Top 10 movie flops of the decade : And the winner is................

Mr. Met

So Amazin
BGOL Investor
http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.reuters.com/top-10-movie-flops-decade-reuters

adventures_of_pluto_nash_verdvd.jpg


LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Movie flops aren't just about losing money. Yes, big budgets that go bust are one consideration. But flops are also about lofty expectations dashed and high profiles brought low. They trigger embarrassing catcalls from the peanut gallery and a general whoever-thought-that-was-a-good-idea-in-the-first-place bewilderment.

Any judgments of flopitude are necessarily subjective, but here are 10 movies from the past decade that made those few moviegoers who saw them cringe. Disagree? Talk among yourselves.

10. THE SPIRIT

* Release date: December 25, 2008

* Estimated cost: $60 million

* Domestic gross: $19.8 million

Frank Miller, the man who created the comics "300" and "Sin City," and who redefined Batman and Daredevil for the modern age, directed this adaptation of Will Eisner's comic-strip hero. Starring Samuel L. Jackson and a bevy of beauties, it may have looked good on the page. But onscreen, the heavily stylized, nearly black-and-white results were disastrous. The expensive movie was killed by comic fans, who wanted Miller to go back to comics, and critics, who trashed the movie's over-the-top tones and aesthetics. Consequently, the partners at the company behind the production, Odd Lot Entertainment, parted ways after 23 years together. It even killed plans for a Miller-directed version of "Buck Rogers."

9. GRINDHOUSE

* Release date: April 6, 2007

* Estimated cost: $67 million

* Domestic gross: $25 million

Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez managed to turn twice the filmmaking firepower into half the box office (and a third of the critical praise). With "Grindhouse," what began as an explicit exercise in joyous B-movie cinema homage -- a double bill of '70s-style schlock, one film from each director -- ended up aping its scuzzy genre ancestors a little too closely in the receipts department. After the three-hour-plus "Grindhouse" opened to a mere $11.6 million, Harvey Weinstein split the film's two parts -- "Death Proof" and "Planet Terror" -- and shuttled them to international markets individually. While that recouped a little of the Weinstein Co.'s money, it incurred the wrath of purists who were angry that the original film had been corrupted. Tarantino and Weinstein are famously loyal to each other, and while the writer-director eventually made good on the losses with the $120 million-grossing "Inglourious Basterds" this year, "Grindhouse" was one instance where loyalty nearly brought down the house.

8. ROLLERBALL

* Release date: February 8, 2002

* Estimated cost: $70 million

* Domestic gross: $19 million

Norman Jewison's 1975 comment on violence, corporatism and spectacle has its place in the paranoid '70s-era cult film pantheon. John McTiernan's remake, on the other hand, would be totally forgettable if it weren't so spectacularly misconceived in every way. The cast -- Jean Reno, Chris Klein, LL Cool J and Rebecca Romijn-Stamos -- was a C-list mishmash closer to reality TV than big-budget studio moviemaking. McTiernan had long since dented his box-office bona fides with "Last Action Hero" and "The 13th Warrior." And the studio releasing it -- MGM -- was so aware of its bomb-worthiness that it pushed the release back four times, out of the summer 2001 field and into the barren wasteland of February. In a last act of desperation, the movie was also re-edited from an R to a PG-13 rating, sabotaging any last chance it had at an audience. Ultimately, it pretty much wrecked McTiernan's career (he has directed only one film since).

7. THE INVASION

* Release date: August 17, 2007

* Estimated cost: $80 million

* Domestic gross: $15.1 million

Nicole Kidman couldn't have started the decade any hotter, scoring with "Moulin Rouge," "The Others" and "The Hours." But after 2002, her career went cold in the U.S. ("Stepford Wives," "Bewitched," "Australia" and "The Golden Compass"); it's as if the actress was abducted by some sort of soul-draining body snatcher. But wait, isn't that what she's fighting in "The Invasion," Hollywood's latest remake of the 1956 film "Invasion of the Body Snatchers"? This time around, the eerie premise, based on a novel by Jack Finney, failed to catch fire. The Wachowski brothers' second unit director, James McTeigue, was called in to shoot additional scenes written by the "Matrix" whiz kids after original director Oliver Hirschbiegel was sent packing, having filmed the bulk of the movie. In an omen of things to come, Kidman suffered an on-set fender-bender during the reshoots. When the film arrived in theaters more than a year late, Kidman's regal bearing took another dent.

6. CATWOMAN

* Release date: July 23, 2004

* Estimated cost: $100 million

* Domestic gross: $40 million

It was inevitable after Michelle Pfeiffer stole scenes as Catwoman in "Batman Returns" that her black-latexed anti-heroine would get a spinoff of her own. But when the inevitable occurred in 2004, this time with Halle Berry playing the character, audiences tried hard to cover up the kitty litter. No one involved with the movie came out unscathed. Not Berry, who just two years earlier had won an Oscar for "Monster's Ball"; not Sharon Stone, who chewed up the scenery as the movie's villainess; and not Pitof, the French filmmaker making his American directorial debut. He went back to his native land and hasn't directed a theatrical feature since. The movie is another example cited by studios in their long-held contention that female superhero movies just don't work.

5. TOWN & COUNTRY

* Release date: April 27, 2001

* Estimated cost: $90 million

* Domestic gross: $6.7 million

Twenty-five years after he seduced audiences in "Shampoo," Warren Beatty decided the time was ripe for another sex comedy, albeit one with a somewhat older circle of friends. He somehow persuaded New Line, which usually concentrated on the youth market, to foot the bill. And what a bill it was: With the script still furiously going through rewrites, Peter Chelsom began shooting in June 1998; 10 months and take after take after take later, the film was still shooting. That's when co-stars like Diane Keaton and Gary Shandling had to leave to fulfill other commitments. A full year later, the whole cast regrouped to finish the shoot, which had escalated to more than twice its original $44 million price tag. The completed film was actually something of a tepid affair. Beatty dithers as a New York architect who cheats on his wife with several women; Shandling's his best pal trying to come out as gay. And then there's Charlton Heston, playing against type, as a gun nut.

4. GIGLI

* Release date: August 1, 2003

* Estimated cost: $54 million

* Domestic gross: $6.1 million

If the course of true love rarely runs smoothly, then "Gigli" is an object lesson in how rocky it can get. As the new century dawned, Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez -- tabloid code name: Bennifer -- were the couple of the moment. With an Oscar for writing "Good Will Hunting" and starring roles in "Pearl Harbor" and "The Sum of All Fears," his movie career was in high gear; she could boast a solid-gold music resume and rom-com appeal in movies like "The Wedding Planner" and "Maid in Manhattan." Onscreen romantic sparks seemed made to order. So what went wrong? Start with that title, "Gigli," that no one was sure how to pronounce. Add lots of lovey-dovey media appearances that erased a bit of their mystique. And then there was Martin Brest's film itself: a low-rent-mobster-boy-meets-enforcer-chick tale complete with a kidnapping, severed thumbs and Al Pacino in high dudgeon. Bennifer split in 2004, just before sharing the bill in another film not too far away on the flop-o-meter, "Jersey Girl."

3. LAND OF THE LOST

* Release date: June 5, 2009

* Estimated cost: $100 million

* Domestic gross: $65 million

Producer/puppeteers Sid and Marty Kroft were masters of the weird and cheesy; their old Saturday morning TV show, "Land of the Lost," is remembered fondly by kids who grew up in the '70s. But the material experienced something of a time warp when director Brad Silbering tried to give it a hipster spin this summer with the help of Will Ferrell, playing a paleontologist who journeys to a parallel universe where he meets the Sleestaks. Normally, any movie with a rampaging Tyrannosaurus (see "Journey to the Center of the Earth," "Night at the Museum") can't miss, but "Lost" was, well, lost in translation. The movie's PG-13 rating wasn't a comfort to many families when word got around of its toilet humor. Older moviegoers weren't interested, and Kroft purists weren't amused. Over the years, Disney and Sony had both held remake rights, but ultimately this hot potato landed at Universal, where it was one of the factors that resulted in the ouster of the studio's two top executives in October.

2. BATTLEFIELD EARTH

* Release date: May 12, 2000

* Estimated cost: $75 million

* Domestic gross: $21 million

Blame it on the Thetans if you want, but John Travolta's space oddity "Battlefield Earth" virtually imploded on the launching pad. Travolta's career was enjoying a resurgence in the wake of "Pulp Fiction" when he wagered a big chunk of his newfound credibility, as well as some of his own coin, on this passion project. "Battlefield Earth" was based on a 1972 sci-fi novel by Scientology guru L. Ron Hubbard, which Travolta promised would be "like 'Star Wars,' only better." Studios shied away, but Travolta found financing from Franchise Pictures, which would later be sued by investors for overstating the movie's costs as $100 million. Originally, Travolta hoped to play the young hero who leads a rebellion against the alien race that enslaves Earth, but the film took so long to assemble he ultimately opted instead to don dreadlocks and platform shoes to play the villain, barking lines like "Execute all man-animals at will, and happy hunting!" A planned sequel, which would have covered the second half of the novel, never materialized. "Some movies run off the rails," observed Roger Ebert. "This one is like the train crash in 'The Fugitive.'"

1. THE ADVENTURES OF PLUTO NASH

* Release date: August 6, 2002

* Estimated cost: $100 million

* Domestic gross: $4.4 million

Eddie Murphy is some kind of miracle. Five of his recent films lost more than $250 million, and yet he not only still gets hired but also commands his salary quote. But on the flop-o-meter, one Murphy title towers above even "Meet Dave," "Showtime" and "I Spy": Trumpets, please, for "The Adventures of Pluto Nash," whose release was delayed for 14 months. It instantly became the "Cleopatra" of our age. A sci-fi gangster comedy, complete with robot sidekick, set on the moon, "Pluto" was neither fish nor fowl -- but mostly foul. But unlike most stars who are tarnished by a mega-flop, Murphy -- who did take time off from broad comedies to redeem himself with his Oscar-nominated turn in "Dreamgirls" -- just keeps going and going and going.
 
GIGLI should of been number 2

* Estimated cost: $54 million

* Domestic gross: $6.1 million

:eek:
 
GIGLI should of been number 2

* Estimated cost: $54 million

* Domestic gross: $6.1 million

:eek:


That aint shit.,......look at this

1. THE ADVENTURES OF PLUTO NASH

* Release date: August 6, 2002

* Estimated cost: $100 million

* Domestic gross: $4.4 million
:hmm::hmm::hmm:
 
Only movie on that list I saw was Grindhouse. The concept of that film went over the heads of nearly everyone I know who didn't know what it was about before seeing it.
 
That aint shit.,......look at this

1. THE ADVENTURES OF PLUTO NASH

* Release date: August 6, 2002

* Estimated cost: $100 million

* Domestic gross: $4.4 million
:hmm::hmm::hmm:

:lol::lol::lol: Pluto Nash was a WTF auto fail type movie.
That shit had no place being made.
 
:lol::lol::lol: Pluto Nash was a WTF auto fail type movie.
That shit had no place being made.

Lucky for Halle Berry her auto accident knocked her out of the female lead. Rosario Dawson got stuck with it (and is the best thing in the film, along with Randy Quaid).

Payback's a bitch though since Halle took over the Catwoman role at the last minute from Ashley Judd and suffered the consequences. At least she got a good paycheck.
 
Only movie on that list I saw was Grindhouse. The concept of that film went over the heads of nearly everyone I know who didn't know what it was about before seeing it.

:yes::yes::yes::yes::yes:

Grindhouse was so fucking ill, I watched that in theatres. I been meaning to cop the Blu Rays. I'm gonna have to do that. Those movies aren't for everyone though. It's just too much dialogue for some people.
 
I dont get it. I dont see how they getthe green light for this shit. Everyone of those flicks are shit.

And I like QT - I love his writing but that Grindhouse shit was indulgence at it's best. RR need to have his head examined for fucking Freddy like that. And I love Kurt Russell too, somebody give that man an award for something but come on.




oNE
 
Grindhouse should have been bigger, that was a fantastic trip to the movies, brought back memories of 70's flicks like a mug. I wish they would release the original cut on Blu-Ray.
 
Grindhouse should have been bigger, that was a fantastic trip to the movies, brought back memories of 70's flicks like a mug.

TRUE.


I just dont know where they went wrong. Had to be in the screenplay. The concept was BRILLIANT, the camerawork was perfect and the talent was on point.

The plotting for Death Proof was insane, the girls' dialogue ran from subtle and suspenseful to annoying in less than a twenty minutes. And every character was hyper cool. Too damn much. That was as indulgent as watching a Kevin Smith flick over an over an over - it's only smart and fresh for awhile.

Freddy Rodriguez gets a lead in Planet Terror but he gotta share the spotlight with ALL thses secondary sub characters. I'm like what the fuck let that man shine. Michael Bein IS THE SHIT but him and Rodrigues dont really get the chance to chew up the cornball shit. That bitch had a gun on her leg... okay... but somebody let Red Sonja know she's should not play camp because shes in camp. Believe in the camp bitch.




oNE
 
Only movie on that list I saw was Grindhouse. The concept of that film went over the heads of nearly everyone I know who didn't know what it was about before seeing it.

Agreed. Deathproof and those previews between the movies were classic.:lol:
 
TRUE.


I just dont know where they went wrong. Had to be in the screenplay. The concept was BRILLIANT, the camerawork was perfect and the talent was on point.

The plotting for Death Proof was insane, the girls' dialogue ran from subtle and suspenseful to annoying in less than a twenty minutes. And every character was hyper cool. Too damn much. That was as indulgent as watching a Kevin Smith flick over an over an over - it's only smart and fresh for awhile.

Freddy Rodriguez gets a lead in Planet Terror but he gotta share the spotlight with ALL thses secondary sub characters. I'm like what the fuck let that man shine. Michael Bein IS THE SHIT but him and Rodrigues dont really get the chance to chew up the cornball shit. That bitch had a gun on her leg... okay... but somebody let Red Sonja know she's should not play camp because shes in camp. Believe in the camp bitch.




oNE

Same here it had a strong buzz on the net and both RR and Tarantino have a large following, that's why Inglorious Basterds did so well.
 
Last edited:
I'm totally :eek::eek::eek::eek: that peice of shit LAND OF THE LOST made $65 million :smh:


Worst movie I seen this year!
 
Last edited:
:yes::yes::yes::yes::yes:

Grindhouse was so fucking ill, I watched that in theatres. I been meaning to cop the Blu Rays. I'm gonna have to do that. Those movies aren't for everyone though. It's just too much dialogue for some people.
I even waited until that shit was showing in the cheap, run down theatre I go to just to "enhance" the experience.
TRUE.


I just dont know where they went wrong. Had to be in the screenplay. The concept was BRILLIANT, the camerawork was perfect and the talent was on point.

The plotting for Death Proof was insane, the girls' dialogue ran from subtle and suspenseful to annoying in less than a twenty minutes. And every character was hyper cool. Too damn much. That was as indulgent as watching a Kevin Smith flick over an over an over - it's only smart and fresh for awhile.

Freddy Rodriguez gets a lead in Planet Terror but he gotta share the spotlight with ALL thses secondary sub characters. I'm like what the fuck let that man shine. Michael Bein IS THE SHIT but him and Rodrigues dont really get the chance to chew up the cornball shit. That bitch had a gun on her leg... okay... but somebody let Red Sonja know she's should not play camp because shes in camp. Believe in the camp bitch.




oNE
Here was the problem with that movie. The concept of the entire movie (fake trailers and all) wasn't explained in great detail to a lot of people. I knew a number of people who walked out after Planet Terror ended not even knowing that there was a second movie. Also, for most people the idea of being in a movie theatre for that long a period of time is torture even if its a movie that needs to be that long anyways.

In regards to the actual movies, I think the order they were shown may have been a problem. While I love Tarentino films, going from Planet Terror where shit was blowing up every 2 minutes to Death Proof where it doesn't really start picking up until the last 30 minutes or so could be a problem.

Agreed. Deathproof and those previews between the movies were classic.:lol:
Only thing I didn't like was that my theatre didn't show the fake trailer Hobo with a Shotgun. For those who didn't see it

 
I even waited until that shit was showing in the cheap, run down theatre I go to just to "enhance" the experience.

Here was the problem with that movie. The concept of the entire movie (fake trailers and all) wasn't explained in great detail to a lot of people. I knew a number of people who walked out after Planet Terror ended not even knowing that there was a second movie. Also, for most people the idea of being in a movie theatre for that long a period of time is torture even if its a movie that needs to be that long anyways.

In regards to the actual movies, I think the order they were shown may have been a problem. While I love Tarentino films, going from Planet Terror where shit was blowing up every 2 minutes to Death Proof where it doesn't really start picking up until the last 30 minutes or so could be a problem.


Only thing I didn't like was that my theatre didn't show the fake trailer Hobo with a Shotgun. For those who didn't see it



Man didn't know about that one.:lol:
 
Pacino was in Gigli?

Pacino AND Chistopher Walken were in it!

I couldn't wait to see that shit!

about halfway through the flick I turned to my girl and looked her DEAD in the face like :hmm:

....right up until:

Hadn't seen a single minute of Gigli until this clip, and even the wasn't worth it. Stopped after 30 seconds.

homie...gone and let that shit play.......seriously.......
 
those were good movies too, but what movie today isn't a crappy remake of some original?

Each movie stands on its own. There are plenty of bad original films and great remakes. And vice-versa.

I just noted that with two classic Invasion films already (and a few other tries at it), this new film was just one too many a retread (with a bigger budget).
 
Back
Top