The Official John McCain Thread

The Economist (August 30, 2008 PDF) - McCain; Iraq; New Cold War; & more

2untstl.jpg
The Economist is a weekly news and business publication written for top business decision-makers and opinion leaders who need a wide range of information and views on world events. It explores the close links between domestic and international issues, business, finance, current affairs, science and technology. Regular editorial departments include American Survey, Asia, Europe, International, Business, Finance, Science and Technology, and the Arts. In additions, The Economist also publishes special monthly editorial surveys that focus on industries, markets or countries.


 
McCain needs new Cold War to win

<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/2d4_1221143845"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/2d4_1221143845" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>
:smh::angry::smh:
 
McCain's Brand is Collapse

<font size="5"><center>McCain's Brand is Collapse</font size></center>


TIME Magazine
by Joe Klein
September 15, 2008

John McCain is up with an ad touting his "experience" to deal with the financial crisis. But no specific experience is cited--which is attributable to the fact that McCain has been a happily orthodox Republican when it comes to financial regulation these past 26 years. He's against it. He's against Washington telling you how to run your business. The unseen hand of the market and all that...

This has been the long-standing Republican bait and switch--scaring small businesses with the threat of new regulations if the Democrats win, commiserating with larger businesses about the evils of environmental and plant safety rules, while lifting as many regulations as possible governing the financial titans whose credit should be at the heart of new economic development. But that hasn't been happening:
the financial titans have been going for the quick buck rather than the sound one. Money and creativity have been redirected during the Reagan-Bush era away from substantive loans to real businesses into a Ponzi scheme of borrowing by investment bankers, so they could engage in the most irresponsible, if lucrative (for them) speculative lending imaginable...​
In this sense, the mortgage crisis was a perfect metaphor for Republican financial governance: Investment banks like Lehman--R.I.P.--took loans to invest money in...bad loans. In this case, the loans were bad mortgages. This is called throwing good money after bad.

Actually, John McCain has excellent experience--a ringside seat--in the vagaries of this experiment in greed and anarchy. He was a member of the Keating Five. This was the signature scandal of the Savings and Loan crisis, twenty years ago. It concerned the insider help that five Senators gave Charles Keating and his Lincoln Savings and Loan, in return for contributions and gifts. The deregulation of S&Ls--community banks dedicated to local mortgages (like George Bailey's bank in "It's A Wonderful Life")--enabled slick operators like Keating to make reckless loans in new areas where they had no expertise. The final tab to the taxpayers was $165 billion.

McCain wasn't the worst offender in the scandal. He was included in the Five to make it bipartisan (the other four were Democrats). But he knew Keating, partied with him, made inquiries on his behalf. He once told me that his role in the scandal was harder on him, in some ways, than being a prisoner of war "Because my honor was called into question."

After an experience like that, you might think Senator Honorable would have devoted himself to preventing other such crises--to making sure the Big Wall Street Casino was operating according to rules that wouldn't screw the small investors and, more to the point, the taxpayers. But he walked the anti-regulatory party line, with only occasional exceptions...and tried to lay down a smokescreen of righteousness by campaigning against small potato[e!]s like legislative earmarks--money to study the mating habits of, uh, crabs, in, uh, Alaska (proposed by Governor Honorable).

What we are seeing on Wall Street today is the result of an ideology gone amok. There was call to loosen and change the antiquated regulations governing investment back in 1980. But the Republican era has seen that loosening go to the point of near-cataclysm. Banks are failing, markets dropping. We are in the midst of a slow-motion economic crash. What happens next is an economic contraction: loans aren't available, so businesses can't expand. A crash comes at the beginning of a period of economic trouble.

John McCain, after his political near-death experience, could have made the responsible regulation of markets one of his great causes. He didn't. And today he said, once again, "The fundamentals of our economy are strong." I hope he's right, but it's entirely possible that he knows as much about our economy as Sarah Palin knows about The Bush Doctrine.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/their_brand_is_collapse.html
 
Re: McCain's Brand is Collapse

Yet people are energized about the GOP?

You just have to love the "American" spirit.
 
Re: McCain's Brand is Collapse

ah shit.. The Keating 5 is making its way back into the media :lol::lol::lol:
 
McCain Aide's Firm Was Paid By Freddie Mac

And he is going around saying executives need to be responsible for their choices.:smh:

source: International Herald Tribune

By Jackie Calmes and David D. Kirkpatrick
Published: September 24, 2008

WASHINGTON: One of the giant mortgage companies at the heart of the credit crisis paid $15,000 a month to a firm owned by Senator John McCain's campaign manager from the end of 2005 through last month, according to two people with direct knowledge of the arrangement.

The disclosure contradicts a statement Sunday night by McCain that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had no involvement with the company for the last several years.

Davis's firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said.

They said they did not recall Davis doing much substantive work for the company in return for the money, other than speak to a political action committee composed of high-ranking employees in October 2006 on the coming midterm congressional elections. They said Davis's his firm, Davis & Manafort, was kept on the payroll because of Davis's close ties to McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, who was widely expected by 2006 to run again for the White House.

Davis took a leave from Davis & Manafort for the duration of the campaign, but as a partner and equity-holder continues to share in its profits.

A Freddie Mac spokeswoman said the company would not comment. The McCain campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

McCain's campaign has been attacking l Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic rival, for his ties to former officials of the mortgage lenders, both of which have long histories of cultivating allies in the two parties to fend off efforts to restrict their activities. McCain has been running a television commercial suggesting that Obama takes advice on housing issues from Franklin Raines, a former chief executive of Fannie Mae, a contention flatly denied by Raines and the Obama campaign. Freddie Mac's roughly $500,000 in payments to Davis & Manafort began immediately after Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in late 2005 disbanded an advocacy coalition that they had set up and hired Davis to run, the people familiar with the arrangement said.

Between 2000 and the end of 2005, Davis had received nearly $2 million as president of the coalition, the Homeownership Alliance, which the companies created to help them oppose new regulations and protect their status as federally chartered companies with implicit government backing. That status let them borrow cheaply, helping to fuel rapid growth but also their increased purchases of the risky mortgage securities that were their downfall.

On Sunday, in an interview with CNBC and the New York Times, McCain responded to a question about Davis's role in the advocacy group by saying that his campaign manager "has had nothing to do with it since, and I'll be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it."

Such assertions, along with McCain campaign television ads tying Obama to former Fannie Mae chiefs, have riled current and former officials of the two companies and provoked them to volunteer rebuttals of what they see as the McCain campaign's inaccuracy and hypocrisy. The two officials with direct knowledge of Freddie Mac's post-2005 contract with Davis spoke on condition of anonymity. One is a Democrat and the other a registered independent. Four other outside consultants, three Democrats and a Republican also speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that it was widely known that Davis was being paid though his firm.

As president of the Homeownership Alliance, Davis got $30,000 to $35,000 a month. Davis, along with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have characterized the alliance as a coalition of many housing industry and consumer groups to promote homeownership, but numerous current and former officials at both companies say the two mortgage companies created and bankrolled the operation to combat efforts by competitors to rein in their business. They dissolved the group at the end of 2005 as part of cost-cutting in the wake of accounting scandals and, at Freddie Mac, a lobbying scandal that forced out its former top Republican lobbyist.

On Monday, the McCain campaign accused The New York Times of bias for reporting the payments to Davis from the mortgage giants. Davis said that had worked not for the two companies but for the advocacy group, which included other nonprofit organization as well.

After the Homeownership Alliance was dissolved, Davis asked to stay on a retainer, the people familiar with the deal said. Hollis McLoughlin, who was chief of staff to Richard Syron, Freddie Mac's chief executive, arranged for a new contract with Davis & Manafort, at the reduced rate of $15,000 a month, they said. Syron lost his job in the government takeover this month. McLoughlin, who through a spokeswoman declined to comment, was a former chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady in the first President Bush's administration, and has longstanding Republican ties.
 
Re: McCain Aide's Firm Was Paid By Freddie Mac

i read this on ny times too and i cant beleve no one is covering . this is the nail in the coffin to kill the cryptkeeper.

i wonder if mccain will throw the age discrimination card at the democrats.
 
Re: McCain Aide's Firm Was Paid By Freddie Mac

His campaign is out of control.

He selected a VP candidate that's not qualified for the job. He has a campaign manager tied directly to Freddie Mac while news of an FBI investigation into them is surfacing. An economic crisis that he at first didn't acknowledge then reacted to irrationally. Lastly, knowing that he's horribly underinformed on all these issues and would get murked in a debate.
 
****Run This Shit Over and Over Like They Did Rev. Wright****

My apologies if any of these are re posts.

Lets run these shits at nausea like Reverend Wright.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the 3 videos below reveal the REAL John McCain:







This bitch continues to get a pass on this shit


 
Re: ****Run This Shit Over and Over Like They Did Rev. Wright****

McCain's Relationship with Keating


Senator McCain is the only member of the Keating Five still in office. He was unique among the group on several dimensions. He was the only Republican. He had the longest, closest relationship with Keating. The relationship was social — Lincoln's airplanes flew Senator and Mrs. McCain, their children, and a nanny to stay at Keating's vacation home in the Bahamas. Senator McCain blames his failure to reimburse the expenses (which he was required to do by law), on his staff. He reimbursed only years later after the scandal broke. No other Senator had a close social relationship with Keating or similar airplane use issues. Keating was a bully and a nasty bigot, whom many politicians refused to deal with once they knew him, but Senator McCain viewed him as a personal friend (and major contributor) for a decade.

Only Senator McCain (and Lee Henkel) had a financial conflict of interest involving the direct investment rule. Senator McCain's wife and father-in-law were engaged in a direct investment with Lincoln. Had the Bank Board taken enforcement action against Lincoln's violation of the direct investment rule Senator McCain's wife and father-in-law's investment would have been placed in substantial risk of loss.

Only Senator McCain was in the House at the time Keating enlisted a majority of the House to co-sponsor his resolution designed to kill the direct investment rule. He was the only member of the Keating Five, therefore who was a co-sponsor. More generally, Senator McCain was the Senator most opposed to financial regulation in general and Gray's "reregulation" of S&Ls in particular. As his March 25, 2008 speech on the ongoing mortgage crisis makes clear, he continues to call for greater deregulation of the kind that is causing our financial crises to become more severe and more common.

Senator McCain's efforts to convince the Reagan administration to give Keating de facto control over the Bank Board by appointing two nominees chosen by Keating to run the agency were not unique among the Keating Five, but he was the most important support for Keating's effort because he was a Republican.

Senator McCain was not unique in not giving direct aid to Keating after the April 9 meeting. It is important to consider how Keating shaped Wall's perspective of the Keating Five's support. He used both Senator Cranston and Senator Glenn's active, continuing support (in February 1988, almost a year after the April 2 and April 9, 1987 meetings) to show Wall that he retained the Keating Five's loyalty and he used Senator Glenn to help recruit Speaker Wright as an ally — knowing that Wall had advised Gray to give in to Wright's political pressure. Wall had no way of knowing that Senator McCain and Senator Riegle were no longer taking affirmative actions to help Keating get the Bank Board not to bring an enforcement action against Lincoln.

http://www.ourfuture.org/progressive-opinion/keating-five-legacy
 
McCain Pulls Out of Michigan

<font size="5"><center>McCain, heeding polls,
scales back campaign in Michigan</font size>
<font size="4">

McCain is pulling campaign television advertising
out of Democratic-leaning Michigan and diverting
staff and other resources to more competitive states</font size></center>

McClatchy Newspapers
By William Douglas
Thursday, October 2, 2008


WASHINGTON — Republican presidential nominee John McCain is pulling campaign television advertising out of Democratic-leaning Michigan and diverting staff and other resources to more competitive states.

Campaign and Republican Party officials said that McCain's ads would end, direct mailings would halt and campaign staff would be reassigned from the Midwestern battleground state, which has 17 electoral votes.

Several Michigan polls have found Obama with a clear lead over McCain, an edge fueled recently by the nation's economic crisis. A Detroit Free Press poll finds Obama ahead of McCain by 51 to 38 percent. When they were asked which candidate is more likely to fight for the concerns most important to them and their families, 56 percent of Michiganders said Obama and 36 percent said McCain.

McCain's campaign had set its sights on Michigan, mindful of his 2000 primary victory there and voters' unhappiness with Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm, and confident that they could attract the state's blue-collar voters.

McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, flew directly to Michigan after the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. They presided over a large rally in Macomb County, just outside Detroit. McCain and Palin also held a town hall meeting last week in Grand Rapids.

McCain campaign officials tried to downplay its exit from Michigan.

"The operations will be scaled back, but we'll still be in place in Michigan," said Mike DuHaime, the campaign's political director. "Resources in terms of some staff and other resources will be moved to Maine, where we will be opening up an aggressive front . . . also specifically to Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, two states we feel very strongly about."

"We played in Michigan to spread the field on Obama," one McCain adviser said in an e-mail. He asked not to be identified because he wasn't authorized to discuss campaign strategy publicly.

He added: "If we win FL, MO, NC, VA, IN and OH — all states Republicans have won for decades — that puts us at 260 electoral votes. We need to find 10 electoral votes from CO, NV, NM, NH, MN, WI and PA. Frankly, we have an easier map than Obama, He's on the defense."

Polls suggest otherwise; Obama is ahead narrowly in Florida, Virginia and Ohio, for example, as well as in most of the seven states the aide cited as second-tier priorities.

McCain's move came as Obama campaigned Thursday in Michigan and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the son of former Michigan Gov. George Romney, held a conference call to tout McCain's chances in Michigan.

However, Romney acknowledged that McCain is slipping in the Wolverine State.

"The polls, of course have bounced around a good deal, and while you don't pay a lot of attention to polls at this stage, nonetheless the trend has not been in the right direction," Romney said. "I think it's a winnable state for Senator McCain, and I think it's a must-win state for Barack Obama. ... John McCain has to simply describe the policies that Barack Obama stands for and ask Michiganders would those policies strengthen Michigan or hurt it?"

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/53397.html
 
Re: McCain Pulls Out of Michigan

Obama's "50 State Strategy" is working as planned. He may go down in history as the blue print for how political campaigns should be conducted.
 
Re: McCain Pulls Out of Michigan

Did you guys see when Mcshame tried to hold a town hall meeting in a Ford Plant in Grand Rapids and a good number of folks at the plant was wearing Obama Shirts, pins and hats. This just isnt Mcstain's time.
 
Just for the record, March 2008

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ed1Tb-vrEww&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ed1Tb-vrEww&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>​
 
McCain refused to shake hands

He pushed Obama's hand away to his wife!!!! His wife shook Obama's hand. He is crazy.:smh:
 
Re: McCain refused to shake hands

The way he looked every time Sen. Obama ( not THAT ONE!) would talk, made him look angry. If you listen, he would have these long exhales that were loud enough to be caught on mike. I would dig getting a copy of his notes. What you think he wrote? Spook, Porch Monkey, Jiggaboo. Cindy, is that two words or one?:lol:
 
Tom Brokaw Acting As NBC Liaison With McCain Camp

Liberal independent media.:lol:

source: The Huffington Post

Tuesday's New York Times features a profile of Tom Brokaw ahead of the October 7 presidential debate being hosted by the veteran NBC newsman. The Times reveals that Brokaw has "played a pivotal role out of public view, both within NBC and in its dealings with the campaign of John McCain in particular."

Mr. Brokaw said that over the summer he had "advocated" within the executive suite of NBC News to modify the anchor duties of the MSNBC hosts Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews on election night and on nights when there were presidential debates. Their expressions of strong political opinions from the MSNBC anchor desk has run counter to the more traditional role Mr. Brokaw played on "NBC Nightly News" for more than two decades. NBC said earlier this month that the two hosts would mostly relinquish their anchor duties to Mr. Gregory, while being present as analysts.


"Keith is an articulate guy who writes well and doesn't make his arguments in a 'So's your old mother' kind of way," Mr. Brokaw said. "The mistake was to think he could fill both roles. The other mistake was to think he wouldn't be tempted to use the anchor position to engage in commentary. That's who he is."

Brokaw said he has also conducted some "shuttle diplomacy in recent weeks" between NBC and the McCain campaign.

His mission, he said, was to assure the candidate's aides that -- despite some negative on-air commentary by Mr. Olbermann in particular -- Mr. McCain could still get a fair shake from NBC News. Mr. Brokaw said he had been told by a senior McCain aide, whom he did not name, that the campaign had been reluctant to accept an NBC representative as one of the moderators of the three presidential debates -- until his name was invoked.


"One of the things I was told by this person was that they were so irritated, they said, 'If it's an NBC moderator, for any of these debates, we won't go,' " Mr. Brokaw said. "My name came up, and they said, 'Oh, hell, we have to do it, because it's going to be Brokaw.' "

The article led off with the news that NBC is considering an ensemble of hosts for "Meet the Press," led by Chuck Todd:

[The network] is leaning toward an ensemble of hosts that would be led by Chuck Todd, NBC's political director, and include David Gregory, a correspondent and MSNBC anchor, according to a person who had been briefed on the proposal but was not authorized to comment, partly because the plans were not set. Like the turnover of anchors at all three network newscasts, the process of choosing a successor for Mr. Russert has been closely watched in media and political circles.


________________________________________________​


source: The New York Times

September 30, 2008
NBC Plans Future of ‘Meet the Press’
By JACQUES STEINBERG

WASHINGTON — Sometime between Election Day and early December, NBC News will make a final decision about who will replace Tim Russert and his interim successor, Tom Brokaw, at the helm of “Meet the Press,” Steve Capus, the president of NBC News, said in an interview.

Mr. Capus refused to characterize the network’s intentions. But it is leaning toward an ensemble of hosts that would be led by Chuck Todd, NBC’s political director, and include David Gregory, a correspondent and MSNBC anchor, according to a person who had been briefed on the proposal but was not authorized to comment, partly because the plans were not set. Like the turnover of anchors at all three network newscasts, the process of choosing a successor for Mr. Russert has been closely watched in media and political circles.

In the meantime Mr. Brokaw has been given an unexpected encore. Since taking over for his close friend Mr. Russert following his death, Mr. Brokaw has lent on-camera stability to “Meet the Press,” which continues to be the most watched of the network Sunday public-affairs programs. He has also appeared in guest spots on “Today” and on MSNBC that might have otherwise gone to Mr. Russert.

But less widely known is that Mr. Brokaw has also played a pivotal role out of public view, both within NBC and in its dealings with the campaign of John McCain in particular.

In an interview here after Sunday’s broadcast, Mr. Brokaw said that over the summer he had “advocated” within the executive suite of NBC News to modify the anchor duties of the MSNBC hosts Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews on election night and on nights when there were presidential debates. Their expressions of strong political opinions from the MSNBC anchor desk has run counter to the more traditional role Mr. Brokaw played on “NBC Nightly News” for more than two decades. NBC said earlier this month that the two hosts would mostly relinquish their anchor duties to Mr. Gregory, while being present as analysts.

“Keith is an articulate guy who writes well and doesn’t make his arguments in a ‘So’s your old mother’ kind of way,” Mr. Brokaw said. “The mistake was to think he could fill both roles. The other mistake was to think he wouldn’t be tempted to use the anchor position to engage in commentary. That’s who he is.”

Mr. Brokaw said he had also conducted some shuttle diplomacy in recent weeks between NBC and the McCain campaign. His mission, he said, was to assure the candidate’s aides that — despite some negative on-air commentary by Mr. Olbermann in particular — Mr. McCain could still get a fair shake from NBC News. Mr. Brokaw said he had been told by a senior McCain aide, whom he did not name, that the campaign had been reluctant to accept an NBC representative as one of the moderators of the three presidential debates — until his name was invoked.

“One of the things I was told by this person was that they were so irritated, they said, ‘If it’s an NBC moderator, for any of these debates, we won’t go,’ ” Mr. Brokaw said. “My name came up, and they said, ‘Oh, hell, we have to do it, because it’s going to be Brokaw.’ ”

Mr. Brokaw will moderate the second debate, on Oct. 7, in Nashville.

Last week during the Clinton Global Initiative in New York, Mr. Brokaw said, he spoke briefly with Mr. McCain, who has not appeared on “Meet the Press” since Mr. Russert’s death. While Mr. Brokaw said he and the Republican nominee are not personal friends, he did say they are “friendly” and “always had a great relationship.”

Of the prospects for a potential booking, Mr. Brokaw said: “We’re going to get him. I don’t know exactly where or when.”

As for Sarah Palin, the Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential nominee, thus far she has passed over “NBC Nightly News With Brian Williams” in favor of interviews with “World News With Charles Gibson” on ABC and the “CBS Evening News With Katie Couric.” She has also yet to accept an invitation to appear on “Meet the Press,” a point Mr. Brokaw said he raised with her when they met for a moment at the Clinton Global Initiative.

“I told her, ‘I’m the only one in this business who ever had Susan Butcher as a house guest,’ ” Mr. Brokaw said, referring to the Iditarod champion, who died in 2006. “Susan Butcher is to Alaska what Cal Ripken is to Baltimore.”

For Mr. Brokaw, who will mark the fourth anniversary of his departure from “Nightly News” in December, the work of the last four months has interrupted a life in which he had balanced outdoor recreation in and around his Montana ranch with long-form journalism, including books, magazine articles and documentaries.

Instead, on Sunday, he presided over a mini-debate between David Axelrod, the top strategist to Senator Barack Obama, and Steve Schmidt, Mr. McCain’s top aide. Asked where he would have otherwise been, Mr. Brokaw, said, “I would have been watching ‘Meet the Press,’ ” probably from Montana.

Last week, he interviewed former president Bill Clinton in New York and then traveled to Mississippi to watch the first presidential debate and provide on-camera analysis. In the preceding weeks, he reported from Beijing, London, and Denver and St. Paul, the sites of the two party conventions.

Mr. Brokaw is 68 now, and the strain of a frenetic travel and work schedule appears to show in ways it did not before. At times on “Meet the Press” or on “Today” in recent weeks, Mr. Brokaw’s eyes have appeared to be mere slits and he has seemed short of breath.

Relaxing in the green room of the NBC Washington bureau, as his taped interview with Mr. Clinton played on a monitor at the end of the broadcast, he pointed to the screen and worried aloud.

“My daughters will say I look tired,” he said.

Asked if he was exhausted, he said: “Yeah, a little bit. Who wouldn’t be?”

If the way he presided over the Axelrod-Schmidt joint interview is any indication, Mr. Brokaw will pick his shots at the debate on next Tuesday. He is often a lenient moderator, who prefers to let the participants fight things out. At times he also seems reluctant to ask a second follow-up question, to say nothing of a third or fourth, when he does not get an answer.

On “Meet the Press” on Sept. 21, for example, he asked Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York if he would seek a third term if the current two-term limit were eased. Mr. Bloomberg answered that he was thinking instead of hosting “Meet the Press.” Mr. Brokaw moved on.

At other moments, though, Mr. Brokaw can evoke Mr. Russert’s prosecutorial style. Throughout his interview with Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Axelrod, he interjected the kinds of provocative quotations from others that were a Russert trademark.

One, from The Wall Street Journal, and another, from Robert L. Bixby, a nonpartisan fiscal analyst, were critical of the economic approaches of both Senators McCain and Obama. Two other quotations cited by Mr. Brokaw, though, singled out Mr. McCain for criticism.

Asked if time he had spent with Mr. McCain — as contrasted with Mr. Obama, whom he does not know socially — would be of any help to Mr. McCain in the debate, Mr. Brokaw promised it would not. Indeed, after Sunday’s broadcast he expressed frustration with both candidates, particularly when it came to their comments in Friday’s debate on the economic crisis.

“They didn’t come very prepared on the economy,” he said. “They’re both trying to give the impression they’re involved, but plainly they’re not.”

“I was interested in how the two of them stuck by their budget programs,” he said. “There was nothing that Obama has proposed that he’s willing to cut. McCain insisted he could balance a budget with spending cuts. Give me” — and here he paused for emphasis — “a break. Nobody believes that, in either case.”

Mr. Brokaw’s obvious engagement left a visitor to wonder whether, come November, he would be reluctant to relinquish his ringside seat at one of the more important junctures in the nation’s history. He insisted he would be ready to step aside.

“This is not like wading into a trout stream,” he said.
 
Re: McCain refused to shake hands

McCain shook his hand while Tom Brokaw read his closing statements. That is why McCain and Obama came into camera view that was supposed to be focusing on Brokaw. Which is also why Brokaw told them he can't read his teleprompter and asked them to move.
 
Re: McCain refused to shake hands

Where anger is the norm, McCain's MO

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fAyK-enrF1g&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fAyK-enrF1g&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
McCain, Letterman Make Amends

<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/fc5_1224215175"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/fc5_1224215175" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>
John McCain apologized to David Letterman for canceling an earlier scheduled appearance on his late night TV talk show.
 
McCain Roasts Obama At Alfred E. Smith Dinner P.1 & p.2

<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/bd7_1224213954"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/bd7_1224213954" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>


<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/b55_1224214196"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/b55_1224214196" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>
:yes:
 
CNN McCain/Palin

DAMN they are going hard today Palin is on CNN right now earlier McCain was on with top financial advisers including Michael Steele (R) Maryland Mitt Romney (R who should've been his running mate LOL McCain is an idiot...) McCain is really trying to make a push that he has his team in place to deal with the economic crisis..

Do you agree? I damn sure don't!!! fuck a photo op.. as much as I have respect for Michael Steele to hell with McCain and his antiquated plans.
 
Re: CNN McCain/Palin

DAMN they are going hard today Palin is on CNN right now earlier McCain was on with top financial advisers including Michael Steele (R) Maryland Mitt Romney (R who should've been his running mate LOL McCain is an idiot...) McCain is really trying to make a push that he has his team in place to deal with the economic crisis..

Do you agree? I damn sure don't!!! fuck a photo op.. as much as I have respect for Michael Steele to hell with McCain and his antiquated plans.

Michael Steel? No, too smart. In repub speak, too uppity. Mitt Romney? No, too smart and wrong religious affiliation. Repubs got this thing about whose turn it is to be president they can't turn loose. Remember Bob Dole and the shit he kept whining about when he tried to run? It was "his turn" and he "kissed the ass cheeks of Ronald Reagan on both ends."

But the people rejected him because, like it or not, dude had a mangled body. They couldn't get past that and they knew most right wing voters wouldn't get past it either.

-VG
 
Re: CNN McCain/Palin

But the people rejected him because, like it or not, dude had a mangled body. They couldn't get past that and they knew most right wing voters wouldn't get past it either.

-VG

Yeah, that was interesting. They couldn't get past the HAND.

QueEx
 
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart: The Daily Show: 10,000 McCainiacs

<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:mvideo:comedycentral.com:189579" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="window" width="425" height="354" allowFullscreen="true" flashvars="dist=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eveoh%2Ecom&orig=veoh"></embed><noembed><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=188473" target="_blank">The Daily Show: 10,000 McCainiacs</a></noembed><div><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=188473" target="_blank">The Daily Show: 10,000 McCainiacs</a></div>
:yes:
 
Do Not Vote John Mccain - Here Is Why

1. He doesnt use email
2. Doesnt know how to use email
3. Doesnt care fo remail
4. Not into Computers

Ok what is wrong with this? It is a reflection of how old and backward this Dude is...he frowns on the IT Industry, so guess what? If he is President you can forsee what would happebn to the Technology Market.

1. He talks more about Barack Obama than Obama
2. He cannot really distance himself from Bush
3. He is still fighting the Vietnam War??? What happens when he catches up to present day
4. The Presidency ages men quickly he is already old...
5. He is hot headed (Does not go well with Nuclear Weapons)
6. His wife is pals with guess who..Dick Cheney aka Lucifer
7. A white conservative is passed its out of date
8. He has no policy for the young, anyone under 40.

Take a look at your 401K notice the losses? Take a look at gas prices notice the hike? Gas should be around $1.69 a gallon yet they are conditioning us to become use to $3.00. Quality of health and life is declining. Mccain has no plan to combat any social issues.

Ok PALIN

Well in this country sad to say there live many uneducated voters who are like lost sheep, we cant reach them all, but please do not vote for a woman because she is a woman. This woman has no idea about National Politics let alone International Politics she is in this for herself.

God Bless...GO OUT AN VOTE VOT VOTE...VOTE FOR CHANGE VOTE FOR THE PEOPLE VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA

EDUCATE YOURSELF, NO WHY THIS MAN BARACK OBAMA IS THE BEST CHANCE WE HAVE TO RISE AGAIN. VOTE AGAINST JIM CROW AGAINST BUSH AND HIS ARAB BUDDIES, VOTE AGAINST CHENEY AND HIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY HALIBURTON. VOTE AGAINST THE $700,000,000,000 BAILOUT FOR THE CONSERVATIVE RICH.

VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA CHANGE WE NEED. IT WILL BE A VOTE FOR YOUR CHILDREN ..

VOTE VOTE VOTE!!!
 
Re: Do Not Vote John Mccain - Here Is Why

:hmm:

Please tell me that you didn't write this? If you didn't and this is one of those chain email posts...they should have taken a second look at it before they clicked on the send button.

Sometimes the content can be overshadowed by the grammatical and spelling errors.

99.9% of the members on this forum are for Barack anyway.

:hmm:
 
Back
Top