You gotta put some more "spect" on Patrice O'Neal name
Tiffany Haddish and Aries Spears accused of child sexual abuse. WTF?!!!
- Thread starter woodchuck
- Start date
You gotta put some more "spect" on Patrice O'Neal name
Martin Lawrence needs to be in with the greats, if not, the goods, imo.
Tiffany Haddish was never funny imo, and I’d take goddamn Shucky Ducky over Hannibal Burress.
this list went off the rails when Robin Williams,Redd Foxx,Don Rickles are not even listed
Sentient Dust Mite Aries Spears Is Getting Dragged Back To Irrelevance Thanks To These Tasteless Skits
The controversial "comedian" sparked outrage when he posted a since-deleted skit going in on plus-sized women.
Sentient Dust Mite Aries Spears Is Getting Dragged Back To Irrelevance Thanks To These Tasteless Skits
The controversial "comedian" sparked outrage when he posted a since-deleted skit going in on plus-sized women.bossip.com
Might want to lump Dan Schneider in there too,w/ all the shit he was pulling at Nickelodeon
It wasn't a list of all the greatest comedians ever, just a tier list
@ seeing what Tiffany does 1st before taking action@ Aries rubbing and smacking the pudding pop on Tiffany's face like SOMETHING ELSE
The suit, which was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleges that Haddish and Spears coerced two siblings on separate occasions to take part in the skits, including one named "Through a Pedophiles Eyes."
A woman and her younger brother have accused comedians Tiffany Haddish and Aries Spears in a new lawsuit of grooming them when they were children and coercing them into filming sexually explicit skits.
The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday by siblings identified only as Jane Doe, now 22, and John Doe, now 14. Jane, who is John's legal guardian, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit both individually and on her young brother's behalf.
The lawsuit alleges that Haddish and Spears coerced the siblings when they were children to take part in sexually explicit skits in separate incidents, which they say "stole the youth of a 7-year-old child and a 14-year-old child."
The lawsuit was first reported by The Daily Beast.
Attorneys for Haddish and Spears, however, have dismissed the lawsuit as a shakedown.
Andrew Brettler, an attorney for Haddish, said the plaintiff’s mother had “been trying to assert these bogus claims against Ms. Haddish for several years.”
Calling the allegations “meritless,” Brettler said Haddish had previously shown she “would not be shaken down.”
“Now, (the accuser's mother) has her adult daughter representing herself in this lawsuit. The two of them will together face the consequences of pursuing this frivolous action,” the attorney said.
In a separate statement, Debra Opri, an attorney for Spears, said the comedian “isn’t going to fall for any shakedown.”
The siblings knew Haddish and Spears as children because their mother shared a close relationship with Haddish, according to the lawsuit.
In 2013, Haddish appeared as a guest speaker at a summer camp Jane, then 14, attended, the lawsuit said. During the visit, Haddish allegedly told Jane that she had the “perfect role” for her.
Neither Jane nor her mother were aware of what the shoot would entail, the lawsuit alleged, adding: “Only Spears and Haddish knew the storyline for the skit."
The skit ended up involving Haddish teaching Jane how to mimic fellatio, however, the lawsuit alleged.
In the incident, the lawsuit said a video had begun playing in the recording studio showing an older man and college-age woman arguing over a sub sandwich, before eventually starting to eat the sandwich "simultaneously from either end." The two appeared to moan and make "sexual noises as they both ate the sandwich in a manner that simulated the act of fellatio," the lawsuit said.
Physically, emotionally, and mentally uncomfortable, Plaintiff Jane Doe mimicked the acts that Haddish and Spears wanted her to do so she could go home," it said.
The lawsuit alleged that the next year, Haddish told the siblings' mother she had a role for the younger brother, John, then 7, for a skit. "She only said it was a sizzle reel for Nickelodeon," the suit stated.
The plaintiffs' mother dropped off John and Jane together so that Jane could chaperone, but the siblings were told that they needed to be "separate" for the Nickelodeon skit, the lawsuit alleged.
It said John was later stripped "down to his underwear" for a skit titled "Through A Pedophiles Eyes" about a child being left with a man, played by Spears, who "leers at the child lustfully" in multiple scenes before massaging John with oil and later, getting into a bathtub with him and forcing the child "closer to him in the tub." In the final scene, the child is "portrayed as leering lustfully" at Spears, who is wearing only shorts, before beginning to rub oil onto his body, the lawsuit said.
The video ends with the words "WATCH WHO YOU LEAVE YOUR KIDS WITH!" appearing on the screen, the lawsuit alleged.
"After filming, Mr. Doe called his mother crying, saying he did not want to film anymore," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit alleged that the plaintiff's mother repeatedly asked both Spears and Haddish about "what was filmed that made her son cry," but Spears at one point told her the footage was still not edited and said he would get back to her about providing the unedited footage. Haddish said she did not have a copy of the footage, the lawsuit alleged, but said it was meant to be a funny skit.
Days later, Spears told the mother that John had been so uncooperative that the footage was unusable and was "deleted," the lawsuit alleged.
It was not until around four years later, in June 2018, that the mother learned that the skit featuring her son had been published online, including on the "Funny or Die" website.
"The mother, upset, stated that she would have never let her son participate in a pedophile child pornography skit," the lawsuit alleged.
"Funny Or Die found this video absolutely disgusting and would never produce such content," a spokesperson for the platform said in a statement.
"We were not involved with the conceptualization, development, funding, or production of this video. It was uploaded to the site as user-generated content and was removed in 2018 immediately after becoming aware of its existence," they said.
The lawsuit alleged that both Jane and John have developed social disorders, with Jane unable to "trust anyone" since the incident and John suffering from depression and anxiety. They are suing Haddish and Spears for damages.
A woman and her younger brother have accused comedians Tiffany Haddish and Aries Spears in a new lawsuit of grooming them when they were children and coercing them into filming sexually explicit skits.
The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday by siblings identified only as Jane Doe, now 22, and John Doe, now 14. Jane, who is John's legal guardian, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit both individually and on her young brother's behalf.
The lawsuit alleges that Haddish and Spears coerced the siblings when they were children to take part in sexually explicit skits in separate incidents, which they say "stole the youth of a 7-year-old child and a 14-year-old child."
The lawsuit was first reported by The Daily Beast.
Attorneys for Haddish and Spears, however, have dismissed the lawsuit as a shakedown.
Andrew Brettler, an attorney for Haddish, said the plaintiff’s mother had “been trying to assert these bogus claims against Ms. Haddish for several years.”
Calling the allegations “meritless,” Brettler said Haddish had previously shown she “would not be shaken down.”
“Now, (the accuser's mother) has her adult daughter representing herself in this lawsuit. The two of them will together face the consequences of pursuing this frivolous action,” the attorney said.
In a separate statement, Debra Opri, an attorney for Spears, said the comedian “isn’t going to fall for any shakedown.”
The siblings knew Haddish and Spears as children because their mother shared a close relationship with Haddish, according to the lawsuit.
In 2013, Haddish appeared as a guest speaker at a summer camp Jane, then 14, attended, the lawsuit said. During the visit, Haddish allegedly told Jane that she had the “perfect role” for her.
Neither Jane nor her mother were aware of what the shoot would entail, the lawsuit alleged, adding: “Only Spears and Haddish knew the storyline for the skit."
The skit ended up involving Haddish teaching Jane how to mimic fellatio, however, the lawsuit alleged.
In the incident, the lawsuit said a video had begun playing in the recording studio showing an older man and college-age woman arguing over a sub sandwich, before eventually starting to eat the sandwich "simultaneously from either end." The two appeared to moan and make "sexual noises as they both ate the sandwich in a manner that simulated the act of fellatio," the lawsuit said.
Physically, emotionally, and mentally uncomfortable, Plaintiff Jane Doe mimicked the acts that Haddish and Spears wanted her to do so she could go home," it said.
The lawsuit alleged that the next year, Haddish told the siblings' mother she had a role for the younger brother, John, then 7, for a skit. "She only said it was a sizzle reel for Nickelodeon," the suit stated.
The plaintiffs' mother dropped off John and Jane together so that Jane could chaperone, but the siblings were told that they needed to be "separate" for the Nickelodeon skit, the lawsuit alleged.
It said John was later stripped "down to his underwear" for a skit titled "Through A Pedophiles Eyes" about a child being left with a man, played by Spears, who "leers at the child lustfully" in multiple scenes before massaging John with oil and later, getting into a bathtub with him and forcing the child "closer to him in the tub." In the final scene, the child is "portrayed as leering lustfully" at Spears, who is wearing only shorts, before beginning to rub oil onto his body, the lawsuit said.
The video ends with the words "WATCH WHO YOU LEAVE YOUR KIDS WITH!" appearing on the screen, the lawsuit alleged.
"After filming, Mr. Doe called his mother crying, saying he did not want to film anymore," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit alleged that the plaintiff's mother repeatedly asked both Spears and Haddish about "what was filmed that made her son cry," but Spears at one point told her the footage was still not edited and said he would get back to her about providing the unedited footage. Haddish said she did not have a copy of the footage, the lawsuit alleged, but said it was meant to be a funny skit.
Days later, Spears told the mother that John had been so uncooperative that the footage was unusable and was "deleted," the lawsuit alleged.
It was not until around four years later, in June 2018, that the mother learned that the skit featuring her son had been published online, including on the "Funny or Die" website.
"The mother, upset, stated that she would have never let her son participate in a pedophile child pornography skit," the lawsuit alleged.
"Funny Or Die found this video absolutely disgusting and would never produce such content," a spokesperson for the platform said in a statement.
"We were not involved with the conceptualization, development, funding, or production of this video. It was uploaded to the site as user-generated content and was removed in 2018 immediately after becoming aware of its existence," they said.
The lawsuit alleged that both Jane and John have developed social disorders, with Jane unable to "trust anyone" since the incident and John suffering from depression and anxiety. They are suing Haddish and Spears for damages.
So many questions.
How do you NOT confirm what your child will be filming with two adults?
How do you drop off your minor child with only your other minor child as a chaperone?
Why would you not demand to see footage immediately?
So many questions.
I can see how a skit- as described in the article- could be traumatic to a child.
How do you NOT confirm what your child will be filming with two adults?
How do you drop off your minor child with only your other minor child as a chaperone?
Why would you not demand to see footage immediately?
So many questions.
I can see how a skit- as described in the article- could be traumatic to a child.
...does Aries Spears have money like that?!?! I mean what at the most you could get is 15k...spread out over YEARS...he might miss a payment or six...teen
Aries got that zo money lol
I just saw the video it’s really bad. Won’t post it here but it’s on media takeout.
They’re finished.
They’re finished.
Hollywood is going to make them pay
for that ANTI PEDO message!!!
How fucking DARE THEY attack PEDOPHILIA, and send a warning shot....something
so SACRED to hollywood??? I KNOW that pissed off the hollyweirdos that run the place....
definitely a money grab!!! nobody does pedo shit and puts it on a comedy site.. and
uploads it.
they hide that shit like epsteins list, with bill gates name on it..
for that ANTI PEDO message!!!
How fucking DARE THEY attack PEDOPHILIA, and send a warning shot....something
so SACRED to hollywood??? I KNOW that pissed off the hollyweirdos that run the place....
definitely a money grab!!! nobody does pedo shit and puts it on a comedy site.. and
uploads it.
they hide that shit like epsteins list, with bill gates name on it..
wait is it THAT bad..?? I mean the premise sounds sus, but Im thinkin they really want to send a message,
I aint want to see it, but now you got a knigga sayin HOL UP??
Interesting. So a video does/did exist. Funny or Die verified it. And these are the kids in it?
And they say Tiffany and Spears did it?
Straight forward to me...........
They might wanna pay and get this out of the news cycle.............. No win for them here. UNLESS this is all made up.
And they say Tiffany and Spears did it?
Straight forward to me...........
They might wanna pay and get this out of the news cycle.............. No win for them here. UNLESS this is all made up.It looks criminal
This is blowback due to Aries going at Lizzo fat ass.
Nothing more.
Nothing more.
I think so too. This video has apparently been around for years, but it resurfaces a few days after he goes in on her. Attention whoring gone wrong.
Even if mom and pops agreed to that every adult involved, how they say, Goose is Cooked!
hell naww..lol
It's a funny premise in someone's head...but once you start giving it life??? Nobody in there right mind would look at that and go: "Everybody's gonna love this!" It isn't funny, I get the process of how one could think it is funny, but at some point further along the process. You gotta look back at what you've done and still have to do to and see that it looses its humor and turns into a pedophile's skit
Damn
There's an actual kid in nothing but his underwear playing on the floor on front of him while he's pretending to read the newspaper with holes cut out for his eyes so he can stare at the kid in a lustful manner. After about 20 seconds, I tapped out. It's bad. I don't know HOW they looked at a playback of the skit and said "We're good here! High five!"
I saw about 20 seconds of it, and yes, you're right. It's bad.
Wow. Won’t even watch that shit.There's an actual kid in nothing but his underwear playing on the floor on front of him while he's pretending to read the newspaper with holes cut out for his eyes so he can stare at the kid in a lustful manner. After about 20 seconds, I tapped out. It's bad. I don't know HOW they looked at a playback of the skit and said "We're good here! High five!"
Similar threads
