Trump's looking for a war ... Carrier Abraham Lincoln & Bombers sent to Persian Gulf

lightbright

Master Pussy Poster
BGOL Investor
Citing Iranian Threat, U.S. Sends Carrier Group and Bombers to Persian Gulf

05dc-military1-articleLarge.jpg
The aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln last month in the Mediterranean Sea off Spain. It has been rerouted to the Persian Gulf.


WASHINGTON — The White House announced on Sunday that the United States was sending an aircraft carrier strike group and Air Force bombers to the Middle East because of “troubling and escalatory indications and warnings” related to Iran.

The deployment was intended “to send a clear and unmistakable message to the Iranian regime that any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force,” said John R. Bolton, the national security adviser, in a statement released Sunday night.

[Sign up for the weekly At War newsletter to receive stories about duty, conflict and consequence.]

The announcement did not give any further information on the reasons for the commitment of military forces. An American military official said on Sunday night that whatever threat Mr. Bolton cited had most likely emerged in the previous 24 to 48 hours because as of late Friday, military analysts were not tracking any new, imminent or clearly defined Iranian or Iranian-backed threats against Americans in Iraq or the region.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, when asked by reporters about Mr. Bolton’s statement on a flight to Finland, said, “It’s something we’ve been working on for a little while.”

“It is absolutely the case that we’ve seen escalatory action from the Iranians, and it is equally the case that we will hold the Iranians accountable for attacks on American interests,” he said. “The fact that those actions take place, if they do, by some third-party proxy, whether that’s a Shia militia group or the Houthis or Hezbollah, we will hold the Iranians — Iranian leadership — directly accountable for that.”

There have been escalating rounds of fatal violence between Hamas, the armed Palestinian group in Gaza, and the Israeli military in recent days, but an American official said that was not related to the military ramp-up in the Persian Gulf. Although Iran has provided financing to Hamas, there is no sign that it was involved in the recent rocket attacks against Israel.

“The United States is not seeking war with the Iranian regime, but we are fully prepared to respond to any attack, whether by proxy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps or regular Iranian forces,” Mr. Bolton said in the statement.

The carrier group heading to the Persian Gulf is that of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, which has been in the Mediterranean Sea. There is no carrier strike group currently in the Persian Gulf, but such groups often transit through those waters since the Suez Canal is in the region.

At the end of April, the Abraham Lincoln and its fleet of accompanying ships trained alongside other American vessels and military units from the United Kingdom, Spain and France.

A Pentagon spokesman confirmed the military moves as outlined in Mr. Bolton’s statement but declined to provide more details.

“We will not distinguish between attacks from Shia militias in #Iraq and the #IRGC that controls them,” Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican of Florida and member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Monday morning on Twitter. “Any attack by these groups against U.S. forces will be considered an attack by #Iran & responded to accordingly.”

The Trump administration has taken a hard-line policy against Iran and has said it aims to force Iran to lessen or end its support for Shiite militias and other groups across the Middle East.







CONTINUED:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/05/world/middleeast/us-iran-military-threat-.html

.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking a War would help his re-election bid....you know being tuff on enemies of the states. He has already mentioned getting an extra two years on this term because of time lost dealing with those who opposed him. A nice WAR against Iran would be just what he is looking for for a distraction while he slips his true intent under the table. It will be decades before we are truly free of this guy, decades.
 
Last edited:
So the democrats out the business of bombing sand cacs now? This might be something they finally agree on. Team Israel, bomb the sand people. :smh:
 
I'm thinking a War would help his re-election bid....you know being tuff on enemies of the states. He has already mentioned getting an extra two years on this term because of time lost dealing those who opposed him. A nice WAR against Iran with be just what he is looking for for a distraction while he slips his true intent under the table. It will be decades before we are truly free of this guy, decades.
No it won’t after Iraq people are a bit Queasy about this stuff now especially if There is no direct attack from Iran
 
No it won’t after Iraq people are a bit Queasy about this stuff now especially if There is no direct attack from Iran
You may be right but if there is another "Iranian Naval incident" that will be all that it takes to ignite it...Remember how Trump criticized President Obama for being soft on that issue? It will be another avenue for Trump to show up that Obama.
 
Typical repug move. The ramifications are many, including the modification of the president's powers during a military conflict. And rarely will people vote against a sitting president when they feel a war is going on or a hostile power is on the loose.
 
Back
Top