U.S. Marines In Iraq Go Hungry

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
U.S. Marines In Iraq Go Hungry </font>
<font face="arial unicode ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">

By BOB KERR

The Providence Journal
http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=TROOPS-HUNGER-05-02-06

http://www.projo.com/

02-MAY-06

The Iraq war has been the war fought on the cheap _ not enough body armor, not enough armor on vehicles, not enough night vision equipment.

It has been the war in which packages from back home have had to fill some crucial needs.

Now, we have chow call at the Greenwood Credit Union in Warwick, R.I. It's the latest in home-front intervention. It's partially in response to the unthinkable image of U.S. Marines approaching Iraqi citizens and asking for food because they do not have enough.

There's a big barrel in the lobby of the credit union on Post Road in Warwick. It's decorated with ribbons and it's there because Karen Boucher-Andoscia's son, Nick Andoscia, called and asked his mother to send food.

Nick's a Marine corporal. He was in Afghanistan last year, where there was enough to eat. He's in Iraq now even though his enlistment was up last year.

He's one of those Marines who can't walk away. His unit, the 3rd Battalion of the 3rd Marines, was headed for Iraq and he just couldn't head for civilian life while those he had served with were heading to their second war.

"He extended," says Karen. "He told me, 'I really have to go. I can't let my guys go alone.' "

There are a lot of stories like that. We don't hear them much. They're kind of personal.

So Nick Andoscia went to Iraq. And hunger soon followed.

"I got a letter," says Karen. "And he had called me before that. He said, 'Send lots of tuna.' "

Nick told his mother that he and the men in his unit were all about 10 pounds lighter in their first few weeks in Iraq. They were pulling 22-hour patrol shifts. They were getting two meals a day and they were not meals to remember.

"He told me the two meals just weren't cutting it. He said the Iraqi food was usually better. They were going to the Iraqis and basically saying, 'feed me.' "

Karen started packing in that wartime tradition as old as mothers and sons. She packed a lot of the packaged tuna, not the canned.

She happened to mention her hungry son to people she works with at Greenwood Credit Union, where she is a teller and has worked for 30 years.

Pounds and pounds of food started showing up amid the daily business of loans and deposits and withdrawals. Marianne Barao, the branch manager, said it could be done, the credit union could become the place where people help feed hungry Marines who are risking their lives on a skimpy diet.

"We sent out 51 pounds this week," says Karen. "There are customers coming in saying, 'What do you need?' "

The credit union is paying the cost of packing and shipping.

Any packaged food is welcome. So are baby wipes because showers are even rarer than a full meal. And foot powder.

Nick Andoscia, who is 22, is due to come home later this year. He wants to study criminal justice, his mother says, then go to work for a fire or police department.

But for the next few months he will be on patrol in western Iraq, dealing with the heat and the dirt and the danger.

The last thing he should have to worry about is an empty stomach. The last thing he should have to do is approach Iraqis and ask for food.

You have to wonder what the gracious hosts must think when a fighting man from the richest country on earth comes to their door in search of something to eat.


(Bob Kerr is a columnist for The Providence Journal. E-mail bkerr@projo.com

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, www.shns.com.)

</font>
 
<img src="http://proquest.umi.com/i/pub/7818.gif">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">Consider the Living</font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, arial unicode ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/ts-herbert-75.jpg">
<b>by Bob Herbert

May 29, 2006</b>

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.h...3OdQ23MbQ23chW9Wc9Q23MbQ7E_zH_zQ5EUQ7EQ5EVQ7C

Pretty soon this war in Iraq will have lasted as long as our involvement in World War II, with absolutely no evidence of any sort of conclusion in sight.

The point of Memorial Day is to honor the service and the sacrifice of those who have given their lives in the nation's wars. But I suggest that we take a little time today to consider the living.

Look around and ask yourself if you believe that stability or democracy in Iraq -- or whatever goal you choose to assert as the reason for this war -- is worth the life of your son or your daughter, or your husband or your wife, or the co-worker who rides to the office with you in the morning, or your friendly neighbor next door.

Before you gather up the hot dogs and head out to the barbecue this afternoon, look in a mirror and ask yourself honestly if Iraq is something you would be willing to die for.

There is no shortage of weaselly politicians and misguided commentators ready to tell us that we can't leave Iraq -- we just can't. Chaos will ensue. Maybe even a civil war. But what they really mean is that we can't leave as long as the war can continue to be fought by other people's children, and as long as we can continue to put this George W. Bush-inspired madness on a credit card.

Start sending the children of the well-to-do to Baghdad, and start raising taxes to pay off the many hundreds of billions that the war is costing, and watch how quickly this tragic fiasco is brought to an end.

At an embarrassing press conference last week, President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain looked for all the world like a couple of hapless schoolboys who, while playing with fire, had set off a conflagration that is still raging out of control. Their recklessness has so far cost the lives of nearly 2,500 Americans and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis, many of them children.

Among the regrets voiced by the president at the press conference was his absurd challenge to the insurgents in 2003 to ''bring 'em on.'' But Mr. Bush gave no hint as to when the madness might end.

How many more healthy young people will we shovel into the fires of Iraq before finally deciding it's time to stop? How many dead are enough?

There is no good news coming out of Iraq. Sabrina Tavernise of The Times recently wrote, ''In the latest indication of the crushing hardships weighing on the lives of Iraqis, increasing portions of the middle class seem to be doing everything they can to leave the country.''

The middle class is all but panicked at the inability of the Iraqi government or American forces to quell the relentless violence. Ms. Tavernise quoted a businessman who is planning to move to Jordan: ''We're like sheep at a slaughter farm.''

Iraqis continue to be terrorized by kidnappers, roving death squads and, in a term perhaps coined by Mr. Bush, ''suiciders.''

The American ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, acknowledged last week that even at this late date, there are parts of western Iraq that are not controlled by American forces, but rather ''are under the control of terrorists and insurgents.''

Now we get word that U.S. marines may have murdered two dozen Iraqis in cold blood last November.

No one should be surprised that such an atrocity could occur. That's what happens in war. The killing gets out of control, which is yet another reason why it's important to have mature leaders who will do everything possible to avoid war, rather than cavalierly sending the young and the healthy off to combat as if it were no more serious an enterprise than a big-time sporting event.

Nothing new came out of the Bush-Blair press conference. After more than three years these two men are as clueless as ever about what to do in Iraq. Are we doomed to follow the same pointless script for the next three years? And for three years after that?

Leadership does not get more pathetic than this. Once there was F.D.R. and Churchill. Now there's Bush and Blair.

Reacting to the allegations about the murder of civilians, the commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. Michael Hagee, went to Iraq last week to warn his troops about the danger of becoming ''indifferent to the loss of a human life.''

Somehow that message needs to be conveyed to the top leaders of this country, and to the public at large. There is no better day than Memorial Day to reflect on it. As we remember the dead, we should consider the living, and stop sending people by the thousands to pointless, unnecessary deaths. </font>
 
Marines approaching Iraqi citizens and asking for food because they do not have enough.

Is that before or after they shot them? But seriously, the defense budget is what 450 billion and these guys are dashing through the streets of Baghdad not only worrying about IED's but where there next meal will come from. It’s hard to believe this story is true.

If true, why is there no outcry about this in the heartland, but there is outcry about stopping those religious whacko’s from protesting at funerals.

Gets weirder and weirder.
 
And People wonder why I'm resigning my commission at year's end....
 
Statistics (as of August 11th 2006) compiled by 'The McLaughlin Group' © www.mclaughlin.com
<table border="4" width="550" id="table2" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" bordercolorlight="#FF0000" bordercolordark="#FF0000" bgcolor="#000000"><tr><td width="329" align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FFFFFF" size="4">U.S. military dead in Iraq,<br>including suicides</font></td><td align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FF0000" size="5">&nbsp; 2,593</font></td></tr>
<tr><td width="329" align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FFFFFF" size="4">&nbsp;U.S. military amputeed, wounded, injured, mentally ill, all now out of Iraq, </font> </td><td align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FF0000" size="5">62,100</font></td></tr><tr>
<td width="329" align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FFFFFF" size="4">Iraqi civilians dead</font></td><td align="center"><font face="Arial Black" color="#FF0000" size="5">129,690</font></td></tr></table>
<font face="verdana" size="4" color="#333333">
<img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10028/Republiklan.jpg">
Even the Washington Times, a newspaper created by the RepubliKlan under the auspices of self-declared messiah and crackpot Sun Myung Moon is appalled at the RepubliKlans complete disregard and contempt for the ‘foot soilders’ sent into the Neo-Con’s Imperial meat-grinder occupation of Iraq. The RepubliKlan congress says ‘Fuck You’ if a solder’s brain gets scrambled by a IED (Improvised Explosive Device) . Meanwhile the RepubliKlan voted unanimously to cut the estate tax for Paris Hilton <i>et al</i> .</FONT>
<hr noshade color="#333333" SIZE="10"></HR>

<img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10028/thumb.jpg">

<hr noshade color="#333333" SIZE="10"></HR>


<table border="4" width="650" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" bordercolorlight="#0000FF" bordercolordark="#0000FF" bgcolor="#CCFFCC">
<tr><td>
washingtontimes-logo-small.gif
<br>
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#000000">
<b>Brain-Dead Appropriations</b></font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
TODAY'S EDITORIAL
August 17, 2006</b>

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060816-090452-6720r.htm

American soldiers in Iraq have suffered severe brain injuries in proportions unknown in previous wars. Congressional appropriators and Pentagon officials typically say all the right things about ensuring the best treatment possible. But then they produce defense appropriations legislation that halves funding for the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, a joint Pentagon-Veterans Affairs program headquartered at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, from $14 million to $7 million. This is unacceptable. Pentagon officials and congressional appropriators have missed a colossal opportunity to do the right thing.

The center, founded in 1992, treats battlefield-wounded veterans who sustained traumatic brain injuries, suffered largely in improvised-explosive device blasts. As we've recounted in this space previously, brain-injured service members sometimes get shuffled from hospital to hospital because their injuries -- including and especially traumatic brain injury -- are often beyond the ken of doctors and therapists accustomed to treating World War II and Vietnam veterans.

"Honestly, they would have loved to fund it, but there were just so many priorities," a Senate Appropriations Committee staffer told USA Today, which broke the story last week.

This week, The Washington Times gave the committee a chance to clarify this obviously short-sighted explanation. Here's what a committee staffer told us: "We understand the importance of this program, but additional funding for it was not requested or justified," reads the e-mail. "There were many competing priorities and important programs that also needed funding." And in truth the Pentagon looms large in defense appropriations, so we contacted a Defense Department spokesman for comment. We received no response by deadline. The VA, for its part, referred us back to the Pentagon. We called Walter Reed's public affairs office, but it has no chief spokesman right now, so it referred us to the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. The command also referred us back to a Pentagon spokesman.

A cut for brain-injury programs would be outrageous, especially in light of the many lower-priority projects now emerging in bills under consideration. For instance, the Labor, Health and Human Services appropriations bill and its 1,867 earmarks contain more than $5 million for projects in Washington, including $500,000 for the InTune Foundation Group's music-education programs; $100,000 "for digitization and technology" at the Georgetown Visitation Monastery; and $150,000 for the Washington National Opera's trips to Maryland schools. The defense bill itself contains $4.5 million for the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Foundation in Manhattan, which bills itself as "privately-operated." We don't mean to denigrate any of these appropriations, but what about soldiers with brain injuries? Add the fact that $7 million is a rounding error in a $468 billion bill and the explanation begins to look insulting.

It's not as if some back story can excuse this. The expected closing of Walter Reed in 2011 did not factor into this decision, according to the committee. There are no plans, at least among appropriators, to transfer the money to other brain-injury centers in Palo Alto, Calif., Richmond, Va., Tampa, Fla., or four other sites after Walter Reed closes.

This episode suggests a pervasive unwillingness to aggressively improve treatment for soldiers with brain injuries coming home from Iraq. It is disgraceful. Fortunately for Republicans, Senate Democrats temporarily derailed the bill two weeks ago for unrelated reasons. Use the opportunity to fix this problem, so our soldiers can heal. It's the least we can do for the men and women who have put their lives on the line. </font></td>
</tr>
</table>


<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="12"></hr>

<font size="4" color="#FF0000"><b><h3><u>Click Picture Below</u></h3>
for FLASH movie about the HORRIBLE treatment American Veterans receive from the Bush Crime Family</b></font><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bushflash.com/swf/vets.swf">
<img src="http://www.bushflash.com/jpg/a42_b.jpg" border="10"></a>

<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="12"></hr>


<table border="2" width="14%" id="table1" bordercolorlight="#000000" bordercolordark="#000000" bgcolor="#3260B9">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://images.usatoday.com/_common/_images/home-mast-logo.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<font face="arial black" color="#d90000" size="6">
Center For War-Related Brain Injuries
Faces Budget Cut</FONT>
<font face="trebuchet ms, arial unicode ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
By Gregg Zoroya, USA TODAY

August 8th 2006</b>

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-08-08-brain-center_x.htm

Congress appears ready to slash funding for the research and treatment of brain injuries caused by bomb blasts, an injury that military scientists describe as a signature wound of the Iraq war.
House and Senate versions of the 2007 Defense appropriation bill contain $7 million for the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center — half of what the center received last fiscal year.

Proponents of increased funding say they are shocked to see cuts in the treatment of bomb blast injuries in the midst of a war.

"I find it basically unpardonable that Congress is not going to provide funds to take care of our soldiers and sailors who put their lives on the line for their country," says Martin Foil, a member of the center's board of directors. "It blows my imagination."

The Brain Injury Center, devoted to treating and understanding war-related brain injuries, has received more money each year of the war — from $6.5 million in fiscal 2001 to $14 million last year. Spokespersons for the appropriations committees in both chambers say cuts were due to a tight budget this year.

"Honestly, they would have loved to have funded it, but there were just so many priorities," says Jenny Manley, spokeswoman for the Senate Appropriations Committee. "They didn't have any flexibility in such a tight fiscal year."

George Zitnay, co-founder of the center, testified before a Senate subcommittee in May that body armor saves troops caught in blasts but leaves many with brain damage. "Traumatic brain injury is the signature injury of the war on terrorism," he testified.

Zitnay asked for $19 million, and 34 Democratic and six Republican members of Congress signed a letter endorsing the budget request.

The House of Representatives approved its version of the spending bill June 20. A vote in the Senate is pending.

Scientists at the center develop ways to diagnose and treat servicemembers who suffer brain damage. The work is done at seven military and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, including the center's headquarters at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, and one civilian treatment site.

The center has clashed with the Pentagon in recent months over a program to identify troops who have suffered mild to moderate brain injuries in Iraq from mortars, rocket-propelled grenades and roadside bombs — the most common weapons used by insurgents.

Preliminary research by the center shows that about 10% of all troops in Iraq, and up to 20% of front line infantry troops, suffer concussions during combat tours. Many experience headaches, disturbed sleep, memory loss and behavior issues after coming home, the research shows.

The center urged the Pentagon to screen all troops returning from Iraq in order to treat symptoms and create a database of brain injury victims. Scientists say multiple concussions can cause permanent brain damage.

The Pentagon so far has declined to do the screening and argues that more research is needed.</font>




<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="12"></hr>


<img src="http://www.ap.org/media/images/logo.gif">
<font face="arial black" color="#d90000" size="5">
U.S. Troops Endure 125 Degrees In Iraq </font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
by Antonio Castaneda,

Monday August 7th 2006 </b>

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060807/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_scorching_heat

After a long day searching homes in suffocating Iraqi heat, Lance Cpl. Mike Young saw a most surprising source of relief — a sprawling Wal-Mart had appeared in the distance.

"No joke — looking through the haze I thought I saw a Wal-Mart. I said to myself, 'I bet they got some cold water in there,'" Young said, recalling a mission last year in a rural area west of Baghdad.

He contemplated running over to fetch water for fellow Marines who were "staggering like dead men." Three of them had collapsed in the heat.

Young soon stirred from his heat-induced hallucination and returned to the struggle of enduring summertime in Iraq.

Daytime temperatures in the Iraqi summer usually range from a low of about 105 degrees Fahrenheit to about 125. Though most bases have added air conditioning, grunts must still venture out to man their posts or patrol steaming streets under an unrelenting sun.

"It's been hotter and hotter than I ever thought I'd be in my life," said Cpl. Eduardo Warren, 20, of Turner, Maine, sweating even as he left for a night mission. "We still get it done."

Besides making conditions miserable for troops, the heat also changes the war itself. Marines in some areas say they patrol less during the hottest hours because fewer insurgents also venture out, creating a siesta cease-fire. But temperatures at night can hover over 100 degrees.

"I feel like I'm in someone's mouth," said Navy medic Kyle Gribi, 22, of Santa Cruz, Calif., as he patrolled beside Iraqi soldiers on the humid riverbanks of the Jazeera area in western Iraq.

Though the sun had set, Gribi sweated through his uniform as he trudged down fields and jumped over canals.

For infantrymen, the sweat rarely stops flowing in the summer, leaving many with heat rash. Troops complain that they sweat through their clothing, their wallets, and even their boots. Some remember awful mornings where they awake with polyester panchos stuck to their bodies.

In some outposts where washing machines are not available, troops hang their soaked uniforms in the sun — leaving them stiff and marked with large salt stains from dried sweat. Some find clumps of salt inside their pockets.

On sprawling logistics bases, support troops in offices are mostly immune to the heat. "Hey, it's only 106 today," cheerfully said one Marine as he walked to a dining hall on the Taqqadum air base in western Iraq.

Though most U.S. infantrymen now have air conditioned Humvees, the insurgent threat has also added to the array of clothing they must wear. Many Marines are now required to wear flame retardant suits, gloves and goggles to protect themselves from roadside bombs.

To some troops, the outside danger is less grating than the temperature.

"Everything else doesn't bother me. It's the heat threat gets to me," said Lance Cpl. John Ursery of Raleigh, N.C., as he stood in the shade of a sand barrier in Ramadi, one of Iraq's most dangerous cities.

Some Marines claim to have seen the rubber on their Humvee tires start to melt. But the heat also helps create barracks lore that stretches the boundaries of reality.

Warren, the Marine in Ramadi, claimed he'd once seen the temperature hit 150 degrees in Karma, a city just west of Baghdad. He also purported to have been in a portable toilet that reached 187 degrees.

According to the NASA Web site, the hottest temperature ever recorded was 136 degrees in Libya in 1922.

Regardless, many troops voiced similar complaints — including many directed toward common portable toilets that trap in heat.

"You can tell people how it is, but they don't experience it until you go into one of those," warned Young, a native of Princeton, Ky., now serving his second tour in Iraq in Ramadi.

Troops have learned to combat the heat with an array of tactics. On the Habaniyah military base, commanders made new Marines patrol around their base in full gear to acclimate themselves.

Many Marines have their own solutions, such as drinking as much water as possible the day before big missions or pre-freezing water bottles before patrols. Others said simple measures such as idle chatter to divert your attention helps — along with frequent changes of clothing.

"Changing your socks is important. Change them everyday whether you're on patrols or not," Warren said.</font>

<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="14"></hr>

01.jpg


06.jpg


10.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's the greatest conquest in the history of the world..."Operation Amerikkkan Takeover"

1. Political corruption
2. Weaken the economy with corrupt politicians.
3. Spread thin the military and break their moral while making others resistant to joining.
4. Secretly start buying up the record number of foreclosers from all of the unemployed.
5. Steal resources (oil from Iraq) while soldiers are dying in the streets
(Investigate the tankers leaving from Iraq and see where the end up.)
6. Continue to use propaganda on the citizens to make them believe everything is going great. :smh:
7. Final objective, control all the wealth to a degree that the inhabitants are virtually your slaves. Accomplishing all of this while pretending to be victims of the ones they are victimizing-see Lebanon.

These creatures behind this have always allowed thier arrogance to destroy them, century after century. You would think that a bunch of galactic clowns/criminals like these would have eventually given up.



In the Talmud there are a thousand reminders to the Jew that he is absolutely superior to all other life forms:

Vayikra Rabba 36 ?Heaven and earth were created only for the sake of the Jews.?

Baba Mezia 114a-114b. Only Jews are human (? Only ye are designated men?). ?The Jews are human beings, but the goyim are not human beings; they are only beasts.?

Menahoth 43b-44a . A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: Thank you God for not making me a Gentile, a woman or a slave.

Kethuboth 11b . ? When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.?

Sanhedrin 106a . Says ?Jesus mother was a whore.?

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a Gentile (? Cuthean? ) the wages owed him for work.

Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile (? heathen? ) it does not have to be returned.

Midrash Talpioth 225 ?Yahweh created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form and is condemned to serve the Jew day and night.?
 
<p>
<img src="http://proquest.umi.com/i/pub/7818.gif">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligence</font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/friedman-ts-75.jpg">
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

November 3rd 2006</b>

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.h...BQ23Q26-Q24lQ24Q26lQ23Q2AQ2BWzQ24KZAPl,(Q22A6

George Bush, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld think youre stupid. Yes, they do.

They think they can take a mangled quip about President Bush and Iraq by John Kerry a man
who is not even running for office but who, unlike Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, never ran
away from combat service and get you to vote against all Democrats in this election.

Every time you hear Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney lash out against Mr. Kerry, I hope you will say
to yourself, They must think Im stupid. Because they surely do.

They think that they can get you to overlook all of the Bush teams real and deadly insults to
the U.S. military over the past six years by hyping and exaggerating Mr. Kerrys mangled
gibe at the president.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to the U.S. military than to send it into
combat in Iraq without enough men to launch an invasion of a foreign country not by the
Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force, but by the Rumsfeld Doctrine of just enough troops
to lose? What could be a bigger insult than that?

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than
sending them off to war without the proper equipment, so that some soldiers in the field were
left to buy their own body armor and to retrofit their own jeeps with scrap metal so that
roadside bombs in Iraq would only maim them for life and not kill them? And what could be
more injurious and insulting than Don Rumsfelds response to criticism that he sent our troops
off in haste and unprepared: Hey, you go to war with the army youve got get over it.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than
to send them off to war in Iraq without any coherent postwar plan for political reconstruction
there, so that the U.S. military has had to assume not only security responsibilities for all of
Iraq but the political rebuilding as well? The Bush team has created a veritable library of
military histories from Cobra II to Fiasco to State of Denial all of which contain the same
damning conclusion offered by the very soldiers and officers who fought this war: This
administration never had a plan for the morning after, and weve been making it up and
paying the price ever since.

And what could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in Iraq than
to send them off to war and then go out and finance the very people theyre fighting against
with our gluttonous consumption of oil? Sure, George Bush told us were addicted to oil, but
he has not done one single significant thing demanded higher mileage standards from Detroit,
imposed a gasoline tax or even used the bully pulpit of the White House to drive
conservation to end that addiction. So we continue to finance the U.S. military with our tax
dollars, while we finance Iran, Syria, Wahhabi mosques and Al Qaeda madrassas with our
energy purchases.

Everyone says that Karl Rove is a genius. Yeah, right. So are cigarette companies. They get
you to buy cigarettes even though we know they cause cancer. That is the kind of genius Karl
Rove is. He is not a man who has designed a strategy to reunite our country around an
agenda of renewal for the 21st century to bring out the best in us. His genius is taking some
irrelevant aside by John Kerry and twisting it to bring out the worst in us, so you will ignore
the mess that the Bush team has visited on this country.

And Karl Rove has succeeded at that in the past because he was sure that he could sell just
enough Bush cigarettes, even though people knew they caused cancer. Please, please, for our
countrys health, prove him wrong this time.

Let Karl know that youre not stupid. Let him know that you know that the most patriotic
thing to do in this election is to vote against an administration that has through sheer
incompetence brought us to a point in Iraq that was not inevitable but is now unwinnable.

Let Karl know that you think this is a critical election, because you know as a citizen that if
the Bush team can behave with the level of deadly incompetence it has exhibited in Iraq and
then get away with it by holding on to the House and the Senate it means our country has
become a banana republic. It means our democracy is in tatters because it is so
gerrymandered, so polluted by money, and so divided by professional political hacks that we
can no longer hold the ruling party to account.

It means we're as stupid as Karl thinks we are.

I, for one, dont think were that stupid. Next Tuesday well see.
</font>
<p>
 
<p>
<img src="http://www.ipsnews.net/imagenes/new/fila2.jpg">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Iraq Vets Left in Physical and Mental Agony </font>
<font face="helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
January 4, 2007

by Aaron Glantz </b>

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0104-07.htm

On New Year's Eve, the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq passed 3,000. By Tuesday, the death toll had reached 3,004 -- 31 more than died in the Sep. 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

But the number of injured has far outstripped the dead, with the Veterans Administration reporting that more than 150,000 veterans of the Iraq war are receiving disability benefits.

Advances in military technology are keeping the death rate much lower than during the Vietnam War and World War Two, Dr. Col. Vito Imbascini, an urologist and state surgeon with the California Army National Guard, told IPS, but soldiers who survive attacks are often severely disabled for life.

"If you lost an arm or a leg in Vietnam, you were also tremendously injured in your chest and abdomen, which were not protected by the armour plates back then," he said. "Now, your heart and chest and lungs and heart are protected by armour, leaving only your extremities exposed."

Dr. Imbascini just returned from a four-month deployment to Germany, where he treated the worst of the U.S. war wounded. He said that an extremely high number of wounded soldiers are coming home with their arms or legs amputated. Imbascini said he amputated the genitals of one or two men every day.

"I walk into the operating room and the general surgeons are doing their work and there is the body of this Navy SEAL, which is a physical specimen to behold," he told IPS. "And his abdomen is open, they're exploring both intestines. He's missing both legs below the knee, one arm is blown off, he's got incisions on his thighs to relieve the pressure on the parts of the legs that are hopefully gonna survive and there's genital injuries, and you just want to cry."

According to documents obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University, 25 percent of veterans of the "global war on terror" have filed disability compensation and pension benefit claims with the Veterans Benefits Administration.

One is a Jul. 20, 2006, document titled "Compensation and Pension Benefit Activity Among Veterans of the Global War on Terrorism," which shows that 152,669 veterans filed disability claims after fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan. Of the more than 100,000 claims granted, Veterans Administration records show at least 1,502 veterans have been compensated as 100 percent disabled.

Pentagon studies show that 12 percent of soldiers who have served in Iraq suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. The group Veterans for America, formerly the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, estimates 70,000 Iraq war veterans have gone to the VA for mental health care.

New guidelines released by the Pentagon released last month allow commanders to redeploy soldiers suffering from traumatic stress disorders.

According to the military newspaper Stars and Stripes, servicemembers with "a psychiatric disorder in remission, or whose residual symptoms do not impair duty performance" may be considered for duty downrange. It lists post-traumatic stress disorder as a "treatable" problem.

"As a layman and a former soldier I think that's ridiculous," Steve Robinson, the director of Veterans Affairs for Veterans for America, told IPS.

"If I've got a soldier who's on Ambien to go to sleep and Seroquel and Qanapin and all kinds of other psychotropic meds, I don't want them to have a weapon in their hand and to be part of my team because they're a risk to themselves and to others," he said. "But apparently, the military has its own view of how well a soldier can function under those conditions and is gambling that they can be successful."

Robinson said problems with the policy are already starting to arise.

On Christmas, for example, Army Reservist James Dean barricaded himself in his father's home with several weapons and threatened to kill himself. After a 14-hour standoff with authorities, Dean was killed by a police officer after he aimed a gun at another officer, authorities told the Washington Post.

Veterans for America's Robinson told IPS that Dean, who had already served 18 months in Afghanistan, had been diagnosed with PTSD. He had just been informed that his unit would be sent to Iraq on Jan. 14.

"We call that suicide by cop," Robinson said.

After his death, Dean's friends told the Washington Post that the reservist enjoyed hunting and fishing but had lost much of his enthusiasm for life when he found out that he was being deployed to Iraq.

"When Congress comes back in session we're looking forward to accountability hearings," Robinson said. "We want to see veterans helped in the first 100 hours of the new session. We want to see the word 'veteran' somewhere in that first hundred hours."

Robinson says his organisation has also documented the existence of at least 1,000 homeless veterans of the Iraq war.

"We need to get on top of the problem of homelessness," he said. "It's too soon to be seeing homelessness. I want to be seeing a commitment from the Democratic Congress to dealing with the war and the needs of the soldiers in the first hundred hours of them coming to power."

Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service
</font>
<br>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="12"></hr>
<br>
 
<br>
<font size="4" face="tahoma" color="#000000"><span style="background-color: #FFFF00">
"We will soon launch an imperial war on Iraq with all the 'On to Berlin' bravado with which French poilus and British tommies marched in August 1914. But this invasion will not be the cakewalk neoconservatives predict ... For a militant Islam that holds in thrall scores of millions of true believers will never accept George Bush dictating the destiny of the Islamic world ...

"The one endeavour at which Islamic peoples excel is expelling imperial powers by terror and guerrilla war. They drove the Brits out of Palestine and Aden, the French out of Algeria, the Russians out of Afghanistan, the Americans out of Somalia and Beirut, the Israelis out of Lebanon... We have started up the road to empire and over the next hill we will meet those who went before."</span><p>
<img src="http://www.asianweek.com/2000_10_26/images/buchanan.jpg" width="80" height="106">
Quote above by Pat Buchanan - 2003</b></font>

<table border="8" width="600" id="table1" bgcolor="#000000" bordercolorlight="#FF0000" bordercolordark="#FF0000">
<tr>
<td><center><img src="http://www.bushflash.com/jpg/GWBush1.jpg"><br><img src="http://www.chris-floyd.com/images/funeral.jpg"></center></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="12"></hr>
<table border="6" width="675" id="table1" bgcolor="#B80600" height="86" bordercolorlight="#000000" bordercolordark="#000000">
<tr><td><img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10028/time.png"></td></tr></table>
<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
A Grim Milestone: 500 Amputees</font>

<img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10030/Bush_Jog.png"><img src="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/28/xin_170603281136077126129.jpg"><br><img src="http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2007/0701/amputee0118.jpg">

Thursday, Jan. 18, 2007
Double amputee Sgt. Christian Bagge prepares to jog with President Bush <div align="right">
<font size="2" color="#0000FF" face="arial"><b>top left photo, what the fuck is bush smiling about???</b></font></div>
<font face="helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
Thursday, Jan. 18, 2007

by MICHAEL WEISSKOPF
</b>
The giant transport planes unload their sad cargo at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington, the first stop home for the most seriously injured Americans of the Iraq war. Arriving virtually every Tuesday, Friday and Sunday nights for the past four years, the parade of wounded warriors may be one of the most predictable events in an otherwise unruly conflict.

Last Tuesday marked another grim milestone: the arrival of the 500th amputee. Army officials said the victim, a 24-year-old corporal, lost both legs in a roadside bomb explosion on January 12. He was treated at the military hospital in Landstuhl, Germany, before landing at Andrews and being taken to Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

The corporal became the newest resident of Ward 57, the hospital's renowned amputee center that has swelled with casualties since 2003. Limb-loss has occurred twice as often in Iraq as in any conflict of the past century, except for Vietnam, for which there are no good statistics. The 500 major amputations — toes and fingers aren't counted — represent 2.2% of the 22,700 U.S. troops wounded in action. But the number rises to 5% in the category of soldiers whose wounds prevent them returning to duty.

Despite the devastating loss, amputation is actually a blessing for many Ward 57 patients. That's because they wouldn't have survived in past wars without today's body armor to protect vital organs and better-equipped medics to quickly stop hemorrhaging and deliver the wounded to hospitals. The extraordinary rates of survival in this war — 9 of every 10 soldiers wounded make it, compared to 7.5 of 10 in Vietnam — explains the larger number of casualties who survive with severe and lasting disabilities, including loss of limbs.

The roadside bomb that wounded the 500th amputee is the signature weapon of the Iraq war, racking up the kind of body count caused by heavy artillery in past conflicts. Usually hidden in the road and detonated by remote control, these so-called improvised explosive devices release powerful blasts and shrapnel as Humvees pass by, carrying soldiers well-protected in all but their dangling limbs. "What takes the brunt of it are the arms and legs," said John Greenwood, historian of the Army Surgeon General's office.

As the U.S. military has upgraded the armor of its Humvees, the annual number of amputees has decreased since a record high of 156 in 2004. But Iraqi insurgents have responded with bigger bombs that cause greater devastation. Experts say this has contributed to the increase in multiple amputees. Last year, nearly a quarter of the 128 amputees lost more than one limb, compared with about 13% in the first full year of the conflict.

This war will produce the first generation of veterans in bionic arms and legs, a legacy that may seem most pronounced for upper extremity amputees. It is relatively rare to see Americans missing hands or arms; they represent only 5% of civilian amputees in the U.S. But nearly a quarter of those who lost limbs in Iraq have come home in that condition.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1580531,00.html

</font>
 
Last edited:
<p><font face="verdana" size="4" color="#333333">
Just saw this commercial from IRAQ WAR VETERANS VoteVets.org on MSNBC.

JOIN the TROOPS - Stop the TROOP ESCALATION</font>

<p><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z8ybvWplJh4"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z8ybvWplJh4"><param name="play" value="undefined"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><param name="scale" value="undefined"><param name="quality" value="undefined"><param name="menu" value="undefined"><param name="bgcolor" value="undefined"><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="undefined"><param name="loop" value="undefined"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z8ybvWplJh4" scale="undefined" wmode="transparent" play="undefined" quality="undefined" menu="undefined" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="undefined" allowscriptaccess="undefined" loop="undefined" align="undefined" height="350" hspace="undefined" vspace="undefined" width="425"></object>
 
<font size="4" color="#333333">
<h2>READ ARTICLE BELOW</h2>
Bush is sending US troops to their death.
THEY DON'T HAVE PROPER EQUIPMENT.
Bush has DESTROYED the US Military.
Will the Senate & Congress stop the demented fool ???????????????????</font><p>
<hr noshade color="#000000" size="3"></hr>
<p>
<img src="http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/ssi/globalnav/wpdotcom_190x30.gif">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Equipment For Added Troops Is Lacking</font><font face="tahoma" color="#0000FF" size="4"><b>
New Iraq Forces Must Make Do, Officials Say</b></font><font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000"><p>
<table border="5" width="600" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" bordercolorlight="#FF0000" bordercolordark="#FF0000" bgcolor="#000000" height="120"><tr><td><font color="#FFFFFF" face="tahoma" size="4"><br>Army National Guard units, have only 40 percent of their required equipment, minimum equipment levels are not expected to return to
'normal' levels until 2013<br>&nbsp;</font></td></tr></table><b>
by Ann Scott Tyson

Washington Post Staff Writer

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/29/AR2007012901584_pf.html

Tuesday, January 30, 2007; page A12</b>
<span style="background-color: #FFFF00"><b>
Boosting U.S. troop levels in Iraq by 21,500 would create major logistical hurdles for the Army and Marine Corps, which are short thousands of vehicles, armor kits and other equipment needed to supply the extra forces, U.S. officials said.</b></span>

The increase would also further degrade the readiness of U.S.-based ground forces, hampering their ability to respond quickly, fully trained and well equipped in the case of other military contingencies around the world and increasing the risk of U.S. casualties, according to Army and Marine Corps leaders.

"The response would be slower than we might like, we would not have all of the equipment sets that ordinarily would be the case, and there is certainly risk associated with that," the Marine Corps commandant, Gen. James Conway, told the House Armed Services Committee last week.
<span style="background-color: #FFFF00"><b>
President Bush's plan to send five additional U.S. combat brigades into Iraq has left the Army and Marines scrambling to ensure that the troops could be supported with the necessary armored vehicles, jamming devices, radios and other gear, as well as lodging and other logistics.

Trucks are in particularly short supply. For example, the Army would need 1,500 specially outfitted -- known as "up-armored" -- 2 1/2 -ton and five-ton trucks in Iraq for the incoming units, said Lt. Gen. Stephen Speakes, the Army's deputy chief of staff for force development.

"We don't have the [armor] kits, and we don't have the trucks," Speakes said in an interview.</b></span> He said it will take the Army months, probably until summer, to supply and outfit the additional trucks. As a result, he said, combat units flowing into Iraq would have to share the trucks assigned to units now there, leading to increased use and maintenance.

Speakes said that although another type of vehicle -- the up-armored Humvee -- continues to be in short supply Army-wide, there would be "adequate" numbers for incoming forces, and each brigade would receive 400 fully outfitted Humvees. But he said that to meet the need, the Army would have to draw down pre-positioned stocks that would then not be available for other contingencies.

Still, U.S. commanders privately expressed doubts that Iraq-bound units would receive a full complement of Humvees. "It's inevitable that that has to happen, unless five brigades of up-armored Humvees fall out of the sky," one senior Army official said of the feared shortfall. He expects that some units would have to rely more heavily on Bradley Fighting Vehicles and tanks that, although highly protective, are intimidating and therefore less effective for many counterinsurgency missions.

Adding to the crunch, the U.S. government has agreed to sell 600 up-armored Humvees to Iraq this year for its security forces. Such sales "better not be at the expense of the American soldier or Marine," Speakes told defense reporters recently, saying U.S. military needs must take priority.

Living facilities in Iraq are another concern for the additional troops, who would be concentrated in Baghdad, Army officials said. The U.S. military has closed or handed over to Iraqi forces about half of the 110 bases established there after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Decisions are being made on where to base incoming units in Baghdad, but it is likely that, at least in the short term, they would be placed in existing facilities, officials said.

Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the new top U.S. commander in Iraq, has requested that additional combat brigades move into Iraq as quickly as possible. But accelerated deployments would mean less time for units to train and fill out their ranks. Brigades are required to have an aggregate number of soldiers before deploying but may still face shortages of specific ranks and job skills.

Meanwhile, the demand for thousands more U.S. forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan is worsening the readiness of units in the United States, depleting their equipment and time to train, Army officials said. "We can fulfill the national strategy, but it will take more time and it will also take us increased casualties to do the job," Speakes said.

Army Chief of Staff Peter J. Schoomaker testified last week before the House Armed Services Committee that, regarding readiness, "my concerns are increased over what they were in June."

"To meet combatant commanders' immediate wartime needs, we pooled equipment from across the force to equip soldiers deploying in harm's way," he said. "This practice, which we are continuing today, increases risk for our next-to-deploy units and limits our ability to respond to emerging strategic contingencies."

Schoomaker called for additional funding to fix "holes in the force" and "break the historical cycle of unpreparedness."
<span style="background-color: #FFFF00"><b>
The equipment shortages are pronounced in Army National Guard units, which have, on average, only 40 percent of their required equipment, according to Army data. Senior Pentagon and Army officials say they expect to have to involuntarily mobilize some National Guard combat brigades earlier than planned to relieve active-duty forces. But the Guard as a whole is not expected to return to minimum equipment levels until 2013, Army figures show.</b></span>

The Army seeks to increase its permanent active-duty ranks by 65,000 soldiers by 2012, creating six new combat brigades at a total estimated cost of $70 billion.
</font>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="12"></hr>
<p>
 
Last edited:
[wm]http://www.pbs.org/perl/media.cgir?t=w&f=virage/newshour/pbsnh091406_220k.asf&s=2893551&e=3593110&extn=.asx[/wm]

<hr noshade color="#333333" size="8"></hr>

wpLogo_250x42.gif


<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration
At Army's Top Medical Facility</font>
<font face="times new roman, times, serif" color="#000000" size="3">
<b>
By Dana Priest and Anne Hull

Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, February 18, 2007; A01</b>


Behind the door of Army Spec. Jeremy Duncan's room, part of the wall is torn and hangs in the air, weighted down with black mold. When the wounded combat engineer stands in his shower and looks up, he can see the bathtub on the floor above through a rotted hole. The entire building, constructed between the world wars, often smells like greasy carry-out. Signs of neglect are everywhere: mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches, stained carpets, cheap mattresses.

This is the world of Building 18, not the kind of place where Duncan expected to recover when he was evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from Iraq last February with a broken neck and a shredded left ear, nearly dead from blood loss. But the old lodge, just outside the gates of the hospital and five miles up the road from the White House, has housed hundreds of maimed soldiers recuperating from injuries suffered in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The common perception of Walter Reed is of a surgical hospital that shines as the crown jewel of military medicine. But 5 1/2 years of sustained combat have transformed the venerable 113-acre institution into something else entirely -- a holding ground for physically and psychologically damaged outpatients. Almost 700 of them -- the majority soldiers, with some Marines -- have been released from hospital beds but still need treatment or are awaiting bureaucratic decisions before being discharged or returned to active duty.

They suffer from brain injuries, severed arms and legs, organ and back damage, and various degrees of post-traumatic stress. Their legions have grown so exponentially -- they outnumber hospital patients at Walter Reed 17 to 1 -- that they take up every available bed on post and spill into dozens of nearby hotels and apartments leased by the Army. The average stay is 10 months, but some have been stuck there for as long as two years.

<img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10029/veteran1.png" width="600" height="390">

Not all of the quarters are as bleak as Duncan's, but the despair of Building 18 symbolizes a larger problem in Walter Reed's treatment of the wounded, according to dozens of soldiers, family members, veterans aid groups, and current and former Walter Reed staff members interviewed by two Washington Post reporters, who spent more than four months visiting the outpatient world without the knowledge or permission of Walter Reed officials. Many agreed to be quoted by name; others said they feared Army retribution if they complained publicly.

While the hospital is a place of scrubbed-down order and daily miracles, with medical advances saving more soldiers than ever, the outpatients in the Other Walter Reed encounter a messy bureaucratic battlefield nearly as chaotic as the real battlefields they faced overseas.

On the worst days, soldiers say they feel like they are living a chapter of "Catch-22." The wounded manage other wounded. Soldiers dealing with psychological disorders of their own have been put in charge of others at risk of suicide.

Disengaged clerks, unqualified platoon sergeants and overworked case managers fumble with simple needs: feeding soldiers' families who are close to poverty, replacing a uniform ripped off by medics in the desert sand or helping a brain-damaged soldier remember his next appointment.

"We've done our duty. We fought the war. We came home wounded. Fine. But whoever the people are back here who are supposed to give us the easy transition should be doing it," said Marine Sgt. Ryan Groves, 26, an amputee who lived at Walter Reed for 16 months. "We don't know what to do. The people who are supposed to know don't have the answers. It's a nonstop process of stalling."

Soldiers, family members, volunteers and caregivers who have tried to fix the system say each mishap seems trivial by itself, but the cumulative effect wears down the spirits of the wounded and can stall their recovery.

<img src="http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10029/veteran+2.png" width="600" height="463">

"It creates resentment and disenfranchisement," said Joe Wilson, a clinical social worker at Walter Reed. "These soldiers will withdraw and stay in their rooms. They will actively avoid the very treatment and services that are meant to be helpful."

Danny Soto, a national service officer for Disabled American Veterans who helps dozens of wounded service members each week at Walter Reed, said soldiers "get awesome medical care and their lives are being saved," but, "Then they get into the administrative part of it and they are like, 'You saved me for what?' The soldiers feel like they are not getting proper respect. This leads to anger."

This world is invisible to outsiders. Walter Reed occasionally showcases the heroism of these wounded soldiers and emphasizes that all is well under the circumstances. President Bush, former defense secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and members of Congress have promised the best care during their regular visits to the hospital's spit-polished amputee unit, Ward 57.

"We owe them all we can give them," Bush said during his last visit, a few days before Christmas. "Not only for when they're in harm's way, but when they come home to help them adjust if they have wounds, or help them adjust after their time in service."

Along with the government promises, the American public, determined not to repeat the divisive Vietnam experience, has embraced the soldiers even as the war grows more controversial at home. Walter Reed is awash in the generosity of volunteers, businesses and celebrities who donate money, plane tickets, telephone cards and steak dinners.

Yet at a deeper level, the soldiers say they feel alone and frustrated. Seventy-five percent of the troops polled by Walter Reed last March said their experience was "stressful." Suicide attempts and unintentional overdoses from prescription drugs and alcohol, which is sold on post, are part of the narrative here.

Vera Heron spent 15 frustrating months living on post to help care for her son. "It just absolutely took forever to get anything done," Heron said. "They do the paperwork, they lose the paperwork. Then they have to redo the paperwork. You are talking about guys and girls whose lives are disrupted for the rest of their lives, and they don't put any priority on it."

Family members who speak only Spanish have had to rely on Salvadoran housekeepers, a Cuban bus driver, the Panamanian bartender and a Mexican floor cleaner for help. Walter Reed maintains a list of bilingual staffers, but they are rarely called on, according to soldiers and families and Walter Reed staff members.

Evis Morales's severely wounded son was transferred to the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda for surgery shortly after she arrived at Walter Reed. She had checked into her government-paid room on post, but she slept in the lobby of the Bethesda hospital for two weeks because no one told her there is a free shuttle between the two facilities. "They just let me off the bus and said 'Bye-bye,' " recalled Morales, a Puerto Rico resident.

Morales found help after she ran out of money, when she called a hotline number and a Spanish-speaking operator happened to answer.

"If they can have Spanish-speaking recruits to convince my son to go into the Army, why can't they have Spanish-speaking translators when he's injured?" Morales asked. "It's so confusing, so disorienting."

Soldiers, wives, mothers, social workers and the heads of volunteer organizations have complained repeatedly to the military command about what one called "The Handbook No One Gets" that would explain life as an outpatient. Most soldiers polled in the March survey said they got their information from friends. Only 12 percent said any Army literature had been helpful.

"They've been behind from Day One," said Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.), who headed the House Government Reform Committee, which investigated problems at Walter Reed and other Army facilities. "Even the stuff they've fixed has only been patched."

Among the public, Davis said, "there's vast appreciation for soldiers, but there's a lack of focus on what happens to them" when they return. "It's awful."

Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, commander at Walter Reed, said in an interview last week that a major reason outpatients stay so long, a change from the days when injured soldiers were discharged as quickly as possible, is that the Army wants to be able to hang on to as many soldiers as it can, "because this is the first time this country has fought a war for so long with an all-volunteer force since the Revolution."

Acknowledging the problems with outpatient care, Weightman said Walter Reed has taken steps over the past year to improve conditions for the outpatient army, which at its peak in summer 2005 numbered nearly 900, not to mention the hundreds of family members who come to care for them. One platoon sergeant used to be in charge of 125 patients; now each one manages 30. Platoon sergeants with psychological problems are more carefully screened. And officials have increased the numbers of case managers and patient advocates to help with the complex disability benefit process, which Weightman called "one of the biggest sources of delay."

And to help steer the wounded and their families through the complicated bureaucracy, Weightman said, Walter Reed has recently begun holding twice-weekly informational meetings. "We felt we were pushing information out before, but the reality is, it was overwhelming," he said. "Is it fail-proof? No. But we've put more resources on it."

He said a 21,500-troop increase in Iraq has Walter Reed bracing for "potentially a lot more" casualties.

<b>Bureaucratic Battles</b>

The best known of the Army's medical centers, Walter Reed opened in 1909 with 10 patients. It has treated the wounded from every war since, and nearly one of every four service members injured in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The outpatients are assigned to one of five buildings attached to the post, including Building 18, just across from the front gates on Georgia Avenue. To accommodate the overflow, some are sent to nearby hotels and apartments. Living conditions range from the disrepair of Building 18 to the relative elegance of Mologne House, a hotel that opened on the post in 1998, when the typical guest was a visiting family member or a retiree on vacation.

The Pentagon has announced plans to close Walter Reed by 2011, but that hasn't stopped the flow of casualties. Three times a week, school buses painted white and fitted with stretchers and blackened windows stream down Georgia Avenue. Sirens blaring, they deliver soldiers groggy from a pain-relief cocktail at the end of their long trip from Iraq via Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany and Andrews Air Force Base.

Staff Sgt. John Daniel Shannon, 43, came in on one of those buses in November 2004 and spent several weeks on the fifth floor of Walter Reed's hospital. His eye and skull were shattered by an AK-47 round. His odyssey in the Other Walter Reed has lasted more than two years, but it began when someone handed him a map of the grounds and told him to find his room across post.

A reconnaissance and land-navigation expert, Shannon was so disoriented that he couldn't even find north. Holding the map, he stumbled around outside the hospital, sliding against walls and trying to keep himself upright, he said. He asked anyone he found for directions.

Shannon had led the 2nd Infantry Division's Ghost Recon Platoon until he was felled in a gun battle in Ramadi. He liked the solitary work of a sniper; "Lone Wolf" was his call name. But he did not expect to be left alone by the Army after such serious surgery and a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. He had appointments during his first two weeks as an outpatient, then nothing.

"I thought, 'Shouldn't they contact me?' " he said. "I didn't understand the paperwork. I'd start calling phone numbers, asking if I had appointments. I finally ran across someone who said: 'I'm your case manager. Where have you been?'

"Well, I've been here! Jeez Louise, people, I'm your hospital patient!"

Like Shannon, many soldiers with impaired memory from brain injuries sat for weeks with no appointments and no help from the staff to arrange them. Many disappeared even longer. Some simply left for home.

One outpatient, a 57-year-old staff sergeant who had a heart attack in Afghanistan, was given 200 rooms to supervise at the end of 2005. He quickly discovered that some outpatients had left the post months earlier and would check in by phone. "We called them 'call-in patients,' " said Staff Sgt. Mike McCauley, whose dormant PTSD from Vietnam was triggered by what he saw on the job: so many young and wounded, and three bodies being carried from the hospital.

Life beyond the hospital bed is a frustrating mountain of paperwork. The typical soldier is required to file 22 documents with eight different commands -- most of them off-post -- to enter and exit the medical processing world, according to government investigators. Sixteen different information systems are used to process the forms, but few of them can communicate with one another. The Army's three personnel databases cannot read each other's files and can't interact with the separate pay system or the medical recordkeeping databases.

The disappearance of necessary forms and records is the most common reason soldiers languish at Walter Reed longer than they should, according to soldiers, family members and staffers. Sometimes the Army has no record that a soldier even served in Iraq. A combat medic who did three tours had to bring in letters and photos of herself in Iraq to show she that had been there, after a clerk couldn't find a record of her service.

Shannon, who wears an eye patch and a visible skull implant, said he had to prove he had served in Iraq when he tried to get a free uniform to replace the bloody one left behind on a medic's stretcher. When he finally tracked down the supply clerk, he discovered the problem: His name was mistakenly left off the "GWOT list" -- the list of "Global War on Terrorism" patients with priority funding from the Defense Department.

He brought his Purple Heart to the clerk to prove he was in Iraq.

Lost paperwork for new uniforms has forced some soldiers to attend their own Purple Heart ceremonies and the official birthday party for the Army in gym clothes, only to be chewed out by superiors.

The Army has tried to re-create the organization of a typical military unit at Walter Reed. Soldiers are assigned to one of two companies while they are outpatients -- the Medical Holding Company (Medhold) for active-duty soldiers and the Medical Holdover Company for Reserve and National Guard soldiers. The companies are broken into platoons that are led by platoon sergeants, the Army equivalent of a parent.

Under normal circumstances, good sergeants know everything about the soldiers under their charge: vices and talents, moods and bad habits, even family stresses.

At Walter Reed, however, outpatients have been drafted to serve as platoon sergeants and have struggled with their responsibilities. Sgt. David Thomas, a 42-year-old amputee with the Tennessee National Guard, said his platoon sergeant couldn't remember his name. "We wondered if he had mental problems," Thomas said. "Sometimes I'd wear my leg, other times I'd take my wheelchair. He would think I was a different person. We thought, 'My God, has this man lost it?' "

Civilian care coordinators and case managers are supposed to track injured soldiers and help them with appointments, but government investigators and soldiers complain that they are poorly trained and often do not understand the system.

One amputee, a senior enlisted man who asked not to be identified because he is back on active duty, said he received orders to report to a base in Germany as he sat drooling in his wheelchair in a haze of medication. "I went to Medhold many times in my wheelchair to fix it, but no one there could help me," he said.

Finally, his wife met an aide to then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, who got the erroneous paperwork corrected with one phone call. When the aide called with the news, he told the soldier, "They don't even know you exist."

"They didn't know who I was or where I was," the soldier said. "And I was in contact with my platoon sergeant every day."

The lack of accountability weighed on Shannon. He hated the isolation of the younger troops. The Army's failure to account for them each day wore on him. When a 19-year-old soldier down the hall died, Shannon knew he had to take action.

The soldier, Cpl. Jeremy Harper, returned from Iraq with PTSD after seeing three buddies die. He kept his room dark, refused his combat medals and always seemed heavily medicated, said people who knew him. According to his mother, Harper was drunkenly wandering the lobby of the Mologne House on New Year's Eve 2004, looking for a ride home to West Virginia. The next morning he was found dead in his room. An autopsy showed alcohol poisoning, she said.

"I can't understand how they could have let kids under the age of 21 have liquor," said Victoria Harper, crying. "He was supposed to be right there at Walter Reed hospital. . . . I feel that they didn't take care of him or watch him as close as they should have."

The Army posthumously awarded Harper a Bronze Star for his actions in Iraq.

Shannon viewed Harper's death as symptomatic of a larger tragedy -- the Army had broken its covenant with its troops. "Somebody didn't take care of him," he would later say. "It makes me want to cry. "

Shannon and another soldier decided to keep tabs on the brain injury ward. "I'm a staff sergeant in the U.S. Army, and I take care of people," he said. The two soldiers walked the ward every day with a list of names. If a name dropped off the large white board at the nurses' station, Shannon would hound the nurses to check their files and figure out where the soldier had gone.

Sometimes the patients had been transferred to another hospital. If they had been released to one of the residences on post, Shannon and his buddy would pester the front desk managers to make sure the new charges were indeed there. "But two out of 10, when I asked where they were, they'd just say, 'They're gone,' " Shannon said.

Even after Weightman and his commanders instituted new measures to keep better track of soldiers, two young men left post one night in November and died in a high-speed car crash in Virginia. The driver was supposed to be restricted to Walter Reed because he had tested positive for illegal drugs, Weightman said.

Part of the tension at Walter Reed comes from a setting that is both military and medical. Marine Sgt. Ryan Groves, the squad leader who lost one leg and the use of his other in a grenade attack, said his recovery was made more difficult by a Marine liaison officer who had never seen combat but dogged him about having his mother in his room on post. The rules allowed her to be there, but the officer said she was taking up valuable bed space.

"When you join the Marine Corps, they tell you, you can forget about your mama. 'You have no mama. We are your mama,' " Groves said. "That training works in combat. It doesn't work when you are wounded."

<b>Frustration at Every Turn</b>

The frustrations of an outpatient's day begin before dawn. On a dark, rain-soaked morning this winter, Sgt. Archie Benware, 53, hobbled over to his National Guard platoon office at Walter Reed. Benware had done two tours in Iraq. His head had been crushed between two 2,100-pound concrete barriers in Ramadi, and now it was dented like a tin can. His legs were stiff from knee surgery. But here he was, trying to take care of business.

At the platoon office, he scanned the white board on the wall. Six soldiers were listed as AWOL. The platoon sergeant was nowhere to be found, leaving several soldiers stranded with their requests.

Benware walked around the corner to arrange a dental appointment -- his teeth were knocked out in the accident. He was told by a case manager that another case worker, not his doctor, would have to approve the procedure.

"Goddamn it, that's unbelievable!" snapped his wife, Barb, who accompanied him because he can no longer remember all of his appointments.

Not as unbelievable as the time he received a manila envelope containing the gynecological report of a young female soldier.

Next came 7 a.m. formation, one way Walter Reed tries to keep track of hundreds of wounded. Formation is also held to maintain some discipline. Soldiers limp to the old Red Cross building in rain, ice and snow. Army regulations say they can't use umbrellas, even here. A triple amputee has mastered the art of putting on his uniform by himself and rolling in just in time. Others are so gorked out on pills that they seem on the verge of nodding off.

"Fall in!" a platoon sergeant shouted at Friday formation. The noisy room of soldiers turned silent.

An Army chaplain opened with a verse from the Bible. "Why are we here?" she asked. She talked about heroes and service to country. "We were injured in many ways."

Someone announced free tickets to hockey games, a Ravens game, a movie screening, a dinner at McCormick and Schmick's, all compliments of local businesses.

Every formation includes a safety briefing. Usually it is a warning about mixing alcohol with meds, or driving too fast, or domestic abuse. "Do not beat your spouse or children. Do not let your spouse or children beat you," a sergeant said, to laughter. This morning's briefing included a warning about black ice, a particular menace to the amputees.

Dress warm, the sergeant said. "I see some guys rolling around in their wheelchairs in 30 degrees in T-shirts."

Soldiers hate formation for its petty condescension. They gutted out a year in the desert, and now they are being treated like children.

"I'm trying to think outside the box here, maybe moving formation to Wagner Gym," the commander said, addressing concerns that formation was too far from soldiers' quarters in the cold weather. "But guess what? Those are nice wood floors. They have to be covered by a tarp. There's a tarp that's got to be rolled out over the wooden floors. Then it has to be cleaned, with 400 soldiers stepping all over it. Then it's got to be rolled up."

"Now, who thinks Wagner Gym is a good idea?"

Explaining this strange world to family members is not easy. At an orientation for new arrivals, a staff sergeant walked them through the idiosyncrasies of Army financing. He said one relative could receive a 15-day advance on the $64 per diem either in cash or as an electronic transfer: "I highly recommend that you take the cash," he said. "There's no guarantee the transfer will get to your bank." The audience yawned.

Actually, he went on, relatives can collect only 80 percent of this advance, which comes to $51.20 a day. "The cashier has no change, so we drop to $50. We give you the rest" -- the $1.20 a day -- "when you leave."

The crowd was anxious, exhausted. A child crawled on the floor. The sergeant plowed on. "You need to figure out how long your loved one is going to be an inpatient," he said, something even the doctors can't accurately predict from day to day. "Because if you sign up for the lodging advance," which is $150 a day, "and they get out the next day, you owe the government the advance back of $150 a day."

A case manager took the floor to remind everyone that soldiers are required to be in uniform most of the time, though some of the wounded are amputees or their legs are pinned together by bulky braces. "We have break-away clothing with Velcro!" she announced with a smile. "Welcome to Walter Reed!"

<b>A Bleak Life in Building 18</b>

"Building 18! There is a rodent infestation issue!" bellowed the commander to his troops one morning at formation. "It doesn't help when you live like a rodent! I can't believe people live like that! I was appalled by some of your rooms!"

Life in Building 18 is the bleakest homecoming for men and women whose government promised them good care in return for their sacrifices.

One case manager was so disgusted, she bought roach bombs for the rooms. Mouse traps are handed out. It doesn't help that soldiers there subsist on carry-out food because the hospital cafeteria is such a hike on cold nights. They make do with microwaves and hot plates.

Army officials say they "started an aggressive campaign to deal with the mice infestation" last October and that the problem is now at a "manageable level." They also say they will "review all outstanding work orders" in the next 30 days.

Soldiers discharged from the psychiatric ward are often assigned to Building 18. Buses and ambulances blare all night. While injured soldiers pull guard duty in the foyer, a broken garage door allows unmonitored entry from the rear. Struggling with schizophrenia, PTSD, paranoid delusional disorder and traumatic brain injury, soldiers feel especially vulnerable in that setting, just outside the post gates, on a street where drug dealers work the corner at night.
<div align="left"><!-- MSTableType="layout" -->
<img src="http://www.chris-floyd.com/images/walterreed.jpg" align="left"></div>
"I've been close to mortars. I've held my own pretty good," said Spec. George Romero, 25, who came back from Iraq with a psychological disorder. "But here . . . I think it has affected my ability to get over it . . . dealing with potential threats every day."

After Spec. Jeremy Duncan, 30, got out of the hospital and was assigned to Building 18, he had to navigate across the traffic of Georgia Avenue for appointments. Even after knee surgery, he had to limp back and forth on crutches and in pain. Over time, black mold invaded his room.

But Duncan would rather suffer with the mold than move to another room and share his convalescence in tight quarters with a wounded stranger. "I have mold on the walls, a hole in the shower ceiling, but . . . I don't want someone waking me up coming in."

Wilson, the clinical social worker at Walter Reed, was part of a staff team that recognized Building 18's toll on the wounded. He mapped out a plan and, in September, was given a $30,000 grant from the Commander's Initiative Account for improvements. He ordered some equipment, including a pool table and air hockey table, which have not yet arrived. A Psychiatry Department functionary held up the rest of the money because she feared that buying a lot of recreational equipment close to Christmas would trigger an audit, Wilson said.

In January, Wilson was told that the funds were no longer available and that he would have to submit a new request. "It's absurd," he said. "Seven months of work down the drain. I have nothing to show for this project. It's a great example of what we're up against."

A pool table and two flat-screen TVs were eventually donated from elsewhere.

But Wilson had had enough. Three weeks ago he turned in his resignation. "It's too difficult to get anything done with this broken-down bureaucracy," he said.

At town hall meetings, the soldiers of Building 18 keep pushing commanders to improve conditions. But some things have gotten worse. In December, a contracting dispute held up building repairs.

"I hate it," said Romero, who stays in his room all day. "There are cockroaches. The elevator doesn't work. The garage door doesn't work. Sometimes there's no heat, no water. . . . I told my platoon sergeant I want to leave. I told the town hall meeting. I talked to the doctors and medical staff. They just said you kind of got to get used to the outside world. . . . My platoon sergeant said, 'Suck it up!' "
</font>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#0000FF" size="8"></hr>
<p>
<iframe src="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/02/TNSreedinspect070227/" width=700 height=800 hspace=0 vspace=0 frameborder=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0 scrolling=yes> <br></iframe>
 
Last edited:
<br>
<font face="georgia" size="5" color="#0000ff"><b>
Walter Reed's Neglected Iraq Vets told "Shut Up!!!"</b></font><p>

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C6MpCkTTOmU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C6MpCkTTOmU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="8"></hr><p>

<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Our Troops Have Been Treated
Disgracefully at Walter Reed</font>

<font face="helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<b>by Brent Budowsky | Feb 28 2007 </b>

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/5775

In the case of American troops killed in action in what the Marine Corps pathologist calls preventable casualties, our government is charged with the moral equivalent of negligent homicide.

In the case of wounded American troops who are disrespected, abused or mistreated in military hospitals our government is charged with the moral equivalent of criminal negligence. On this count I take responsibility and plead guilty for not knowing about this and acting to stop it. Shame on me.

In the case of politicians who let these wrongs persist while accusing opponents of not supporting our troops, you are charged with the moral equivalent of perjury.

In the case of politicians who walk by homeless veterans living on grates and hungry with pain, and don't wage a historic battle to end this harvest of shame, you are charged with ignoring the Golden Rule, Sermon on the Mount and our national anthem.

For government that increases our troops in Iraq while allowing some to continue to be killed by preventable deaths, you are charged with the moral equivalent of murder.

For those who claim this is "over the top" you might consider this:

When the Marine Corps pathologist said up to 70 percent of American casualties in Iraq were preventable, this means they were not killed or wounded only by enemy attack, but by negligence in Washington that could have prevented these wounds and deaths, but did not.

Even today, approaching the fifth year of this war, the preventable casualties continue. It deserves no pardon for politicians that only 50 percent, or 30 percent, or 10 percent of casualties are caused by neglect from Washington. It deserves no commutation of sentence that finally, a great reporter uncovers a great scandal in the treatment of wounded heroes, which remained unnoticed only miles from the gala fundraising, pork barrel gouging and endless spinmeistering by the powers to whom this note is addressed.

What is the legal culpability of the drunken driver who gets tanked and kills five innocent victims? And is released, gets drunk again, and kills five hundred more? And does it again, gets drunk, drives, and kills a thousand more?

Have we lost all sense of decency and honor that even after the Marine Corps pathologist shames us by quantifying our negligence, this continues? We are a nation to whom God has given much, with heroes who give all in service.

We are a nation where markets are awash in cash. Millionaires proliferate in record number. Our news is obsessed with Britney's hair and Anna Nicole's corpse. Some dance to their iPods. Others count their stock options and worry about their housing bubbles.

Yet our heroes give their lives in Arabia or come to be treated like dirt only miles from the Capitol while politicians proclaim their love for the troops. Shame, shame, shame.

I propose the president, congressional leaders and the armed services committees join in extraordinary legislative and executive public hearings.

Bring the best minds in the country together. Shine the light on every issue that involves the lives and health of our troops.

Take responsiblity. Write a program. Pass it by the 4th of July. Go to the country. Tell our people the cost, and a grateful nation will proudly pay it, to stand with those who keep us free.
</font>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="8"></hr><p>
 
<BR>
[WM]http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Download/14973/1/Cafferty_WalterReed.wmv[/WM]
<br>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="10"></hr>


7818.gif


<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
Valor and Squalor</font><font face="trebuchet ms" size="3" color="#000000"><b>

March 5th 2007

ts-krugman-75.jpg


by Paul Krugman. </b> page A.19

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.h...3Q7B(CQ7BQ7DrhQ51hQ7DQ51Q7B(C9,W_uGQ51nQ221uA


When Salon, the online magazine, reported on mistreatment of veterans at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center two years ago, officials simply denied that there were any problems. And they initially tried to brush off last month's expose in The Washington Post.

But this time, with President Bush's approval at 29 percent, Democrats in control of Congress, and Donald Rumsfeld no longer defense secretary -- Robert Gates, his successor, appears genuinely distressed at the situation -- the whitewash didn't stick.

Yet even now it's not clear whether the public will be told the full story, which is that the horrors of Walter Reed's outpatient unit are no aberration. For all its cries of ''support the troops,'' the Bush administration has treated veterans' medical care the same way it treats everything else: nickel-and-diming the needy, protecting the incompetent and privatizing everything it can.

What makes this a particular shame is that in the Clinton years, veterans' health care -- like the Federal Emergency Management Agency -- became a shining example of how good leadership can revitalize a troubled government program. By the early years of this decade the Veterans Health Administration was, by many measures, providing the highest-quality health care in America. (It probably still is: Walter Reed is a military facility, not run by the V.H.A.)

But as with FEMA, the Bush administration has done all it can to undermine that achievement. And the Walter Reed scandal is another Hurricane Katrina: the moment when the administration's misgovernment became obvious to everyone.

The problem starts with money. The administration uses carefully cooked numbers to pretend that it has been generous to veterans, but the historical data contained in its own budget for fiscal 2008 tell the true story. The quagmire in Iraq has vastly increased the demands on the Veterans Administration, yet since 2001 federal outlays for veterans' medical care have actually lagged behind overall national health spending.

To save money, the administration has been charging veterans for many formerly free services. For example, in 2005 Salon reported that some Walter Reed patients were forced to pay hundreds of dollars each month for their meals.

More important, the administration has broken longstanding promises of lifetime health care to those who defend our nation. Two months before the invasion of Iraq the V.H.A., which previously offered care to all veterans, introduced severe new restrictions on who is entitled to enroll in its health care system. As the agency's Web site helpfully explains, veterans whose income exceeds as little as $27,790 a year, and who lack ''special eligibilities such as a compensable service connected condition or recent combat service,'' will be turned away.

So when you hear stories of veterans who spend months or years fighting to get the care they deserve, trying to prove that their injuries are service-related, remember this: all this red tape was created not by the inherent inefficiency of government bureaucracy, but by the Bush administration's penny-pinching.

But money is only part of the problem.

We know from Hurricane Katrina postmortems that one of the factors degrading FEMA's effectiveness was the Bush administration's relentless push to outsource and privatize disaster management, which demoralized government employees and drove away many of the agency's most experienced professionals. It appears that the same thing has been happening to veterans' care.

The redoubtable Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, points out that IAP Worldwide Services, a company run by two former Halliburton executives, received a large contract to run Walter Reed under suspicious circumstances: the Army reversed the results of an audit concluding that government employees could do the job more cheaply.

And Mr. Waxman, who will be holding a hearing on the issue today, appears to have solid evidence, including an internal Walter Reed memo from last year, that the prospect of privatization led to a FEMA-type exodus of skilled personnel.

What comes next? Francis J. Harvey, who as far as I can tell was the first defense contractor appointed secretary of the Army, has been forced out. But the parallels between what happened at Walter Reed and what happened to New Orleans -- not to mention parallels with the mother of all scandals, the failed reconstruction of Iraq -- tell us that the roots of the scandal run far deeper than the actions of a few bad men.</font>
<br>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="10"></hr>
<p>
 
<font face="verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
The articles highlight how the "Bush Crime Family" supports???......"our troops".

Those of us in the “reality based” community have never been snookered by the RepubliKlans and their corporate media whores about how US soldiers are really supported.

The easily available empirical evidence, that anyone with a C average & a 10th grade education could quickly obtain via official government agencies and defense department databanks, shows that “The Bush Crime Family” has nothing but utter contempt for US soldiers.

In every category—education, healthcare, insurance, training, equipment, etc. “The Bush Crime Family” <b>HAS CUT TROOP SUPPORT.</b>

Has the defense budget gone up dramatically due to this self-declared perpetual war on terrorism? Yes, but the money is not going to the soldiers. Where is it going?

It’s going into the offshore bank accounts of defense contractors. Companies you have heard of like Halliburton and Bechtel are stashing billions of no-bid contract money into offshore accounts. Companies that you might not of heard of like Blackwater, Caci, L3Titan are stacking billions.

A significant portion of these virtually tax-free billions are then recycled and combined with the billions of oil dollars that $3.25 a gallon US gasoline prices are providing.

Where do these vast pools of $$$$$$$$ capital go? They are going into private equity funds. If like most cavalier Americans, you don’t know what a private equity fund is, you should. A private equity fund bought Chrysler last week. Some of the nation’s major highways are being sold to private equity funds. Sears and Kmart are owned by private equity funds.

Can’t wrap your mind around this? Okay, here’s what’s going on in two sentences. Billions of tax-payer money, your money, is going to politically connected corporations via no-bid contracts, that money is then used by an offshore private equity fund to buy US assets (Sears, Chrysler, Kmart) fire workers, reduce wages, raid the pension fund, which results in higher stock prices which benefit a small (5%) percentage of people exponentially.

<i>Anecdote</i> - There are two bars within walking distance of my house where people line up of Thursday, Friday & Saturday nights to sit at a table and buy bottles of Grey Goose for $1,500. per bottle.

</font>

<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
White House ‘Strongly Opposes’ Extra Pay for Troops</font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
May 17, 2007


The House of Representatives wants to boost soldier pay by 3.5 percent in order to close the gap with private sector wages, but the White House opposes an increase beyond 3 percent. The White House has also come out against new benefits for disabled veterans and survivors of military retirees.
<blockquote>
<h3>Army Times:</h3>

Troops don’t need bigger pay raises, White House budget officials said Wednesday in a statement of administration policy laying out objections to the House version of the 2008 defense authorization bill.

The Bush administration had asked for a 3 percent military raise for Jan. 1, 2008, enough to match last year’s average pay increase in the private sector. The House Armed Services Committee recommends a 3.5 percent pay increase for 2008, and increases in 2009 through 2012 that also are 0.5 percentage point greater than private-sector pay raises.

The slightly bigger military raises are intended to reduce the gap between military and civilian pay that stands at about 3.9 percent today. Under the bill, HR 1585, the pay gap would be reduced to 1.4 percent after the Jan. 1, 2012, pay increase.
</blockquote>

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/military_whitehouse_opposeraise_070516w/


</font>
<hr noshade color="#333333" size="4"></hr>

<font face="times new roman" size="6" color="#000000"><b>
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." </font><font face="tahoma" size="3" color="#0000FF">
<div align="left"><!-- MSTableType="layout" -->
<img src="http://www.democracymeansyou.com/images/kissinger-rummy.jpg" align="left"></div>
-- Henry A. Kissinger, quoted by Monika Jensen-Stevenson, Kiss the Boys Goodbye, Dutton, 1990, Page 97, citing The Final Days, Woodward and Bernstein (Simon & Schuster, 1976) </B></FONT><p>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="10"></hr><p>
 
Last edited:
<img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sitelogos/Guardian.gif"><img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/siteheaders/Guardian.gif">

<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
Fatigue Cripples US Army In Iraq</font>
<font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000FF"><b>
Exhaustion and combat stress are besieging US troops in Iraq as they battle with a new type of warfare. Some even rely on Red Bull to get through the day. As desertions and absences increase, the military is struggling to cope with the crisis<br><font color="#ff0000">The anecdotal evidence on the ground confirms what others - prominent among them General Colin Powell, the former US Secretary of State - have been insisting for months now: that the US army is 'about broken'</b></font></font>

falluja10c.jpg

<font face="arial" size="2" color="#ff0000"><b>US Marines asleep at their base in Falluja, Iraq.</b></FONT>

<img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2003/09/03/Beaumont256.jpg"><br>
<font color="#000000" face="arial" size="2"><b>Peter Beaumont<br></b></font>
<font face="helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
by Peter Beaumont in Baghdad

Sunday August 12, 2007
The Observer </b>

Lieutenant Clay Hanna looks sick and white. Like his colleagues he does not seem to sleep. Hanna says he catches up by napping on a cot between operations in the command centre, amid the noise of radio. He is up at 6am and tries to go to sleep by 2am or 3am. But there are operations to go on, planning to be done and after-action reports that need to be written. And war interposes its own deadly agenda that requires his attention and wakes him up.

When he emerges from his naps there is something old and paper-thin about his skin, something sketchy about his movements as the days go by.

The Americans he commands, like the other men at Sullivan - a combat outpost in Zafraniya, south east Baghdad - hit their cots when they get in from operations. But even when they wake up there is something tired and groggy about them. They are on duty for five days at a time and off for two days. When they get back to the forward operating base, they do their laundry and sleep and count the days until they will get home. It is an exhaustion that accumulates over the patrols and the rotations, over the multiple deployments, until it all joins up, wiping out any memory of leave or time at home. Until life is nothing but Iraq.

Hanna and his men are not alone in being tired most of the time. A whole army is exhausted and worn out. You see the young soldiers washed up like driftwood at Baghdad's international airport, waiting to go on leave or returning to their units, sleeping on their body armour on floors and in the dust.

Where once the war in Iraq was defined in conversations with these men by untenable ideas - bringing democracy or defeating al-Qaeda - these days the war in Iraq is defined by different ways of expressing the idea of being weary. It is a theme that is endlessly reiterated as you travel around Iraq. 'The army is worn out. We are just keeping people in theatre who are exhausted,' says a soldier working for the US army public affairs office who is supposed to be telling me how well things have been going since the 'surge' in Baghdad began.

They are not supposed to talk like this. We are driving and another of the public affairs team adds bitterly: 'We should just be allowed to tell the media what is happening here. Let them know that people are worn out. So that their families know back home. But it's like we've become no more than numbers now.'

The first soldier starts in again. 'My husband was injured here. He hit an improvised explosive device. He already had a spinal injury. The blast shook out the plates. He's home now and has serious issues adapting. But I'm not allowed to go back home to see him. If I wanted to see him I'd have to take leave time (two weeks). And the army counts it.'

A week later, in the northern city of Mosul, an officer talks privately. 'We're plodding through this,' he says after another patrol and another ambush in the city centre. 'I don't know how much more plodding we've got left in us.'

When the soldiers talk like this there is resignation. There is a corrosive anger, too, that bubbles out, like the words pouring unbidden from a chaplain's assistant who has come to bless a patrol. 'Why don't you tell the truth? Why don't you journalists write that this army is exhausted?'

It is a weariness that has created its own culture of superstition. There are vehicle commanders who will not let the infantrymen in the back fall asleep on long operations - not because they want the men alert, but because, they say, bad things happen when people fall asleep. So the soldiers drink multiple cans of Rip It and Red Bull to stay alert and wired.

But the exhaustion of the US army emerges most powerfully in the details of these soldiers' frayed and worn-out lives. Everywhere you go you hear the same complaints: soldiers talk about divorces, or problems with the girlfriends that they don't see, or about the children who have been born and who are growing up largely without them.

'I counted it the other day,' says a major whose partner is also a soldier. 'We have been married for five years. We added up the days. Because of Iraq and Afghanistan we have been together for just seven months. Seven months ... We are in a bad place. I don't know whether this marriage can survive it.'

The anecdotal evidence on the ground confirms what others - prominent among them General Colin Powell, the former US Secretary of State - have been insisting for months now: that the US army is 'about broken'. Only a third of the regular army's brigades now qualify as combat-ready. Officers educated at the elite West Point academy are leaving at a rate not seen in 30 years, with the consequence that the US army has a shortfall of 3,000 commissioned officers - and the problem is expected to worsen.

And it is not only the soldiers that are worn out. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to the destruction, or wearing out, of 40 per cent of the US army's equipment, totalling at a recent count $212bn (£105bn).

But it is in the soldiers themselves - and in the ordinary stories they tell - that the exhaustion of the US military is most obvious, coming amid warnings that soldiers serving multiple Iraq deployments, now amounting to several years, are 50 per cent more likely than those with one tour to suffer from acute combat stress.

The army's exhaustion is reflected in problems such as the rate of desertion and unauthorised absences - a problem, it was revealed earlier this year, that had increased threefold on the period before the war in Afghanistan and had resulted in thousands of negative discharges.

'They are scraping to get people to go back and people are worn out,' said Thomas Grieger, a senior US navy psychiatrist, told the International Herald Tribune in April.

'Modern war is exhausting,' says Major Stacie Caswell, an occupational therapist with a combat stress unit attached to the military hospital in Mosul. Her unit runs long group sessions to help soldiers with emerging mental health and discipline problems: often they have seen friends killed and injured, or are having problems stemming from issues at home - responsible for 50 to 60 per cent of their cases. One of the most common problems in Iraq is sleep disorders.

'This is a different kind of war,' says Caswell. 'In World War II it was clear who the good guys and the bad guys were. You knew what you would go through on the battlefield.' Now she says the threat is all around. And soldiering has changed. 'Now we have so many things to do...'

'And the soldier in Vietnam,' interjects Sergeant John Valentine from the same unit, 'did not get to see the coverage from home that these soldiers do. We see what is going on at home on the political scene. They think the war is going to end. Then we have the frustration and confusion. That is fatiguing. Mentally tiring.'

'Not only that,' says Caswell, 'but because of the nature of what we do now, the number of tasks in comparison with previous generations - even as you are finishing your 15 months here you are immediately planning and training for your next tour.' Valentine adds: 'There is no decompression.'

The consequence is a deep-seated problem of retention and recruitment that in turn, says Caswell, has led the US army to reduce its standards for joining the military, particularly over the issue of no longer looking too hard at any previous history of mental illness. 'It is a question of honesty, and we are not investigating too deeply or we are issuing waivers. The consequence is that we are seeing people who do not have the same coping skills when they get here, and this can be difficult.

'We are also seeing older soldiers coming in - up to 41 years old - and that is causing its own problems. They have difficulty dealing with the physical impact of the war and also interacting with the younger men.'

Valentine says: 'We are not only watering down the quality of the soldiers but the leadership too. The good leaders get out. I've seen it. And right now we are on the down slope.'

<b>'War tsar' calls for return of the draft to take the strain</b>

America's 'war tsar' has called for the nation's political leaders to consider bringing back the draft to help a military exhausted by wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In a radio interview, Lieutenant General Douglas Lute said the option had always been open to boost America's all-volunteer army by drafting in young men in the same way as happened in Vietnam. 'I think it makes sense to consider it,' he said. Lute was appointed 'war tsar' earlier this year after President Bush decided a single figure was needed to oversee the nation's military efforts abroad.

Rumours of a return to the draft have long circulated in military circles as the pressure from fighting two large conflicts at the same time builds on America's forces. However, politically it would be extremely difficult to achieve, especially for any leader hoping to be elected in 2008. Bush has previously ruled out the suggestion as unnecessary.

Lute, however, said the war was causing stress to military families and, as a result, was having an impact on levels of re-enlistment. 'This kind of stress plays out across dinner tables and in living-room conversations within these families. Ultimately the health of the all-volunteer force is going to rest on those sorts of personal family decisions,' he said.

A draft would revive bad memories of the turmoil of the 1960s and early 1970s when tens of thousands of young men were drafted to fight and die in Vietnam. Few other policies proved as divisive in America and the memories of anti-war protesters burning their draft cards and fleeing to Canada are still vivid in the memory

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2147052,00.html</font><br>

<hr noshade color="#0000FF" size="10"></hr><p>
 
Last edited:
10.000 Iraq veterans have gone AWOL

[FLASH]http://www.liveleak.com/player2.swf?token=a9e_1192549980[/FLASH]An increasing number of soldiers refuse to return to the war in Iraq
 
Veterans Make Up One Quarter of US Homeless, Here Are Some of Their Stories

[FLASH]http://www.liveleak.com/player2.swf?token=1d5_1195058251[/FLASH]A recent AP article released sobering numbers about our nation’s veterans: they make up 25 percent of homeless persons, while representing just 11 percent of the overall population.

The data is already a couple of years old, which does not bode well for the future:

Some advocates say such an early presence of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan at shelters does not bode well for the future. It took roughly a decade for the lives of Vietnam veterans to unravel to the point that they started showing up among the homeless. Advocates worry that intense and repeated deployments leave newer veterans particularly vulnerable.

"We're going to be having a tsunami of them eventually because the mental health toll from this war is enormous," said Daniel Tooth, director of veterans affairs for Lancaster County, Pa.

The image of a healthy soldier returning from war, physically and mentally unscathed, is a fiction. If we are to demonstrate our true patriotism, then we must rehabilitate the present and future lives of those veterans who carried the biggest burdens of our declarations of war
:smh:
 
Back
Top