TikTok influencer ordered to pay $1.75M for 'seducing' manager, leading to the end of his marriage. North Carolina's alienation of affection law

Database Error

Everything's Above Board
OG Investor

TikTok influencer ordered to pay $1.75M for 'seducing' manager, leading to the end of his marriage​



https%3A%2F%2Fs3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpocket-curatedcorpusapi-prod-images%2F6bde4a08-cf08-47f4-abb4-c317e652412f.jpeg



Brenay Kennard was sued by her manager's ex-wife under North Carolina's alienation of affection law, accused of coming between the married couple.

Nov. 12, 2025, 4:16 PM EST
By Doha Madani and Cristian Santana
A North Carolina jury ordered a TikTok influencer to pay $1.75 million to her manager’s ex-wife after the woman accused her of sparking the end of their marriage.

Brenay Kennard, who has 2.9 million followers on the app, was sued by her manager’s ex-wife, Akira Montague, under North Carolina’s alienation of affection law. In her complaint, Montague accused Kennard of getting close to her and using information from their friendship to pursue her husband.


Alienation of affection laws allow a spouse to file a lawsuit against a third party if they believe that person caused the other spouse to end their marriage. According to Cornell Law School, cases are typically filed against a person who caused the other spouse to cheat during the time of the marriage.

Tim Montague served as Kennard’s manager and Kennard was married to his cousin, according to the lawsuit.

Kennard, who is in a relationship with Montague, was accused of engaging “in behavior designed to seduce” the married man, including wearing short skirts and bending over in front of him in the attire, verbally flirting with him and “flicking her tongue to expose her tongue rings in a flirtatious manner,” the suit said.

Akira Montague said she confided in Kennard about personal matters, thinking they were friends, such as her husband’s infidelity during one of her pregnancies, the complaint said. She accused Kennard of having “utilized the personal information gained from the friendship to seduce.”

She learned of her husband’s affair with Kennard in January 2024, the suit said, because of a video of the two of them in the couple’s home.

The suit said that Kennard and Tim Montague exchanged “numerous sexual videos and text messages,” and frequently met in the Montagues’ marital home.

Kennard was also accused in the suit of planning and taking trips with the married man, making videos expressing her love for him, and making videos expressing her desire to marry him and have “four to five kids” with him.

Akira Montague said in her suit that her husband began to withdraw emotionally from her as a “direct result” of Kennard’s seduction. The suit alleges that he “began concealing his financial matters and expenses, including hiding the many outings, dates, transactions, and payments” involving Kennard.

“The Defendant has intentionally, wrongfully and unjustifiably interfered with the relationship between the Plaintiff and her Husband,” the suit said.

Akira Montague’s lawsuit described Kennard’s behavior as “malicious, unlawful, willful and wanton.”

Kennard was found liable for engaging in criminal conversation with Tim Montague and alienation of affection during his marriage, according to Monday’s jury decision.

According to the verdict form, the jury found Kennard liable for $250,000 for the criminal conversation claim and awarded another $1.5 million in damages for the alienation of affection claim.

Kennard criticized the jury’s decision, NBC affiliate WRAL reported. She said that Akira Montague gave her consent to the affair, something Montague denied in her lawsuit.

“She said it was okay because she knew her marriage was over with, and it was done,” Kennard said.

 
wife looks better....thats not really hard to do....honestly....

what was this nikka thinking?
Went down a rabbit hole a few months back about this...loong story, but the tik tok chick and tim got history from hs..I blame dude as well and there's nothing about brenay that would make me want to be with here over his wife. :smh: Just messy for no reason





 
I don't know why people love to break up a happy home.

Every time somebody is either married or in a relationship is when these women want to be with you but wouldn't even look a person's way if they were single.

Yes, sue that fat ugly bitch.
 
Those fucking charges are bullshit. She suffered humiliation mental and emotional distress... Bitch get over it. Take your divorce and be happy.

Suong somebody for fucking 2 million Because your husband couldn't stay faithful to some dumbass shit, and the dumbass courts gave it to her. Slippery slope. Every time I break up with a chick I'm a sue her saying emotional distress

Fuck outta here
 
I don't know why people love to break up a happy home.

Every time somebody is either married or in a relationship is when these women want to be with you but wouldn't even look a person's way if they were single.

Yes, sue that fat ugly bitch.
Yep ever hear that Women find a man.more attractive when he has ring on finger
 
Those fucking charges are bullshit. She suffered humiliation mental and emotional distress... Bitch get over it. Take your divorce and be happy.

Suong somebody for fucking 2 million Because your husband couldn't stay faithful to some dumbass shit, and the dumbass courts gave it to her. Slippery slope. Every time I break up with a chick I'm a sue her saying emotional distress

Fuck outta here
The tranny poster has spoken.
 
Those fucking charges are bullshit. She suffered humiliation mental and emotional distress... Bitch get over it. Take your divorce and be happy.

Suong somebody for fucking 2 million Because your husband couldn't stay faithful to some dumbass shit, and the dumbass courts gave it to her. Slippery slope. Every time I break up with a chick I'm a sue her saying emotional distress

Fuck outta here
The law is a little bit more complicated then that. You should research it.
 
We all know why that wide body Benz built bitch borrowed her beau.
Eat ass with captain crunch crumbs then get on the mic like..
 
The law is a little bit more complicated then that. You should research it.
Don't care enough. This ain't even me. But to be able to sue somebody before embarrassment or because they stole your husband or you stole a wife? We doing that? I can sue because I'm embarrassed and you embarrassed me? We doing that? You know how many lawsuits you could bring if that's what we doing now?

Cuz if that's what we doing now there's a lot of motherfuckers about to be playing basketball in pelican Bay
 
Don't care enough. This ain't even me. But to be able to sue somebody before embarrassment or because they stole your husband or you stole a wife? We doing that? I can sue because I'm embarrassed and you embarrassed me? We doing that? You know how many lawsuits you could bring if that's what we doing now?

Cuz if that's what we doing now there's a lot of motherfuckers about to be playing basketball in pelican Bay
:lol:Listen just listen :roflmao3:
It's not about embarrassment. Any third party, shit I believe if a psychiatrist were to suggest to a person that they should leave their spouse in nc ( lawsuit! ) It's a lot more to it then just she or he fucked your spouse and embarrassed you. In N.C. if a person intentionally lead a married individual to divorce court they might as well bring their asses to the courthouse too because they're next.




Screenshot-20251119-143834-Firefox.jpg

Screenshot-20251119-144652-Firefox.jpg
 
It is a big time slippery slope. Cheat on your spouse if you want to in NC
 
Is the pussy really worth it? I don't know no pussy that's worth $750 large
 
Yes if the stripper pursued a married person with the intention of destroying their marriage.
Okay so the stripper would have to prove that dude pursued her or she would have to prove that it was the usual back and forth attraction...so this law only applies in the rare case when someone goes above and beyond in regards to pursuing a married person?
 
Okay so the stripper would have to prove that dude pursued her or she would have to prove that it was the usual back and forth attraction...so this law only applies in the rare case when someone goes above and beyond in regards to pursuing a married person?
Yes but not only pursuing they called it the mother-in-law law. Say you're married your mother-in-law doesn't like you convinced your wife to divorce you then you can sue the mother-in-law for alienation of affection. People are getting hung up on the act of sex. I could fuck a married chick all day and the night but if I make it clear that all i want is sex and I'm not trying to get her to leave her husband for me then the law doesn't apply.
 
Yes but not only pursuing they called it the mother-in-law law. Say you're married your mother-in-law doesn't like you convinced your wife to divorce you then you can sue the mother-in-law for alienation of affection. People are getting hung up on the act of sex. I could fuck a married chick all day and the night but if I make it clear that all i want is sex and I'm not trying to get her to leave her husband for me then the law doesn't apply.
Got it...sounds like something that will be abused and will eventually be removed but a lot of people will suffer until that happens...but I get the intent based of what you said...its not just cheating
 
Back
Top