The War on Terror After Osama bin Laden

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

The War on Terror After Osama bin Laden


Its Waaaay too early to tell; but Al Qaeda's influence was already believed
to be waning, so, will Bin Laden's death embolden a new wave of
terrorists? What effect might Binny's death have on the War on Terrorism ?



Here are some thoughts you might want to read:


  • A Limited Demoralizing Effect

    Apart from being a moment of justice for the world and a partial closure for
    Al Qaeda’s victims, Osama bin Laden’s death has strategic implications for
    the global struggle against salafi terrorism, the war in Afghanistan and U.S.-
    Pakistan relations.


  • Al Qaeda's Divisions Within

    His removal not only deprives Al Qaeda of its founder and leader but comes
    at a critical time for AQ. It is struggling to remain relevant amid the Arab
    revolutions, its growing unpopularity in Muslim communities, and internal
    divisions about the theological and strategic direction of the movement.
    This loss could unleash internal divisions and fractures within the movement
    and call into question the very legitimacy of Al Qaeda.



  • Seek a Political Solution in Afghanistan

    The real impact could be on the Afghan war. On the military side, Al Qaeda
    has not played an important role and one should not wait for a different
    strategy or a less aggressive Taliban this summer. The “surge” has failed
    and the momentum is definitively with the Taliban. But on the political side,
    the removal of Bin Laden from the political equation opens a window of
    opportunity for the White House to start negotiations with Taliban leaders.

    The question becomes: will President Obama use his newly acquired political
    capital to make a major diplomatic opening?



  • More Powerful Dead Than Alive?

    The implications for the U.S.-Pakistan relationship are perhaps more
    interesting. The good news is that President Obama cited President Zardari,
    Pakistan’s civilian leader, in his remarks, and did not mention Pakistani military
    or intelligence authorities except obliquely by stating that members of his
    team were in touch with their counterparts. While he thanked the Pakistani
    authorities, President Obama made it clear that U.S. forces carried out the
    operation.

    The bad news is that there are fundamental questions about what Pakistani
    authorities knew about Bin Laden’s whereabouts, since he apparently lived for
    some time in a large compound near a military academy, in a city in Pakistan
    where large numbers of retired military leaders live. Abbottabad is just 50
    kilometers north of the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. Obviously, he was not
    cowering in a cave in the tribal areas as many had assumed.

    If Pakistani military intelligence did not know about this, they should have
    known. If they did know, the withholding of information of this importance
    from the U.S. is more evidence that the relationship is broken. Either way,
    it is an embarrassment for Pakistan and a likely further irritant in its relations
    with the U.S.


  • The Taliban Is Not the Enemy

    For one thing, I have long held that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are not as tightly intermeshed as argued. The Taliban's goals remain domestic, concentrating first on ousting the foreigners whom they view as an occupying force and second on what relationship – or even role -- they should have with the government. I say this with the growing caveat that the longer the United States stays and fights the Taliban, the more the militants will want to hit U.S. targets far from South Asia.



Sorry, if you've got "Colinitis" and prefer pictures to reading, can't help you.


So, What Should We Do Now ? ? ?

Any Thoughts ? ? ?





 
<param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=world/2011/06/04/nr.al.qaeda.military.brain.killed.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=world/2011/06/04/nr.al.qaeda.military.brain.killed.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>
 
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=international/2011/06/06/meserve.is.kashmiri.dead.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=international/2011/06/06/meserve.is.kashmiri.dead.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>
 
There is not a shortage, of those willing to fall on the sword, to fill his shoes...

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2075776,00.html



Drone Strike Killed No. 2 in Al Qaeda, U.S. Officials Say



PAKISTAN-articleInline.jpg

Abu Yahya al-Libi




ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A Central Intelligence Agency drone strike in Pakistan’s tribal belt killed Al Qaeda’s deputy leader, Abu Yahya al-Libi, American officials said on Tuesday, dealing another blow to the group in a lawless area that has long been considered the global headquarters of international terrorism but the importance of which may now be slipping.

Mr. Libi’s death would be another dramatic moment for an American covert war in Pakistan that has been particularly active over the past year, starting with the death of the group’s founder, Osama bin Laden, in May 2011 and followed up by drone strikes against several senior lieutenants, including Atiyah Abd al-Rahman.

But that very success could, paradoxically, signal a shifting target: as Al Qaeda’s leadership in the tribal belt has been cornered or killed, new efforts to attack Western targets have been mounted by the group’s affiliates in Yemen and Somalia.

Unlike many of the relatively unknown figures killed in other drone strikes, Mr. Libi, who had a $1 million bounty on his head, was a virtual ambassador for global jihad. An Islamic scholar by training, he used frequent video appearances to expound on world events, chastise critics and boast about his escape from an American military prison in Afghanistan in 2005.

He negotiated with the ethnic Pashtun militant groups that have sheltered Al Qaeda in the tribal belt for over a decade, and at one point urged Pakistanis to overthrow their own government.

The White House spokesman, Jay Carney, said that as a result of Mr. Libi’s death, “there is no clear successor to take on the breadth of his responsibility, and that puts additional pressure” on Al Qaeda, “bringing it closer to its ultimate demise than ever.”

Mr. Libi, who was thought to be in his late 40s, was born in Libya, and during the 1990s he was a member of an Islamist group that sought to overthrow Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

His star rose after he escaped from a United States military detention center at Bagram Air Base outside Kabul in July 2005, picking a lock and dodging the prison guards, along with three other Qaeda operatives.

A year later, Mr. Libi released a 54-minute video mocking his American captors — the first of many that would burnish his reputation as a propagandist.

Soon after Bin Laden’s death, Mr. Libi moved up to become Al Qaeda’s deputy, behind Ayman al-Zawahri.

One American official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, described Mr. Libi as one of Al Qaeda’s “most experienced and versatile leaders,” and said he had “played a critical role in the group’s planning against the West, providing oversight of the external operations efforts.”




ARTICLE



 
Back
Top