UK considered bringing home Islamic State-linked nationals, court hears

MCP

International
International Member
Document cited during Shamima Begum's citizenship appeal reveals government explored options to repatriate detainees from camps in Syria
begumscreengrab.jpg



Begum's British citizenship was revoked in February 2019 by former UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid (Screengrab)
By
Areeb Ullah
in
London
Published date: 25 October 2019 15:27 UTC | Last update: 32 min 59 sec ago

The British government considered the repatriation of nationals who travelled to Islamic State (IS) group-controlled territory and are now being held in camps by Kurdish forces in northern Syria, a court in London has heard.

The information emerged during an appeal being brought by Shamima Begum against the British government's decision to revoke her citizenship being heard at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission in London.

On Friday, Begum's lawyer, Tom Hickman, referred to a government document stating that it had explored options for the potential repatriation of British citizens suspected of aligning themselves with IS.

"There was a foreseeable chance of her being repatriated to the UK because that’s stated in terms," Hickman said the government document noted on Friday.
He then went on to quote the government document which stated: “Although speculative, it is possible that at some point in the future British nationals will be treated differently.”

"We don't accept that it was merely speculation. It is possible she would have been taken back to the UK," said Hickman.
The court later moved into a closed session, meaning that journalists, members of the public and even Begum's legal team were excluded from proceedings.
The revelation departs from previous government statements on the repatriation of British nationals detained in Kurdish-run camps across northern Syria.

Speaking to the Times newspaper on Wednesday, Begum, who absconded to Syria from London aged 15 in 2016, said she feared being attacked by female IS militants inside the al-Roj refugee camp.

She raised concerns that a hearing against her citizenship revocation would have no impact on her current circumstances.
“My case is no different to that of the other British women here, many of whom have not had their citizenship removed,” she said.
“Their cases have not moved forward, though they still have British citizenship, so I can’t see mine changing quickly.”

'No way' of Begum returning


Last month, UK Home Secretary Priti Patel said that there was "no way" that Begum could return to the UK.
In previous statements, former ministers have shied away from committing to repatriating children or others on the grounds that it is considered too dangerous for officials to attempt a rescue.

Begum was stripped of her British citizenship by then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid in February 2019 shortly after giving an interview to the Times in the camp where she was being held.

She is among dozens of British nationals who have travelled to Syria who have been stripped of citizenship by the government amid fears about the potential security threat posed by returnees to the UK.

It is understood that Javid made the decision on the advice that Begum could qualify for Bangladeshi citizenship due to the fact that her parents hold Bangladeshi citizenship.

Court papers noted that Patel supported her predecessor's decision to strip Begum of her citizenship on grounds that she was "aligned" to IS.
This new development also comes as the UK government faces mounting pressure to repatriate children of suspected IS members stranded in northern Syria who hold British citizenship or are entitled to it.

The government said it was exploring options to bring back orphans and unaccompanied children stranded in northern Syria, stating that it was working with "partners on the ground".
No indication, however, was given on the timeline for these repatriations or whether the government would consider taking in children whose carers are still with them in northern Syria.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
"The British government considered the repatriation of nationals who travelled to Islamic State (IS) group-controlled territory and are now being held in camps by Kurdish forces in northern Syria"

If you know, what is the feeling, generally, among the British populace regarding the repatriation of British nationals who've had contact or association (not sure whether we're talking about fighters only -- or those who could be wives, children, etc., of combatants) with Isis ???
 

MCP

International
International Member
If you know, what is the feeling, generally, among the British populace regarding the repatriation of British nationals who've had contact or association (not sure whether we're talking about fighters only -- or those who could be wives, children, etc., of combatants) with Isis ???

The general view from the UK is that most people agree that any IS fighters and anyone related with ISIS should've had their British citizenship revoked.
 

MCP

International
International Member
Britain Strips More Than 100 Islamic State Fighters of Citizenship



Britain Strips More Than 100 Islamic State Fighters of Citizenship


By Jamie Dettmer

July 30, 2017 09:16 AM








ROME - Their home countries don’t want them back. Hundreds of foreign fighters who enlisted with Islamic State to fight in Syria and Iraq are being stripped of their citizenship and blocked from returning by Western governments.
Returning fighters are seen as a grim threat, the deadly legacy of a murderous movement being defeated and rolled back on the battlefield. Western intelligence officials say they are already over-stretched trying to monitor tens of thousands of suspected extremists who never left their home countries.

British officials say they have stripped more than 100 British fighters and brides of their citizenship, preventing them re-entering the country legally, according to British news reports. All those who have lost British citizenship are dual nationals. Under international law, governments can’t revoke someone’s citizenship if it would render them stateless.

According to Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper, 152 IS recruits have been stripped of British citizenship since 2016, 30 since March.
Of the estimated 850 Britons who joined IS or al-Qaida-linked groups in Syria, 15 percent are thought to have been killed. A handful of returnees have been jailed, but officials say many cannot be prosecuted for lack of evidence. Some are thought to have become disillusioned with jihadism, but many are thought to pose a significant terror risk.

Britain isn’t alone in fearing the havoc returnees could wreak or the added burden they place on intelligence services already struggling to maintain surveillance on thousands of suspects who never left to fight. In June, following terrorist attacks in Manchester and London, British authorities admitted 23,000 radical Islamists had been considered a “person of interest” to the security services at any one time, more than six times the previous figures made public by the government. Of those, 3,000 are considered serious threats, including about 400 people who have returned to Britain after fighting for IS in Syria and Iraq.

Other countries fearful

Since 2015, several Western governments have moved to amend their laws to make it easier to revoke the citizenship of dual nationals involved in terrorism. Even so, European governments have faced mounting criticism that they have little in the way of comprehensive plans ready for returnees, either in keeping tabs on them or requiring them to enter rehabilitation and de-radicalization programs.

There is fierce debate also over the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs on fighters who have not already become disillusioned.
Critics include Alex Carlile, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, who has complained about the British government’s inconsistency and has called for the reintroduction of tough "control orders" that were banned in 2012 over human right fears. The control orders allowed the authorities to restrict suspects’ movement and their use of phones and computers.

He said in a television interview last month it was a “grave mistake” to abolish the orders which “may have saved dozens of lives” between 2005 and 2011.

In February, the Australian government revoked the citizenship of Khaled Sharrouf, who slipped out of Australia in 2013 after serving a four-year jail term on terrorism-related charges.

He became internationally infamous after posting on the internet in August 2014 a photograph of his seven-year-old son holding the severed head of a Syrian soldier. In April a new video surfaced showing Sharrouf’s youngest son wearing a suicide vest being prompted by his father to issue threats to murder Australians.

At least 110 Australians are estimated to have joined terrorist groups in Iraq and Syria. Seventy are thought to be dead, three were captured in Lebanon and are in jail there. Australian officials are considering revoking their citizenship.

It has been rare for Western fighters to be captured. In an interview last week with VOA, Gen. Andrew Croft, who oversees the coalition air campaign against IS in Iraq, said foreign fighters are certainly among the IS forces.

“One of the dynamics you see is that foreign fighters can't just blend in with civilians and go to an IDP camp. So the foreign fighters often move around in groups, and they will often fight to the death,” he said.

A move by then-president Francois Hollande to pass legislation to make it easier to revoke French citizenship of terrorist suspects holding dual nationality failed last year. Opinion polls suggested the legislation had public backing, but political critics and rights groups argued the measure would do little to prevent terror attacks and risked worsening race relations by stigmatizing sections of the population, notably Muslims of North African descent.
 
Top