The Primitive Black nation of America in 1832 by Professor Constantine Rafinesque

Mask

"OneOfTheBest"
Platinum Member
Have any one researcher this info yet?




PROFESSOR CONSTANTINE SAMUEL RAFINESQUE THE PRIMITIVE BLACK NATIONS OF AMERIC...



8aced2de2c8a93d44a65c3356c3a2723.jpg


PROFESSOR CONSTANTINE SAMUEL RAFINESQUE
THE PRIMITIVE BLACK NATIONS OF AMERICA. 1832


"The Native American Negroes or black Indians have been seen in Brazil, Guyana, Caraccas, Popayan, Choco, North California and etc:

The Aroras or Caroras of Cumana, were black, but with fine features and long hair, like the Jolofs and Gallas of Africa.

The Esteros latitude 32, are like the Hottentots and the Numuquas, Tambukis, and many other Nigritian tribes, not black, but dark brown, yet complete Negroes, with large thick lips, broad flat noses, and very ugly, with hair crisped or curly. All these tribes live in New California The Aroras or Caroras of Cumana, were black, but with fine features and long hair, like the Jolofs and Gallas of Africa.

The Esteros latitude 32, are like the Hottentots and the Numuquas, Tambukis, and many other Nigritian tribes, not black, but dark brown, yet complete Negroes, with large thick lips, broad flat noses, and very ugly, with hair crisped or curly. All these tribes live in New California

The American Negroes of Quarenqua, in Choco, (the great level plain 900 miles long, 90 wide, separating the Andes of South America from the mountains of Panama,) were black and with woolly heads in 1506. They are mentioned by Dangleria, and all the early accurate writers.

The Yemasees or Jamasi were remarkably Black people Notices of Florida and the Campaigns;
The Ancient Caracoles of Hayti, represented as a Nation of Beasts by the Historical Songs

The Califurnams of the Carib Islands, called Black Caribs or Guauini by others, are a black branch of Caribs.

The Arquahos of Cutara mentioned by Garcias in the West Indies, quite black.

The Aroras of Raleigh or Yaruras of the Spaniards, ugly black or brown Negroes, yet existing near the Oronoco, and language known, called Monkeys by their neighbors The Chaymas of Guyana, brown Negroes like Hottentots,

The Manjipas and Porcigis of Nienhof, the Motayas of Knivet are all of Brazil, brown Negroes with curly hair.

The Nigritas of Martyr in Darien, yet existing in Choco under the name of Chuanas or Gaunas or Chinos (Dariente). Ugly black or red Negroes.

The Manabies of Popayan (in Columbia) blackish with Negro features and hair.

The Guabas and Jaras of Tagugalpa (Tegucigalpa) near the Honduras. The Enslen or Esteros of New California, ugly blackish Negroes.

The black Indians met by the Spaniards in Louisiana in 1543.

The Moon-eyed Negroes, and Albinos, destroyed by the Cherokees, and seen in Panama."
 
Remember that these white folks would group dark-skinned groups together. Aboriginal Australians have been known to be in the Americas. There's no reason to doubt Africans sailed west on the same currents Europeans used. Just interesting tying all of together.

It would still be nice to know what happened to the Mali expedition to the west in the 1300s.
 
This where the confusion arrives. The Negro Native Americans were from Africa, some were also Negrito, Africans that traveled East and ended up in America. But both were in America before the white man.

Our history is being hidden from us. We are the blacks that the Pope sent to be killed and captured, in the interest of conquering this land.
 
Im saying there is a reasone why you NEVER hear nothing about the Olmecs...

the biggest trick they played on us was robbing our true culture and calling us these imaginary things like negro and black as if there is a place called negoland or blackland...

I said it once and I will say it many more times.. the atlantic slave trade did occur, but most of us were already here...

europeans are on our land... stole it with disease, murder and pen and paper....

wrote on the paper, this is a deed and it means we own the land...

and most of us still believe that bullshit....

they love saying go back to africa when the truth is,

they need to go back to europe and pay back all the gold and resources they stole...
 
Im saying there is a reasone why you NEVER hear nothing about the Olmecs...

the biggest trick they played on us was robbing our true culture and calling us these imaginary things like negro and black as if there is a place called negoland or blackland...

I said it once and I will say it many more times.. the atlantic slave trade did occur, but most of us were already here...

europeans are on our land... stole it with disease, murder and pen and paper....

wrote on the paper, this is a deed and it means we own the land...

and most of us still believe that bullshit....

they love saying go back to africa when the truth is,

they need to go back to europe and pay back all the gold and resources they stole...
...and boom goes the dynamite. :itsawrap:
 
apparently a lot of his work can be found in harvard...

just more proof this information is well known throughout,

established academia, and is purposely kept away from our children

so we can stay lost in the columbus discovered america and we were only slaves in this country myth....

the truth is slowly seeping out....
 
I agree that we came before Columbus, but most of use were murdered, infected by European disease. They continued to kill the native African that was here, s0 they went and replenished them with us. We are from Africa. No matter how you look at it, we are Igbo, Youruba, and Hausa from Nigeria. It is historical record that most of us come from the Bight of Biafra, modern day Nigeria. The name given to that area by a white woman, yeah, that ****** area. Them motherfuckers aint fooling shit. Dig deeper. Now, if you got some good documents, then share them bitches to support your argument.

Not as many africans came here.. Depend on who you listen too, 95% of us are native!! Im not here to argue with you..
 
Interesting.

The “Primitive” Black Nations of America
BY MARCUS · PUBLISHED 07/20/2016 · UPDATED 08/10/2016


The “Primitive” Black Nations of America.

tmp_8528-Screenshot_20160709-223727281798200.jpg

Photo:Wikipedia Commons

By Professor C. S.Rafinesque
Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge
1833 Indians

The Society of Geography having offered a reward for the best memoir on the Origin of the Asiatic Negroes, I sent them last year two Memoirs; one on those Asiatic Negroes,’wherein I demonstrated the affinities of their languages with the African and Polynesian Negroes, as well as with the Hindus and Chinese, and renders it probable that all the Negroes originated in the Southern Slopes of the Himalaya Mountains, as they did once exist all over India, South China, Japan, Persia and Arabia.

My second Memoir was on the Negro or Black Nations, found in America before Columbus, wherein I proved their existence and connection by language with the Negroes of Africa and Polynesia. These Memoirs have been rewarded by the learned Society of Geography, with a gold medal of 100 Francs, which was lately communicated to me by Messrs Warden, our former Consul in Paris, and Jomard member of the Institute. This gratifying intelligence will be acceptable to all my friends, and furnish another proof of my ability to unravel at last, the origins of all the American Nations and Tribes, in pursuing the path which I have opened, by comparing all the Languages mathematically and numerically with each other.

To many, this fact of old Black Nations in America will be new, yet it is an important feature of American History, as well as the existence of primitive White Nations there still more numerous. To furnish a kind of insight into this subject. I will here merely enumerate the Black tribes of which I have found evident traces and remains in North and South America.

1. The Ancient Caracols of Hayti, represented as a Nation of Beasts by the Historical Songs, see Roman
and Martyr.

2. The Califurnaims of the Carib Islands, called Black Caribs or Guanini by others, are a black branch of Caribs. See Rochefort, Herrera, &c.

3. The Arguahos of Cutara mentioned by Garcias in the West Indies, quite black.

4. The black Aroras of Raleigh, or Yaruras of the Spaniards, ugly
black or brown Negroes, yet existing near the Oronoco, and language known, called Monkeys by their neighbors.

5. Chaymas of Guyana, brown Negroes like Hottentots, see Humboldt.

6. The Mangipas and Porcigis of Nienhof, the Motayas of Knivet are all of Brazil, brown Negroes with curly hair. See also Vespucius and Pigafetta.

7. The Nigritas of Martyr in Darien, yet existing in Choco under the name of Chuanas or Gaunas or Chinos (Dariente). Ugly black or red Negroes.

8. The Manabies of Popayan (in Columbia) blackish with Negro features and hair. See Stevenson.

9. The Guabas and Jaras of Tagugalpa (Tegucigalpa) near the Honduras. . See Juaros, &c., now called Zambos.

10. The Enslen or Esteros of New California, ugly blackish Negroes See Vanegas, Langsdorf, &c.

11. The Black Indians met by the Spaniards in Louisiana in 1543. See Soto’s invasion.

12. The Moon-eyed Negroes, and Albinos, destroyed by the Cherokees, and seen in Panama. Barton, &c. Among these the Yarura language has 50 per cent of anal with t e Gauna, 40 percent with e- Ashanty qr Fanty of Guinea, and about 33.per cent with the Fulah, Bornu and Congo languages of Africa. In Asia it has 39 per cent of numerical affinity with the Samang Negroes, and 40 per cent with the Negroes of Andaman as well as those of Australia or New Holland. All this and many other details are given at length, proved by authorities and compared Vocabularies, in my Memoir.

Rafinesque, C. S. (Constantine Samuel), 1783-1840. Atlantic journal, and friend of knowledge [microform] : in eight numbers : containing about 160 original articles and tracts on natural and historical sciences, the description of about 150 new plants, and 100 new animals or fossils ; many vocabularies of languages, historical and geological facts, &c. &c. &c. (Kindle Locations 4173-4193). Philadelphia : [s.n.].

“Ancient Black Americans”( ) and made it into a song/beat.The original video poster misquoted, by stating that “John Brown” called Powhatan Black. This is incorrect, it was John Smith in 1619 whom made that statement. Also for some reason my screen shots are out of focus, so I’ve included the text below.

FOUR LETTERS ON AMERICAN HISTORY.
By Prof. Rafinesque, to Dr. J. H. M’Culloh, of Baltimore.

FIRST LETTER.

You appear desirous to learn something more of my Researches on the Ancient and Modern History of North and South America. I feel willing and happy to be able to answer your inquiries, and even to suggest perhaps some new facts.

The continent of America has ever been the field of philosophical delusions, as Africa of fables and monsters, and Asia of religious creeds. All the various systems amd theories of monks and philosophers on the origin, climate, inhabitants, &c. of America, have been repeatedly destroyed by facts, and yet they find to this day many believers. To this day they speak and write of the Red men of America, while there is not a Red Man, (nor never was,) in this continent. To this day do they attempt to separate the American languages from all others, while their roots and structure are exactly like many in the Eastern Continent.

When we are led by systems, or do not investigate and compare subjects in all their bearings, we are apt to fall into these delusive mistakes. But whoever will take the trouble, (as I have done,) to compare the features, languages, religions, customs, &c. of all the nations of the five parts of this world, Asia, Europe, Africa, Polynesia, and America, will find, (as I have found,) that mankind is a unity with many deviations of features, complexions, languages, religions, governments, civilizations, &c. all derived from single primitive types of those effect, and a common central focus.

To evince this result in a single but striking point, doubted to this day by superficial inquirers, it is sufficient to mention that there were in America, before Columbus came, nations and tribes of the following complexions: coppered, tawny, olive, dusky, white or pale yellow, dark brown, and black; (but none red unless painted,) and that all these complexions are also found in Asia, in Polynesia, and in Africa.

The native American Negroes or black Indians, have been seen in Brazil, Guyana, Caraccas, Popayan, Choco, North California, &c. Some of them, such as the Aroras or Caroras of Cumana, were black, but with fine features and long hair, like the Jolofs and Gallas of Africa. Others in New California, latitude 32, called Esteros, are like the Hottentots, Numuquas, Tambukis, and many other Nigritian tribes, not black, but dark brown, yet complete Negroes, with large thick lips, broad flat noses, and very ugly, with hair crisped or curly. The Negro features belong to the form of the head rather than the colour, since [there] are in Africa, Asia, and Polynesia, black, brown, yellow, olive, coppery, (and even white) Negroes.
May, 1828. C. S. RAFINESQUE.

Aggregated Source:

Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge, Volume 1
Volume 839 of American periodical series: 1800-1850
Contributor Constantine Samuel Rafinesque
Published 1833
Original from Harvard University
Digitized Jul 4, 2007

http://aggregatepress.org/the-primitive-black-nations-of-america/
 
If the Spaniards met black native americans in 1534, yet there was an native american slave trade in the 15th Century (1400's), there's are good chance, almost certainly that negroid native americans were being captured into slavery. Before the europeans arrived America was a nation of mongols and blacks, and I've heard but not yet verified that the blacks outnumbered the mongols when the Europeans arrived. American History says the first "AFRICAN" slaves arrived in America in 1619, but the native american aka negro slave trade was already in motion for 200 YEARS.

-------

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave...cas#European_enslavement_of_indigenous_people

"European colonies purchased indigenous people as slaves as part of the international indigenous American slave trade, which lasted from the late 15th century into the 19th century. Recently, scholars Andrés Reséndez and Brett Rushforth have estimated that between two and five million indigenous people were enslaved as part of this trade.[2][3] Although slavery is illegal throughout the Americas, some indigenous peoples are still enslaved today.[4]"



"The encomienda system was an agreement between the Council of the Indies and the Spanish crown to exchange education and protection from warring tribes for the use of the land owned by the caciques, lords, or encomenderos and the promise of seasonal labour.[5] Intermittently, the colonists needed to purge these anaborios (native mercenaries). From the earliest days on the Caribbean islands they settled, the Spanish encomenderos precipitated manyrevolts and hostilities, both Native American and Spanish in origin, through their harsh treatment. One of the first localities for intensive use of encomienda was the gold mines of Hispaniola.

Native American slavery was also practiced by the English in the Carolinas who sold Native American captives into slavery locally and on the English plantations in the Caribbean.[6] One of the first tribes that specialized in slave raids and trade with Carolina was the Westo, followed by many others including the Yamasee, Chickasaw, and Creek. Historian Alan Gallay estimates the number of Native Americans in southeast America sold in the British slave trade from 1670 to 1715 as between 24,000 and 51,000. He also notes that during this period more slaves (Native American, African, or otherwise) were exported from Charles Town than imported.[7] Slaving of Indians in Carolinas had been forbidden in about 1672.[8]

Many Native American tribes did enslave small numbers of captives and in the southwestern United States, and some were sold to local Hispanic residents.[9] In at least one instance in the San Luis Valley of Colorado a female household slave continued in her status long after the Emancipation Proclamation.

Slavery of Native Americans was organized in colonial and Mexican California through Franciscan missions, theoretically entitled to ten years of Native labor, but in practice maintaining them in perpetual servitude, until their charge was revoked in the mid-1830s. Following the 1848 American invasion, Native Californians were enslaved in the new state from statehood in 1850 to 1867.[10] Slavery required the posting of a bond by the slave holder and enslavement occurred through raids and a four-month servitude imposed as a punishment for Native American "vagrancy".[11]

The citizens of New France received slaves as gifts from their allies among First Nations peoples. Many of these slaves were prisoners taken in raids against the villages of the Fox nation, a tribe that was an ancient rival of the Miami people and their Algonquian allies.[12] Native or ("panis", likely a corruption of Pawnee) slaves were much easier to obtain and thus more numerous than African slaves in New France, but were less valued. The average native slave died at 18, whereas the average African slave died at 25.[13] In 1790, the abolition movement was gaining credence in Canada; there was an incident involving a slave woman being violently abused by her slave owner on her way to being sold in the United States.[14] The Act Against Slavery of 1793 legislated the gradual abolition of slavery: no slaves could be imported; slaves already in the province would remain enslaved until death, no new slaves could be brought into Upper Canada, and children born to female slaves would be slaves but must be freed at age 25.[14] The Act remained in force until 1833 when the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act finally abolished slavery in all parts of the British Empire.[15] Historian Marcel Trudel has discovered 4,092 recorded slaves throughout Canadian history, of which 2,692 were aboriginal people, owned mostly by the French, and 1,400 blacks owned mostly by the British, together owned by about 1,400 masters.[14] Trudel also noted 31 marriages took place between French colonists and aboriginal slaves.[14]"
 
Last edited:
I have not read this but Dr. King knew a lot about the truth that he did not let white people on that he knew. They soon found out he was not being programmed the way they have so called Christians programmed. But the seed he was planting was trying to uncover our subconscious to a period that whites thought they had completely hid and got rid of. It was a period when we was more natural and more ourselves. The original and God. Now it is my job( ORIGINAL BLACK NATION) to rebuild the Garden Of Eden when we was more advanced than we are today and when we lived as ourselves (God).
 
So much true history has been hidden.

This is true.

I have not read this but Dr. King knew a lot about the truth that he did not let white people on that he knew. They soon found out he was not being programmed the way they have so called Christians programmed. But the seed he was planting was trying to uncover our subconscious to a period that whites thought they had completely hid and got rid of. It was a period when we was more natural and more ourselves. The original and God. Now it is my job( ORIGINAL BLACK NATION) to rebuild the Garden Of Eden when we was more advanced than we are today and when we lived as ourselves (God).

I wanted to post these before on BGOL, but thought it would be laughed at. I wasn't absolutely positive it was all correct knowing how youtube "scholars" can twist things, but the more I checked into it the more I see there is gems in what is being said.


 
This is true.



I wanted to post these before on BGOL, but thought it would be laughed at. I wasn't absolutely positive it was all correct knowing how youtube "scholars" can twist things, but the more I checked into it the more I see there is gems in what is being said.



That was my first time checking out that video. Dr. King use to talk to some of his workers about how certain things in different books contradicted each other. The dude that did this video did his home work. I went and got a pateron page also. I plan on trying to do the tee shirts soon Plus start selling them around here. I notice that Ben X and a few more blacks start out with certain moves to become businessmen.
Somebody on here had a post about killer robots. Well everybody that has embraced whites paid for it later on. And the black scientist that created them may have been killed by them himself. Without total separation and a chance for us to at least think for ourselves we are doomed and the programming and genocide will continue to go on. Any contact with the truth of the origin of man is almost completely gone. We are the last ones left.
 
That was my first time checking out that video. Dr. King use to talk to some of his workers about how certain things in different books contradicted each other. The dude that did this video did his home work. I went and got a pateron page also. I plan on trying to do the tee shirts soon Plus start selling them around here. I notice that Ben X and a few more blacks start out with certain moves to become businessmen.
Somebody on here had a post about killer robots. Well everybody that has embraced whites paid for it later on. And the black scientist that created them may have been killed by them himself. Without total separation and a chance for us to at least think for ourselves we are doomed and the programming and genocide will continue to go on. Any contact with the truth of the origin of man is almost completely gone. We are the last ones left.

This is why I think there is so much distrust by people when it comes to education and believing some of its teacher of the different types of knowledge given to humans. There should be critical thinking and balanced thought process which the masses doesn't generally have. I spoke in another thread concerning Steph Curry and the Moon landing(I dropped stuff about space and colonizing being elements of mankind from the beginning of time. Some see the ancients as being primitive, but it is clear they had some knowledge of things that we no longer grasp just as we have knowledge they probably couldn't grasp meaning we as humans have supreme skills that is still not tapped fully . The back and forth there regardless of who was right or wrong got me thinking why there is so much strife in the world as everyone's view of the same thing isn't exactly the same thing. People can come to different conclusions and this imo is the real tool used by those in power moreso than anything else.

Dr. King depending on who you talk to has various perceptions on what he was all about. IMO it is clear Dr. King understood spiritual laws and manifested that in ways to get the message across on what was happening in the US showing the war was not just started with the civil rights movement. He saw that there was a system put in place that allowed the mindset to grow and also put one group into a situation that it would be hard to turn over that system.

He is known as being the more peaceful between himself and Malcolm X, but it seems to me Dr. King was more lethal by even some of what I seen in that video. It is why he was killed in the way that he was. The supposed heir apparent of King and X being Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson seemed to switch roles of their predecessors in terms of how they were doing things in their last days.

Back to the topic of Mars and the Moon. The origin of man being completely lost could be true, but it could also be concealed by those who had the knowledge passed on. It could have also have deliberately been destroyed for whatever reason good or bad. There are parts missing I have no doubts.

That is why in the other thread I talked about Mars and humans being sent there. Could the confusion we have now be exactly what a future population of Mars have thousands of years from now? Who knows maybe the original man thought the knowledge would always be there not realizing humans would alter things later on. I still think biblical books and so on have certain knowledge to it, but at times gets dismissed as primitive.

It's very arrogant to dismiss the forefathers of the human race as simple minded or not intelligent since we are all descendants from these very people. The blueprints for civilizations are written all over it. That knowledge came from somewhere just as if a person goes to the doctor to get diagnosed for an ailment. That doctor received that knowledge from somewhere.

The saying knowledge is power is very real. It is how societies are made and how it creates classes of people.

What's your opinions on these videos?




The conflict of how history is told with him above is with these videos below which clearly have slave oral history on tape.
It still doesn't mean that there hasn't been any alterations by people about what happened.


 
This is why I think there is so much distrust by people when it comes to education and believing some of its teacher of the different types of knowledge given to humans. There should be critical thinking and balanced thought process which the masses doesn't generally have. I spoke in another thread concerning Steph Curry and the Moon landing(I dropped stuff about space and colonizing being elements of mankind from the beginning of time. Some see the ancients as being primitive, but it is clear they had some knowledge of things that we no longer grasp just as we have knowledge they probably couldn't grasp meaning we as humans have supreme skills that is still not tapped fully . The back and forth there regardless of who was right or wrong got me thinking why there is so much strife in the world as everyone's view of the same thing isn't exactly the same thing. People can come to different conclusions and this imo is the real tool used by those in power moreso than anything else.

Dr. King depending on who you talk to has various perceptions on what he was all about. IMO it is clear Dr. King understood spiritual laws and manifested that in ways to get the message across on what was happening in the US showing the war was not just started with the civil rights movement. He saw that there was a system put in place that allowed the mindset to grow and also put one group into a situation that it would be hard to turn over that system.

He is known as being the more peaceful between himself and Malcolm X, but it seems to me Dr. King was more lethal by even some of what I seen in that video. It is why he was killed in the way that he was. The supposed heir apparent of King and X being Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson seemed to switch roles of their predecessors in terms of how they were doing things in their last days.

Back to the topic of Mars and the Moon. The origin of man being completely lost could be true, but it could also be concealed by those who had the knowledge passed on. It could have also have deliberately been destroyed for whatever reason good or bad. There are parts missing I have no doubts.

That is why in the other thread I talked about Mars and humans being sent there. Could the confusion we have now be exactly what a future population of Mars have thousands of years from now? Who knows maybe the original man thought the knowledge would always be there not realizing humans would alter things later on. I still think biblical books and so on have certain knowledge to it, but at times gets dismissed as primitive.

It's very arrogant to dismiss the forefathers of the human race as simple minded or not intelligent since we are all descendants from these very people. The blueprints for civilizations are written all over it. That knowledge came from somewhere just as if a person goes to the doctor to get diagnosed for an ailment. That doctor received that knowledge from somewhere.

The saying knowledge is power is very real. It is how societies are made and how it creates classes of people.

What's your opinions on these videos?




The conflict of how history is told with him above is with these videos below which clearly have slave oral history on tape.
It still doesn't mean that there hasn't been any alterations by people about what happened.




I would beware of Dane Calloway. He's telling some truth but not the whole truth.

"98% of African-Americans Ain't African" is false. It is true that SOME native americans blended in with african slaves, but it ain't no damned 98%.
 
I would beware of Dane Calloway. He's telling some truth but not the whole truth.

"98% of African-Americans Ain't African" is false. It is true that SOME native americans blended in with african slaves, but it ain't no damned 98%.

Yeah, this is what I mean by humans and having motives telling history. I figured there had to be blending because of other records. Even then sometimes lack of records doesn't exactly mean something didn't exist either. People in power could destroy records if they want something not be known.
 
So sad my people don't know we were already here and the HIStory they think they know is moot. Africans are indigenous to all continents of this planet, Caucasians decend from Africans, their lack of melanin and recessive traits and ties to Neanderthal genetics mutated them and they are now our nemesis we must share the world with them in peace but never forget who or what they are!

...I could go on but hopefully my melanated children of light will wake up and rise up.
 
This is why I think there is so much distrust by people when it comes to education and believing some of its teacher of the different types of knowledge given to humans. There should be critical thinking and balanced thought process which the masses doesn't generally have. I spoke in another thread concerning Steph Curry and the Moon landing(I dropped stuff about space and colonizing being elements of mankind from the beginning of time. Some see the ancients as being primitive, but it is clear they had some knowledge of things that we no longer grasp just as we have knowledge they probably couldn't grasp meaning we as humans have supreme skills that is still not tapped fully . The back and forth there regardless of who was right or wrong got me thinking why there is so much strife in the world as everyone's view of the same thing isn't exactly the same thing. People can come to different conclusions and this imo is the real tool used by those in power moreso than anything else.

Dr. King depending on who you talk to has various perceptions on what he was all about. IMO it is clear Dr. King understood spiritual laws and manifested that in ways to get the message across on what was happening in the US showing the war was not just started with the civil rights movement. He saw that there was a system put in place that allowed the mindset to grow and also put one group into a situation that it would be hard to turn over that system.

He is known as being the more peaceful between himself and Malcolm X, but it seems to me Dr. King was more lethal by even some of what I seen in that video. It is why he was killed in the way that he was. The supposed heir apparent of King and X being Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson seemed to switch roles of their predecessors in terms of how they were doing things in their last days.

Back to the topic of Mars and the Moon. The origin of man being completely lost could be true, but it could also be concealed by those who had the knowledge passed on. It could have also have deliberately been destroyed for whatever reason good or bad. There are parts missing I have no doubts.

That is why in the other thread I talked about Mars and humans being sent there. Could the confusion we have now be exactly what a future population of Mars have thousands of years from now? Who knows maybe the original man thought the knowledge would always be there not realizing humans would alter things later on. I still think biblical books and so on have certain knowledge to it, but at times gets dismissed as primitive.

It's very arrogant to dismiss the forefathers of the human race as simple minded or not intelligent since we are all descendants from these very people. The blueprints for civilizations are written all over it. That knowledge came from somewhere just as if a person goes to the doctor to get diagnosed for an ailment. That doctor received that knowledge from somewhere.

The saying knowledge is power is very real. It is how societies are made and how it creates classes of people.

What's your opinions on these videos?




The conflict of how history is told with him above is with these videos below which clearly have slave oral history on tape.
It still doesn't mean that there hasn't been any alterations by people about what happened.



I am going to check these videos out. They teach us slave teachings without us knowing it. They act like they are the only real men and women in the world. The bible was a record of our thoughts. There was a time when all blacks could do what Jesus did and more. My patron page is right. Check out the part "Garden Of Eden (TRUE STORY OF GENESIS)https://www.patreon.com/user?alert=2
The story came from blacks all over the middle east and Africa. It was passed on by word of mouth from generation to generation. It is the truth. But what you saw in Jonestown is like a model of what we was born in. Even as a toddler I did not view family life the way my family and other families viewed it. But From the time you are born they start to take control of your manhood. As you grow up either they control it or they take it. If they cannot control your man hood or control it then they are making moves to kill you.

It is all about them being able to be looked at as real men and women and the masses especially blacks as gay demons that have to be controlled by them. We originally only ate raw fruits and vegetables and the foods out of the bee hive which the Chinese used to call food of the Gods. At one time they to recognized us for who we really are. But just like they are doing now, they worked with the white devils to dominate us and make sure the erasing of our minds stayed. It is true that our health is our only real wealth. But the work we did was like the bible said be fruitful and multiply. It is a man job to have sex with a lady to reproduce. But in Jonestown Jim Jones said he was the only heterosexual in the world. Everybody else was gays and lesbians if they had sex with each other it was just compensation for helping the church. It told them I will be your God until you realize that you are God. But the job was to keep blacks from ever realizing who they really are. Can you image an organization that is at least 80 or 90 percent black referring to a white man as father. George Washington was called the father of our nation. The man ruthlessly raped and abused his slaves. He raped the men and women. And killing slaves to him was like dropping bread crumbs and he killed some of his slaves regularly. The constitution that we teach our kids to embrace, when they wrote they they said that the black man was one fifth of a man.

The thing that lifts poor whites and underprivileged whites is that God of this world is white. Dr. King knew this world was based off of the dream of some white family (white man). But now there is another man on the block. That white man is not the only man in the world. It was the same with Elijah Muhammad. But King was getting more recognition than the president. And the influence was growing. It was getting to the point that he could almost come out and speak and tell everybody not to go to work today and most would do it. In a prison only the warden is suppose to have the influence. With the rise of Elijah and Dr. King it was beginning to look like somebody else besides the hidden rulers of the world having a dick.

Farrakhan and Jesse are from 2 different programmings. Elijah was programming his students to be a God and rise above white rule and control. Separation is not even suppose to be in the subconscious of the people who are the original owners of the earth and universe. Jonestown proved whites can work with us but the trick is for their master to be our master. Most of the whites in Jonestown did not even know they was in a mind control experiment and an experiment to infiltrate and destruct black organizations. Elijah did not make a mistake in his teachings. It is like whites have painted a picture in our subconscious and their presence reminds of us of that picture that is hard to remove and it deals with the origin of man and the truth. We live by their truth not the real truth. And they will kill before they let their slaves become free.
 
This is why I think there is so much distrust by people when it comes to education and believing some of its teacher of the different types of knowledge given to humans. There should be critical thinking and balanced thought process which the masses doesn't generally have. I spoke in another thread concerning Steph Curry and the Moon landing(I dropped stuff about space and colonizing being elements of mankind from the beginning of time. Some see the ancients as being primitive, but it is clear they had some knowledge of things that we no longer grasp just as we have knowledge they probably couldn't grasp meaning we as humans have supreme skills that is still not tapped fully . The back and forth there regardless of who was right or wrong got me thinking why there is so much strife in the world as everyone's view of the same thing isn't exactly the same thing. People can come to different conclusions and this imo is the real tool used by those in power moreso than anything else.

Dr. King depending on who you talk to has various perceptions on what he was all about. IMO it is clear Dr. King understood spiritual laws and manifested that in ways to get the message across on what was happening in the US showing the war was not just started with the civil rights movement. He saw that there was a system put in place that allowed the mindset to grow and also put one group into a situation that it would be hard to turn over that system.

He is known as being the more peaceful between himself and Malcolm X, but it seems to me Dr. King was more lethal by even some of what I seen in that video. It is why he was killed in the way that he was. The supposed heir apparent of King and X being Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson seemed to switch roles of their predecessors in terms of how they were doing things in their last days.

Back to the topic of Mars and the Moon. The origin of man being completely lost could be true, but it could also be concealed by those who had the knowledge passed on. It could have also have deliberately been destroyed for whatever reason good or bad. There are parts missing I have no doubts.

That is why in the other thread I talked about Mars and humans being sent there. Could the confusion we have now be exactly what a future population of Mars have thousands of years from now? Who knows maybe the original man thought the knowledge would always be there not realizing humans would alter things later on. I still think biblical books and so on have certain knowledge to it, but at times gets dismissed as primitive.

It's very arrogant to dismiss the forefathers of the human race as simple minded or not intelligent since we are all descendants from these very people. The blueprints for civilizations are written all over it. That knowledge came from somewhere just as if a person goes to the doctor to get diagnosed for an ailment. That doctor received that knowledge from somewhere.

The saying knowledge is power is very real. It is how societies are made and how it creates classes of people.

What's your opinions on these videos?




The conflict of how history is told with him above is with these videos below which clearly have slave oral history on tape.
It still doesn't mean that there hasn't been any alterations by people about what happened.



I can download these videos and watch them on my television but the first one is a live stream. But anyway I came across one of his videos before and I tried to find it again. Now I know his name and can look it up to go over it again.
 
This is true.



I wanted to post these before on BGOL, but thought it would be laughed at. I wasn't absolutely positive it was all correct knowing how youtube "scholars" can twist things, but the more I checked into it the more I see there is gems in what is being said.





mann thats a great clip.......shit
 
THE AFRICAN PRESENCE IN EARLY AMERICA BEFORE SLAVERY
November 22, 2018TERESA
Screen-Shot-2018-11-21-at-9.31.14-PM.png

RUNOKO RASHIDI

The Olmec (2000 B.C.E.–300 C.E.) were an early people of Meso-America who settled the Mexican Gulf Coast. The ancient American culture that they produced has been labeled the first civilization of the western hemisphere. No one knows whence the Olmec came or whether they were direct derivatives of the indigenous population.

We do know that much of their sculpture, especially nineteen colossal stone heads, clearly evidences an ancient Africoid presence in the Americas. In fact, some scholars have concluded that the Olmec may have originally have been an African settler-colony which conquered the indigenous population of southern Mexico.

Others are convinced that the African presence among the Olmec merely consisted of a small but elite and influential community. The Olmec civilization dominated Meso-America long before the massive enslavement and deportation of Africans from Africa as the result of enslavement. The evidence in support of it is abundant. And yet this critically important data is not taught in the classrooms and universities of either Africa or the Americas. We cite it as another example of the importance of contemporary Africa as a consequence of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and its aftermath.

Article by: Runoko Rashidi. Original article appeared in True Culture University
 
I am going to check these videos out. They teach us slave teachings without us knowing it. They act like they are the only real men and women in the world. The bible was a record of our thoughts. There was a time when all blacks could do what Jesus did and more. My patron page is right. Check out the part "Garden Of Eden (TRUE STORY OF GENESIS)https://www.patreon.com/user?alert=2


The thing that lifts poor whites and underprivileged whites is that God of this world is white. Dr. King knew this world was based off of the dream of some white family (white man). But now there is another man on the block. That white man is not the only man in the world. It was the same with Elijah Muhammad. But King was getting more recognition than the president. And the influence was growing. It was getting to the point that he could almost come out and speak and tell everybody not to go to work today and most would do it. In a prison only the warden is suppose to have the influence. With the rise of Elijah and Dr. King it was beginning to look like somebody else besides the hidden rulers of the world having a dick.

Farrakhan and Jesse are from 2 different programmings. Elijah was programming his students to be a God and rise above white rule and control. Separation is not even suppose to be in the subconscious of the people who are the original owners of the earth and universe. Jonestown proved whites can work with us but the trick is for their master to be our master. Most of the whites in Jonestown did not even know they was in a mind control experiment and an experiment to infiltrate and destruct black organizations. Elijah did not make a mistake in his teachings. It is like whites have painted a picture in our subconscious and their presence reminds of us of that picture that is hard to remove and it deals with the origin of man and the truth. We live by their truth not the real truth. And they will kill before they let their slaves become free.

The link for the Garden of Eden doesn't lead anywhere. However, I do know what you speak of. The most damaging thing is black people thinking the The Bible (which is just a word for the books) is of white European nature due to the ruling class back in the day depicting the images to look like them. Some of us actually want to know the real truth and some of us ironically want to stay ignorant because it means remaining in a state of mind that doesn't mean to act upon the action of powers that we have.

I once had a discussion with a German scientist and he straight up told me blacks are ignorant to their power and that things have been deliberately reversed. He said it was blacks who gave the cave man knowledge (spirituality) out of the schools of Africa. It clearly shows you this in the Bible. Moses was a pharaoh learned in the high science before being cast out by the Egyptian lineage. This is why he struggled so hard finding God and came back with a different knowledge above what he was taught under the Egyptians. The same source as you said that mankind could do what Jesus did and more(who also tells you this too in the same books). There is some semblance of knowledge being shown in that Black Panthers movie.

I've had white people(the German and also from Hungary) telling me the Garden of Eden was in Africa which I already knew, but it was their arrogance that surprised me as they found it funny how blacks followed a corrupted version of spirituality which if they studied more would see the sleight of hand. The evolution story as noted in that video in the other post is one race's way of trying to figure out where they came from although history shows us. It goes back to humans not having trust in certain history or knowledge. For instance this video below.

Stuff like this I always second guess because it leaves out the intellect and spirituality of man. It doesn't delve into things like the pyramids and those civilizations for a reason. The reason I mentioned already that a German scientist had explained. It's a missing key deliberately.

What was scary I was told this YEARS ago and had knowledge, but what sealed it for me was a show on the history channel soon after having the conversation with the German. I posted part of it in another thread. The lineage and Garden of Eden roots leads back to the Lemba tribe. This was on actual television, but didn't make too much waves for obvious reasons as it turns things upside down.
https://mjbi.org/2017/09/26/lemba-jewish-tribe/

I'm not sold completely on all of this information in the video below, but I do take in how the records of the oral tradition stayed in tact with what is being shown in the books. It shows that it's for the most part correct and not tampered with.


So the most important thing to take from this imo is that blacks had the lineage and knowledge of the books BEFORE the slave trade system in America which then smashes the idea that blacks were forced to learn the bible which some blacks use to ignore the teachings in the book. I stated above already that learned whites have told me that whites (cave man) got spirituality from the schools of Africa which leads right back to things like the Lemba tribe and the break in lineage with pharaoh through Moses who led people out of the region.

It has a lot to do with Rome and how they used spirituality and twisted things along with most likely destroying records to make it hard for some people to believe Yeshua actually lived. I don't know why some rely on the lack of records they have when they were executing people who threatened them to erase them. Josephus the historian is always used either for or against the existence of the movement, but again he was apart of the same system. They obviously couldn't quell the people's belief in the Messiah and decided to use it. It's sort of like how Dr King has now become apart of the government with his message, but we don't hear from that same government certain things King was actually saying to help rise his people. History repeats itself.

The problem I have with Elijah Muhammad and Farrakhan is they also kind of use people's plight to make themselves gods among people especially in the 60's when blacks felt very disenfranchised. The message to be like God is a good one, but my issue is when they try to act like they are beyond reproach or aren't fallible. I get this vibe they are using tactics like Hitler (I AM NOT SAYING THEY ARE HITLER) to get people to follow them. With that said they are at least in deed helping certain people who would be astray which is very good. Wanting to be like God is good, but it's another thing when one wants to be God over people. This is how we got into all of this mess to begin with.
 
Back
Top