What do you mean NXT is overrated? IMO its the best wrestling product being put out right now in the U.S. right now. They in ring product is top notch. They have top raided Indy talent lol. I enjoy the passion that Marro brings as a analyst. They product caters to wrestling fans. You're not watch ROH, Impact, Lucha Underground, MLW, if you're just a casual.
It's overrated compared to what the WWE use to produce and the industry as a whole. The levels have dropped since the start of the millennium. I know WWE gets out of hand with the micromanaging on the major level, but it also can't be denied that just maybe WWE does that because they don't trust the talent. They don't trust the talent because of how they are grooming the talent in NXT. They are training them to do flips and monkey spots with no real coherent psychology. Some of these guys also lack actual charisma to draw people in as well.
For example let's look at Roman Reigns. Yes, they screwed up his push by pitting him originally as a face up against Daniel Bryan. They butchered the guy there, but Roman also didn't have the tools to handle the heat and overcome it like say past guys put into that spot. WWE has created a McDonald's pro wrestling which is coming back to haunt them.
The guys who were trained in OVW such as Lesnar, Cena, Orton, and so on were better seasoned when they came up on the main roster. They also had the legitimate legends around at that time to help these guys along in 2002 such as Hogan, Taker, Flair, etc. The workrate is there, but the psychology of working in synergy with the audience is severely lacking due to the wrestlers thinking that stringing a bunch of pointless moves together is telling a story.
WWE is also at fault as they seem to think every epic has to copy UT vs HBK from WM 25. The women I applaud as they did step up in NXT and came on board onto WWE RAW and Smackdown when given a chance delivered. Even that was more to do with fans giving them backlash that started with AJ Lee.
I get it that NXT is catering to the hardcore fan, but it is still an inferior product overall to what they use to produce with WCW, ECW, and WWE in the hey day. There is a reason a lot of them are flopping when they come onto the big level. Their psychology and charisma is lacking.
2 hours for Raw was ideal for Vince compared to when Raw was only 1 hour during the first half of the 90s.
I wouldn't call NXT overrated, but like I said it caters to a much different crowd than the typical WWE audience.
I don't know about the median WWE fan being 54. That source seems a bit flawed. They must be accounting for the live shows and the parents who are taking their kids to see the shows.
Watch an NXT show and you'll see almost all adults in the crowd. A WWE show will be larger of course and have a much higher percentage of kids in the crowd.
I agree about WWE not creating stars. The problem is everything now is so overproduced and scripted. Guys aren't allowed to really break out and become stars on their own like Stone Cold and The Rock.
Yeah, 2 hours was better than 1 for Vince. However, Vince made the comment during the time Nitro was doing 3 hour broadcasts on TNT. Vince felt they were going to burn themselves out eventually with also doing monthly 3 hour ppv shows. It's just ironic Vince said that when Nitro had much more roster depth than what RAW has now.
My thing with NXT is that they are trying to turn it into something it shouldn't. They are trying to make it a 3rd brand to RAW and Smackdown instead of using it more for a training ground. For example, they had Samoa Joe start there which was ridiculous unless they wanted him there to help work with the youngsters. They had him start there because of their usual politics. The same with other guys like Brood. Compare that to how they treated AJ Styles. He came in as how should have and he is a star for them right now, while Samoa Joe and Brood are struggling.
NXT has failed to deliver WWE what OVW was delivering and that was the next crop of stars who could main event. Sure, The Shield came in and did well. However, look for all that push they got how far have they actually gone in being draws?
The age thing I think is accurate as I also seen it on The Bleacher Report too and their source wen even further back.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...-ages-of-wwe-audience-shows-interesting-trend
What I don't understand with WWE is how they are actually going backwards with their promotion. What they are doing now is actually what they mocked WCW for. Aging guys in the title scene or main event legends taking over main show spots. I actually don't have a problem mixing, but I think WWE has relied on icons instead of trying to build new guys.
They took Reigns and pushed him over everyone at the expense of the whole roster and for what? He wasn't drawing like Cena who is also a downgrade of their traditional stars. He wasn't awing crowds with his matches as say HBK use to which excused him being pushed besides lack of drawing power in his physical prime of 1996.
They over script and over produce the show as you stated. You know there is a problem if today's way of doing business guys like Flair, Hogan, UT, Sting, Warrior, Steamboat, Savage, Dibiase, and so on would have trouble getting over due to how they are making the show. On the flip side they don't really have top notch guys at that level either, but if they don't let them sink or swim how are they going to get REAL new stars(Guys like Cena were forced and manufactured to the point where he was organically getting over they started to overproduce him).