almost a fair statement. it presumes that the chicago bulls could have "gone up" without michael jordan also. but the FACT is, that WITH michael jordan, the chicago bulls did "go up". the TRUTH is, that michael jordan steadily elevated the chicago bulls.
example: the 1994 milwaukee bucks were "in the trash" (20 wins). one could say they had "nowhere to go but up" after drafting glenn robinson. did they thrive and flourish? no. that's how then ended up in the same situation again 2 seasons later (25 wins)
not every player can elevate a team. so it's NOT a fair assumption that poor teams will simply improve with ANY addition of talent.
starts. how is it logically possible that a team with "the best player in basketball" LOSES MORE FREQUENTLY WHEN HE STARTS MORE GAMES? simple answer. it's not. therefore, that person can NOT be "the best player in basketball". consequently, that person can NOT be "the best player" even on his own team.
proof: i've already posted in several threads the fakers' win/loss record without tobe v. the fakers' win/loss record without shaquille o'neal. case closed.
the miami heat have performed better without dwyane wade this season. but i don't believe that dwyane wade's absence makes the miami heat a better team.
and NO, that does not minimize dwyane wade's talent. in fact, is should only further solidify the hierarchy that is already well known: shaquille o'neal is the most important player on the roster, followed by dwyane wade.
i agree. i didn't think this was a point of contention that needed acknowledgement. i'm not sure i see how discussing personnel with poor (or non-existent) work ethic is relevant to this thread.
i think steve kerr has 4 championship rings. but i may be mistaken. i don't really follow the careers of lebanese pussific 10 guards. like tobe, steve kerr was in the right place at the right time, and rode on the coat tails of a superior player and a winning coach.
because we all know how steve kerr managed to improve phoenix, cleveland, orlando and portland while he was with those teams, right?
lumping steve kerr into the same group as robert horry is as foul as throwing tobe into the same group as michael jordan.
first of all, robert horry was a starter on consecutive championships with the houston rockets. steve kerr was never a starter on any of the championship squads he played for.
second, robert horry was a major contributor to the rockets' success. if you watched the finals when the rockets swept the magic, you'd know that robert horry did WAY more for the rockets than either sam cassell or kenny smith.
third, robert horry was a major contributor to the fakers' championship teams too. as a fakers fan, you should appreciate the playoff minutes he logged even though he was rarely a starter. people like to mention robert horry's big last second shots, but i wonder why they seldom mention that he was the 2nd leading rebounder behind shaquille o'neal during 2 of those championship runs?
steve kerr belongs in the same category as jack haley (who is in the running for head coach of long beach state

). steve kerr has no business being lumped together with robert horry.
again, there's no idiots running around here (or anywhere else) talking nonsense about david robinson being "the best player in the game". even in david robinson's MVP season (the 2nd year of michael jordan's FIRST retirement), when he lead the san antonio spurs to the league's best record (62-20) and the WCF, NOBODY was saying dumb shit like "david robinson is the best player in the game".
david robinson owned hakeem olajuwon in the regular season, with the spurs winning the matchup 5-1.
so again, there's NO NEED to refute any bogus claims about david robinson, because nobody's making any bogus claims about him. but bogus claims about tobe are plentiful.
everybody knows the spurs didn't have a winning record for 6 consecutive seasons before david robinson. and everybody knows the spurs never again had a losing record in any season david robinson played. but tobe has 2005.
everybody knows that the spurs had 35 more wins with david robinson in his ROOKIE season. and that david robinson was ROTY. but tobe didn't start until his 3rd season.
everybody knows the spurs made the playoffs every season david robinson played. and the year david robinson didn't play, the spurs only won 20 games and didn't make the playoffs. but historical FACT PROVES that the fakers played better without tobe in the starting lineup. and again, tobe has 2005.
david robinson's record speaks for itself. and so does tobe's, if you're willing to examine it HONESTLY.
i DO enjoy watching allen iverson play. but as i've mentioned before, it's because i enjoy watching his speed and quickness (something few people can appreciate or understand) with the ball. i certainly don't "swear by" him.
and allen iverson more of a chucker? tobe was like what, DOUBLE the amount of 40+ FGA games than allen iverson, but tobe's NOT a bigger chucker?
NO. i'm not limiting this discussion to any group of seasons. i'm talking tobe's CAREER.
so am i. to date, this season is only his FOURTH best year in terms of assist per game.
in order from highest to lowest assist per game average, they are:
2005 (6 APG) - not a championship year
2003 (5.9 APG) - not a champioinship year
2002 (5.5 APG) - a championship year
2007 (5.4 APG) - not a championship year
so i clearly wasn't talking about championship seasons. and how do you figure tobe has more assists per game this season?
no hate. just TRUTH and an accurate perspective.
don't get me wrong. there are some aspects that are appealing and nostalgic. but when you distill it, it all comes down to who has the best ball handling, senior leadership, and big game experience.
by TALENT.
see, these are the types of comments that i think are unfair. and mildly surprsing coming from a fakers fan.
how can you make these comments about players and a team whose growth is prevented by tobe's play? when tobe hijacks the O, he necessarily retards the development of the players in the system.
IF GIVEN REASONABLE AMPLE OPPORTUNITY (for example, ALL of the games between november and december) to play TOGETHER within the system, i believe the fakers have (and HAVE had) the personnel to win 50 games.
the players can NOT learn how to react and develop instinctual behavior IN THE FAKERS SYSTEM during practice. these are characteristics established during in-game situations. tobe's inconsistent and erratic play IS the fatal flaw that makes narrowing the learning curve impossible.
all irrelevant. i talk BASKETBALL and don't concern myself with off-court intangibles. you don't need to be popular, nice, or best friends to win as a player or a coach. ask rick barry, dennis rodman or coach knight.
all the talk about perceived arrogance, tobe's criminal sexual assault charge, tattoos, cars, irish/mexican wife, is for tobe stans, NOT basketball fans.