The Supreme Court Ends Multiracial Democracy as We Know It

MCP

International
International Member

As Tennessee eliminated its only majority-Black district, Ari Berman and Tennessee state Rep. Justin J. Pearson explain how SCOTUS enabled the right’s “power grab.”

Louisiana-gerrymandering.jpg


The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a fatal blow to the Voting Rights Act, triggering a new wave of redistricting fights in the midst of midterm primary elections. Last week, the court struck down a Louisiana congressional map with a second majority-Black district. The decision requires there to be evidence of intentional racism to prove that a map is discriminatory, making it nearly impossible to successfully challenge racial gerrymandering.

Following the 6-3 decision along partisan lines, Louisiana suspended its already active congressional primary, throwing out cast ballots. Alabama’s Republican governor took steps to gerrymander her state’s maps ahead of November elections. Tennessee GOP leaders also convened a special session to eliminate the last remaining Democratic stronghold in the state, home to Memphis, a majority-Black city and district; the new map would split Memphis into three districts and further split Nashville and the surrounding counties into five districts. On Thursday, Tennessee Gov. Lee signed a bill that repealed a state law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting, and the new map was passed by Tennessee Republicans.

The primary goal state Rep. Justin J. Pearson tells The Intercept Briefing “is to dilute Black political voting power and representation, and it’s starting at the U.S. congressional level.” The Democratic Tennessee state representative for Memphis is running for U.S. Congress in the district at the heart of the state’s re-districting fight. “When you look across the South, the truth is about at least a dozen seats are likely to be taken in this very racist redistricting era that we are in, but it won’t stop there,” Pearson says. “We have over 200 legislative seats in the House and the Senate that are also likely to be eliminated through racist redistricting that is happening.”

Voting rights journalist and author Ari Berman says SCOTUS’s latest blow to voters’ rights is a “power grab.”

This week on the podcast, Berman and Pearson speak to host Jessica Washington about how the latest Supreme Court decision bolsters President Donald Trump and Republicans’ aims to take control of voting in the country.

“This is now the third major decision by the Roberts court gutting the Voting Rights Act,” says Berman. “You can’t understand this latest attack on the Voting Rights Act unless you understand the attacks that came before it, and how this is part of a pattern. … This is part of a larger conservative counterrevolution against the civil rights movement of the 1960s.”

Berman says that this ruling could bring us back to the “dark days” before the Voting Rights Act made the United States a “multiracial democracy.” Now you look at what’s going to happen in these places, in places like Tennessee, in places like Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi. If they eliminate all of their Black members of Congress, that’s going to make politics a white-only game. If politics is a white-only game, that’s going to mean that white supremacy in some form or another is going to be the dominant politics in those states. It’s already the dominant politics in lots of these states, but it’s going to become much more explicit in terms of how it’s expressed.”

Pearson says that the Supreme Court’s assertion that these protections are no longer necessary is a lie. “The hatred that hung us on lynching trees did not disappear. It dissipated into institutions of power, into state houses, into governor’s mansions, into the U.S. Senate, into the U.S. House, into the presidency of the United States,” says Pearson. “Everybody has to do more than they are currently doing in this moment in time in order for us to preserve this modicum of a democratic constitutional republic. … Because what is likely to happen is the most significant purging of Black political power and elected Black leaders since the end of Reconstruction.”

“The litmus test for America’s progress is not Massachusetts, New York, and California,” says Pearson. “The litmus test for America’s progress is what happens in the South, where 50 percent of Black African American descendants of enslaved people live.”


 
@MCP still waiting for an answer. You had a lot of questions about Harris.
Here goes. If Kamala decides to enter the race to become the president of the United States, what wouls black Americans would demand fro her to ensure their vote for her?

On a local level, for any black politician, what would you require from them to get your vote?
 
Last edited:
Here goes. If Kamala decides to enter the race to become the president of the United States, what wouls black Americans would demand fro her to ensure their vote for her?

Well the the dude from the Heritage Foundation was on CSPAN this morning bragging about Trump initiating over 1000 project 2025 principles, his words.

We know that wouldn't have happened under Harris.

As much stuff as you post about Trump’s racist policies going into full effect, are you still pretending both sides are exactly the same?

Would we be debating voting rights like it's 1950's or have DEI programs litterally being treated like felonies in the eyes of the government?

I could go on, but you get my point.
 
Well the the dude from the Heritage Foundation was on CSPAN this morning bragging about Trump initiating over 1000 project 2025 principles, his words.

We know that wouldn't have happened under Harris.

As much stuff as you post about Trump’s racist policies going into full effect, are you still pretending both sides are exactly the same?

Would we be debating voting rights like it's 1950's or have DEI programs litterally being treated like felonies in the eyes of the government?

I could go on, but you get my point.
From my observation, yes the Republican are against any policies that would benefit black Americans. Where my argument is, is about the Democrats taking black votes for granted.

From what I am seeing, other minorities, are getting federal assistance put into law. e.g. Anti-Asian hate bill. Why have Black American not advocated for this as well?
 
From my observation, yes the Republican are against any policies that would benefit black Americans. Where my argument is, is about the Democrats taking black votes for granted.

From what I am seeing, other minorities, are getting federal assistance put into law. e.g. Anti-Asian hate bill. Why have Black American not advocated for this as well?
I don't really understand this argument. What did the anti-asian violence bill do after covid went away?

Meanwhile, folks like you complain that programs like the black farm bill isn't really black because it included other minorities. However. it's only black farners that are complaining about the funds being taken away and its only the black farmers that are complaining about not having access to the President, or anyone that's in charge of farming legislation.

We litterally seen white people sue and win court cases against black organizations for trying to cater to black people only. Courts stacked by Republicans by the way.

How's black voting rights going these days? I don't see the GOP trying to take over Hispanic or Asian voting districts, even if the voting rights act is technically for everybody.
 
From what I am seeing is that the black vote is taken for granted without any promises offered to them.

You mentioned about the anti-Asian hate crime bill. This was passed into law despite the statistics showing that black people were disproportionately attacked as a group against any statistics for other groups.

Why would the GOP try to redistrict black neighborhoods? From what I am seeing is that certain entities want to water down the black vote and diminished their voting power.
 
From what I am seeing is that the black vote is taken for granted without any promises offered to them.

You mentioned about the anti-Asian hate crime bill. This was passed into law despite the statistics showing that black people were disproportionately attacked as a group against any statistics for other groups.

Why would the GOP try to redistrict black neighborhoods? From what I am seeing is that certain entities want to water down the black vote and diminished their voting power.
for the record, you ignored everything else i said because you want to over sale an Asian crine bill no one cares about.

Never mind all the other hate crime bills that were already on the books that have been used to prosecute racist violence against black people.

But let me guess, that doesn't count because it doesn't have black in the title.:rolleyes2:
 
@MCP

Emmett Till Antilynching Act (2022): Signed into law by President Joe Biden, this bill designates lynching as a federal hate crime. It ensures that conspirators who plan or assist in racially motivated mob violence or lynching against African Americans can be held federally accountable
 
Back
Top