Slower. But the delusion runs deep, just bottled up in passive smiles and soft voices.

A few weeks ago, one of them tried to convert me at a bar. He knew I wasn’t into the Trump cult, but he started soft. Calm voice. Friendly tone.

“Mario, you’re white. You can drink a lot, you eat meat, “he was just surprised that I was eating rare burger” and drinking vodka chasing it with Guinness. He also said, “You’re one of us. You should feel proud.”

That’s their seduction tactic.
Not facts. Not logic. Just subtle tribal grooming.
“You’re white. You drink. You belong.”

It was almost sweet, in a sad, culty way.
Like a Jehovah’s Witness trying to sell you eternal life with a shaky brochure and cheap suit.

But let’s talk about the whole ecosystem.
The truth.

MAGA men?
Most are not warriors.
They’re out-of-shape, insecure, jealous small-town boys who peaked in high school, still clinging to stories from when they “almost went pro” or “should’ve been in the military.”
They’re proud of being able to drink a case of light beer, drive a truck, and scream about freedom while their knees buckle from sugar and rage.

They’re easy to manipulate because they don’t ask questions.
They don’t read.
They react.

They memorize memes like scripture and repeat them like gospel.
They think being loud equals being right.

They think the world is laughing with them.
It’s not.
The world’s laughing at them, when it’s not just ignoring them entirely.

MAGA women?

They’re caught in a brutal paradox, constantly screaming about how proud and strong they are, while reshaping every inch of their body to meet a fake beauty standard pushed by the very system they claim to hate.
Plastic lips. Inflated cheeks. Eyelashes thick as windshield wipers.
Trying to look rich while shopping clearance at Walmart.
They scream about “natural family values” while injecting Botox and collapsing into MLM scams that promise empowerment through overpriced lipstick.

They mock liberals for being “gender confused” while wearing more synthetic parts than a Barbie made in a Russian factory.

Here’s the thing: MAGA America isn’t just backward.

It’s boring. MAGA folks are simply subsimple.

There’s nothing imaginative about it. No new culture. No innovation. No ideas.
They don’t invent, they imitate.
They don’t challenge, they chant.

It’s the same five phrases over and over.
The same flag. The same truck. The same outfit.
Patriot cosplay.

And that’s why the world doesn’t just hate MAGA.
It forgets it.
Because once the shouting stops, there’s nothing under the hood.

Just cheap beer breath, fake smiles, and a belief that whiteness and loudness are still enough to matter.

You want the brutal truth?

Even without Trump, even without the cult, most of them would still be irrelevant.
Not because they’re evil.
But because they chose comfort over growth.
Tribalism over truth.
Imitation over imagination.

They don’t want to understand the world.
They want the world to stay small enough to understand them.

And that’s the saddest, most humiliating part.
 



Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024​



Summarize


Jun 09, 2025, 09:16:17 PM IST
Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024
APKamala Harris may have actually won: Voting machine tampering in 2024 raises major election concerns, as watchdog groups reveal secret software changes, missing votes, and statistical red flags that could have change the story of who really won the presidency.Kamala Harris won the U.S. elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024: A new report is stirring fresh debate about the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, claiming that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were even cast. The bombshell allegation raises a serious question: Did Kamala Harris actually win the 2024 election?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads

According to the investigative piece from Daily Boulder, a private lab quietly implemented sweeping changes to voting machines used in over 40% of U.S. counties ahead of the 2024 race. Those changes, the report claims, were made with no public notice, no formal testing, and no third-party oversight.

Want a Loan? Get cash against your Mutual Funds in 4 hours

What changes were made to voting machines before the 2024 election?​

The report centers around Pro V&V, a federally accredited lab responsible for certifying voting machines in key states like Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, and California. In early 2024, the lab reportedly approved updates to ES&S voting systems, which included:

  • New ballot scanners

  • Printer reconfigurations

  • Firmware upgrades

  • A new Electionware reporting system
Instead of labeling these as major changes, Pro V&V classified them as “de minimis,” a term typically reserved for insignificant tweaks. This classification allowed them to bypass public scrutiny and avoid triggering full-scale testing or certification processes.

But watchdog group SMART Elections wasn’t convinced. In their words:
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads

“This wasn’t just a glitch in some sleepy county. It was a stress test of our entire system.”
Soon after the machines went live, complaints began to surface.
LiveEvents_0_img
LiveEvents_1_img
LiveEvents_2_img

Were votes miscounted or ignored in key counties?​

In Rockland County, New York, several voters testified under oath that their ballots didn’t match the official results. Senate candidate Diane Sare reportedly lost votes in precinct after precinct:

  • In one district, 9 voters claimed they voted for Sare, but only 5 votes were recorded.

  • In another, 5 voters swore they supported her, but only 3 votes appeared.
It wasn’t just third-party candidates who saw odd results.

In multiple Democratic-leaning areas, Kamala Harris’s name was reportedly missing from the top of the ballot entirely. Voters said they couldn’t even find her name to select. These same areas had high support for Democrats like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, yet Harris received zero votes—a statistical anomaly that defies traditional voting patterns.

Even more shocking: Donald Trump received 750,000 more votes than Republican Senate candidates in these districts. As reported by Dissent in Bloom, a political Substack,

“That’s not split-ticket voting. That’s a mathematical anomaly.”

Who is behind Pro V&V, and why is there no oversight?​

At the center of the controversy is Jack Cobb, the director of Pro V&V. While he doesn’t appear in the headlines, his lab certifies the machines that millions of Americans use to vote. According to the report, once the controversy began to gain traction, Pro V&V’s website went dark, leaving only a phone number and a generic email address. No public logs. No documentation. No comment.

Pro V&V is certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). However, once accredited, labs like Pro V&V face no real public oversight. There is no hotline, no review board, and no formal process for the public to challenge or remove them.

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads
The EAC itself has four commissioners, two of whom—Benjamin Hovland and Donald Palmer—were appointed by Donald Trump during his first presidency. Even if wrongdoing were discovered, the process to revoke a lab’s accreditation is slow, murky, and entirely internal. There are no public hearings and no outside investigations.

As of June 2025, Pro V&V remains fully accredited and uninvestigated.

Could Kamala Harris have actually won the election?​

The question is no longer whispered in political corners—it’s being asked outright. In May 2025, Judge Rachel Tanguay ruled that allegations raised by SMART Elections were credible enough to move forward. The case, SMART Legislation et al. v. Rockland County Board of Elections, is scheduled for hearing this fall.

While the lawsuit won’t change the outcome of the election—Congress already certified Trump’s victory—it could set off wider probes, from state investigations to federal criminal inquiries.

Political writer John Pavlovitz openly questioned the result, writing:

“Kamala Harris may have won.”
During the campaign, Harris reportedly drew massive crowds, high early voting numbers, and strong poll performances in swing states. Her debate showing against Trump was widely viewed as dominant—Trump even skipped the second debate.

And yet, despite that momentum, Trump won.

Adding fuel to the fire, Elon Musk, who vocally supported Trump, posted cryptic tweets during the 2024 cycle, including:

“Anything can be hacked.”
Later, Musk stated:
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election.”
Trump himself added to the speculation, telling supporters:

“He [Musk] knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”
The upcoming court case could become a pivotal moment in election security history. The lawsuit claims that a private company quietly changed voting machines in over 40% of U.S. counties—and no one knew until after the votes were counted.

The implications are serious:

  • Could future elections be altered without oversight?

  • Should the EAC change how it certifies and monitors voting labs?

  • Is the public being kept in the dark about the technology behind their vote?
SMART Elections warns this isn’t just about one race:

“If one underfunded watchdog group can dig up this much from a quiet New York suburb, what else is rotting in the shadows of this country’s ballots?”
 
The Trump White House Is a Giant National Security Red Flag

That’s essentially the scenario outlined in a stunning new report from the Washington Post today, alleging that DOGE and Trump administration officials outright dismissed concerns from the White House’s communications team that Musk’s Starlink internet service was rampant with security risks. That reportedly included an exceedingly flimsy WiFi network that could rival your own personal setup

INAE OH
Senior News and Engagement Editor
June 7, 2025


starlink-in-white-house.jpg
 
The fact that msm and political dipshits have given legitimacy to this racist senile old fart is a disgrace.
Your post appears as if you don't know why The Press was created. The Press was created by the rich to amplify the messages of its rich owner. Either it was used to sing its praises or weaponized against its enemy. Politicians are little amplifiers and speakers of the rich who round out the sounds to make it appear messages richer. Why would they? Why wouldn't they? If that's how people choose to be indoctrinated, you have to put it where the goats can get it.
 

Those mind your business folks are just cowards. Those are the guys that saw the cutlass and the flame and pretended to be down, waited for you to leave, then ran and got the water to put out the fire on the sugar plantation. Their minds is the equivalent of seeing darkness in the middle of a sea of flames. Massa has never done nothing bad to him.
 
Back
Top