The Zimmerman Trial: Justice for Trayvon! (Let's discuss it)

GTFOH...he's claiming to hear some shit on TV and was able to distinguish TMs screams as GZs...nothing similar or anything. I cannot believe that the jury would buy that shit at all.
Unbelievable. That shit should have been objected to atleast 4 different times. Absolutely unbelievable.
 
This is a stunningly horrendous cross by the prosecution of this witness. Absolutely absolutely atrocious beyond words.

You have a ear witness who says he heard background audio from a low quality phone call recording while sitting in another room watching a computer and he immediately identified it as his nephew without any prior knowledge to the facts of this case!!?? And you dont pound his ass at all!!!???

Not to mention the failures to object atleast 4times during his direct??

Ive never seen anything like this. This is terrible guys.
 
Unbelievable. That shit should have been objected to atleast 4 different times. Absolutely unbelievable.

:dunno:

He presented well.

I'm no legal analyst or anything, but sometimes you let people, the ' Uncle ' let them dig their own holes.

An most women got a radar for bullshit.
 
This might have been addressed already. Who is the black woman with the glasses behind the defense. I cannot take my eyes off of her.

I'd fuck her so good she'd be wearing a Trayvon hoodie come Monday


Hopefully the jury see that is so far fetch and totally dismiss that BS.

You could sense how they were rehearsed to the point that the mother gave a canned answer for a question that wasn't asked.
 
Why didn't the prosecution got his route?
Listen to P when they yell Help...didn't sound of Latin decent!
Just a thought!
Dialect experts and forensic linguists are professionals used in law enforcement, and like other forensic analysts, they study the evidence of a case and offer expert opinions and evaluations that could change the course of an investigation or trial. They may be employed by police departments, the FBI or even private law firms. The science of dialectology requires you to determine a speaker's dialect, which could, for example, help identify the speaker on a tape recording, making you an asset to a criminal investigation.

GZ wasn't raised as Hispanic/Latin, he is whitewashed. He has no such accent or detectable dialect. His voice is also deeper than the screams would indicate IMO.
 
A law enforcement officer testifying in a case where a relative is accused of murder, get the fuck out of here.:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Utter bullshit. And again the prosecution fails to object.

Sometimes you have to let the story play out, especially if it's complete bullshit like this testimony. Trayvon's mother was way more convincing than these 2 liars, and there stories sound like knuckles scraping at the bottom of the barrel:smh:
 
GZ wasn't raised as Hispanic/Latin, he is whitewashed. He has no such accent or detectable dialect. His voice is also deeper than the screams would indicate IMO.



I agree that it was a kids scream but even being raised around people who talk a certain way you will pick up some of those traits. Even when you don't think you hear and accent, there is an accent. I think it should be checked by a dialect expert.

His whole story is just bull shit!
 
The black woman at the defense table is fine ass a muthafucka.

I am distracted everyday.

So is banging.

Tall, thin and beautiful.

bilde


0625-ZIMMERMAN-TEAM-sized.jpg_full_600.jpg


0615_US_GeorgeZimmerman_full_380.jpg
 
:dunno:

He presented well.

I'm no legal analyst or anything, but sometimes you let people, the ' Uncle ' let them dig their own holes.

An most women got a radar for bullshit.
Absolutely not sir. That "uncles" entire testimony should been one HUGE objection from the prosecution. He should have immediately objected to his bolstering decorations and qualifications being offered to the Court. He should have killed his narrative answers. And he should have destroyed his ass on cross.

I cannot overstate how terrible of a job the prosecution just did.
 
Sometimes you have to let the story play out, especially if it's complete bullshit like this testimony. Trayvon's mother was way more convincing than these 2 liars, and there stories sound like knuckles scraping at the bottom of the barrel:smh:
No. You dont allow a family members witnesses entire resume to be read to the jury as if he is being offered as a law enforcement expert. You dont allow a witness to paint a perfect story and narrative to the jury over and over and over. And further, to allow this shit and NOT destroy it on cross is flat out incompetence.

You dont leave this shit up to the jury to decipher and filter whats valid or not. You object to verbalize that the fuckery is afoot and you give an effective cross examination to further expose it as the fraud that it is.
 
Anybody find it odd that damn near every single witness/friend of Zimmerman and for the defense is a cop, detective or some form of law enforcement? Did I miss where the prosecution brought it up, or did they Romo again?
 
I don't think that was a wrap up... the jury wasn't even out there at that point I believe. I think they were in recess while the defense tried to get an immediate acquittal. They should definitely have that guy do closing arguments though, because he could wrap it up better than the other two.


He's doing a good job in the wrap up. He's making some excellent points. A perfectly aligned shot through the heart during all of that struggling. The screams that stop when the gun is fired.
 
The black woman at the defense table is fine ass a muthafucka.

I am distracted everyday.

So is banging.

Tall, thin and beautiful.

:yes:
I almost said something out loud with my girl watching it with me. Had to fix it to some numbskullery like :I wonder what her position, there which, be it, they may be about the case? Her credentials, as they were!


It got quiet.
 
No. You dont allow a family members witnesses entire resume to be read to the jury as if he is being offered as a law enforcement expert. You dont allow a witness to paint a perfect story and narrative to the jury over and over and over. And further, to allow this shit and NOT destroy it on cross is flat out incompetence.

You dont leave this shit up to the jury to decipher and filter whats valid or not. You object to verbalize that the fuckery is afoot and you give an effective cross examination to further expose it as the fraud that it is.

That's why it's bullshit because it's too perfect. We have no idea what's going on inside the jurors heads but we want to make them all out to be sheep, maybe they buy their story or maybe they see it as complete crap like we all do. Everyone here wanted to hang the prosecution then after Wednesday wanted to give them the tko against the defense, now they're back to being incompetent and they've lost this case:confused:
 
:yes::yes::yes: I stopped being mad soon as the dude with the combover started talking.

Hollow points
Recounting statements
Implied that a direct shot through the heart meant Zimmerman was holding Trayvon's hoodie so he couldnt run, and pressed it against his chest and fired. They were standing up. Also implying TRayvon staggered and fell, landing face down on his chest after he clutched his heart.

It's illegal for civilians to have hollow points

Motion for acquittal----->DENIED<-----


The rope TIGHTENS

JG

:yes:
 
Absolutely not sir. That "uncles" entire testimony should been one HUGE objection from the prosecution. He should have immediately objected to his bolstering decorations and qualifications being offered to the Court. He should have killed his narrative answers. And he should have destroyed his ass on cross.

I cannot overstate how terrible of a job the prosecution just did.

I'm not going to verse too much on it. I can agree with you.

I think we can agree together though, the uncle was utter bullshit and most will instantly see through the creditability attempt of military service and current law enforcement service, even though whites LOVE THAT SHIT. He is protecting family. Just because it's after the 4th, whatever.







After seeing Trayvon's mother, I'm going to give my mother a call, and thank her.
 
Re: The Zimmerman Trial: Justice for Trayvon

I tried watching this but I am done now as it s painfully obvious that this piece of shit will be acquitted!
 
I hope somehow they get to bring in (probably in closing) how the screaming stopped as soon as the shot was fired. George, by his own account of the incident said that he didn't know if he had actually shot Trayvon yet at that point... so why, if he was screaming, would he stop screaming as soon as he pulled the trigger? Seems way more logical that the person who got shot would be the one to stop screaming.
 
It's illegal for civilians to have hollow points



:yes:

Nice!!! So, i wasn't tripping when I heard that. Wonder if the prosecution brought this up beforehand. I've missed a good bit of the trial. Anybody know if hollow points being illegal was brought up other than the 2 seconds I heard?
 
That's why it's bullshit because it's too perfect. We have no idea what's going on inside the jurors heads but we want to make them all out to be sheep, maybe they buy their story or maybe they see it as complete crap like we all do. Everyone here wanted to hang the prosecution then after Wednesday wanted to give them the tko against the defense, now they're back to being incompetent and they've lost this case:confused:
I dont know what everyone else here wanted to do but im telling you what i just saw and what i just saw was a got dam travesty. And you're right, you dont know whats going on in the juries heads which is why you dont allow it to be filled with inappropriate shit by the defense. And you certainly squash ridiculous and incredible testimony when its offered in such a impossible narrative as such.
 
I dont know what everyone else here wanted to do but im telling you what i just saw and what i just saw was a got dam travesty. And you're right, you dont know whats going on in the juries heads which is why you dont allow it to be filled with inappropriate shit by the defense. And you certainly squash ridiculous and incredible testimony when its offered in such a impossible narrative as such.

Make no mistake im not saying you're wrong in your opinion im just offering my perspective, from my pov the mom came off as very rehearsed and offered nothing and the uncle crafted as you put it "the perfect story". I think the defense wanted a immediate acquittal because they knew how flimsy the mom and uncle's testimony would look, and the only person who will buy any of it is GZ good friend frank taffee.
 
Don't read too much into a motion for acquittal. It is a standard motion. Only difference here is everyone playing to the camera.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
I hope somehow they get to bring in (probably in closing) how the screaming stopped as soon as the shot was fired. George, by his own account of the incident said that he didn't know if he had actually shot Trayvon yet at that point... so why, if he was screaming, would he stop screaming as soon as he pulled the trigger? Seems way more logical that the person who got shot would be the one to stop screaming.

The yelling seemed to me to be two different people . At two different times. The last yell seeming to be Trayvons.
 
This is a stunningly horrendous cross by the prosecution of this witness. Absolutely absolutely atrocious beyond words.

You have a ear witness who says he heard background audio from a low quality phone call recording while sitting in another room watching a computer and he immediately identified it as his nephew without any prior knowledge to the facts of this case!!?? And you dont pound his ass at all!!!???

Not to mention the failures to object atleast 4times during his direct??

Ive never seen anything like this. This is terrible guys.

Damn. This is tough to hear coming from someone with your knowledge of the law. :smh:
 
Back
Top