The Official Governor Secessionist (Perry) Thread

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
source: CBS News


Rick Perry's prayer meeting causes stir in Texas


116961949_620x350.jpg
Texas governor Rick Perry speaks during the 2011 Republican Leadership Conference on June 18, 2011 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (Getty Images)

<!-- 416 -->
(AP) HOUSTON - A group of Houston religious leaders have expressed concern about Gov. Rick Perry's day-long prayer meeting, saying it excludes non-Christians.

Perry has said the Saturday event at Houston's Reliant Stadium is "about coming together as a state, lifting up this nation in prayer, having a day of prayer and fasting."

But more than 50 Muslim, Jewish and Christian leaders signed a statement, saying Perry's involvement in the event sends "an official endorsement of one faith over all others, thereby sending an official message of religious exclusion and preference to all Texans who do not share that faith."

The skeletons in Rick Perry's closet
Perry stresses opposition to gay marriage

The statement urged elected leaders to not impose their beliefs on others or divide citizens along religious lines. The opposition was organized by the Anti-Defamation League.

Asked about it, Perry aides said he "looks forward to attending `The Response, a day of prayer and fasting for our nation."'

The event's organizers announced Tuesday that James Dobson, an outspoken Christian conservative, will attend. Dobson and others will lead attendees in prayer, read from scripture and offer inspirational messages, organizers said.
 
You got 2 choices Thought;

1) War & Socialism
2) Socialism & War

Choose one!

perry8.png


What did we have under Clinton that worked? Because perry is gonna have the few of us that are still working to work for slave wages, just like Texas.
 
What did we have under Clinton that worked? Because perry is gonna have the few of us that are still working to work for slave wages, just like Texas.

Thought, you got it all wrong; Not only was he Gore's campaign manager, Rick Perry is down with ACORN too!

Perry+ACORN.bmp
 
Thought, you got it all wrong; Not only was he Gore's campaign manager, Rick Perry is down with ACORN too!


paul-harvey1.jpg

"An Now The Rest of the Story"


source: Texas Liberal

Governor Rick Perry—A Friend Of Acorn And Of America When He Finds It Useful To Be So

Texas Governor Rick Perry is a study in hypocrisy.

Below are two pictures that show Governor Perry as a hypocrite.

First is a picture of Governor Perry with members of Acorn. I took this picture from a recent Burnt Orange Report post. This picture was taken in 2005 as the Governor signed a housing bill.

Now Governor Perry is criticizing his 2010 Republican primary opponent for Governor of Texas, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson, for skipping out on a Senate vote that would have denied funding to Acorn.

It seems that not so long ago that Governor Perry was more than happy to be seen in the company of Acorn and it’s representatives.

r9repi.jpg

The second example of what a fraud Governor Perry is, is this picture below where Governor Perry leans in front of the flag of the United States. (He’s leaning–right? Like he’s going to ask you your phone number or ask you your sign.) Governor Perry said recently that treason would be an acceptable option if some folks in Texas were sufficiently upset with policies coming from our elected officials in Washington.

Governor Perry should stay away from our flag if can’t be loyal to our federal union. The course of treason has been attempted before in our national history.

governor-rick-perry.jpg





Stop Trolling Right Wing Web Sites!
 
And this is coming from someone who is an Al Gore supporter. Where ya at Lamarr?


source: Think Progress


FLASHBACK: In 2000, Perry Said It’s ‘Almost Treasonous’ Not To Support George W. Bush


Speaking yesterday in Iowa, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) said that “printing more money” is “almost treasonous”:

If this guy [Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke] prints more money between now and the election, I dunno what y’all would do to him in Iowa but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas. Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treasonous in my opinion.


As Matt Yglesias noted today, accusing the Chairman of the Federal Reserve of treason is not only inappropriate, but also betrays a certain ignorance of history on the part of Governor Perry. Under Reagan, after all, the Fed was happy to increase the monetary base.

Governor Perry has drawn fire for his statement from conservatives, including none other than Karl Rove, who said that Perry’s remark was “not Presidential.” “You don’t accuse the chairman of the federal reserve of being a traitor to his country,” Rove told Fox News. Other former Bush aides have made similar criticisms.

But the Bush camp didn’t seem to mind such language back in 2000, when Perry — then Bush’s Lieutenant Governor — said that supporters of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) were “almost treasonous“:
Lt. Gov. Rick Perry, casting his Republican primary ballot early Monday, plugged George W. Bush’s presidential candidacy and urged Texans to join him in voting for the Texas governor.

“Wherever your political philosophy might be, if you’re not for George Bush being the next president of the United States, I consider that to be almost treasonous if you’re a Texan,” Perry said.
It’s instructive to consider how Perry responded in 2000 versus today. Back then, Perry’s aides moderated his language. His spokesman informed the Associated Press that the Lieutenant Governor was simply being “humorous.” No such excuse was offered today. Greg Sargent reports that, given another bite at the apple, the Perry camp “is not disavowing the implied threat in his original remarks.”
<!-- (for webtech) Posted in General, Politics
--><!-- googleoff: all --><!-- googleon: all -->
 
Rick Perry's "Exaggerations"


Rick Perry has made false or exaggerated claims on U.S. oil imports, the federal debt, Social Security and the federal health care law.

The Texas governor gave a speech Aug. 13 in South Carolina to announce he will run for the Republican presidential nomination. As we have for other declared candidates, we offer here a summary of his past statements that we have found to be false or misleading.

Here are some of his questionable claims:

  • Dependence on Foreign Oil. In his announcement speech, Perry said the U.S. cannot afford four more years of "rising energy dependence on nations that intend us harm."

    But U.S. reliance on foreign oil has dropped under President Barack Obama, and it is expected to decline again this year. The Energy Information Administration's Aug. 9 “Short-term Energy Outlook” said U.S. net imports of liquid fuels — as the EIA calls oil and other petroleum products — dropped from 57 percent of total consumption in the United States in 2008 to 49 percent in 2010, “because of rising domestic production and the decline in consumption during the economic downturn.” EIA projects net imports "will decline further to 47 percent in 2011 before rising slightly to 48 percent in 2012." Perry did not identify the "nations that intend us harm," but in March we looked at a similar claim by Sarah Palin and found that from 2008 to 2010 net imports from the Middle East were down 24 percent. Those from Africa dropped 8 percent.


  • The National Debt. Perry also incorrectly claimed in his speech that Obama's economic policies "have given us record debt." U.S. public debt as a percentage of the nation's economy is at its highest level since World War II, but not at a record high.

    The national debt is best measured as “the amount of government debt held by the public relative to annual economic output,” according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The public debt as a share of the gross domestic product stood at 62 percent last year, and CBO projects it will be even higher, at 69 percent, at the end of this fiscal year. That's high, but it was even higher for seven straight years, from 1943 to 1950, peaking at 109 percent of GDP in 1946, according to the Office of Management and Budget's historical tables.


  • The Social Security System. Last November, Perry exaggerated the financial problems of the Social Security system, when he claimed that "our kids are never going to see any benefit from it."

    At the time, the Social Security Board of Trustees had projected that there would be enough money coming in from payroll taxes to finance 78 percent of promised benefits, even when the Social Security Trust Fund is exhausted in 2037. The board's most recent report says the fund will be exhausted by 2036, but "tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085." Perry would have been correct to say that today’s young workers are not going to see the benefits now promised unless payroll taxes are increased. In an Aug. 5 analysis, the CBO said the payroll tax paid by employers and employees would have to be raised immediately from a combined 12.4 percent to about 14 percent to keep the trust fund in balance for the next 75 years.


  • Texas' Share of Medicaid Costs Increase. Also in November, Perry exaggerated how much Texas' share of Medicaid costs would increase as a result of the new federal health care law. Perry said the new law would cost Texas "$27 billion more, over and above what we’re already paying over the next 10 years, $2.7 billion every year."

    That's not true, according to a May 2010 study by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. The new law expands Medicaid eligibility to cover more Americans. But the federal government will pay most of the extra cost: 100 percent in the first three years, phasing out to 90 percent by 2020. Kaiser estimated that Medicaid enrollment in Texas will increase 63.5 percent by 2019. The total Medicaid cost for the state would be $4.5 billion — but that's only 5.1 percent more, or $219 million, than it would have been without the new law.






 
Rick Perry is an Idiot ! ! !


'Rick Perry is an idiot'



Los Angeles Times
August 19, 2011



<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">"Rick Perry is an idiot, and I don't think anybody would disagree with that."</span>
- Former Treasury official Bruce Bartlett, on CNN's "American Morning"​

Bartlett was responding to critical comments that presidential hopeful Rick Perry
had made recently about Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. Perry, the
governor of Texas, had said Bernanke would be "treasonous" if he moved
forward with a plan to print more money to help America out of its money
problems.

Barlett's comments are not only hyperbolic -- surely at least one person, most
likely Perry himself, would disagree -- but just the latest indicator of how low
the political debate can sink into the mud.

The verbal slap-fighting started earlier this week when Perry was speaking in
Iowa. "If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don’t
know what you all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly
down in Texas," Perry said. "Printing more money to play politics at this
particular time in American history is almost ... treasonous in my opinion."


The backlash to such charged language was immediate, with the White House
calling on Perry to elevate the debate and adding that "threatening the Fed
chairman is probably not a good idea." Political guru Karl Rove went even
further: "You don't accuse the chairman of the Federal Reserve of being a
traitor to his country, of being guilty of treason. Suggesting that we treat
him pretty ugly in Texas — you know, that is not, again, a presidential
statement."





http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nat...is-an-idiot-the-politics-of-namecalling-.html


<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=bestoftv/2011/08/19/exp.am.bartlett.perry.idiot.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=bestoftv/2011/08/19/exp.am.bartlett.perry.idiot.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>

 
source: Townhall

Rick Perry's NAFTA Superhighway Problem


Move over Mitt Romney. Rick Perry has a bigger problem to defend from his tenure as governor. Remember the NAFTA Superhighway project? It was to consist of a two-mile wide $184 billion transit system of toll roads, rail lines and utilities from the Texas-Mexico border all the way up to the Minnesota-Canadian border, to make it easier to ship foreign goods from China and other countries into North America. It became so unpopular in Texas that the Texas portion of it, called the Trans-Texas Corridor, was renamed and mostly disbanded a couple of years ago. Perry was the only gubernatorial candidate in 2006 of four major candidates who supported it. Even the Democratic candidate opposed it.

Perry’s campaign website lists the Trans-Texas Corridor as one of his accomplishments, “Rather than taking decades to expand these important corridors a little bit at a time, Governor Perry developed the Trans-Texas Corridor plan.”But is it something Perry really wants broadcast as an achievement? The Texas Republican Party’s 2010 platform includes a plank specifically opposing the Trans-Texas Corridor. Some of the opposition to the NAFTA Superhighway has been dismissed as conspiratorial, but loud objections also came from people concerned with border security and one million rural interests and farmers that stood to lose their land to eminent domain.

Construction of the Trans-Texas Corridor began in 2007. Perry received substantial campaign contributions from the companies expected to benefit from the construction, Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transport and Zachry Construction Company. Cintra is a Spanish-owned company that would own the toll roads. This arrangement has been accused of being a hidden tax payable to a foreign corporation. Zachry was selected by the Texas Department of Transportation to construct the Trans-Texas Corridor. Perry initially opposed efforts by the Texas legislature to impede the construction, vetoing several bills. As opposition increased, the legislature was finally able to repeal the section of the Transportation code dealing with the Trans-Texas Corridor and pass an eminent domain bill protecting property. The TTC-35 project, a privately built multi-lane toll road, railway and utility line network that was to run parallel to Interstate Highway 35, was canceled. Perry finally backed down in the 2010 Republican primary for governor running against Kay Bailey Hutchinson, and opposed construction of the TTC-35.

NAFTA and expanding free trade sounds good superficially. Unfortunately, it has turned out to be considerably less than free. New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi, known for orchestrating the Swift Boat ads targeting John Kerry, wrote a book exposing the NAFTA Superhighway in 2009 called “The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada.” Corsi’s efforts, as well as exposure by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and the website Corsi writes for, WorldNetDaily, may have contributed more to getting the Trans-Texas Corridor shut down than anything else.

Corsi explains in his book that the U.S. is at a disadvantage with “free trade” because unlike most of the world’s international trading countries, we do not charge a value added tax (VAT) to imported goods. This makes our products much more difficult to sell overseas, and other countries’ products much cheaper than ours. The price of union labor drives the costs up even more, making our own products less competitive here as well. This results in a trade imbalance leaving us heavily in debt to other countries, and part of the reason we have a debt ceiling crisis today.

With the economy currently in the tank and nine percent unemployment holding steady, the last thing Americans want is enabling China to sell us more products using cheap exploited labor. Corsi writes that the average age of a worker in a Chinese toy factor is between 12 and 15. The CANAMEX Corridor Coalition, a trade association that supports a transportation super corridor, reports that the average hourly manufacturing wage in the U.S. is $17.20. In Mexico it is $2.10, and in China and India it is $.25.

Furthermore, Corsi has put forth a compelling amount of information in his book showing how the plan to create a North American Union goes well beyond simple free trade agreements and purposely disguises efforts to subvert U.S. sovereignty to an entity that would operate much like the European Union.

Perry is hoping the NAFTA Superhighway quietly fades away. But has it really gone away? The controversial financing mechanism behind it that leases right-of-way to a private company – often Cintra – is still being used for freeways. That funding, known as Comprehensive Development Agreements, was recently used to build a toll road bypass to the Austin area, SH 130, considered part of the Trans-Texas Corridor. Trucks on Interstate 35 are still a big problem during rush hour in Dallas, Austin and San Antonio, so eventually a separate road will need to be built for them similar to what the Trans-Texas Corridor called for. On July 6, the Obama administration struck a deal with Mexico to re-open access to the U.S. for certified Mexican truckers.

Perry already has a record that hurts him with voters concerned about illegal immigration. In April, he stated that he would not support a version of Arizona’s SB 1070 for Texas. In 2001, he signed a bill allowing the children of illegal immigrants to receive in-state tuition at Texas universities. He opposes using E-Verify, the federal electronic system for verifying prospective workers’ immigration status.

Unlike Romney, Perry has not completely disavowed his controversial history as governor. Romney distanced himself from Mass-Care by promising that the first Executive Order he would sign upon becoming president would be a waiver to all 50 states from Obamacare. Perry, on the other hand, proudly lists Trans-Texas Corridor as one of his accomplishments on his website. The state of Texas, multiple factions within the Republican Party, and significant numbers of Democrats oppose the Trans-Texas Corridor. They are not going to sit back and risk repeating an “accomplishment” like this on a national scale. Former president George W. Bush, who was also a Texas governor, was one of the biggest proponents of the NAFTA Superhighway. Voters have the hindsight now to realize that the NAFTA Superhighway is the wrong direction for our country.
 
Did he ask them to pray for his pornographic movie store investments too ???

Capitalism is greater than God, in fact it is his God!

Assist:


FORT WORTH, Texas — A 16-year-old investment by Texas Gov. Rick Perry in a firm that rented pornographic movies is drawing new scrutiny in light of his just-launched presidential campaign.

Liberal bloggers and a handful of news sites have been taking the Republican candidate to task for his 1995 investment in the now-defunct Movie Gallery, which at the time was an Alabama-based video store chain that attributed some of its profits from renting pornographic films.

"They sold family-friendly material in the front but had adult rooms in the back," said Patrick Vaughn, general counsel with the American Family Association, a socially conservative group that led the charge for years against Movie Gallery. The association more recently hosted and organized The Response, a high-profile prayer rally in Houston that Perry attended a week before kicking off his presidential campaign.

<!-- story_feature_box.comp --><!-- /story_feature_box.comp -->In 1995, while serving as Texas' agriculture commissioner, Perry bought between $5,000 and $10,000 worth of the company's stock, according to his financial disclosure forms. Perry sold his entire investment the same year, campaign spokesman Mark Miner said.

While critics contend that the investment doesn't match Perry's record as a social conservative, Miner said liberals are trying to create a story where there is none.

"This company was a regional video store that he owned (stock in) for less than a year," Miner said. "This is nothing different than a Blockbuster chain."

Perry has spoken out against pornographers in the past. In his 2008 book, "On My Honor," he criticized the ACLU for "protecting the rights of pornographers" and suggested that pornography plays a role in "turning some viewers into eternal predators."

Miner said Perry's views on pornography have nothing to do with his 1995 investment.

News reports show the American Family Association's Florida chapter protested Movie Gallery stores as early as 1990. Vaughn said the national organization did not embark on its protest of the chain until 2000. He said he didn't think Perry was likely to have been aware of the protests against the company in 1995.

Vaughn also said Perry's investment was too small to be considered relevant now.

"The fact is we were trying to get big institutional investors to take a look at it," Vaughn said. "People are only talking about that $5,000 or $10,000 investment because he has made it known that he stands for family values. I don't think that qualifies him to be a hypocrite.

"It's not like he was making investments in dirty movies," Vaughn added.

Though the investment was available in public documents, it has not become a campaign issue against Perry in the last decade. Some of Perry's other investments have drawn scrutiny in the past, most notably a series of land deals that critics allege were arranged through the inappropriate use of political connections.

Matt Angle, the director of the Lone Star Project, a Democratic research group, predicted the Movie Gallery investment will be brought up by opponents now that Perry is playing on the national stage.

"He doesn't get a pass for something that happened in 1995," Angle said. "He was a statewide elected official in Texas and let me tell you, Rick Perry is not ... the type of candidate who would give his opponent a pass on anything like that."


Others disagree.

"These things become problems when they play into an existing narrative about a candidate," said Matt Mackowiak, a Republican strategist. "This turns contrary to what people know about Perry. ... To me, this is so long ago, it's such a minor investment, and I think, it's is a pretty minor deal."

Jason Stanford, a Texas Democratic strategist, agreed that Perry's record since the investment insulates him from any fallout.

"He has pretty convincingly governed like an American Family Association Republican," Stanford said.
 
source: Huffington Post


Rick Perry Connects Civil Rights Movement To Fight For 'Freedom From Overtaxation' (VIDEO)

During a stop in Rock Hill, South Carolina over the weekend, Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry connected the civil rights movement to a fight being waged by Republicans for lower taxes.

"Listen, America’s gone a long way from the standpoint of civil rights and thank God we have," said the Texas governor. "We've gone from a country that made great strides in issues of civil rights, I think we all can be proud of that. And as we go forward, America needs to be about freedom. It needs to be about freedom from overtaxation, freedom from over-litigation, freedom from over-regulation. And Americans, regardless of what their cultural or ethnic background is, they need to know that they can come to America and you got a chance to have any dream come true because the economic climate is gonna be improved."

The remarks came in response to a question from a reporter asking the Texas governor to weigh in on the significance of Rock Hill to the country's civil rights history. The reporter noted, "This year we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Friendship Nine sit-in."

The AP has more on what Perry had to say during his time in the Palmetto State:
Perry's primary pitch from the beginning has been getting more people back to work and blaming Obama for job loss.
"The answer is we're going to cut the taxes, we're going lower the regulations, we're going to get the lawyers out of our business and we're going to get America back working again," Perry said.
...
Perry didn't leave South Carolina empty-handed. His campaign raised money at a private event Friday in Greenville. And he left the state with key endorsements.

Longtime state legislator David Wilkins, who played a big role in George W. Bush's White House races, signed onto Perry's bid. And Harvey Peeler, majority leader in the state Senate, jumped aboard, too.
Heading back to Texas for the first time since declaring his candidacy for president of the United States, Perry reportedly encouraged Texans to push back against criticism of the Lone Star State.

According to the AP, Perry said, "When the liberal pundits start trashing Texas ... I want you all to stand up and say that dog won't hunt."

Below, video of Perry's remarks on the civil rights movement via American Bridge 21st Century, a progressive research and communications organization.

WATCH:
<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uR2ReqmGUTU" frameBorder=0 width=560 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>
 
Hey Thought, I still think you'll luv Rick Perry. He endorsed TARP & Sen Obama & the democratic congress voted for TARP & Bush signed TARP.

perry_letter.jpg
 
Re: Rick Perry's "Exaggerations"



"Social Security by definition is a Ponzi scheme that even master swindler Charles Ponzi would feel badly about," Texas Gov. Rick Perry said Sunday, arguing that the federal government should turn over block grants to states to run entitlement programs.

"My children who are in their 20s know that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme," Perry, the new chief of the Republican Governors Association, told "Fox News Sunday."​

- Rick Perry, Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme, November 21, 2010 FoxNews.com





 
source: Think Progress


Just One Week Into His Campaign, Rick Perry Disavows His Nine-Month-Old Book


Last November, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) published take it all back just one week into his presidential campaign:
[Perry's] communications director, Ray Sullivan, said Thursday that he had “never heard” the governor suggest [Social Security] was unconstitutional. Not only that, Mr. Sullivan said, but “Fed Up!” is not meant to reflect the governor’s current views on how to fix the program. [...]

In an interview, Mr. Sullivan acknowledged that many passages in Mr. Perry’s “Fed Up!” could dog his presidential campaign. The book, Mr. Sullivan said, “is a look back, not a path forward.” It was written “as a review and critique of 50 years of federal excesses, not in any way as a 2012 campaign blueprint or manifesto,” Mr. Sullivan said.

The campaign’s disavowal of “Fed Up!” is itself very new. On Sunday evening, at Mr. Perry’s first campaign stop in Iowa, a questioner asked the governor to talk about how he would fix the country’s rickety entitlement programs. Mr. Perry shot back: “Have you read my book, ‘Fed Up!’ Get a copy and read it.”
Fed Up is not some 20-year-old graduate school thesis that Perry wrote before he served in elected office. It is a substantial, nationally published manifesto that Perry was proudly signing at book tours just a few months ago. Indeed, as recently as last Monday, Perry was on the campaign trail citing Fed Up for the unusual proposition that “I don’t think the federal government has a role in your children’s education.” Watch it:

<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VvSqmnHctFE" frameBorder=0 width=560 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>​

After just a few days of embarrassing press, however, Perry now expects the country to believe that his entire book was not intended to be a factual statement.
 
source: Reuters


Exclusive: Perry sought to sideline nuclear waste site critic

(Reuters) - Texas governor Rick Perry tried to sideline a state commissioner who opposed expanding the scope of a nuclear-waste landfill owned by one of the governor's biggest political donors, Reuters has learned.

Bobby Gregory, owner of a wildlife ranch and landfill company south of Austin, had opposed a plan to let 36 states send nuclear waste to a 1,338-acre site in Andrews County.

On the other side of the issue was billionaire Harold Simmons and his company Waste Control Specialists LLC, which stood to gain millions of dollars from accepting out-of-state shipments. Simmons had donated over $1 million to Perry's gubernatorial campaigns.

A report in the Los Angeles Times in August examined the case of the Texas waste site and Perry's ties to Simmons, a conservative who funded the Swift Boat campaign that helped torpedo John Kerry's presidential bid.

Perry maintains his appointments are based on merit, and Simmons is inclined to help any conservative Republican, spokespeople for the two said.

In any case, the January vote by the eight-member Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact Commission was key to the future profitability of the nuclear landfill.

Reuters has learned that late last year, after it became clear that the commission might block Waste Control's request to truck in waste from around the country, Perry's appointments chief, Teresa Spears, offered commissioner Gregory an alternative job -- a prestigious appointment as a regent of a state university.

Under Texas law, Gregory could not hold two state-appointed positions requiring Senate approval at the same time, and so taking the regent job would have required him to leave the waste commission.

Gary Newton, a lawyer for Gregory's company, Texas Disposal Systems, told Reuters his boss declined the offer. "There was a call from Ms. Spears. Bobby said they asked him if he was interested in this position. It was a Board of Regents position. He said 'No, I'm not interested in that type of appointment,' and declined," Newton said.

Gregory's term as commissioner ended on August 31 this year, so Perry can now replace him. The waste commission voted in January to allow imports, though it still has to examine and approve specific applications to import waste on a case-by-case basis.

Perry spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said: "Governor Perry's decisions are based solely on what's in the best interests of the people of Texas."

The news of Perry's intervention in the nuclear-waste issue comes as the governor is climbing the polls in the fight to take on President Barack Obama as the Republican candidate in the U.S. presidential election next year.

The Texan is running on a pro-jobs, pro-business platform. His political foes allege that he has granted favors to businesses owned by Perry donors (which wouldn't necessarily be improper under Texas campaign-finance rules). The governor's camp says he pushes the interests of all business in Texas.

FIGHT OVER IMPORTS

The WCS-operated site will store 2.3 million cubic feet of low-level nuclear waste, which is everything from cut up nuclear power plants, to radioactive detritus from hospitals and research labs -- but not spent nuclear fuel itself.

A key issue for the economics of the nuclear waste site was whether it would be allowed to handle waste imported from states other than Vermont. Texas already had a "compact" deal to handle Vermont's low-level waste.

In the latter part of 2010, Gregory was one of two people on the eight-member panel known to oppose allowing out of state imports. Two other members of the panel were Republican appointees from Vermont who favored the imports, but they were due to be replaced, presumably by Democratic appointees who would be in the opposition camp, early in 2011.

That could have swung the balance of the committee from 6-2 in favor to a 4-4 stalemate. Replacing Gregory would have given importation proponents the vote to carry the day.

After Gregory declined the job offer, the commission was called to vote on January 4, before the terms of the Vermont Republicans ended.

At a meeting that day, Gregory pleaded with his fellow commissioners to vote against importation.

"Without question in my mind this is too much, too soon, too fast, and I've added the caveat -- if at all," Gregory told the meeting. "It is beyond preposterous, it is beyond absurd," that the commission should vote without reading over 5,000 public comments, he said.

The panel voted 5-2 in favor of allowing out-of-state imports, and the Texas legislature sealed the importation allowance into law in May.

The Andrews County dump could begin accepting waste late in 2011 or early in 2012.

Perry's spokeswoman did not dispute the details of the regent offer, but would not comment on the donor's ties to Perry or the governor's intention to remove a waste specialist from a waste regulatory board in favor of overseeing a university. She broadly defended the process.

"Governor Perry makes appointments based on the qualifications of an individual and his or her ability to serve in Texans' best interests, nothing more," Frazier said. "As you may know, the project you mention was approved overwhelmingly by the Texas legislature, and has the support of the local community," she added.

Simmons' support of Perry is not unique and extends to Republican conservative candidates nationwide, said Chuck McDonald, spokesman for Waste Control Specialists, who dismissed any suggestion that Simmons' donations had gained him any favors from Perry or state regulators.

"The record is pretty clear: If you are a conservative Republican seeking office, Mr. Simmons is going to support you," McDonald said. "Every congressman who comes dragging through Texas, if he stops in (Simmons') office and he's got an "R" by his name, he's going to get money."
 
source: Think Progress

Perry Campaign Repeats False Claim That Rick Perry Never Said Social Security Is Unconstitutional


ThinkProgress filed this report from the Republican presidential debate in Simi Valley, California.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) just doesn’t know what to do with his radical book arguing that Social Security and Medicare are unconstitutional. The Perry campaign has alternatively embraced the book, distanced itself from it, run away from voters asking him about it, and misrepresented what it says.

ThinkProgress’ Scott Keyes caught up with Rick Perry’s campaign manager yesterday, and learned that Team Perry is back to simply not telling the truth about what their candidate believes:
KEYES: Does the governor still think that Social Security exists at the expense of the Constitution?

PERRY SPOX: In the book he never said — he didn’t say it was unconstitutional. Is that what you’re getting at?

KEYES: Well, just that he wrote that Social Security exists at the expense of the Constitution.

PERRY SPOX: He believes Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and that we’ve got to address it. We’re starting a national conversation.
Watch it:

<IFRAME height=345 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ywSODjhLslI" frameBorder=0 width=560 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>


For the record, here is the passage in Fed Up! where Rick Perry says that Social Security is unconstitutional:


There is no ambiguity in this passage. Nor is there ambiguity in a subsequent interview where Perry reiterated his belief that Social Security and Medicare violate the Constitution:
I don’t think our founding fathers when they were putting the term “general welfare” in [the Constitution] were thinking about a federally operated program of pensions nor a federally operated program of health care. What they clearly said was that those were issues that the states need to address. Not the federal government. I stand very clear on that.
Simply put, the Perry campaign needs to stop misrepresenting what their candidate believes.
 
Perry tryin to imtimidate Ron Paul :smh:

2011-09-08T022735Z_01_LOA29_RTRIDSP_3_USA-CAMPAIGN-DEBATE.jpg


Al Gore's cheerleader is getting mad :yes:

5b48bf3232cf2114f80e6a7067000eca.jpg


The establishment really hates Ron but he's still kickin their azz

ronpaulwinsagainfixed.jpg
 
Perry tryin to imtimidate Ron Paul :smh:

The establishment really hates Ron but he's still kickin their azz

Lamar, face it; people just don't care much for pointy-head twerps, i.e., Ron Paul, Ross Perot, Dennis Kucinich, et al. :lol:
 
Lamar, face it; people just don't care much for pointy-head twerps, i.e., Ron Paul, Ross Perot, Dennis Kucinich, et al. :lol:

Not necessarily.....


source: New York Times

Published: June 11, 1992
<!-- Module ends: article-byline-->
THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: On the Trail; POLL GIVES PEROT A CLEAR LEAD


QueEx, these debates are pretty much canned. The debaters are accepted and rejected by the powers that be. Former Louisiana Governor, Buddy Roemer was not permitted in any debate so far this year. He is hardly a pointy head, being the only former Governor and Congressman running this year. Ralph Nader was physically kept from even attending the 2000 presidential debate in Massachusetts. Do you think that if it weren't for the backing of Texas oil money, anyone would even care about crackpot Perry? In reality, we are all voting for our choice of the lesser of the evils.
 
T.O., my comments aren't related to the debates at all. We've been here before and you missed in then; I just don't like them lil no personality know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos. LOL. aiight.
 
Lamar, face it; people just don't care much for pointy-head twerps, i.e., Ron Paul, Ross Perot, Dennis Kucinich, et al. :lol:

Ross Perot Debates Al Gore on NAFTA

Ross Perot was independent and challenging the 2-party establishment centered on the NAFTA legislation. I wish more people would've listened to him cause Hoffa & the Dems sittin around today wonderin where the jobs went, when all they have to do is look who lobbied for, and passed, NAFTA.

Just as Ron Paul is challenging Perry on being Al Gore's cheerleader. :D

Paul zeroed in on the accusation that Perry tried to forcibly vaccinate 12-year-old girls against HPV by executive order. Dude is bad news

2elgkcx.png
 
T.O., my comments aren't related to the debates at all. We've been here before and you missed in then; I just don't like them lil no personality know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos. LOL. aiight.


So it's personal? Unfortunately this is how the majority of the voting populace casts their votes. Any wonder why we are in our current predicament? May be if we had used the left side of our brains more instead of the right side, Al Gore would have been president and the 8 year national nightmare under GW would have never occurred!
 
So it's personal? Unfortunately this is how the majority of the voting populace casts their votes. Any wonder why we are in our current predicament? May be if we had used the left side of our brains more instead of the right side, Al Gore would have been president and the 8 year national nightmare under GW would have never occurred!

No, its not personal T.O., its humor!

Lighten the fuk up man; use more of the center portion of your brain; and perhaps, you'll see that it is this vicious hard left/right schism that is largely responsible for our current predicament: left/right deadlock paralysis.
 
I just don't like them lil no personality know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos. LOL. aiight.

It's cool Que, but even you must admit......Ross Perot was correct in his assessment of how NAFTA would affect American jobs. He deserved more credibility than the mainstream media gave him. They ridiculed this man cause he had big ears & a gang of charts tellin Reps & Dems how they were fuckin up......kinda juvenile, don't cha think?

Fast-forward to Ron Paul, who's scenario is a bit different because Ron has a track record of correctly, understanding monetary policy and how it affects the overall economy. Ron Paul was correct in his analysis, the cracka, "pointy-head twerp" was right......And you know it! Which is a lot more than I can say for these "know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos" from Princeton, Yale & Harvard that run the Treasury and Fed Reserve.
 
No, its not personal T.O., its humor!

Lighten the fuk up man; use more of the center portion of your brain; and perhaps, you'll see that it is this vicious hard left/right schism that is largely responsible for our current predicament: left/right deadlock paralysis.


use more of the center portion of your brain

The left brain is associated with logic and reason, the right brain is associated with emotion and creativity. Apropos isn't it?
 
Back
Top