Trayvon Martin - After The Verdict

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

From the Very Beginning:



As they began deliberating in George Zimmerman's murder trial, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">3 of the 6 jurors wanted to acquit</span> him while the other three wanted to convict him of either murder or manslaughter, one of the jurors said.


 

The woman, who was identified just as Juror B37, spoke
exclusively to CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" on Monday
night. She is the first juror to speak publicly about the case





<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/vvrpp4SODBE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


 

Part Two




<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/hyO65lOx0r4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

The Reaction of Rachel Jentel


<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/07/16/pmt-jeantel-sot-zimmerman-not-bashed.cnn&contentId=us/2013/07/16/pmt-jeantel-sot-zimmerman-not-bashed.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/07/16/pmt-jeantel-sot-zimmerman-not-bashed.cnn&contentId=us/2013/07/16/pmt-jeantel-sot-zimmerman-not-bashed.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="234"></embed></object>

 
Trayvon never had a chance in the so called justice system. The state took a month to even investigate the killing throughly. The charges were brought several months later, Zimmerman was treated as the victim from the start, the prosecution was not engaged in fighting for Tayvon's justice,. the jury had no empathy for Trayvon's life or death and the media wasn't interested until MSNBC and then president Obama acknowledged it publicly.


If this isn't a telling moment, then what is?
 
The best way to argue the morality of this case is to address the accountability of Zimmerman being wrong.

Conservatives are celebrating an affirmation of Zimmerman being able to defend himself when he feels threatened, and conservatives are taking it for granted that it equals that Martin was actually a threat. The trial, as far as I know did not give that status to Martin.

It's a fairly simple thing to point out that Zimmerman believed he was under threat but was wrong. He took a life under an ultimately false assumption. He does have a right to exercise his right to self-defense but he should face the consequences of his actions which is supposed to fit the conservative ideal of personal responsibilty.

Conservatives readily want a welfare mother to face the realities of her choices by cutting off an economic subsidy, but will happily endorse Zimmerman's wrong choice with a subsidization of the optimal political cost.

Proving conservatives as hypocrites while bypassing the racism aspect should be very easy.
 
Trayvon never had a chance in the so called justice system. The state took a month to even investigate the killing throughly. The charges were brought several months later, Zimmerman was treated as the victim from the start, the prosecution was not engaged in fighting for Tayvon's justice,. the jury had no empathy for Trayvon's life or death and the media wasn't interested until MSNBC and then president Obama acknowledged it publicly.


If this isn't a telling moment, then what is?

The best way to argue the morality of this case is to address the accountability of Zimmerman being wrong.

Conservatives are celebrating an affirmation of Zimmerman being able to defend himself when he feels threatened, and conservatives are taking it for granted that it equals that Martin was actually a threat. The trial, as far as I know did not give that status to Martin.

It's a fairly simple thing to point out that Zimmerman believed he was under threat but was wrong. He took a life under an ultimately false assumption. He does have a right to exercise his right to self-defense but he should face the consequences of his actions which is supposed to fit the conservative ideal of personal responsibilty.

Conservatives readily want a welfare mother to face the realities of her choices by cutting off an economic subsidy, but will happily endorse Zimmerman's wrong choice with a subsidization of the optimal political cost.

Proving conservatives as hypocrites while bypassing the racism aspect should be very easy.

Very well put!!!:yes::yes::yes:
 
The best way to argue the morality of this case is to address the accountability of Zimmerman being wrong.

Conservatives are celebrating an affirmation of Zimmerman being able to defend himself when he feels threatened, and conservatives are taking it for granted that it equals that Martin was actually a threat. The trial, as far as I know did not give that status to Martin.

It's a fairly simple thing to point out that Zimmerman believed he was under threat but was wrong. He took a life under an ultimately false assumption. He does have a right to exercise his right to self-defense but he should face the consequences of his actions which is supposed to fit the conservative ideal of personal responsibilty.

Conservatives readily want a welfare mother to face the realities of her choices by cutting off an economic subsidy, but will happily endorse Zimmerman's wrong choice with a subsidization of the optimal political cost.

Proving conservatives as hypocrites while bypassing the racism aspect should be very easy.


Was this even necessary?
 

You can't "bypass the racism" in the Zimmerman murder trial. The murder trial was all about racism. The murderers defense lawyers central thesis of their defense of murderer Zimmerman, was that the scary looking, tall, menacing Black man-child, Trayvon, attacked the helpless murderer Zimmerman, punching him to the ground, and then ponding his head on the concrete over and over again until murderer Zimmerman had no recourse but to pump a hollow point bullet into the child Trayvon Martin’s heart. The lawyers defending the murderer Zimmerman abandoned any “stand-your-ground” defense because arguing “stand-your-ground” would of brought into reality the fact that Trayvon Martin had a right to also “stand-your-ground”. Instead the lawyers representing the murderer Zimmerman went with the scary ****** defense; a direct racist appeal to an all white female jury. Raw, naked, unbridled, unapologetic, unashamed, racism, —not hypocrisy. Racist, conservatives, RepubliKlans do not respond to their being exposed as hypocrites, especially when centuries old embedded racist beliefs are concerned.




Save Your Breath, Zimmerman Supporters

The Black Community Know You Better Than You Know Yourselves


<img src="http://cdn.madamenoire.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Eric-Wattree-240x221.jpg" width="150">
by Eric L. Wattree | Monday, July 15, 2013

The vast majority of people in this country - both Black, White, and others - are good people. While we all have a strain of racism in us, it’s not a conscious racism, and most of us of normal intelligence are engaged a constant internal struggle eradicate it when we recognize it in ourselves. What makes it such a struggle is we’re constantly inundated by it in this country, and the reason we try so desperately to weed it out is, being of normal intelligence, we see it for what it is - a form of gross stupidity.
.
But as a Black man - one who has three mixed grandsons, including Eric Wattree III, and a daughter-n-law who is so pure in her White heritage that she makes Mitt Romney look like an Angolan immigrant - I’ve found the debate over the George Zimmerman verdict very enlightening. I used to think that racism was a choice, but now I see that there is a group of people, of normally good conscience, in this country whose racist strain is so innate to who they are that they are completely blind to it. They don’t intend to be racist, nevertheless, their racist attitudes and assumptions seep all the way to their bone marrow. We’ve seen a clear example of that in the Zimmerman verdict.
.
It takes either racism or a complete lack of common sense not to clearly recognize that racism played a huge role in both George Zimmerman’s motives, and his intent. First, the only thing that caught Zimmerman’s attention about Trayvon Martin was the fact that he was a Black male. Secondly, Zimmerman contacted 911 more than 40 times, and virtually every call involved Black males. Third, Zimmerman was instructed to remain in his car, and he ignored those instructions. Fourth, Zimmerman claimed he murdered Trayvon in self-defense, but regardless to what took place after he approached Trayvon, Zimmerman had to approach Trayvon to place himself in a position to require him to have to defend himself. And fifth, Zimmerman claimed that he had to resort to lethal force because Trayvon, who weighed 40 pounds less than him, was banging his head against the concrete so vigorously that it caused him to fear for his life. Yet, all he had to show for this brutal assault were a few scratches, not the huge lumps on his head that you would expect from a person whose head had been banged against concrete.

Thus, I feel safe in saying that no parent in America - Black or White - would find that anywhere close to a justifiable excuse for the murder of their child - a child who was doing nothing more criminal than going to the store to get a bag of Skittles. So I submit that it takes either gross racism or gross stupidity to accept such a story as a justification for murder.

In order for people to accept such a story they have to also accept the fact that, 1) simply because Trayvon was Black was an acceptable reason for Zimmerman to suspect him of criminal activity. 2) Again, because Trayvon was Black, he posed a serious enough threat to the community to justify Zimmerman ignoring police instructions to remain in his car. 3) Since Trayvon was Black, they should ignore the fact that Zimmerman actually approached him in the first place. And finally, 4) since Trayvon was Black, it was the height of audacity for him to think he had the right to defend himself after being confronted by a man who wasn’t a police officer, and who didn’t have any visible sign of authority.
.
If we accept that as the standard for justice in this country, that could cause murder-for-hire to overtake drug dealing as an easy source of disposable income. What’s to prevent some woman’s boyfriend from dragging her husband in an alley, blowing his brains out, and then calling the police and claiming self-defense? Or what’s to prevent a robber from killing his victim to cover his crime, and then calling the police and claiming he was attacked? Thus, the standard that Zimmerman was freed on was absolutely ridiculous - and clearly racist in nature.
.
An assault is an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. So just by following, and then walking up to Trayvon at night constituted was an assault, because you don't have to put your hands on a person for it to constitute an assault. Putting you hands on them is assault and battery. An assault is merely placing them in fear for their well being. So it was Trayvon who had the right to defend himself. If the exact same scenario had taken place, but it had been a Black man who killed a White kid, the Black man would undoubtedly already be on Death Row - for first degree murder.
.
But Black people are used to such ridiculous standards being applied to them, because many Americans, when it comes to self-serving comfort of racism, have a pronounced blind spot - and it’s historic in nature. The blind arrogance of many Americans is absolutely astounding - and then they’ll say things like, "There you go playing the race card again!" Of course we are, because you’re a racist, idiot!
.
How in the hell can a White person even presume to tell a Black man about racism, and the state of racism in America? They have absolutely no idea what America looks like through the eyes of a Black man. George Zimmerman stalked an unarmed Black child, who was minding his own business, AFTER being told by the police to stay in his car, then shot and killed him. That’s murder, regardless to how you slice it - Period.
.
Now, I love this country, but I don’t suffer any illusions about what it represents. But if you relate the truth about this country to some White folks - especially conservatives - they’re so blind to reality that they’ll call you un-American, regardless to how many facts you bring to bear. The reason for that is, as Americans, we’re expected to adhere to an unspoken agreement to perpetuate the American myth.
.
But the easily demonstrable fact is, the United States is one of the most racist countries on the face of the Earth - and it always has been. All this "freedom and justice for all" was a lie when it was written, and it's still a lie.
.
Again, Americans have a delusional blind spot when it comes to this country. We condemned Hitler for killing 6 million Jews, but we conveniently ignore the fact that Americans killed over 100 million Native Americans - and some historians place the number at closer 300 million. We call Al Qaeda unconscionable terrorists for killing three thousand Americans, then we trot right over to Iraq and kill over one million innocent women and children - and for absolutely nothing! Then we talk about the war against terrorism, but we're the only country on Earth that has dropped not one, but two, atomic bombs on Japan - one each, on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing and maiming thousands of innocent men, women, children, cute little puppies, and cuddly little kittens.
.
Yeah, I know - we were at war with Japan. But we were at war with the Japanese government, not innocent noncombatants, and terrorism is defined as "the killing of innocent noncombatants for political purposes." So based on that definition, the United States is the most brutal and prolific terrorist nation in the history of mankind - and I didn't even mention the atrocities committed during slavery, the Jim Crow years, and during WWII when Black war heroes were forced to give up their seats on the train for Nazi prisoners of war.
.
So George Zimmerman supporters can talk until their mouths are dry about why he was justified in killing that innocent child, but they’re not fooling the Black community for one second. Because contrary to what they’ve obviously convinced themselves to believe, being a minority and being dumb is far from synonymous, so we know them much better than they obviously know themselves.

http://wattree.blogspot.com/2013/07/save-your-breath-zimmerman-supporters.html



<img src="http://70.38.64.76/g/1/fe8dc380-f0e6-4470-a082-d8cd32539e71.JPG" width="300">
MLK-Hoodie.jpg
 


<img src="http://cdn.madamenoire.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Eric-Wattree-240x221.jpg" width="150">
by Eric L. Wattree
Monday, July 15, 2013



Thus, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">I feel safe in saying that no parent in America - Black or White - would find that anywhere close to a justifiable excuse for the murder of their child</span> - a child who was doing nothing more criminal than going to the store to get a bag of Skittles. So I submit that it takes either gross racism or gross stupidity to accept such a story as a justification for murder.

In order for people to accept such a story they have to also accept the fact that,

1) simply because Trayvon was Black was an acceptable reason for Zimmerman to suspect him of criminal activity.​

2) Again, because Trayvon was Black, he posed a serious enough threat to the community to justify Zimmerman ignoring police instructions to remain in his car.​

3) Since Trayvon was Black, they should ignore the fact that Zimmerman actually approached him in the first place. And finally,​

4) Since Trayvon was Black, it was the height of audacity for him to think he had the right to defend himself after being confronted by a man who wasn’t a police officer, and who didn’t have any visible sign of authority.​






“<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">I am 101 percent certain that he</span> [George Zimmerman] <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">should have
done what he did
</span>, except for the things he did before [he shouldn't
have gotten out of his car or pursued Trayvon Martin]. But <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">when
the end came the end, he</span> [George Zimmerman] <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">was justified in
shooting Trayvon Martin
.</span>"




<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=crime/2013/07/16/ac-exclusive-juror-b37-zimmerman-justified.cnn&contentId=crime/2013/07/16/ac-exclusive-juror-b37-zimmerman-justified.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=crime/2013/07/16/ac-exclusive-juror-b37-zimmerman-justified.cnn&contentId=crime/2013/07/16/ac-exclusive-juror-b37-zimmerman-justified.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="234"></embed></object>


 


"I believe he [Trayvon Martin] played a huge role in his death,"
"He could have . . . when George confronted him, and he could
have walked away and gone home. He didn't have to do
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">what-ever he did
</span> and come back and be in a fight,"

Juror B37

fe8dc380-f0e6-4470-a082-d8cd32539e71.JPG


 

Trayvon Martin's Death Sparks Widespread Outrage
Over Florida's "Stand Your Ground" Law



<param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=52504666^17100^79310&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc2c0746" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=52504666^17100^79310&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit NBCNews.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.nbcnews.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>



 
ee4c65a4-c05e-46fe-ac12-b101c474d5b1.JPG


Goodbye to my American dream

My mom moved us here for a better life. But as a black woman,
I'm tired of loving a country that can't love me back


<img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/07/tiffianie_drayton-620x412.jpg" width="400">

by Tiffanie Drayton | July 18, 2013


http://www.salon.com/2013/07/16/goodbye_to_my_american_dream/

On the day of college graduation, I told my friends and family the news: I was leaving the country I had lived in since childhood.

“I just need a change,” I told them, but they knew there was more. Was it some romance gone awry, they wondered? Some impulsive response to a broken heart? And I was running from heartbreak. My relationship with the United States of America is the most tumultuous relationship I have ever had, and it ended with the heart-rending realization that a country I loved and believed in did not love me back.

Back in the ’90s, my mother brought me from our home in the Caribbean islands to the U.S., along with my brother and sister. I was 4 years old. She worked as a live-in nanny for two years, playing mommy for white kids whose parents had better things to do. She took trips to the Hamptons and even flew on a private jet to California as “the help.” My mom didn’t believe that nanny meant maid, but she did whatever was asked of her, because she was thirsty. She had a thirst that could only be quenched by the American dream. One day, she thought, her children would be educated. One day, they might have nannies of their own.

That was our path. Get a “good education.” When the neighborhoods with quality schools became too expensive for my mom to afford as a single parent with three kids, we traversed the United States with GreatSchools.net as our compass. New Jersey, elementary school: decent, mostly Hispanic school, even though my gifted and talented program was predominantly Indian. Texas, middle school: “Found a great school for you guys,” my mom said while rain poured into our car through the open windows where the straps of our mattresses were tied down. It had an “A” grade and was 70 percent white. Florida, high school: “Hey, Tiffanie, you should have this egg. It’s the only brown one like you!” my classmate told me during AP biology. Philadelphia, Hawaii, North, South, East, West. Car, U-Haul, Greyhound, plane, train. New York City, private university: “I really want to write an essay on being the gentrifier,” one courageous young man pitched in a journalism class. I was one of only two people who were disturbed.

For a long time I survived by covering myself in the labels I’d accumulated over the years. I plastered each one to my body with super glue as if they were Post-It note reminders that I was someone. Sports fanatic (hot pink). Feminist, beautiful, writer, comedian, fashionista, friend (fuchsia, yellow, blue, purple, red, green). I hid behind them; they were my only shields.

‪Green covered my eyes when a childhood friend’s family banged down my front door and demanded their daughter get out of the house full of blacks. Blue protected my heart when my black peers ostracized my enjoyment of complete, complex sentences. Yellow blocked my ears when whispers floated through the air at my ex-white-American boyfriend’s home like haunted ghosts: I can’t believe he is dating a black girl. The words passed like a gentle breeze barely creating flutter.‬

I existed right there on the fringe of ugly, ignorant and uncultured. Black but not black enough for my positive attributes to be justified. “Where are you from?” potential dates asked when they met me. “I am from Trinidad and Tobago,” I said. “Oh, that’s why you are so beautiful and exotic — I knew you couldn’t be all black.”

“Black people don’t really know how to swim,” my co-worker once told me when I worked as a swim instructor at my neighborhood’s pool. “What about me?” I asked. “Oh, you aren’t black. You’re from Trinidad,” she said.

“The black children don’t like to read very much,” I overheard one librarian discussing with another while I sat down reading a book a couple feet away. They passed right by me with smiles.

I was the model minority — absent, yet present. The yardstick to which other minorities were measured. If I could finish high school and college, why couldn’t so many African-American people find their way out of their hoods and pull themselves up by their bootstraps? If I could speak English without using a single ebonic slang, why do others call themselves “niggas”? If I managed to make it through 23 years without contracting an STD or getting pregnant, why do black women have the highest statistical risk of disease and teenage motherhood? Daddy America looked to me to prove that he did something right. After all, one of his children turned out all right. The others must simply be problem kids.

I survived because I was never able to make America my home. I never watched my childhood neighborhood become whitened by helicopter lights in search of criminals or hipsters in search of apartments. No state, city or town has been a mother to me, cradling generations of my family near her bosom, to then be destroyed by unemployment or poverty. No school system had the time or opportunity to relegate me to “remedial,” “rejected” or “unteachable.” I never accepted the misogynistic, drug-infested, stripper-glamorizing, hip-hop culture that is force-fed to black youths through square tubes. I am not a product of a state of greatness but a byproduct of emptiness.

In that empty, dark space I found my blackness. I stripped myself of the labels, painfully peeling them off one by one. Beneath them there is a wounded, disfigured colored woman who refuses to be faceless anymore, remain hidden any longer. My face may be repulsive to some since it bears proof that race continues to be a problem.

Still, I count myself lucky. Where my open cuts remain, eventually scars will take their place and those scars will fade with time. For many, their wounds will never heal. Gunshots bore coin-size holes into their chests that will never close. Their chained wrists and ankles will continue to bruise. Their minds have collapsed under the weight of a failed education system.

I was already back in Trinidad and Tobago when the Trayvon Martin verdict came down last week. I wasn’t surprised, but I was speechless. My hope is that it will force Americans to reexamine their “post-racial” beliefs. A friend of mine posted on my Facebook page, “You made the right choice.” I think I did, too.

I have found freedom by leaving the land of the free.




<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="6"></hr>


<img src="http://www.bartcop.com/nugget-asshole-day.jpg" width="400"><img src="http://www.bartcop.com/zim-talk.jpg" width="500">
 
Last edited:
I just read the same article, she was on the Young Turks. She was talking about how the school districts changed the zoning to keep blacks out.

They keep showing immigrants coming over from Mexico for propaganda something North Korea would do but there is hardly any from Europe. Most just come over for the money due to the exchange rates. Once that is gone, they will stop coming.

If people knew what really goes on they wouldnt come at all such as mass surveillance to suppress dissent.

I would like to do the same thing, check out a different environment.
 
I just read the same article, she was on the Young Turks. She was talking about how the school districts changed the zoning to keep blacks out.

They keep showing immigrants coming over from Mexico for propaganda something North Korea would do but there is hardly any from Europe. Most just come over for the money due to the exchange rates. Once that is gone, they will stop coming.

If people knew what really goes on they wouldnt come at all such as mass surveillance to suppress dissent.

I would like to do the same thing, check out a different environment.

. . . luckily, this got through !

 
Rachel Jeantel and Juror B37:
2 women, 2 tales, 1 trial​



The divide between these two women, their perceptions of
the case and the two men involved, reflect the same gulf on
display nationally in the aftermath of Zimmerman’s acquittal.

If America is having a “conversation” about race, it’s happening
in different rooms. The vast majority of black Americans are
certain race played a role in Martin’s death. Another poll
shows that a majority of white Americans believe it did not.


<IFRAME SRC="http://thegrio.com/2013/07/18/rachel-jeantel-and-juror-b37-2-women-2-tales-1-trial/" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://thegrio.com/2013/07/18/rachel-jeantel-and-juror-b37-2-women-2-tales-1-trial/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
ee4c65a4-c05e-46fe-ac12-b101c474d5b1.JPG


Goodbye to my American dream
My mom moved us here for a better life. But as a black woman,
I'm tired of loving a country that can't love me back

tiffianie_drayton-620x412.jpg


by Tiffanie Drayton | July 18, 2013

http://www.salon.com/2013/07/16/goodbye_to_my_american_dream/

On the day of college graduation, I told my friends and family the news: I was leaving the country I had lived in since childhood.

“I just need a change,” I told them, but they knew there was more. Was it some romance gone awry, they wondered? Some impulsive response to a broken heart? And I was running from heartbreak. My relationship with the United States of America is the most tumultuous relationship I have ever had, and it ended with the heart-rending realization that a country I loved and believed in did not love me back.

Back in the ’90s, my mother brought me from our home in the Caribbean islands to the U.S., along with my brother and sister. I was 4 years old. She worked as a live-in nanny for two years, playing mommy for white kids whose parents had better things to do. She took trips to the Hamptons and even flew on a private jet to California as “the help.” My mom didn’t believe that nanny meant maid, but she did whatever was asked of her, because she was thirsty. She had a thirst that could only be quenched by the American dream. One day, she thought, her children would be educated. One day, they might have nannies of their own.

That was our path. Get a “good education.” When the neighborhoods with quality schools became too expensive for my mom to afford as a single parent with three kids, we traversed the United States with GreatSchools.net as our compass. New Jersey, elementary school: decent, mostly Hispanic school, even though my gifted and talented program was predominantly Indian. Texas, middle school: “Found a great school for you guys,” my mom said while rain poured into our car through the open windows where the straps of our mattresses were tied down. It had an “A” grade and was 70 percent white. Florida, high school: “Hey, Tiffanie, you should have this egg. It’s the only brown one like you!” my classmate told me during AP biology. Philadelphia, Hawaii, North, South, East, West. Car, U-Haul, Greyhound, plane, train. New York City, private university: “I really want to write an essay on being the gentrifier,” one courageous young man pitched in a journalism class. I was one of only two people who were disturbed.

For a long time I survived by covering myself in the labels I’d accumulated over the years. I plastered each one to my body with super glue as if they were Post-It note reminders that I was someone. Sports fanatic (hot pink). Feminist, beautiful, writer, comedian, fashionista, friend (fuchsia, yellow, blue, purple, red, green). I hid behind them; they were my only shields.

‪Green covered my eyes when a childhood friend’s family banged down my front door and demanded their daughter get out of the house full of blacks. Blue protected my heart when my black peers ostracized my enjoyment of complete, complex sentences. Yellow blocked my ears when whispers floated through the air at my ex-white-American boyfriend’s home like haunted ghosts: I can’t believe he is dating a black girl. The words passed like a gentle breeze barely creating flutter.‬

I existed right there on the fringe of ugly, ignorant and uncultured. Black but not black enough for my positive attributes to be justified. “Where are you from?” potential dates asked when they met me. “I am from Trinidad and Tobago,” I said. “Oh, that’s why you are so beautiful and exotic — I knew you couldn’t be all black.”

“Black people don’t really know how to swim,” my co-worker once told me when I worked as a swim instructor at my neighborhood’s pool. “What about me?” I asked. “Oh, you aren’t black. You’re from Trinidad,” she said.

“The black children don’t like to read very much,” I overheard one librarian discussing with another while I sat down reading a book a couple feet away. They passed right by me with smiles.

I was the model minority — absent, yet present. The yardstick to which other minorities were measured. If I could finish high school and college, why couldn’t so many African-American people find their way out of their hoods and pull themselves up by their bootstraps? If I could speak English without using a single ebonic slang, why do others call themselves “niggas”? If I managed to make it through 23 years without contracting an STD or getting pregnant, why do black women have the highest statistical risk of disease and teenage motherhood? Daddy America looked to me to prove that he did something right. After all, one of his children turned out all right. The others must simply be problem kids.

I survived because I was never able to make America my home. I never watched my childhood neighborhood become whitened by helicopter lights in search of criminals or hipsters in search of apartments. No state, city or town has been a mother to me, cradling generations of my family near her bosom, to then be destroyed by unemployment or poverty. No school system had the time or opportunity to relegate me to “remedial,” “rejected” or “unteachable.” I never accepted the misogynistic, drug-infested, stripper-glamorizing, hip-hop culture that is force-fed to black youths through square tubes. I am not a product of a state of greatness but a byproduct of emptiness.

In that empty, dark space I found my blackness. I stripped myself of the labels, painfully peeling them off one by one. Beneath them there is a wounded, disfigured colored woman who refuses to be faceless anymore, remain hidden any longer. My face may be repulsive to some since it bears proof that race continues to be a problem.

Still, I count myself lucky. Where my open cuts remain, eventually scars will take their place and those scars will fade with time. For many, their wounds will never heal. Gunshots bore coin-size holes into their chests that will never close. Their chained wrists and ankles will continue to bruise. Their minds have collapsed under the weight of a failed education system.

I was already back in Trinidad and Tobago when the Trayvon Martin verdict came down last week. I wasn’t surprised, but I was speechless. My hope is that it will force Americans to reexamine their “post-racial” beliefs. A friend of mine posted on my Facebook page, “You made the right choice.” I think I did, too.

I have found freedom by leaving the land of the free.





<HR color=#ff0000 SIZE=6 noShade></HR>


Wow, talk about a weak generation. I guess she would have given up after emancipation.

Times were a lot tougher than they are now.

What are ancestors die for we take as a given.
 
How the Tea Party's "Black Conservatives"
Reacted to the Zimmerman Verdict​


In the hours after George Zimmerman was found not guilty of second-degree murder and acquitted on manslaughter charges, the Tea Party News Network — a shoestring operation that is exactly what it sounds like and that launched last fallsent out an email blast touting the voices of <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">"black conservatives"</span> sounding off on the verdict. The press release featured statements from five people, all of whom provided a view that seemed to clash with that of Rev. Al Sharpton.


cooper_sm.jpg

Horace Cooper

"While I’m thrilled with this outcome, it should never have come to this. This case should never have been brought forward," wrote Horace Cooper, a former law professor. "The rush to arrest and indict Zimmerman merely to appease the media or race-based interest groups not only jeopardized Mr. Zimmerman’s rights and liberty, but the precedent suggests that all of our rights could be infringed."

See more on Horace Cooper in this thread:
Black conservatives launch effort to scrap part of Voting Rights Act




portrait3l.jpg

Lisa Fritsch

"Despite a not guilty verdict, we must remember that George Zimmerman is not truly free," wrote Lisa Fritsch. "This trial will forever remain in his mind for his remaining days."



IMG_7910.JPGnt

Emery McClendon

"For too long, people such as the NAACP’s Ben Jealous and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have spoke out in hate and ignorance and found placement in the media," wrote Emery McClendon. "It’s time to stop the madness. We must turn the tide. If we put as much time into restoring our Constitution as we did into the Zimmerman trial, America would be a better place for all of us."

See more on Emery McClendon at Post No. 3 in this thread:
Congressional Black Caucus' Dangerous Violent Rhetoric: Declares 'War' on Racist Tea


Never heard of them?
Cooper, it turns out, was once a staffer for Dick Armey and was charged with five counts of public corruption for exchanging gifts from Jack Abramoff for political favors.

Fritsch, a Tea Partier and occassional Fox commenter, has ranted about the "diabolical liberal agenda...corrupting the black community."

McClendon, a self-described Tea Party activist in Iowa, has penned circuitous missives explaining why the Tea Party is not racist. (Why is the Tea Party not racist? Because "the tea parties are not picking on anyone because of color, ethnicity or race.")​

The three of them were writing for Project 21, a black conservative policy group. It's not totally clear from their HTML website what it is they do, other than provide commentary, but they sure made a splash in 2005 when the Senate passed a resolution apologizing for not doing more to stop lynchings of black people. Project 21 dismissed the resolution, and called on people "not to wallow in apologies and regrets." (This was a statement Fritsch, incidentally, helped to draft.)

Mychal Massie, until recently the head of Project 21, once lambasted Al Sharpton, saying he had "hijacked" MLK's message and "prostituted it for personal gain." Today, many of the center's policy papers are written by David Almasi, who heads the umbrella group to which Project 21 belongs and who is white.

See more on Mychal Massie, David Almasi and Project 21 in this thread:
Black conservatives launch effort to scrap part of Voting Rights Act



SOURCE

 
Wow, talk about a weak generation. I guess she would have given up after emancipation.

Times were a lot tougher than they are now.

What are ancestors die for we take as a given.
She doesn't owe it to you and white people to put up with your destructive bullshit.

I would leave to if I had another culture I identified with.
 
She doesn't owe it to you and white people to put up with your destructive bullshit.

I would leave to if I had another culture I identified with.


Wow, talk about a weak generation. I guess she would have given up after emancipation.

Times were a lot tougher than they are now.

What are ancestors die for we take as a given.


Damn you have a one track mind. Is there anything in that post that mentioned me?

However, like always, your response is spot on in telling why this generation feels that they are constantly repeating the past. They feel they owe their successes and advancements to no one. They have believed, hook, line and sinker, in the libertarian philosophy of "I built that".

I guess that's why they choose user names like GREED!
 
Damn you have a one track mind. Is there anything in that post that mentioned me?

However, like always, your response is spot on in telling why this generation feels that they are constantly repeating the past. They feel they owe their successes and advancements to no one. They have believed, hook, line and sinker, in the libertarian philosophy of "I built that".

I guess that's why they choose user names like GREED!
What "successes and advancements."

Study: 30-somethings worse off than their parents' generation

YOU built that.

Unfortunately, you're still building.
 
May be because the "30-somethings" hate public service. Gotta love that private sector.


Free market you know!
That is true. No wonder 30-somethings are broke.

Between the politicians and the 1% turnover in the bureaucracy, the public sector is where the money is.

About time you admit it, now you just need to admit that it's a bad thing.
 
That is true. No wonder 30-somethings are broke.

Between the politicians and the 1% turnover in the bureaucracy, the public sector is where the money is.

About time you admit it, now you just need to admit that it's a bad thing.

I guess you are right, record private sector profits prove the money is in the public sector.

Why am I arguing with a fool?
 
I guess you are right, record private sector profits prove the money is in the public sector.

Why am I arguing with a fool?
So now you're promoting that record private sector profits implies that the average working is doing well too?
 
AP Essay: Black male humanity shown in 'Fruitvale'

AP Essay: Black male humanity shown in 'Fruitvale'
By JESSE WASHINGTON | Associated Press
2 hours 27 minutes ago

Oscar Grant did not deserve to die.

This is the central message of "Fruitvale Station," a film dramatizing the real-life case of the young unarmed black man shot in the back by a white police officer in 2009. It's a common message, often heard in film and life in general. But the way writer/director Ryan Coogler delivers this message is extraordinary.

As portrayed by Michael B. Jordan (beware of plot spoilers ahead) Grant is a great father — and a convicted felon. He loves his girlfriend — and he cheats on her. He wants to hold down a legal job — and he can't make it to work on time. He's a drug dealer who takes time to make his bed in the morning, a hardened convict and a mama's boy — a thuggish angel.

By the time the credits roll, Oscar Grant has become one of the rarest artifacts in American culture: a three-dimensional portrait of a young black male — a human being.

Which raises the question: If Grant was a real person, what about all these other young black males rendered as cardboard cutouts by our merciless culture? What other humanity are we missing?

"Everyone either made Oscar out to be a saint, depending on whatever their political agenda was, and on the other side they made him out to be this villain," Coogler said in an interview.

"Everything he had ever done wrong in his life was magnified," Coogler said. "He was just a criminal, a thug, a drug dealer, and he deserved what he got. You live that type of lifestyle, you get what you deserve. His humanity was lost."

Grant was 22 years old in the early hours of New Year's Day, returning home to Oakland with his girl and other friends. In the film, a fight starts on the train when Grant encounters an enemy from prison. Police detained Grant and his friends on the platform of the Fruitvale station.

The police are abusive; Grant and friends respond with belligerence. Grant is being held face down on the platform, unarmed and struggling, when the officer shoots him once in the back. Numerous bystanders captured the scene on video.

That's the first scene of the film, using real video shot by bystanders. Then it jumps backwards one day to fill in the blanks of an average brother, to illustrate the mundane moments with family, friends and strangers that constitute real life.

When Grant's death hit the news, what much of the public saw was a convicted drug dealer who had been released from prison three months before his death. They saw a troublemaker who police said was resisting arrest. They didn't see everything else that's in "Fruitvale Station."

"If there's one thing missing in our country, it's an acknowledgment of the broad humanity of black folks," Ta-Nehisi Coates recently wrote on his blog at TheAtlantic.com. "Racism — and anti-black racism in particular — is the belief that there's something wrong with black people."

The remedy: "Close the gap between what they see and who we really are," Coates wrote.

Asked what it felt like to close that gap, the actor Jordan said, "It felt real. It felt like I was telling a story for young African-American males who are stereotyped and judged before people get a chance to know them."

"We wanted to let people know who this guy was through the people who knew him the best," Jordan said. "Show the good, bad and the ugly. Flaws and all."

"Fruitvale Station" is not unprecedented. It's part of a recent wave of independent black films, such as "Middle of Nowhere," that are putting authentic black characters on more screens than ever.

This can make a difference in how black men are perceived in the real world, said Ava DuVernay, who directed "Middle of Nowhere."

"A more complex, truer, authentic, comprehensive, non-caricature view of any person, of any kind of person, helps us all to understand each other a little bit more," Duvernay said. "When you're only getting one dimension, unfortunately it does do its work, and that is mostly negative."

We have seen the complex depths of black manhood before, from actors such as Sidney Poitier and Denzel Washington, or television's "The Wire," or Kanye West's music catalogue. Even major studios are presenting substantial black male roles this year with "12 Years a Slave" and "Lee Daniels' The Butler." (Although the roles are still, well, a slave and a butler.)

Perhaps it's serendipity, then, that gives "Fruitvale Station" so much power: The film started trickling into theaters as the verdict was delivered in the Trayvon Martin case.

The parallels are inescapable: two young black men shot dead, both unarmed, both with checkered pasts, both accused of being responsible for their own deaths.

"Often times people can deal with certain things happening to people when they don't see them as full human beings," Coogler said. "They're not real to you, you don't know them. What makes somebody a real person is those gray areas."

What were Trayvon Martin's gray areas? All many see is black and white.

"With 'Fruitvale' opening the weekend this verdict came down, it's one of these zeitgeist moments that can't be planned and can never be predicted," said DuVernay.

"In those moments, the power of film is so abundantly clear," she said. "These two lives, Oscar Grant and Trayvon Martin, really intersected in tragic and beautiful ways. One was made into a film that helps folks process and understand the tragedy of another."

The tragedy that Trayvon Martin did not deserve to die.

http://music.yahoo.com/news/ap-essay-black-male-humanity-shown-fruitvale-142027925.html
 
Back
Top