Thomas Sowell on playing the “slavery card”
- Thread starter Mr. Met
- Start date
"As usual, you negroes have got it all wrong about me.
Believe it or not, I'm not anti-Black.
And I'm not here to empower nor to encourage Blacks to be loyal, hard working, productive American citizens.
No...
My function here to help White people feel better about themselves and to deny the very specfic role they played in the historic, systemic and horrific destruction of Black people."
Dude has been a conservative mouth piece for LONG time. I'm guessing black folk are coming across his posted bullshit talking points from over the years.
Watched full video. He made factual points.
Slavery isnt race based. Black people have been pinned as the only people in the entire world. Have also pinned it on ourselves. When anyone in the current world heres slaves they automatically picture a black person. Much like how black christians have an image of white god in there mind.
This was a simple info piece on how huge slavery was for everyone and still exists. And how no one is trying to free the people who are slaves now. I honestly dont know any current slaves, so will do some research.
I can see the coon part at the end. The idea that everyone should get reparations should only come from a white person. You gotta just shut up on this one Tom. Let niggas get paid!
Slavery isnt race based. Black people have been pinned as the only people in the entire world. Have also pinned it on ourselves. When anyone in the current world heres slaves they automatically picture a black person. Much like how black christians have an image of white god in there mind.
This was a simple info piece on how huge slavery was for everyone and still exists. And how no one is trying to free the people who are slaves now. I honestly dont know any current slaves, so will do some research.
I can see the coon part at the end. The idea that everyone should get reparations should only come from a white person. You gotta just shut up on this one Tom. Let niggas get paid!
I've been getting recommendations from this shit channel on youtube the last couple of months. I don't even watch his sorry ass channel.
Slavery still exists.
and you make a great point. the difference is all the other groups that were enslaved in America have been compensated except for one.
Also, I think it is sinister that the school system doesn’t talk about how many so-called whites were slaves and even owned by so-called black people. Free blacks living in the south during the chattel slavery period, Aboriginal Americans being so-called black, etc. The closest you get is Crispus Attacks’s murder kicking off the American Revolution. (They admit he was a free so-called black and Native American)
That would be history to destroy their confidence and superiority complex as well as their delusions that they are anything other than descendants of white trash and degenerates that were kicked out of Europe.
That is a fact.
Of course it still exists. Im making a point to his cry to put attention on non americans and towards others. He really really dont want people to help black americans.
and yeah His second cooning point " you gotta pay everyone" They already did get paid.
Last edited:
This board is a reflection of this generations alpha female energy. Niggas dont read, dont watch video, just go with emotion. your gayness cant even see when someone has agreed with you.
You scraping "cheater" on niggas cars too?
This is how he subverts white hegemony to his own benefit.
"As usual, you negroes have got it all wrong about me.
Believe it or not, I'm not anti-Black.
And I'm not here to empower nor to encourage Blacks to be loyal, hard working, productive American citizens.
No...
My function here to help White people feel better about themselves and to deny the very specfic role they played in the historic, systemic and horrific destruction of Black people."
One of the problems I've noticed on this board is that if the majority calls someone a coon, people will either jump on the bandwagon quickly, or they won't listen to the subject person at all.
If you don't listen to the person (who's presumably your enemy), how will you ever understand him? How will you ever see him coming at you, or worse, coming for you? In the 1930s, no one listened to Hitler much. But, Winston Churchill did. He tried to tell the other nations that Germany was preparing themselves again for war. No one listened until Hitler and Stalin invaded Poland.
Some of the most brilliant people in history were enemies to others.
The man is brilliant. Will I listen to what he says? Yes. Would I follow him into battle? No... he'd be my enemy. I'd like to hope that I could out think him with the help of others who feel that he's a dangerous person just like I do.
If you don't listen to the person (who's presumably your enemy), how will you ever understand him? How will you ever see him coming at you, or worse, coming for you? In the 1930s, no one listened to Hitler much. But, Winston Churchill did. He tried to tell the other nations that Germany was preparing themselves again for war. No one listened until Hitler and Stalin invaded Poland.
Some of the most brilliant people in history were enemies to others.
The man is brilliant. Will I listen to what he says? Yes. Would I follow him into battle? No... he'd be my enemy. I'd like to hope that I could out think him with the help of others who feel that he's a dangerous person just like I do.
"As usual, you negroes have got it all wrong about me.
Believe it or not, I'm not anti-Black.
And I'm not here to empower nor to encourage Blacks to be loyal, hard working, productive American citizens.
No...
My function here to help White people feel better about themselves and to deny the very specfic role they played in the historic, systemic and horrific destruction of Black people."
Is this an actual quote?
Yes, because Thomas Sowell is 92 years old and no longer speaks much. Most of this shit is dated.
yeah. Your asking too much from effeminate men. These dudes dont live in a space where you can see someone isnt for you and learn from him showing his cards.
so watch out theres males like @ansatsusha_gouki actually hitting the super sassy ignore button when you dont call names like everyone else. Bandwagon niggas talking like children for likes.
yep. He has gained alot of traction as Blacks leave the democrat bullshit party and go over to the Republican bullshit party
This here. Sowell is a coon but intelligent and makes good points. His book Black Rednecks White Liberals outlines some very interesting ideas. Personally, I don’t trust white folks in general. Both Conservatives and Liberals, Democrats and Republicans have agendas that put white folks before us.
For some reason, our people (in general) do not like the truth and want to live in fantasy land. Even in that fantasy land, it is still described as a nightmare. This is because of the feminine principle and mother goddess worship that is prevalent in our community and it is foolish thought methodology. This thought process is associated with what I call pro-white because this same group of people will look to a Caucasian to solve their problems instead of looking within.
how much of this dude do you have to listen to before you realize his talking points are pretty much everything you hear nightly on Fox News?
I've personally heard his name brought up a number of times as someone to respect and listen to. However, every clip is what I hear pretty much word for word from the Fox News/Liberals are dumb crowd.
I have yet to find any clip of this dude in which he has brought a new perspective to things.
If you have some clips/interviews where he talks about something other than how stupid the black agenda is in general, please let me know.
He puts white folks before US. So how does that work?
so...after listening to him for yourself you agree with the majority?
It's funny/sad that you can't tell how old some of the videos are because black folks are still asking/arguing about the same shit no matter what decade.
SLAVE LAWS PASSED IN VIRGINIA:
1660 — 1680: Slave Laws Further Restrict Freedom of Blacks and Legalize Different Treatment for Blacks and Whites
1667 - Virginia lawmakers say baptism does not bring freedom to blacks. The statute is passed because some slaves used their status as a Christian in the 1640s and 1650s to argue for their freedom or for freedom for a child. Legislators also encourage slave owners to Christianize their enslaved men, women and children.
1668 - Free black women, like enslaved females over the age of 16, are deemed tithable. The Virginia General Assembly says freedom does not exempt black women from taxation.
1669 - An act about the "casual killing of slaves" says that if a slave dies while resisting his master, the act will not be presumed to have occurred with “prepensed malice.”
1670 - Free blacks and Native Americans who had been baptized are forbidden to buy Christian servants.
1672 - It becomes legal to wound or kill an enslaved person who resists arrest. Legislators also deem that the owner of any slave killed as he resisted arrest will receive financial compensation for the loss of an enslaved laborer. Legislators also offer a reward to Indians who capture escaped slaves and return them to a justice of the peace.
that highlighted law in 1670 forbids free blacks and indians from owning WHITE SERVANTS (christian=white) so while free blacks could own other blacks they couldn't own whites by law...
That law effectively makes slavery chattel and also separates whites from nonwhites in the institution... Its the basis for all the race politics played out even today. Thus creating a level that even the poorest white person can't fall below. Poor whites TODAY catch as much hell as poor minorities but have historically and consistently chosen their skin color over their class distinction because of that very law. This is why white racist groups consist primarily of poor whites, its also why the easiest way to get poor whites to vote AGAINST their economic best interest is to say it helps minorities but especially blacks and you will see poor whites viscerally angry in opposition to whatever measure is proposed even tho it benefits them too. American history has show that poor whites inevitably and invariably WILL choose their skin color over their class distinction whenever rich whites dangle that race politics carrot in their face and the root of that can be traced directly back to that time period.
now post the info on the cases of blacks owning white slaves and what that percentage was???
I'll wait
saying slavery isn't or wasn't race based isn't some hidden information...yes WE ALL KNOW the basic institution of slavery has never been race based since the institution predates the concept of "race" as we know and use it. I've posted this before..
The development of what would become "race" classifications as it developed between the 1100s and 1500s Europe. For example sub-Saharan Africans were generally called Ethiopians. That was the catch-all term for any dark skin African, western Europeans encountered at that time. You don't necessarily see the term "Black" used for Africans in the early middle ages but you see it in their artwork...BUT many of the images in their art that portrayed bad things like executioners and negative religious symbols were characterized with black colored skin and African features, so you start to see an early connection with Black = sin/evil/unredeemable. Its not necessarily SAID but its SHOWN.
Around the 1300s and 1400s you start to see the term "Black" in association with dark skin Africans. As the slave trade moved across the Atlantic to western Europe, the catholic church in Spain starts to use its influence to further marry the color Black + unredeemable sin + slavery = dark skin Africans are supposed to have this position in a social structure in life.
This is adopted in the Americas and by the late 1600s, 1700s the colonies/USA are looking for ways to perfect the slave system they have by developing chattel slavery making the condition heritable and permanent for offspring thru the mother. While all this is happening the term Black and Slave are used interchangeably and synonymously in their laws and customs. When you say slave you mean Black and when you say Black its understood its about a person of the lowest social order. This is why IN WESTERN CULTURE PARTICULARLY IN THE AMERICAS SLAVERY AND RACE ARE CONNECTED.
All of this took centuries to work out but by the 1800s the culture had solidified and the perception of Africans/American Blacks had been set. So by the time slavery was "abolished" (except as a form of punishment for crime) the immediate response was to come up with work arounds for this group of people whom the Bible deemed unredeemable and therefore subjugation was supposed to be their normal and rightful state of living. Hence Black Codes and Vagrancy Laws and Jim Crow Laws and before you know it we're in the latter part of the 20th century around the1960s before the last vestiges of all that shit is officially removed tho the perceptions and treatment remains defacto.
All those CENTURIES in developing a specific perception and treatment of "Black" People and motherfuckers think all that's changed in the last 50 years....
Last edited:
All those CENTURIES in developing a specific perception and treatment of "Black" People and motherfuckers think all that went away in the last 50 years....
Fixed
The Curious History of Anthony Johnson: From Captive African to Right-wing Talking Point - AAIHS
In various corners of the internet, memes circulate about a Black man identified as “Anthony Johnson,” believed to be a pioneer of American slavery and the first slave owner in North America. Intended for shock value, these memes reveal the new ways people disseminate knowledge in the age of...
www.aaihs.org
That’s a start. But you have to go back further than that. No need for me to post anything because of what you just posted, which is nothing but a half-assed attempt at research from one of the colonies. I’m surprised you didn’t post about Pocahontas and John Smith.SLAVE LAWS PASSED IN VIRGINIA:
1660 — 1680: Slave Laws Further Restrict Freedom of Blacks and Legalize Different Treatment for Blacks and Whites
1667 - Virginia lawmakers say baptism does not bring freedom to blacks. The statute is passed because some slaves used their status as a Christian in the 1640s and 1650s to argue for their freedom or for freedom for a child. Legislators also encourage slave owners to Christianize their enslaved men, women and children.
1668 - Free black women, like enslaved females over the age of 16, are deemed tithable. The Virginia General Assembly says freedom does not exempt black women from taxation.
1669 - An act about the "casual killing of slaves" says that if a slave dies while resisting his master, the act will not be presumed to have occurred with “prepensed malice.”
1670 - Free blacks and Native Americans who had been baptized are forbidden to buy Christian servants.
1672 - It becomes legal to wound or kill an enslaved person who resists arrest. Legislators also deem that the owner of any slave killed as he resisted arrest will receive financial compensation for the loss of an enslaved laborer. Legislators also offer a reward to Indians who capture escaped slaves and return them to a justice of the peace.
that highlighted law in 1670 forbids free blacks and indians from owning WHITE SERVANTS (christian=white) so while free blacks could own other blacks they couldn't own whites by law...
That law effectively makes slavery chattel and also separates whites from nonwhites in the institution... Its the basis for all the race politics played out even today. Thus creating a level that even the poorest white person can't fall below. Poor whites TODAY catch as much hell as poor minorities but have historically and consistently chosen their skin color over their class distinction because of that very law. This is why white racist groups consist primarily of poor whites, its also why the easiest way to get poor whites to vote AGAINST their economic best interest is to say it helps minorities but especially blacks and you will see poor whites viscerally angry in opposition to whatever measure is proposed even tho it benefits them too. American history has show that poor whites inevitably and invariably WILL choose their skin color over their class distinction whenever rich whites dangle that race politics carrot in their face and the root of that can be traced directly back to that time period.
now post the info on the cases of blacks owning white slaves and what that percentage was???
I'll wait
Similar threads
