That this ranking is heavily based on LAST year and PRE-season expectations, fool. Rookies are clearly ranked based on predicted performance and a very small early sample. I'm sure Griffin is on the cusp of the Top 50, and will rank higher next year. Fool.
*Top 50 NBA Players (Active)*
- Thread starter Blunt
- Start date
That this ranking is heavily based on LAST year and PRE-season expectations, fool. Rookies are clearly ranked based on predicted performance and a very small early sample. I'm sure Griffin is on the cusp of the Top 50, and will rank higher next year. Fool.
Right, BGOL members know more about the NBA than the actual players, coaches and GMs. YOU should've been hired by a team by now.
Whatever list YOU came up with would be easily torn apart too. That's the nature of such LISTS and rankings, though some clearly have more value than others. You're free to disagree with the pros.
apparently so because jamison is clearly a wuss and has been for the past 4years. a 2nd tier contributor who isn't better than a lot of people he's ahead of. starts for the wuss mean nothing
then why bring in walls stats to prove your point?
you brought in his stats
so i brought in griffins stats who are better
now that griffins stats are better, the stats don't mean anything even though you're the one who brought up the stats in the 1st place
predicted performance, everyone i saw expected griffin to be very good this year, and he's even better than they thought.
again, if wall is in the top 50, then griffin isn't on the cusp of the top 50, he is clearly planted in the top 50, well ahead of wall.
To prove he's worthy of the ranking even if the list was compiled BEFORE the season started (which it likely was). He's lived up to the PREDICTION.
Then you should have posted this bullshit list LAST year, bitch.
Similar threads
