The Right’s Assault On Obama’s Character, Is He Patriotic Enough?

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
First the conservatives try and claim he is a Muslim, then they say his middle name Hussein proves that, now this. Let the “Swift Boating” begin!

source: MSNBC.com

Obama may face grilling on patriotism
No flag pin, no hand over his heart: Is he exposed?


WASHINGTON - Sen. Barack Obama's refusal to wear an American flag lapel pin along with a photo of him not putting his hand over his heart during the National Anthem led conservatives on Internet and in the media to question his patriotism.

Now Obama's wife, Michelle, has drawn their ire, too, for saying recently that she's really proud of her country for the first time in her adult life.

Conservative consultants say that combined, the cases could be an issue for Obama in the general election if he wins the nomination, especially as he runs against Vietnam war hero Sen. John McCain.

'Blame America first crowd'
"The reason it hasn't been an issue so far is that we're still in the microcosm of the Democratic primary," said Republican consultant Roger Stone. "Many Americans will find the three things offensive. Barack Obama is out of the McGovern wing of the party, and he is part of the blame America first crowd."

Opponents of Sen. John Kerry proved in the 2004 election that voters are sensitive to suggestions that a candidate is not sufficiently patriotic. The Democratic presidential nominee's campaign was torpedoed by critics of his Vietnam War record called the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, even though he won multiple military honors and was lauded by his superiors.

The Swift Boat campaign started as a relatively small television ad buy that exploded into an issue that dogged Kerry for months. The Massachusetts senator has conceded since losing to President Bush that the campaign and his lackluster response to unsubstantiated allegations he considered unworthy of a reaction likely cost him the election. And the term even became part of the campaign lexicon -- swift boating.

Obama already is the subject of a shadowy smear campaign based on the Internet that falsely suggests he's a Muslim intent on destroying the United States. Obama is a Christian and has been fighting the e-mail hoax, which also claims he doesn't put his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance, and he's been trying to correct the misinformation.

"Whenever I'm in the United States Senate, I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America," Obama frequently tells voters.

"I've been going to the same church for 20 years, praising Jesus," he adds.

Retired Major General Scott Gration, an Obama military adviser, said he expects the attacks will only increase if Obama wins the Democratic nomination.

"People are projecting things and taking things out of context," Gration said. "There's absolutely no question in my mind that Michelle and Barack are extremely patriotic, appreciate our freedoms and our values and everything else that the flag represents."

Officials with the McCain campaign and the Republican Party say they won't be suggesting Obama is less than patriotic, and instead plan to focus their criticisms on his record and inexperience if he wins the nomination. Well-funded outside groups, however, consider anything fair game.

Conservative Republican consultant Keith Appell, who worked with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, said Obama's opposition to the war will create a "striking contrast between McCain the war hero and Obama the poster child for the anti-war movement."

"If you are McCain, you want to play up the decorated war hero, loves his country, served his country," Appell said. "You want to play those themes up as much as possible, especially in comparison to Obama and his role in the anti-war movement."

Questions around Michelle
On Monday, Michelle Obama told an audience in Milwaukee, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."

Cindy McCain, McCain's wife, days later responded by saying, "I have, and always will be, proud of my country." Barack Obama has expressed frustration that his wife's remarks had been taken out of context and turned into political fodder -- both the Obamas say she was talking about politics in the United States, not the country itself.

Last summer, Obama was photographed by Time magazine at an event in Iowa standing with his hands folded during the national anthem. His primary rivals Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson appear beside him, with their hands on their hearts.

It has been repeatedly reported that the moment came during the Pledge of Allegiance, but that's not the case.

In October, Obama told Iowa television station KCRG that he decided to stop wearing a U.S. flag lapel pin during the run-up to the Iraq war because it had become "a substitute for, I think, true patriotism."

"I decided I won't wear that pin on my chest. Instead, I'm going to try to tell the American people what I believe will make this country great and, hopefully, that will be a testimony to my patriotism," Obama said.

Obama's comments led conservatives and media commentators to question his patriotism.

Questioning his patriotism
"First he kicked his American flag pin to the curb. Now Barack Obama has a new round of patriotism problems. Wait until you hear what the White House hopeful didn't do during the singing of the national anthem," said Steve Doocy, co-host of "Fox and Friends" on the Fox News Channel.

"He felt it OK to come out of the closet as the domestic insurgent he is," former radio host Mark Williams said on Fox.

Gration said he had a copy of the national anthem photo e-mailed to him by a friend who didn't know the facts and questioned how a military man could support someone who doesn't honor the Pledge of Allegiance.

"I go to baseball games and football games and there's just a minority of us who put our hands over our heart. It's not an indication of patriotism," Gration said. Gration said he personally wears a flag pin, but "if I meet someone who doesn't have a lapel pin, it doesn't mean they are more or less patriotic than I am."

And, he added, "I don't think you can find Barack again not putting his hand over his heart at the national anthem."
 
This is not as significant as you may assume. Democrats don't wear patriotism like a badge. Republicans believe most Dems are weak on patriotism.

Swiftboating didn't defeat John Kerry. He didn't motivate enough Dems to get out and vote.

George Bush supporters gave him the victory over both Gore and Kerry. This will not be true this time. Republicans don't like McCain. McCain can't say or do enough to get the Republicans him.

That patriotism attack is an old tired argument. Obama is no Kerry. He has energized the Democratic party. The only thing that can harm Obama is if female Dems hold Hillary's lost against Obama.
 
This is not as significant as you may assume. Democrats don't wear patriotism like a badge. Republicans believe most Dems are weak on patriotism.

Republicans use patriotism as a wedge issue and a weapon. Few of the Hawks put their money where their mouths are. Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Hannity, GW even Reagan didn’t serve in the military or even saw combat when they could have, yet they want other people to pay the ultimate sacrificed.

Swiftboating didn't defeat John Kerry. He didn't motivate enough Dems to get out and vote.

Swift boating helped defeat Kerry, although it is the fault of those people that did not research the factual holes, half truths and out right lies of their tactics. In either case, it was dishonest which is in line with their mindset.

George Bush supporters gave him the victory over both Gore and Kerry. This will not be true this time. Republicans don't like McCain. McCain can't say or do enough to get the Republicans him.

There was so much hanky panky in the 2004 Ohio election.
Voter Suppression in Ohio

That patriotism attack is an old tired argument. Obama is no Kerry. He has energized the Democratic party. The only thing that can harm Obama is if female Dems hold Hillary's lost against Obama.

This is an old tactic used most famously by Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy during the 1950s and they will drag it up when convenient. Do you remember how energized the democrats were in 2004? GW won 51% to 49% in the most participated election in US history? Ohio was in dispute (see above).
 
Bill O’Reilly Audio
[WM]http://clips.mediamatters.org/static/audio/oreilly-20080219-obama.mp3[/WM]​
 
The only thing that can harm Obama is if female Dems hold Hillary's lost against Obama.

..u don't really know the repubs do u? how long have u been in the United States? these guys do whatever it takes to win..yes it seems like the repubs don't like McCain but guess what, they will be united come november, sorry, ways b4 november. They will find a common thread that will bind them to McCain n swallow the differences. I notice some of them here on this board brandishing Obama signs, but they have been lapdogs for this admin big time. Funny how they are supporting Obama, initiating tons of posts, makes u wonder how many Repubs voted for him to kick Shillary's ass, so far. Good post Thought1, i started listening to conservative radio more lately to find out what these guys are saying about Obama n some impending 'swift boat' attacks.
 
O'Reilly's statement "..I don't want to go out on a lynching party against Michelle Obama..." shows the use of words in a coded language. These words cause a reaction when they hit white ears just as they cause a reaction when they hit brown ears. Use of the term is not accidental with these highly paid communications professionals. Part of their compensation is for the trust extended that they will choose their words carefully - even controversial terminology. There can be no explaining away the use of the term "lynching party" by O'Reilly (he tried to tie in Clarence Thomas "high-tech media lynching" as justification) WE ALL need to stand up against this stuff EVERY TIME it happens.

President Obama will only be as strong as we are standing with him!!
 
source: Media Matters.org

Fox & Friends' Doocy reported Obama's "patriotism problems"

[WM]http://mediamatters.org/static/video/fnf-20071023-obama.wmv[/WM]​

36 U.S.C. § 301(b)(1) (the current section of the U.S. Code dealing with conduct during the national anthem) does not compel the placement of the right hand over the heart during the performance of the national anthem (a requirement that would presumably be unconstitutional).
 
The Rev. Wright thing is also, among other things, an attack on Obama's patriotism.

QueEx
 
He and his wife are as patriotic as most Americans today, living in, paying taxes, earning and spending greenbacks and having a good time with the family on weekends, in the ol' U.S.of A. ...
 
The Rev. Wright thing is also, among other things, an attack on Obama's patriotism.

QueEx

You think?

He and his wife are as patriotic as most Americans today, living in, paying taxes, earning and spending greenbacks and having a good time with the family on weekends, in the ol' U.S.of A. ...


School Desegregation Protests. Boston 1973
 
Last edited:
The sad thing is...these people have nothing on this dude...so they are going with talking about his pastor......lol....and the sad thing is the dumb ass American public are going to think about that instead of 4 dollar a gallon gas when they enter the voting booth.....America gets what it deserves if they fall for the media's okey doke
 
<font size="5">

The "God bless America" test</font size>



2004353959.gif




Seattle Times
By David Domke and Kevin Coe
April 22, 2008

For Barack Obama, campaign 2008 has been a series of absurd but consequential tests.

First, there was the faith test: Profess publicly that Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior. Each candidate faced this test, but the stakes were higher for Obama because of the whispering campaign that he was (gasp!) a Muslim. He passed this test by often beginning speeches with "Giving all praise and honor to God" and noticeably ratcheting up his Christian references in key contexts.

Then there was the patriotism test: Recite the Pledge of Allegiance and wear an American flag lapel pin. Some falsely said that Obama hasn't always done the former, whereas it is the case that Obama has not always done the latter, and he offered this response: "I'm less concerned about what you're wearing on your lapel than what's in your heart." This comment was lauded on the left and jeered on the right. Given that the left matters more for Obama in the primary season, he cleared the bar.

Having passed the God test and the country test, Obama recently has been subjected to the God and country test: Embrace the nation's beloved slogan, "God bless America."

When the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's remix of this political favorite began to hit the airwaves, Obama appeared on several cable-news programs to attempt damage control. In a CNN interview, Anderson Cooper put this question to Obama: "Just for the record, you have no problem singing 'God Bless America'?" Obama laughed the question off, joking that his lack of vocal ability wouldn't allow it.

Three days later, though, Obama concluded a speech in Pennsylvania by saying "God bless America." The Chicago Tribune noted it was a departure from the norm, calling the closing "uncharacteristic." For the candidate perhaps, but certainly not for U.S. politicians.

Whether Obama's speech on March 18 and his explanations of his view on God and country (and race, it should be noted) will be sufficient to earn a passing grade on this crucial third test remains to be seen. But the fact that Obama — or any other candidate — must face such a test points to the deterioration of the American political environment.

Consider this reality: The omnipresence of "God bless America" as a political slogan is an entirely recent phenomenon. We know because we've run the numbers. Analysis of more than 15,000 public communications by political leaders from Franklin Roosevelt's election in 1932 — the beginning of the modern presidency — through six years of George W. Bush's administration revealed that prior to Ronald Reagan taking office in 1981, the phrase had passed a modern president's lips only once in a major address: Richard Nixon used it to conclude an April 30, 1973, speech about Watergate.

But Reagan brought "God bless America" into the mainstream by regularly using it to conclude his speeches. Since then, presidents and other politicians have used it nearly to death. Like Nike's "Just Do It" or any other ubiquitous catchphrase, the words eventually lose their meaning. "God bless America" has become the Pennsylvania Avenue equivalent to consumerized Madison Avenue staples.

That's the problem with the "God bless America" test: Like most of the other tests that constitute modern political discourse, it doesn't mean anything.

If a willingness to profess one's faith and patriotism and to conclude speeches with "God bless America" were accurate indicators of presidential prowess, Bush family members would have long ago secured their places among the nation's greatest leaders. Both George H.W. and George W. used it to conclude more than 80 percent of their major addresses, with the son often offering this important twist: "May God continue to bless America."

Asking candidates to demonstrate their God and country bona fides by parroting a political catchphrase is insulting and unnecessary. Journalists' and pundits' time would be far better spent interrogating the actual beliefs of those candidates so willing to ask God to bless America. After all, had the phrase not been rendered all but meaningless through overuse, "God bless America" would have to be taken as a serious theological proposition.

Today, it's just more of the noise that passes for serious political matters.

David Domke is professor of communication and head of journalism at the University of Washington. Kevin Coe is a doctoral candidate in speech communication at the University of Illinois. They are authors of "The God Strategy: How Religion Became a Political Weapon in America" (Oxford, www.thegodstrategy.com).
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
 
Obama may face grilling on patriotism
No flag pin, no hand over his heart: Is he exposed?



<font size="3">Questions around Michelle</font size>

On Monday, Michelle Obama told an audience in Milwaukee, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."

Cindy McCain, McCain's wife, days later responded by saying, "I have, and always will be, proud of my country." Barack Obama has expressed frustration that his wife's remarks had been taken out of context and turned into political fodder -- both the Obamas say she was talking about politics in the United States, not the country itself.



<font size="5"><center>Obama tells Tenn.'s GOP: 'Lay off my wife'</font size></center>

Obama_2008.sff_ORCC103_20080518145004.jpg

Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., is introduced
to seniors by his wife Michelle at Huntinton Terrace Assisted Living
Community in Gresham, Ore., Sunday, May 18, 2008. (AP Photo/Chris
Carlson)


Associated Press
May 19, 7:58 AM (ET)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama has a message for Tennessee's Republican Party: "Lay off my wife."

Obama, his party's presidential front-runner, and his wife, Michelle, were asked in an interview aired Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America" about an online video last week by the state's GOP taking her to task for a comment some considered unpatriotic.

"The GOP, should I be the nominee, can say whatever they want to say about me, my track record," Obama said. "If they think that they're going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family."

He called the strategy "low class."

The video, posted on YouTube, centered on remarks Michelle Obama made while campaigning in Wisconsin last February, when she said: "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country."

The four-minute video replayed the remark six times, interspersing it with commentary by Tennesseans on why they are proud of America. In a news release that included a link to the video, Tennessee's GOP said "the Tennessee Republican Party has always been proud of America." It urged radio stations to play "patriotic music" during Michelle Obama's visit to Nashville last Thursday.

Michelle Obama later clarified the remark, saying she meant she was proud of how Americans were engaging in the political process and that she had always been proud of her country.

"Whoever is in charge of the Tennessee GOP needs to think long and hard about the kind of campaign they want to run, and I think that's true for everybody, Democrat or Republican," Obama said in the ABC interview, adding: "These folks should lay off my wife."

Obama said his wife "loves this country. For them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her is, I think, just low class. I think that most of the American people would think that as well."

Tennessee's Republican Party was roundly criticized in March, including by likely presidential nominee John McCain, for a news release that used Barack Obama's middle name - Hussein - and showed a photo of him wearing what it said was "Muslim attire."

The release ultimately was removed from the party's Web site at the urging of the state's two Republican senators and Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan, who said he "rejects these kinds of campaign tactics."


http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20080519/D90OMOF00.html
 
thoughtone;3600334 MSNBC said:
Now Obama's wife, Michelle, has drawn their ire, too, for saying recently that she's really proud of her country for the first time in her adult life.

<font size="5"><center>McCain: It can be “tough” to be proud of USA</font size></center>

Reuters
Jeff Mason
June 14, 2008

WASHINGTON - Republican presidential candidate John McCain admitted on Saturday it can be difficult at times to be proud of the United States.

“I’ll admit to you … that it’s tough in some respects,” McCain said when asked by a questioner at a town hall meeting how to be proud of the country.

“We have not always done things right and we mismanaged the war in Iraq very badly for nearly four years.”

McCain’s wife, Cindy, pounced on Michelle Obama, the wife of presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, for saying in February that she was proud of her country “for the first time in my adult life.”

The Arizona senator said it was important for the United States to be more humble and inclusive.

“I think we can be proud of America because of what we’ve achieved and accomplished in this world,” he said.

“What we have to do is tell our friends around the world that we will be proud of America because of what we’re going to do.”


http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/06/14/mccain-it-can-be-tough-to-be-proud-of-usa/
 
<font size="5"><center>
Wanting the White House in the worst way</font size>
<font size="4">

The pundits who adore John McCain wonder why
he has adopted campaign tactics he once despised,
but his compromise with the smear merchants
began a long time ago</font size></center>


story.jpg

Fox News contributor Karl Rove at the Fox press
tour in Beverly Hills, Calif., July 14, 2008.


Salon
By Joe Conason
Aug. 1, 2008

For many of the journalists who regard John McCain as an unusually honorable politician, listening to his increasingly dishonorable campaign rhetoric is a painful and puzzling experience. They are openly wondering what has driven him to denigrate and even smear Barack Obama in a style more reminiscent of McCain’s old enemies in his own party than the straight-talking maverick. They want to believe that he has not really changed, and that somehow these lapses can be blamed on someone else. Like a spouse in a bad marriage, they have yet to face up to the fact that he actually changed years ago -- or to ask if he was ever the man they once thought he was.

Although several prominent pundits have denounced McCain for questioning Obama’s patriotism, a lingering reluctance to confront reality still colors much commentary on the campaign. Writing gingerly in the Washington Post of the Arizona senator’s “fuzzy” campaign persona, David Ignatius pleaded with McCain to return to the noble, tolerant and healing ways that no longer seem to govern his character.

Without saying exactly what troubles the Senator’s Beltway fan club about his current behavior, the Post columnist offered an exculpatory theory: “What’s damaging the McCain campaign now, I suspect, is that this fiercely independent man is trying to please other people -- especially a Republican leadership that doesn't really trust him.”

But the Republican leadership, whoever that might include, did not dictate the smears against Obama now emanating almost daily from the McCain camp. When McCain accused Obama of seeking to win the presidency by losing the Iraq war, tantamount to calling the Democrat a traitor, he uttered those words himself. When his campaign aired a commercial claiming that Obama had refused to visit wounded U.S. troops without TV cameras, he personally endorsed that lie. When his campaign then airs a vapid ad depicting Obama as a celebrity comparable to Britney Spears, McCain claims to be “proud” of that attack on a Senate colleague.

It is sad to watch McCain so casually abandon the civility that he pledged to maintain. But the descent from decency didn’t begin yesterday.

As many observers have noted by now, the negative strategy adopted by the McCain campaign under the leadership of new manager Steve Schmidt follows a template created by Schmidt’s old boss, Karl Rove. It is all very familiar stuff, from the direct assault on Obama’s power as a media star to the insinuations that he is weak, elitist, and not truly patriotic. All these themes can and will be amplified by “independent” advertising that raises doubts about Obama’s religious and racial attitudes (or those of his wife).


Using Rove's Tactics

It isn't Swift-boating -- yet -- but it regurgitates the same themes used by Rove in both the midterm campaigns of 2002 and the presidential race of 2004. Whether Schmidt or Rove executes those same old appeals to the worst in us hardly matters. What matters is that McCain has adopted an approach that was once thought beneath him. And that choice dates back to his decision to ally himself with George W. Bush and indeed with Rove, despite the vicious tactics that defeated him in the Republican primaries of 2000 -- for which he held them responsible.

The slurs aimed at McCain during the South Carolina and New York primaries were appalling-- even in an era of scoundrel politics -- and nobody doubted that they should be attributed, at least indirectly, to Rove. The whispering campaign included anonymous leaflets and phone calls about the former drug dependency of Cindy McCain and the alleged illegitimacy of the McCain’s adopted Bangladeshi daughter Bridget. Then an independent committee tied closely to Rove and Bush mounted a TV campaign in New York accusing McCain of cutting breast cancer research funding, even though his sister was a survivor of the disease.

It must have been hard for Cindy and Bridget McCain to watch the maverick reformer throw his arms awkwardly around President Bush during the 2004 convention. It must have been hard for McCain to make the TV ad featuring that embrace, with a script approved by Rove. It must have been even harder for him to watch the Swift-boating of his old friend John Kerry, a fellow Navy veteran whose volunteer service he respected, even though they disagreed vehemently about the Vietnam war and many other issues.

By the time McCain spoke up feebly against the Swift-boat campaign, the damage had been done -- to him as well as to Kerry. He had undergone a public transformation into a willing instrument of lesser men who trampled on his character and his honor, even his patriotism, just as his campaign is now seeking to do to Obama.

"They know no depths," he had complained wearily to reporters on his "straight talk" bus during the 2000 primaries. Now he has once more sold himself to those same forces, hoping that they will at last usher him into the White House. In his concession speech after the South Carolina primary, he said, "I want the presidency in the best way, not the worst way."

That is what has changed.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/08/01/rove_mccain/
 
Even so called liberal NPR is on the assault to paint Obama as foreign or out of the mainstream. As I have stated, their is NO major liberal news outlet!


source: Media Matters

<object width="320" height="335"><param name="movie" value="http://mediamatters.org/static/flash/mmfaplayer.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/tools/flash/config?id=462896"></param><embed src="http://mediamatters.org/static/flash/mmfaplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/tools/flash/config?id=462896" width="320" height="335"></embed></object>​

Roberts again criticizes Obama for "exotic" trip home to Hawaii

Summary: On NPR, Cokie Roberts asserted that Sen. Barack Obama's vacation to Hawaii "makes him seem a little bit more exotic," and characterized Hawaii as "a somewhat odd place to be doing it," despite also asserting, "I know that he is from Hawaii, he grew up there, his grandmother lives there." Roberts previously criticized Obama on ABC's This Week, stating that Obama's vacation in Hawaii "has the look of him going off to some sort of foreign, exotic place."

During the August 11 edition of NPR's Morning Edition, NPR news analyst Cokie Roberts asserted that Sen. Barack Obama's vacation to Hawaii, where he was born, "makes him seem a little bit more exotic," and characterized Hawaii as "a somewhat odd place to be doing it," despite also asserting, "I know that he is from Hawaii, he grew up there, his grandmother lives there."

The Honolulu Star-Bulletin reported on August 9 that "[a]fter delivering a campaign speech, Sen. Barack Obama's first stop on his Hawaii vacation was a visit to his grandmother's Makiki apartment, where he also lived during his youth."

Roberts also criticized Obama during the August 10 edition of ABC's This Week, acknowledging that "Hawaii is a state" but stating that Obama's vacation there "has the look of him going off to some sort of foreign, exotic place."

From the August 11 edition of NPR's Morning Edition:

RENEE MONTAGNE (co-host): Now, Obama is spending the week on vacation in Hawaii. He's taking a vacation, he says, because it's, you know, good for his family, but is it a good point in the presidential campaign?

ROBERTS: It's a little rough to be doing it at this point although, he -- you know, I think he is feeling somewhat secure, but Hawaii is also a somewhat odd place to be doing it. I know that he is from Hawaii, he grew up there, his grandmother lives there, but he's made such a point about how he is from Kansas and, you know, the boy from Kansas and Kenya and it makes him seem a little bit more exotic than perhaps he would want to come across as at this stage in the presidential campaign.



____________________________​

source: Media Matters



[WM]http://mediamatters.org/static/audio/npr-20080807-liasson2.mp3[/WM]​

Liasson finds "irony" in "a liberal Democrat showcasing his faith"

Summary: On NPR's Morning Edition, Mara Liasson asserted there was "irony" in "a liberal Democrat showcasing his faith." Liasson did not explain what she thought was "ironic" about such an action.

On the August 7 broadcast of NPR's Morning Edition, national political correspondent Mara Liasson asserted there was "irony" in "a liberal Democrat showcasing his faith," stating during a report about the presidential candidates' efforts to "court white evangelical voters": "The irony of a liberal Democrat showcasing his faith is not lost on [former Republican presidential candidate] Gary Bauer, a leading conservative religious activist." Liasson did not explain what she thought was "ironic" about such an action.

Media Matters for America has documented numerous instances of the media advancing the false notion that Democratic candidates shy away from discussions of religious faith.

From the August 7 broadcast of NPR's Morning Edition:

STEVE WALDMAN (Beliefnet.com editor-in-chief): If Obama can show himself to be a person of faith, it also helps him combat the idea that he's an elitist, that he's not a mainstream American. Because if he shows that he prays and he's a churchgoing guy and he's a religious guy, that's a very mainstream characteristic.

LIASSON: The irony of a liberal Democrat showcasing his faith is not lost on Gary Bauer, a leading conservative religious activist.
 
Last edited:
<font size="4">If you thought the attacks on Barack Obama's
"Patriotism" had run their course, think again:


</font size>


<font size="5"><center>McCain Backers Attack
Obama's Character, Patriotism </font size></center>


Bloomberg
By Christopher Stern
October 5, 2008


(Bloomberg) -- Senator John McCain's supporters escalated attacks on Senator Barack Obama's patriotism and his acquaintance with a former Vietnam-era radical as polls show the Republican nominee losing ground a month before the election.

``It's appropriate to talk about Barack Obama's judgment,'' said Republican Senator Mel Martinez, a Florida Republican, on ABC News's ``This Week.''

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty said on the program that Bill Ayers, a founding member of the Weather Underground group that carried out a series of domestic bombings in the 1970s, once hosted a coffee in his home to aid Obama's political career.

The comments highlight the McCain campaign's determination to turn the contest into a discussion of Obama's character. Democrats accused the McCain campaign of using smear tactics in a bid to revive his fortunes and distract voter attention from the souring economy, an issue that polls show favors Obama.

``This is going to be a month, I think, of character assassination,'' Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat who supports Obama, told ``Face the Nation.''

Republican Representative Heather Wilson of New Mexico said on CBS's ``Face the Nation'' that Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, ``has been critical not only of the president but of American policy and hence has kind of a negative view of America in the world.''


A Rally

At a campaign rally yesterday, McCain's running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, said Obama, 47, used to ``pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country.''

Ayers, now a professor of education at the University of Illinois in Chicago, donated $200 in 2001 to Obama's campaign for the Illinois state senate and served with him from 1999 to 2002 on the nine-member board of the Woods Fund, an anti-poverty group.

Obama, of Illinois, answered a question about Ayers earlier this year during a debate, saying: ``The notion that somehow as a consequence of knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense.''

The Weather Underground carried out a series of bombings in the early 1970s -- including the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. While Ayers was never convicted of those attacks, he told the New York Times in an interview published Sept. 11, 2001, that ``I don't regret setting bombs.''


Polls Show

The attempt to link Obama to Ayers comes as polls show Obama building a lead over McCain, of Arizona. McCain's campaign last week said it is effectively ceding Michigan, which has 17 electoral votes. It takes 270 electoral-college votes to win the presidential election.

Obama led by at least 7 percentage points nationally in two polls released last week.

Obama led McCain 49 percent to 42 percent among registered voters surveyed by the Pew Research Center. In a CBS News poll, Obama is ahead of the Arizona senator 50 percent to 41 percent among likely voters.

In addition, a survey by the Columbus Dispatch showed Obama leading 49 to 42 in Ohio, and a Minneapolis Star Tribune poll showed Obama leading 55 to 37 in Minnesota.

``We are very well-funded, and we are looking for a very aggressive last 30 days,'' senior McCain adviser Greg Strimple told reporters Oct. 2. ``We're looking to turning the page on this financial crisis and getting back to discussing Mr. Obama's liberal, aggressively liberal record and how he will be too risky for the Americans.''


Complaint

The Republican National Committee today said that it will ask the Federal Election Commission to investigate the origins of some small-dollar donations that have fueled the Obama campaign's record-shattering fundraising totals.

The committee's chief legal counsel, Sean Carincross, alleged that Obama's campaign accepted donations from outside of the country, citing a Newsweek article that detailed donors who contributed under apparently fake names. ``We believe that the American people should know first and foremost if foreign money is pouring into a presidential election,'' Cairncross said in a conference call with reporters.

Obama's campaign responded that McCain ``has had to return over $1.2 million to donors who potentially violated the law with their contributions.''

``We look forward to a thorough investigation into whether John McCain's campaign has returned all of the money it raised from foreign nationals,'' Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. ``We constantly review our donors for any issues and, while no organization is completely protected from Internet fraud, we will continue to review our fundraising procedures to ensure that we are taking every available step to root out improper contributions.''

To contact the reporters on this story: Christopher Stern in Washington at cstern3@bloomberg.net; Julianna Goldman in Asheville, North Carolina at jgoldman6@bloomberg.net

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a1F8yut_q.O0&refer=home
 
`

Looking back on this thread . . .


<font size="5"><center>
The Massive Resistance Movement </font size>
<font size="5">Against Obama
</font size></center>

By: Sherrilyn A. Ifill
September 22, 2010


We haven't wanted to face it.

We've tried to avoid it.

We've hoped that:

  • last summer's town halls,

  • the Birthers,

  • the deliberate misinformation about President Barack Obama,

  • the rise of the Tea Party,

  • the refusal of Republican leadership to engage with the president in good faith --

<font size="3">just represented the temporary growing pains of a nation that was navigating unchartered waters after courageously electing its first African-American president at a time of devastating economic turmoil.</font size>


. . . apparently not.

QueEx
 
Back
Top