the official LSU getting their ass stomp by FLORIDA thread !!

[PLASMA CANNON]

..........i never said anything about UF winning. I was just statin the first quarter facts.

 

[superman2004]

When you suck at coaching in the SEC

Where do you go to find success?

 

[blackmouth]

Youre contradicting the hell out of yourself. You say Kentucky got "exposed" but come back to say SC is legit? Negro are you slow? It was the #8 school vs #11 school, not to mention Steve Spurrier is the coach at SC. That doesn't mean Kentucky got "exposed" it means Spurrier came up with a gameplan to blitz and put pressure on Woodson and not give him time to throw.

The rest arent worth mentioning? Even after this weekend there STILL won't be a conference in college football with more teams in the top 25 than the SEC. And lets not forget that Auburn will probably be making a move into the top 25 soon.

I hate discussing college football with people that obviously dont have a CLUE. So what conference is better at this point...do tell? The PAC 10? USC damn sure isn't going anywhere with a loss to a 1 win Stanford team. Cal will probably move up and take USC's spot @ #2 and USC SHOULD drop out of the top 10 altogether for losing to that sorry ass team. I'll even give you oregon...but who else? An overrated Arizona State?

Please don't even mention the Big 10...Wisconsin had no business being in the top 5 anyway and they got exposed by a YOUNG Illinois team. Michigan State started strong and lost to a sorry ass Northwestern team. Michigan sucks, Indiana? HA!! The rest, as you say...aren't even worth mentioning because OSU will run through that sorry conference as usual.

What people need to understand is that the SEC is NOT getting sorry, the balance of power is just shifting. With Spurrier @ SC, a new coach @ Kentucky & a still young Florida team (which has quite a few freshmen on the field), it's just not guaranteed that LSU or Florida or Auburn will win the conference anymore...unlike those other sorry conferences.

it is sunday, and the above statements = preaching the word.

When you suck at coaching in the SEC

Where do you go to find success?

meanwhile, ucla gives ND it's 1st win.

 

[ajc921]

When you suck at coaching in the SEC

Where do you go to find success?

not necessarily....ya'll dont understand...the florida gators is the ny yanks of college football...you better win or they will have website and all kinds of crazy shit against ya...zook had to much pressure to win and immediately......thats pretty difficult w/ the shadows on spurrier in rear...

 

[ajc921]

out of the top 4 ....South Florida Has the faster defense ....there offense in suspect...but we will seee... By the Way, The Hurricans Don't Suck... they r finally in a real confrence...Welcome to the Acc.....Look what south florida is doing in miami's old conference...

co sign... ...and w/ a new coach and new coordinator...we are suppose to struggle...im not stressed about this year....im really watin on the next 2 years...
big east is garbage...if we were still in that conference we would still win that conference, that's just how bad it is....

 

[bham_brotha]

Didnt even read the whole post, but Kentucky got exposed because Sc was the first real team they played and they got raped, how hard is that to grasp??? Ninja are you slow??? How in the fuck was Kentucky ranked number 8 overall and SC was 11, when Kentucky aint played anybody all fuckin year getting all this hype that all SEC schools seem to benefit from. The bigten dosent have sexy schhols but if you know ffotball you know it aint a cake walk. Indiana is vastly improved this year, as is Illinois(even though I called that before the season started)

Again clearly you dont know college football. Kentucky didn't get exposed, Spurrier just exploited the one fault they had, the blitz. As far as Indiana and Illinois, they look good because the Big 10 is sorry. Hell SOMEONE always looks good until the postseason comes..then the truth comes out.

 

[bham_brotha]

not necessarily....ya'll dont understand...the florida gators is the ny yanks of college football...you better win or they will have website and all kinds of crazy shit against ya...zook had to much pressure to win and immediately......thats pretty difficult w/ the shadows on spurrier in rear...

Trust....you will have a better chance at keeping your job @ Florida than you will if youre losing at Alabama. They expect IMMEDIATE results.

 

[Mt. Yukon]

Again clearly you dont know college football. Kentucky didn't get exposed, Spurrier just exploited the one fault they had, the blitz. As far as Indiana and Illinois, they look good because the Big 10 is sorry. Hell SOMEONE always looks good until the postseason comes..then the truth comes out.

Bla bla bla, the Big Ten was 2-1 against the vaunted SEC last bowl season, hows that for truth??? If thats your way of rationalizing why Illinois and Indiana are good, then the same can be said for Bama and Kentucky. If they couldnt adjust to something as simple as blitz packages then apparently they weren't as good as that number 8 ranking were they???

 

[J.A.]

CORRECTION


1. California (5-0)
2. Ohio State (6-0)
3. Boston College (6-0)
4. South Florida (5-0)
5. Florida (5-1)
6. LSU (5-1)
7. USC (5-1)
8. The Other USC (5-1)
9. Oklahoma (5-1)
10. Virginia Tech (5-1)
11. Wisconsin (5-1)
12. Missouri (5-0)
13. West Virginia (5-1)
14. Arizona St. (6 -0)
15. Kentucky (5-1)
16. Hawaii (5-0)
17. Rutgers (5-1)
18. Illinois (5-1)
19. Georgia (4-2)
20. Florida State
21. Kansas (6-0)
22. Cinncinati (5-1)
23. Auburn (4-2)
24. UCONN (5-0)
25. Purdue (5-1)

Lookie Lookie Penn St. Michigan, Alabama , Tennessee and Boise St. Bringing up the rear

LSU MADE FLORIDA LOOK STUPID AS HELL

 

[Ronnie_Reals]

This is the official I spoke way too soon thread.

 

[max-dawg]

SEC football = good, hard play.

everyone is watching this game including DEUCE.

don't lie bitch.

LSU 28
UF 24

what a hard fought game.

THIS IS SEC FOOTBALL FOR THOSE THAT DO NOT KNOW!!!!

meanwhile, deuce is recording the purdue vs osu game cause it's better than this.

deuce, i called wisconsin a bitch team and over-rated and so did espn. and what happened?

and everyone KNEW florida vs lsu in baton rouge would be a war, so i dedicate this Sticky Icky post to you:

are the Deuce and Trojansfan on suicide watch?



and i wonder how many people fell asleep during that osu vs purdue game?

and exactly where is that thread, deuce?



this nicca did a family feud set.

SURVEY SAYS...?

 

[SOULSONIC]

are the Deuce and Trojansfan on suicide watch?

Man I'm just sick and tired garbage ass USC getting the benefit of the fukkin doubt every damn year.

For what possible reason was USC #1 in any poll this year? What have they done?

It took them losing at home to a bunch of nerds to lose their #1 ranking in the USA Today coaches polls and the Harris polls. These polls factor into the BCS rankings.

They play nobodies, beat nobodies, and lose to nobodies but always get the inside track to the NC game. That's some bullshit.

Last year, for example, it took a second loss against a mediocre UCLA team to get a legit one-loss Florida team to the NC game. If USC would've ended their season with one loss, they would've gone. AND THEY PLAYED NOBODY ALL YEAR!!!

Every year them fukkers hang their hats on beating Notre Dame, Cal, UCLA, and Michigan.

Cal appears to be good this year but the rest of those teams? Man please.

But leave it up to the ABC/ESPN/DISNEY conglomerate--they'll try to stick them bitches in the NC game again even after getting embarrassed at home by fukking Stanford!

FUCK THE OVERRATED TROJANS.

LSU BITCHES!!!

 

[DollarDay]

SEC Home of The Brave

 

[max-dawg]

Man I'm just sick and tired garbage ass USC getting the benefit of the fukkin doubt every damn year.

For what possible reason was USC #1 in any poll this year? What have they done?

It took them losing at home to a bunch of nerds to lose their #1 ranking in the USA Today coaches polls and the Harris polls. These polls factor into the BCS rankings.

They play nobodies, beat nobodies, and lose to nobodies but always get the inside track to the NC game. That's some bullshit.

Last year, for example, it took a second loss against a mediocre UCLA team to get a legit one-loss Florida team to the NC game. If USC would've ended their season with one loss, they would've gone. AND THEY PLAYED NOBODY ALL YEAR!!!

Every year them fukkers hang their hats on beating Notre Dame, Cal, UCLA, and Michigan.

Cal appears to be good this year but the rest of those teams? Man please.

But leave it up to the ABC/ESPN/DISNEY conglomerate--they'll try to stick them bitches in the NC game again even after getting embarrassed at home by fukking Stanford!

FUCK THE OVERRATED TROJANS.

LSU BITCHES!!!

as a diehard SEC fan, i have to disagree with you on this one.

usc plays a good tough out of conference schedule. they've played REAL teams out of conference like arkansas, nebraska, etc.

the "THEY DON'T PLAY ANYBODY" phrase applies to that bitch made wisconsin team that plays the citadel, unlv, etc. every year, NEVER plays osu AND michigan in the same year, etc. they were exposed this past weekend by illinois, an unranked team that was favored by 3 over them.

osu is cutting thru the big 10 like a hot knife thru butter and there's no one available to stop them. they've got a few tough road games left, but they won't lose any. the media conglomerates will have them and the SEC champ in the nat'l c-ship game with osu favored because of their undefeated record and the SUPER TOUGH schedule they play.

 

[SOULSONIC]

as a diehard SEC fan, i have to disagree with you on this one.

usc plays a good tough out of conference schedule. they've played REAL teams out of conference like arkansas, nebraska, etc.

the "THEY DON'T PLAY ANYBODY" phrase applies to that bitch made wisconsin team that plays the citadel, unlv, etc. every year, NEVER plays osu AND michigan in the same year, etc. they were exposed this past weekend by illinois, an unranked team that was favored by 3 over them.

osu is cutting thru the big 10 like a hot knife thru butter and there's no one available to stop them. they've got a few tough road games left, but they won't lose any. the media conglomerates will have them and the SEC champ in the nat'l c-ship game with osu favored because of their undefeated record and the SUPER TOUGH schedule they play.

The PAC-10 conference has been a joke for decades. This year, they finally appear to have caught up with the rest of college football.

For example, in 2004, USC got more credit for beating teams like Washington St and Oregon than Auburn did for beating teams like LSU, Georgia, and Tennessee.

Now look at the shit happening this year. The bitches lost at home to fukkin Stanford and only fell six spots in the polls. That's some bullshit.

Last year, they lost to Oregon St and UCLA, mediocre and garbage teams.

The year they tried to rob LSU of the NC, they lost to a 6-loss Cal team. U fukkin kidding me?

They lose to garbage squads every year but I'm supposed to look at them as the best team in college football? Bullshit.

If they're as good as the media and the bullshit coaches pollsters say they are, playing in that soft ass conference, they should run the table every year.

Fukkin coaches are jealous of the SEC's dominance and that's their way of getting payback--no big secret.

Every year, USC beats sorry ass Notre Dame and the media treats that like the game of the century--who really gives a fuck?

Every year they beat Michigan in the Rose Bowl--big fukkin deal--Michigan is trash.

This year, who have they played that is actually worth a shit?

USC's opponents' Win-Loss records going into the Stanford game was a combined 9-14.

LSU's opponents' Win-Loss records going into the Florida game was a combined 16-13.

Yet it took a loss by USC for the Tigers to jump them bitches in the coaches and Harris polls. More bullshit.

LSU plays a 5-1 Kentucky squad this weekend who happens to have a 1st round NFL caliber QB.

USC plays 2-4 Arizona.

Like I said man...USC plays nobodies all year, every year, but get handpicked for the NC game over teams with similar records that play MUCH TOUGHER COMPETITION!!!

Fuck them.

 

[HandsSolo2K5]

Are you two circle jerking AGAIN?

 

[HandsSolo2K5]

USC played in 2006 these teams

9/2 at Arkansas W (-10) W (-10) 50-14 W 9/16 Nebraska W (-17) W (-16) 28-10 W
9/23 at Arizona W (-16) W (-21) 20-3 W
9/30 at Washington State W (-15) W (-14) 28-22 W
10/7 Washington W (-29) W (-26) 26-20 W
10/14 Arizona State W (-14) W (-17) 28-21 W
10/28 at Oregon State W (-16) W (-14) 31-33 L
11/4 at Stanford W (-16) W (-24) 42-0 W
11/11 Oregon W (-10) W (-7) 35-10 W
11/18 California W (-12) W (-9) 23-9 W
11/25 Notre Dame W (-10) W (-9) 44-24 W 12/2 at UCLA W (-7) W (-9) 9-13 L
1/1 Michigan (Rose Bowl) **** W (-2) 32-18 W


They obviously played "somebody" in Oregon State and UCLA because they lost those games

 

[HandsSolo2K5]

8/28
vs. Virginia Tech
(at Landover, Md.) W (-10) W (-10)
24-13
W

9/11 Colorado State W (-16) W (-16) 49-0 W
9/18 at Brigham Young W (-22) W (-26) 42-10 W
9/25 at Stanford W (-19) W (-19) 31-28 W
10/9 California W (-10) W (-6) 23-17 W
10/16 Arizona State W (-18) W (-12) 45-7 W
10/23 Washington W (-18) W (-29) 38-0 W
10/30 at Washington State W (-13) W (-19) 42-12 W
11/6 at Oregon State W (-5) W (-14) 28-20 W
11/13 Arizona W (-28) W (-35) 49-9 W
11/27 Notre Dame W (-16) W (-21) 41-10 W 12/4 at UCLA W (-15) W (-16) 29-24 W
1/4

Oklahoma
(BCS Title Game
at the Orange Bowl) ****

L (+5)

55-19

L

USC cant help their PAC 10 inner conference schedules...... I am not a defender of the PAC 10 , of course its suffered its down years, but I want to prove that you all dont know what the FUCK youre talking about


9/3 at Hawaii W (-21) W (-21) 63-17 W 9/17 Arkansas W (-17) W (-25) 70-17 W
9/24 at Oregon W (-15) W (-21) 45-13 W
10/1 at Arizona State W (-7) W (-8) 38-28 W
10/8 Arizona W (-26) W (-35) 42-21 W
10/15 at Notre Dame W (-17) W (-13) 34-31 W 10/22 at Washington W (-19) W (-25) 51-24 W
10/29 Washington State W (-21) W (-26) 55-13 W
11/5 Stanford W (-23) W (-31) 51-21 W
11/12 at California W (-8) W (-14) 35-10 W
11/19 Fresno State W (-10) W (-15) 50-42 W
12/3 UCLA W (-15) W (-20) 66-19 W
1/4

Texas
(BCS Title Game
at the Rose Bowl) ****

L (+5)

38-41

W


Aug. 30, 2003 at Auburn (CBS) W 23-0 1-0 Sept. 6, 2003 Brigham Young (ABC) W 35-18 2-0
Sept. 13, 2003 Hawaii (FSN) W 61-32 3-0
Sept. 27, 2003 at California (FSN) L 34-31 3-1 (0-1)
Oct. 4, 2003 at Arizona State (ABC) W 37-17 4-1 (1-1)
Oct. 11, 2003 Stanford (FSN) W 44-21 5-1 (2-1)
Oct. 18, 2003 at Notre Dame (NBC) W 45-14 6-1 Oct. 25, 2003 at Washington (ABC) W 43-23 7-1 (3-1)
Nov. 1, 2003 Wash. St. (ABC) W 43-16 8-1 (4-1)
Nov. 15, 2003 at Arizona (TBS) W 45-0 9-1 (5-1)
Nov. 22, 2003 UCLA (ABC) W 47-22 10-1 (6-1)
Dec. 6, 2003 Oregon State (ABC) W 52-28 11-1 (7-1)
Jan. 1, 2004 at Michigan1 W 28-14 12-1


Date Opponent* Result Record
Sept. 2, 2002 Auburn W 24-17 1-0 Sept. 14, 2002 at Colorado W 40-3 2-0
Sept. 21, 2002 at Kansas State L 27-20 2-1 Sept. 28, 2002 Oregon State W 22-0 3-1 (1-0)
Oct. 5, 2002 at Wash. St. L 30-27 3-2 (1-1)
Oct. 12, 2002 California W 30-28 4-2 (2-1)
Oct. 19, 2002 Washington W 41-21 5-2 (3-1)
Oct. 26, 2002 at Oregon W 44-33 6-2 (4-1)
Nov. 9, 2002 at Stanford W 49-17 7-2 (5-1)
Nov. 16, 2002 Arizona State W 34-13 8-2 (6-1)
Nov. 23, 2002 at UCLA W 52-21 9-2 (7-1)
Nov. 30, 2002 Notre Dame W 44-13 10-2 Jan. 2, 2003 Iowa1 W 38-17 11-2

 

[SOULSONIC]

8/28
vs. Virginia Tech
(at Landover, Md.) W (-10) W (-10)
24-13
W

9/11 Colorado State W (-16) W (-16) 49-0 W
9/18 at Brigham Young W (-22) W (-26) 42-10 W
9/25 at Stanford W (-19) W (-19) 31-28 W
10/9 California W (-10) W (-6) 23-17 W
10/16 Arizona State W (-18) W (-12) 45-7 W
10/23 Washington W (-18) W (-29) 38-0 W
10/30 at Washington State W (-13) W (-19) 42-12 W
11/6 at Oregon State W (-5) W (-14) 28-20 W
11/13 Arizona W (-28) W (-35) 49-9 W
11/27 Notre Dame W (-16) W (-21) 41-10 W 12/4 at UCLA W (-15) W (-16) 29-24 W
1/4

Oklahoma
(BCS Title Game
at the Orange Bowl) ****

L (+5)

55-19

L

USC cant help their PAC 10 inner conference schedules...... I am not a defender of the PAC 10 , of course its suffered its down years, but I want to prove that you all dont know what the FUCK youre talking about


9/3 at Hawaii W (-21) W (-21) 63-17 W 9/17 Arkansas W (-17) W (-25) 70-17 W
9/24 at Oregon W (-15) W (-21) 45-13 W
10/1 at Arizona State W (-7) W (-8) 38-28 W
10/8 Arizona W (-26) W (-35) 42-21 W
10/15 at Notre Dame W (-17) W (-13) 34-31 W 10/22 at Washington W (-19) W (-25) 51-24 W
10/29 Washington State W (-21) W (-26) 55-13 W
11/5 Stanford W (-23) W (-31) 51-21 W
11/12 at California W (-8) W (-14) 35-10 W
11/19 Fresno State W (-10) W (-15) 50-42 W
12/3 UCLA W (-15) W (-20) 66-19 W
1/4

Texas
(BCS Title Game
at the Rose Bowl) ****

L (+5)

38-41

W


Aug. 30, 2003 at Auburn (CBS) W 23-0 1-0 Sept. 6, 2003 Brigham Young (ABC) W 35-18 2-0
Sept. 13, 2003 Hawaii (FSN) W 61-32 3-0
Sept. 27, 2003 at California (FSN) L 34-31 3-1 (0-1)
Oct. 4, 2003 at Arizona State (ABC) W 37-17 4-1 (1-1)
Oct. 11, 2003 Stanford (FSN) W 44-21 5-1 (2-1)
Oct. 18, 2003 at Notre Dame (NBC) W 45-14 6-1 Oct. 25, 2003 at Washington (ABC) W 43-23 7-1 (3-1)
Nov. 1, 2003 Wash. St. (ABC) W 43-16 8-1 (4-1)
Nov. 15, 2003 at Arizona (TBS) W 45-0 9-1 (5-1)
Nov. 22, 2003 UCLA (ABC) W 47-22 10-1 (6-1)
Dec. 6, 2003 Oregon State (ABC) W 52-28 11-1 (7-1)
Jan. 1, 2004 at Michigan1 W 28-14 12-1


Date Opponent* Result Record
Sept. 2, 2002 Auburn W 24-17 1-0 Sept. 14, 2002 at Colorado W 40-3 2-0
Sept. 21, 2002 at Kansas State L 27-20 2-1 Sept. 28, 2002 Oregon State W 22-0 3-1 (1-0)
Oct. 5, 2002 at Wash. St. L 30-27 3-2 (1-1)
Oct. 12, 2002 California W 30-28 4-2 (2-1)
Oct. 19, 2002 Washington W 41-21 5-2 (3-1)
Oct. 26, 2002 at Oregon W 44-33 6-2 (4-1)
Nov. 9, 2002 at Stanford W 49-17 7-2 (5-1)
Nov. 16, 2002 Arizona State W 34-13 8-2 (6-1)
Nov. 23, 2002 at UCLA W 52-21 9-2 (7-1)
Nov. 30, 2002 Notre Dame W 44-13 10-2 Jan. 2, 2003 Iowa1 W 38-17 11-2

The saddest thing about this is that unless it's just a couple of sentences, I never even read what you type anymore. I just skip past it to the next post. Been doing so for weeks.

 

[HandsSolo2K5]

:smh:The saddest thing about this is that unless it's just a couple of sentences, I never even read what you type anymore. I just skip past it to the next post. Been doing so for weeks. :smh:[/QUOTE]

Thats because you are ignorant....... I cant help that....... for a least one to two years of USCs Championship run, they probably would have demolished any TEAM in their path....... There is Nothing Phillip Fulmer, Steve Spurrier, Houston Nutt, Tommy Tuberville, Nick Saban, Ron Zook/UrbanMeyer, could have done to stop them.

 

[HandsSolo2K5]

By their performances against Auburn and Arkansas..... They wouldnt have had any problem with the SEC........Your disrespect of possibly one or two of the greatest teams of all time is disrespectful..... Thats like me doubting that Nebraska 1995-1996 could run the table in the SEC or Big Ten