U.S. Senate Republicans block voting rights bill and clowns on here say "Don't Vote"

donwuan

The Legend
BGOL Investor
WASHINGTON, Oct 20 (Reuters) - A bill aimed at thwarting restrictive new voting laws enacted in Republican-led states failed to advance in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, as Republican lawmakers blocked a Democratic effort to begin debating the measure.

It was the third time this year Senate Democrats tried to advance a voting rights bill in reaction to new state balloting restrictions that were fueled by Donald Trump's false claims of a stolen 2020 presidential election.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said it would not be the last time. "The fight to protect our democracy is far from over," he said.

While he did not lay out specific steps to possibly alter the Senate's "filibuster" rule that gives the minority party the power to block legislation, he hinted at doing so.

He complained that Wednesday's vote was "not how the Senate is supposed to work," adding: "Voting rights is not like other issues we deal with in this chamber. It's about protecting the very soul of this nation."

Some senators have been urging a carve-out to exempt the voting rights bill from the filibuster, which requires 60 of 100 senators to agree on most legislation.

All 50 Senate Republicans voted to block the measure, with party leaders saying it was an attempt to wrest control of voting rules from the states.

The bill would set broad federal standards for how states conduct elections, including ensuring all qualified voters can request mail-in ballots.

It also aims to expand voter turnout by making Election Day a federal holiday and would outlaw partisan drawing of congressional districts, known as "gerrymandering," that both parties have engaged in for decades.

On Tuesday, Senator Angus King, an independent who aligns with Democrats, told reporters that if Republicans again blocked the bill, "we would either have to figure out a rule change or we have to try to have discussions toward a compromise solution."

Democratic President Joe Biden, a former senator, has voiced objections to altering or abandoning the filibuster, although he suggested he was open to considering it during the recent showdown over hiking the debt ceiling.


There are several reform ideas percolating that could stop short of a ban on legislative filibusters. Those could include the exemption just for voting rights bills, limiting the number of filibusters against any one bill, or forcing those waging a filibuster to remain standing and speaking on the Senate floor until one side relents.

Moderate Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema voted to advance the bill and Manchin helped draft its language, along with fellow Democrat Amy Klobuchar.

In the past, Manchin and Sinema have voiced objections to ending the filibuster, making it unclear whether Schumer would have the votes needed to alter the rule.

SLEW OF STATE LAWS

At least 19 states have enacted 30 laws restricting voting access this year, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, following false claims by Trump, the Republican former president, that he lost the 2020 election to Biden because of widespread voting fraud.

Democrats and voting rights advocates denounce the measures as partisan power grabs that will make it harder for Black and Hispanic voters - important voting blocs for Democrats - to cast ballots.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell rejected Democrats' contention that the latest election reform bill was a compromise following the failure of a more sweeping proposal earlier this year.

“This latest umpteenth iteration is only a compromise in the sense that the left and the far left argued among themselves about exactly how much power to grab in which areas," McConnell said in a Senate floor speech.

Since leaving office, Trump has continued to repeat his false election fraud allegations. Multiple courts, state election officials and members of Trump's own administration rejected his claims.
 
Why are Dems depending on just two other senators to reach across the aisle?? Biden and Kamala should be the ones trying to reach across the aisle if they are hoping to get anything done. In fact, all of them know each other, everyone should be talking. This is why this "voting your party" stuff doesn't work.

Additionally, the dems will never get anything passed if they keep attempting to write their own bills without republican input.

Lastly, don't get lost in the smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk.
 
Last edited:
Why are Dems depending on just two other senators to reach across the aisle?? Biden and Kamala should be trying to reach across the aisle of they are hoping to get anything done. In fact, all of them know each other, everyone should be talking. This is why this "voting your party" stuff doesn't work.

Additionally, the dems will never get anything passed if they keep attempting to write their our bills without republican input.

Lastly, don't get lost in the smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk.


Please stop this nonsense. Dems always work across the aisle. They have been meeting with the GOP. Dems always accept GOP amendments etc, or make concessions, then the GOP votes against the bills. There were member of the GOP who voted against the stimulus plan, but took credit for all the good stuff in it back home. They don't negotiate in good faith. Never have and never will. Dems keep giving them chances tho rather than be accused of going it alone.
 
Why are Dems depending on just two other senators to reach across the aisle?? Biden and Kamala should be the ones trying to reach across the aisle if they are hoping to get anything done. In fact, all of them know each other, everyone should be talking. This is why this "voting your party" stuff doesn't work.

Additionally, the dems will never get anything passed if they keep attempting to write their own bills without republican input.

Lastly, don't get lost in the smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk.

You are possibly the dumbest coon in the history of BGOL.
 
Why are Dems depending on just two other senators to reach across the aisle?? Biden and Kamala should be the ones trying to reach across the aisle if they are hoping to get anything done. In fact, all of them know each other, everyone should be talking. This is why this "voting your party" stuff doesn't work.

Additionally, the dems will never get anything passed if they keep attempting to write their own bills without republican input.

Lastly, don't get lost in the smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk.
Lmbaoooooo this guy
 
Please stop this nonsense. Dems always work across the aisle. They have been meeting with the GOP. Dems always accept GOP amendments etc, or make concessions, then the GOP votes against the bills. There were member of the GOP who voted against the stimulus plan, but took credit for all the good stuff in it back home. They don't negotiate in good faith. Never have and never will. Dems keep giving them chances tho rather than be accused of going it alone.
What republican worked on the voter bill?

I'll wait.
 
You are possibly the dumbest coon in the history of BGOL.
Ah yes. The lickiest bootlicker to ever lick a boot here to throw out the coon card. They got you ignorant house negros all worked up about this voter bill and as I previously stated, it's a smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk. The voter bill helps democrats, not black folks. Cut it out man, it's not that hard to see..........if you actually wanted to.
 
What republican worked on the voter bill?

I'll wait.

Manchin worked with the GOP, or at least attempted to. The compromise bill he came up with was supposed to have been crafted after feedback from the GOP. The GOP refusing an offer to work on it, doesn't mean it wasn't attempted. You can't force them to participate.

They also tried to work on police reform with the GOP, didn't work out.

The GOP negotiate in bad faith. They never have intention of supporting, they want to delay and water down bills. That's all they do. Just like the 1/6 commission. Every demand the GOP wanted, the dems gave into, except seating people who could be a subject of the investigation or who had publicly spoken out against it and wouldn't investigate in good faith. They bowed out.

Progressives are playing it smart this time. Normally when stuff blows up, progressives get the blame and moderates get to sit back in the cut like their hands are clean. Progressives get told they wanted too much, they had a wish list that wasn't practical. Not this time. We can see who the problems are in the party. Progressives are voting on bills they don't like to try to keep Biden's agenda alive. The only thing they've the line on and refused to budge is insisting both bills get voted on at the same time, because otherwise the human infrastructure one is dead in the water. They want to get a small part done, hoping for a bigger dem congress to be able to deliver more in the future, or in the hopes programs can be expanded or funded longer independently of this one bill.
 
Ah yes. The lickiest bootlicker to ever lick a boot here to throw out the coon card. They got you ignorant house negros all worked up about this voter bill and as I previously stated, it's a smoke screen. The voter bill is BS and is not the most pressing issue regarding the plight of black folk. The voter bill helps democrats, not black folks. Cut it out man, it's not that hard to see..........if you actually wanted to.
You think republicans will let anything that help black folks pass?
 
You think republicans will let anything that help black folks pass?
The mistake you are making is thinking that its simply a black and white issue. It's more of a green issue. The problem is, whites control most of the green and black folk want more green.

Before someone asks, yes, there are racists in government....on both sides. So, I do not trust either side. I analyze each election, bill, levy, etc. individually and I make a decision that is in the best interest of me and my family. I then further analyze to see how the aforementioned helps my people.
 
The mistake you are making is thinking that its simply a black and white issue. It's more of a green issue. The problem is, whites control most of the green and black folk want more green.

Before someone asks, yes, there are racists in government....on both sides. So, I do not trust either side. I analyze each election, bill, levy, etc. individually and I make a decision that is in the best interest of me and my family. I then further analyze to see how the aforementioned helps my people.
If you are as successful as you claim to be, I'm pretty sure a few Republican policies will benefit you more so than the general black population.

With that being said, what Republican policies have you seen that benefit you, your family, AND the black community?

Don’t say tax cuts because the last round of cuts had a time limit for those that weren't ultra rich or actual businesses.
 
If you are as successful as you claim to be, I'm pretty sure a few Republican policies will benefit you more so than the general black population.

With that being said, what Republican policies have you seen that benefit you, your family, AND the black community?

Don’t say tax cuts because the last round of cuts had a time limit for those that weren't ultra rich or actual businesses.

He’s just trying to cover up the fact that he’s a Republican. Ol Paris Dennard nigga
 
My G, ask yourself, what are the most pressing issues facing black folk?? Ask yourself from Obama to Trump to Biden, what has changed significantly for black folk?

I will wait.
OBAMA care will always be my number one goto. Alot of folks got to benefit from it. So much so that Repubs couldn't even kill it with Trump in office.

Healthcare is a big issue for black folk.

Before you bring up Healthcare disparities, no one law is going to fix everything, but it was by far the best start since no one was going to pass a universal Healthcare policy.
 
OBAMA care will always be my number one goto. Alot of folks got to benefit from it. So much so that Repubs couldn't even kill it with Trump in office.

Healthcare is a big issue for black folk.

Before you bring up Healthcare disparities, no one law is going to fix everything, but it was by far the best start since no one was going to pass a universal Healthcare policy.

Bro - as someone who works in health policy I don't think people realize what this one policy did. Was it perfect, NAW, but from a policy standpoint it moved the whole healthcare system in the direction it needs to go...Preventative care > Reactive care

Something is going to have to happen in the near future with heatlhcare costs consuming so much of the GDP...

This was taken from the CBO

U.S. health care spending increased 9.7 percent to reach $4.1 trillion in 2020, a much faster rate than the 4.3 percent increase experienced in 2019. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined 2.2 percent in 2020, leading to a sharp increase in the share of the overall economy related to health care spending—from 17.6 percent in 2019 to 19.7 percent in 2020. The acceleration in national health spending in 2020 was primarily due to a 36.0 percent increase in federal expenditures for health care that occurred largely in response to the COVID19 pandemic. In 2020, most of the faster growth was not directly linked to patient care events. Rather, spending growth was driven by federal financial assistance to health care providers through the Provider Relief Fund and Paycheck Protection Program loans, increased federal public health activity, as well as increased federal Medicaid funding. The increase in federal funding among medical care providers far outweighed negative or slow growth in private health insurance and out-of-pocket spending, particularly for hospitals, physicians, and nursing homes. When spending associated with federal public health and other federal programs (which includes the Provider Relief Fund and Paycheck Protection Program loans) is excluded, total national health expenditures increased just 1.9 percent in 2020. This was a function of less use of medical goods and services in 2020. Although the pandemic led to economic and employment disruptions, the number of uninsured people fell slightly (by 0.6 million, or 1.9 percent). At the same time, fewer people were covered through employer-sponsored insurance, and more people had insurance through the individual market and public programs, in particular for Medicaid.


This is a proposal from CBO about a single payer model

 
Back
Top