The Nine, Nine, Nine

It's because they're too poor to pay federal income taxes. How does that need reforming?


Don’t know why the issue of 47% not paying any federal taxes is so incomprehensible for some. According to United States Government statistics, the IRS & CENSUS — we know that 35% of all American households earn LESS THAN $33,000 per year. There are 114,000,000 (114 Million) households in the US; so, 35% would be 40 Million households.

jbtu1TQvE1Vsfk.JPG


US household incomes have remained stagnant for the past 40 years even as US productivity has soared. The huge wealth represented by the productivity gains have all gone to the top 2% of US households and particularly to the top half of 1%. Millions of American households have sunk into the working poor because their real wages were not going up at all, even as their cost of living was going up every year (inflation).

To compensate for employers refusing to share productivity gains with their employees by raising their wages, congress and presidents starting with Gerald Ford in the 1970’s added deductions to the tax code such as the Earned Income Credit (EIC) and Child Tax Credit and others which eliminated many working poor households federal income tax burden. It’s not coincidental that these credits phase out once your household income goes much above $36,000. If you want to scream 'class warfare' and make the argument that these tax credits for the working poor be eliminated , which would significantly increase their federal tax burden — and at-the-same-time argue that millionaires like Mitt Romney who earned $39 Million last year should continue to pay less than 15% in taxes— then you are indeed supporting class warefare against the working poor.

Among the 47% who pay no federal income tax are 7,000 households who earn more than $1,000,000 ($1 Million) per year; the media never mentions these households. The RepubliKlan politicians and <s>FOX</s> FAKE News which perpetually regurgitate the mantra that 47% pay no federal taxes are correctly, confident in the reality that their brain addled audience would not understand the few paragraphs and charts that are in this post.


jb1mG3lR4YgNOG.png
 
Lol obama got this.

The shit im reading in this thread is NUTS.

All of the candidates fucking suck. This ----- Cain is wilding out.

And whoever posted that mitt romney shit gtfo.

He's MORMON! Did you know Southern Baptist convention has classified Mormonism as a cult? You know what's funny is when a BLACK MAN will get elected over a WOMAN or a MORMON. Lmaoooooo
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Herman Cain says the 9-9-9 plan does not
raise taxes on those making the least



8741035-large.jpg




<IFRAME SRC="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/oct/18/herman-cain/herman-cain-says-9-9-9-plan-does-not-raise-taxes-t/" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/oct/18/herman-cain/herman-cain-says-9-9-9-plan-does-not-raise-taxes-t/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Seeing as how he's for raising taxes, then it should be unanimous vote on this board against Cain. From those of us on the Left because he wants to raise taxes on the poorest citizens and from those on the Right because he wants to raise taxes period.
 

Herman Cain Offers Tax Reform Tweak: 9-0-9

GOP candidate says he wouldn't raise income taxes on the poor.



129894379.jpg.CROP.thumbnail-small.jpg

(Herman Cain speaks while unveiling his
'Opportunity Zone' economic plan in front
of the Michigan Central Station, an aban-
doned train depot, October 21, 2011 in
Detroit.) Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images.



Slate
By Will Oremus
Friday, Oct. 21, 2011


Ever a believer in Occam’s razor, Republican presidential contender Herman
Cain has responded to criticism of his “9-9-9” tax reform plan with one
simple switcheroo. For the poor, he said, he would replace the middle “9”
with a zero.

The original formulation called for replacing the nation’s complex tax code
with a 9 percent corporate tax, 9 percent income tax and 9 percent sales
tax. As a chorus of critics pointed out, that would mean lower taxes for the
rich and higher taxes for the poor. So in a speech in Detroit on Friday, Cain
offered an amendment.

“If you are at or below the poverty level, your plan isn't 9-9-9, it is 9-0-9,"
he said, according to CNN. "Say amen y'all. 9-0-9.”

Amen?

But if this was the plan all along, as Cain asserted, why didn’t he mention it
before now? "We simply chose not to talk about this piece earlier such that
we could get people used to the whole concept," he said, as reported by
MSNBC.

Cain also has one other number for people to get used to: 3-3-3. The surging
Republican candidate told the Detroit News in an interview that as president
he would create “empowerment zones” in poor areas of cities like Detroit,
using further tax breaks to lure new business. In exchange, those poor areas
would get rid of “barriers”—presumably, zoning regulations, environmental
reviews and the like.

While a 9-0-9 section of the tax code would ease the burden of Cain’s tax
reform for some, however, it will remain regressive for many others. As the
Associated Press noted earlier this week, a study found that 9-9-9 would
amount to a tax hike for 84 percent of Americans, with middle-income
households taking the biggest hit of all.






http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2011...publican_candidate_tweaks_9_9_9_tax_plan.html


 
Back
Top