The Fundamental Slavery

water

Transparent, tasteless, odorless
OG Investor
The Fundamental Slavery



These are the five tricks through which man has been turned into a slave, into an ugly phenomenon, a cripple.

The first is:

Keep man as weak as possible if you want to dominate him. If the priest wants to dominate you or the politician wants to dominate you, you have to be kept as weak as possible. And the best way to keep a man weak is not to give love total freedom. Love is nourishment. Now the psychologists have discovered that if a child is not given love, he shrivels up into himself and becomes weak. You can give him milk, you can give him medicine, you can give him everything else, but just don't give love. Don't hug him, don't kiss him, don't hold him close to the warmth of your body, and the child will start becoming weaker and weaker and weaker. There are more chances of his dying than surviving.

What happens? Why? Just hugging, kissing, giving warmth, and somehow the child feels nourished, accepted, loved, needed. The child starts feeling worthy; the child starts feeling a certain meaning in his life.

Now, from the very childhood we starve them; we don't give love as much as is needed. Then we try to force the young men and young women not to fall in love unless they get married. By the age of fourteen they become sexually mature. But their education may take more time, ten years more, until they are twenty-four, twenty-five years old—then they will be getting their M.A.s, or Ph.D.s, or M.D.s. So we try to force them not to love.

Sexual energy comes to its climax near the age of eighteen. Never again will a man be so potent, and never again will a woman be able to have a greater orgasm than she will be able to near the age of eighteen. But we force them not to make love—girls and boys are kept separate, and just between them stands the whole mechanism of police, magistrates, vice-chancellors, principals, headmasters. They are all standing there, just in between, just holding the boys back from moving to the girls, holding the girls back from moving to the boys. Why? Why is so much care taken? They are trying to kill the bull and create an ox.

By the time you are eighteen you are at the peak of your sexual energy, your love energy. By the time you get married at twenty-five, twenty-six, twenty-seven . . . and the age has been going up and up. The more cultured a country the longer you wait, because more has to be learned, the job has to be found, this and that. By the time you get married you are almost declining in your powers. Then you love, but the love never becomes really hot; it never comes to the point where people evaporate, it remains lukewarm. And when you have not been able to love totally, you cannot love your children because you don't know how. When you have not been able to know the peaks of it, how can you teach your children? How can you help your children to have the peaks of it?

So down the ages man has been denied love so that he should remain weak.

Second:

Keep man as ignorant and deluded as possible so that he can easily be deceived. And if you want to create a sort of idiocy—which is a must for the priest and the politician and their conspiracy—then the best thing is not to allow man to move into love freely. Without love a man's intelligence falls low. Have you not watched it? When you fall in love, suddenly all your capacities are at their peak, at their crescendo, just a moment ago you were looking dull and then you meet your woman and suddenly a great joy has erupted in your being; you are aflame. While people are in love they perform at their maximum. When love disappears or when love is not there, they perform at their minimum.

The most intelligent people are the most sexual people. This has to be understood, because love energy is basically intelligence. If you cannot love you are somehow closed, cold; you cannot flow. While in love one flows. While in love one feels so confident that one can touch the stars. That's why a woman becomes a great inspiration, a man becomes a great inspiration. When a woman is loved she becomes more beautiful immediately, instantly! Just a moment ago she was just an ordinary woman, and now love has showered upon her—she is bathed in a totally new energy, a new aura arises around her. She walks more gracefully, a dance has come to her step. Her eyes have tremendous beauty now; her face glows, she is luminous. And the same happens to the man.

When people are in love they perform at the optimum. Don't allow love and they will remain at the minimum. When they remain at the minimum they are stupid, they are ignorant, they don't bother to know. And when people are ignorant and stupid and deluded, they can be easily deceived.

When people are sexually repressed, lovewise repressed, they start hankering for the other life. They think about heaven, paradise, but they don't think to create the paradise here, now. When you are in love, paradise is here now. Then you don't bother; then who goes to the priest? Then who bothers that there should be a paradise? You are already there! You are no longer interested. But when your love energy is repressed, you start thinking, "Here is nothing, now is empty. Then there must be somewhere some goal..." You go to the priest and ask about heaven and he paints beautiful pictures of heaven. Sex has been repressed so that you can become interested in the other life. And when people are interested in the other life, naturally they are not interested in this life.

This life is the only life. The other life is hidden in this life! It is not against it, it is not away from it; it is in it. Go into it—this is it! Go into it and you will find the other, too. God is hidden in the world, God is hidden here now. If you love, you will be able to feel it.

The third secret:

Keep man as frightened as possible. And the sure way is not to allow him love, because love destroys fear—"love casteth out fear." When you are in love you are not afraid. When you are in love you can fight against the whole world. When you are in love you feel infinitely capable of anything. But when you are not in love, you are afraid of small things. When you are not in love you become more interested in security, in safety. When you are in love you are more interested in adventure, in exploration. People have not been allowed to love because that is the only way to make them afraid. And when they are afraid and trembling they are always on their knees, bowing to the priest and bowing to the politician.

It is a great conspiracy against humanity. It is a great conspiracy against you! Your politician and your priest are your enemies, but they pretend that they are public servants. They say, "We are here to serve you, to help you attain a better life. We are here to create a good life for you." And they are the destroyers of life itself.

The fourth:

Keep man as miserable as possible—because a miserable man is confused, a miserable man has no self-worth, a miserable man is self-condemnatory a miserable man feels that he must have done something wrong. A miserable man has no grounding—you can push him from here and there, he can be turned into driftwood very easily. And a miserable man is always ready to be commanded, to be ordered, to be disciplined, because he knows: "On my own I am simply miserable. Maybe somebody else can discipline my life." He is a ready victim.

And the fifth:

Keep men as alienated from each other as possible, so that they cannot band together for some purpose of which the priest and the politician may not approve. Keep people separate from each other. Don't allow them too much intimacy. When people are separate, lonely, alienated from each other, they cannot band together. And there are a thousand and one tricks to keep them apart.

More: http://www.whale.to/b/osho.html

Thoughts?
 
yo kayanation wanted to know did Pope Gregory XVI really say its ok to turn blacks into slaves please send links.

Because every time I search its never on point with the question.
 
yo kayanation wanted to know did Pope Gregory XVI really say its ok to turn blacks into slaves please send links.

Because every time I search its never on point with the question.


I never heard of that.

Just looking at the dates of his life

Pope Gregory XVI (Latin: Gregorius XVI; 18 September 1765 – 1 June 1846)



The trans atlantic slave trade was already on it's way with Portugal shipping Africans to Brazil.



:cool:
 
just like humans that domesticate animals.....you have to know and study the animal before you domesticate or tame it. Whites did this with us. Which is why whites are experts in black history and we know nothing about their history.

We need to know cac history not just Egyptian faggot ass pyramid texts like coffin text spell 635
 

On June 1452 Catholic Pope Nicholas V issued a papal bull entitled Dum Diversas which declared African people and the people today described as ‘American Indians’ as ‘non-humans’ and therefore incapable of becoming Catholics. Africans & Indians were classified as heathens and their enslavement was therefore NOT a sin in the eyes of the church. The papal declaration in 1452 would be the equivalent of a unanimous 9-0 ruling by today’s U.S. Supreme Court. This ruling legally sanctioned the African slave trade and codified and entrenched “white skin supremacy”, as the Raison d'être for white skinned elites worldwide. Queen Elizabeth 1, ancestor of the current queen of England got involved in the African slave trade in the 1500’s with her own personal ships, including one named “Jesus of Lubeck”.






Narrative from the video above starts @ 1:20-<blockquote>

"....A slave entered the world in a one room dirt floor shack, drafty in winter, reeking in summer. Slave cabins breed typhus, pneumonia, cholera, lockjaw, tuberculosis. A child who survived to be sent to the fields at 12 was likely to have rotten teeth, worms, dysentery, and malaria. Fewer than four slaves out of 100 lived to age sixty. Work began at sunrise and continued 14 hours, unless there was a full moon when the work continued longer...."
</blockquote>

 
Last edited:
^^^^^ good looks I just got the name wrong. Damm so its true all along I thought it was a lie. But y i thought they were atleast 3 black popes.
 
This ruling legally sanctioned the African slave trade and codified and entrenched “white skin supremacy”, as the Raison d'être for white skinned elites worldwide.



This part is not true.

White supremacy didn't start with the Trans Atlantic Slave trade.

The concept of race was created 200 years after slavery started in the 1600.

So there was no concept of white supremacy.

Slavery was an economic system that generated great wealth.

200 years of it's existence, something needed to be done to justify KEEPING THE WEALTH

So a classification system was created to attribute negative value to the oppressed in order to justify enslaving them.

Now they could keep their WEALTH and MORALITY.


This is a must-have great book to get
51Y0lqc2PfL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
 

.....This ruling legally sanctioned the African slave trade and codified and entrenched “white skin supremacy”, as the Raison d'être for white skinned elites worldwide.....


This part is not true.

White supremacy didn't start with the Trans Atlantic Slave trade.

The concept of race was created 200 years after slavery started in the 1600.

So there was no concept of white supremacy........

White Supremacy is a global system utilized against ALL so-called "People-Of-Color".

<img src="https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRoizRNdmqWRCdqKhlYJzQDfEL0dxHfuF5jkEIyTdteFJLCvkQVdw" width="400">

Are "Native Americans" NOT "People-Of-Color"??

When Columbus "discovered"?? America he actually was in what is now called the Caribbean & West Indies; the stark contrast in skin color and customs of the 'natives' that he encountered is chronicled in his diaries which are archived and you can read them online. He said: "they are savage cannibals, with dog-like noses"

Columbus said:
"They should be good servants .... I, our Lord being pleased, will take hence, at the time of my departure, six natives for your Highnesses."

From his very first contact with native people, Columbus had their domination in mind. For example, on October 14, 1492, Columbus wrote in his journal, "with fifty men they can all be subjugated and made to do what is required of them."

These were not mere words: Columbus sent back a consignment of natives to be sold as slaves.

What was the justification for the enslavement of the 'natives'??
Religion!

Following Columbus' discovery, Pope Alexander VI issued a May 4, 1493, papal bull granting official ownership of the "New World" to Ferdinand and Isabella the monarchs who sponsored his trip.

The Pope declared that 'natives' must immediately comply with "The Requirement" an ultimatum in which Indians were forced to accept "the Church as the Ruler and Superior of the whole world" or face persecution. If Indians did not immediately comply, the Requirement warned them:

"We shall take you and your wives and your children, and shall make slaves of them, and as such shall sell and dispose of them as their Highnesses may command; and we shall take away your goods, and shall do all the harm and damage that we can."

This papal ruling unleashed slavery, barbarism and genocide against the "People-Of-Color" 'Natives'. Spaniards cut off 'natives' ears and noses with their swords for "fun". Spaniards tested the sharpness of their blades on Native people by cutting them in half, beheading them in contests and throwing Natives into vats of boiling soap. All of these atrocities were chronicled by eye witnesses in diaries which are all available to read today.

The Spanish & Portuguese were involved in the African slave trade starting in the late 15th century well before the British who were late to the debauchery. The authorization for the Spanish & Portuguese enslavement of Africans was the June 1452 Catholic Pope Nicholas V issued papal bull entitled Dum Diversas.

It is true that in centuries prior to the mid 15th century humans interacted with each other without the scourge of skin-color racism. Chinese Admiral Zheng He in the early 1400's he sailed to Africa in ships six times larger than Columbus' primitive ships; peaceful trade ensued. History is replete with numerous examples of peaceful human interaction between people who had various skin hues and different features prior to the advent of worldwide white supremacy.

 
Last edited:
imgres.jpeg

Without love a man's intelligence falls low. Have you not watched it? When you fall in love, suddenly all your capacities are at their peak, at their crescendo, just a moment ago you were looking dull and then you meet your woman and suddenly a great joy has erupted in your being; you are aflame. While people are in love they perform at their maximum. When love disappears or when love is not there, they perform at their minimum.


The most intelligent people are the most sexual people. This has to be understood, because love energy is basically intelligence. If you cannot love you are somehow closed, cold; you cannot flow. While in love one flows. While in love one feels so confident that one can touch the stars. That's why a woman becomes a great inspiration, a man becomes a great inspiration. When a woman is loved she becomes more beautiful immediately, instantly! Just a moment ago she was just an ordinary woman, and now love has showered upon her—she is bathed in a totally new energy, a new aura arises around her. She walks more gracefully, a dance has come to her step. Her eyes have tremendous beauty now; her face glows, she is luminous. And the same happens to the man.

When people are in love they perform at the optimum. Don't allow love and they will remain at the minimum. When they remain at the minimum they are stupid, they are ignorant, they don't bother to know. And when people are ignorant and stupid and deluded, they can be easily deceived.

Love has nothing do with intelligence, there is no credible scientific study to back the theory.
 
On June 1452 Catholic Pope Nicholas V issued a papal bull entitled Dum Diversas which declared African people and the people today described as ‘American Indians’ as ‘non-humans’ and therefore incapable of becoming Catholics. Africans & Indians were classified as heathens and their enslavement was therefore NOT a sin in the eyes of the church. The papal declaration in 1452 would be the equivalent of a unanimous 9-0 ruling by today’s U.S. Supreme Court. This ruling legally sanctioned the African slave trade and codified and entrenched “white skin supremacy”, as the Raison d'être for white skinned elites worldwide. Queen Elizabeth 1, ancestor of the current queen of England got involved in the African slave trade in the 1500’s with her own personal ships, including one named “Jesus of Lubeck”.






Narrative from the video above starts @ 1:20-<blockquote>

"....A slave entered the world in a one room dirt floor shack, drafty in winter, reeking in summer. Slave cabins breed typhus, pneumonia, cholera, lockjaw, tuberculosis. A child who survived to be sent to the fields at 12 was likely to have rotten teeth, worms, dysentery, and malaria. Fewer than four slaves out of 100 lived to age sixty. Work began at sunrise and continued 14 hours, unless there was a full moon when the work continued longer...."</blockquote>

This was the key. It gave Europeans the green light to profit from slavery. All other people's were to be converted
 
Back
Top