The Full List Of Every Senator Who Stands To Be Personally Enriched By The Tax Bill

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
source: International Business Times

Republican Senators Will Save Millions With Special Real-Estate Tax Break



When the U.S. Senate took up the final tax bill Tuesday, more than one-quarter of all GOP senators were voting on a bill that includes a special provision that could give them a new tax cut through their real estate shell companies, according to federal records reviewed by International Business Times.

The provision was not in the original bill passed by the Senate on Dec. 1. It was embedded in the final bill by Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, who is among the lawmakers that stand to personally benefit from the provision.

In response to Democratic lawmakers who have slammed the provision as a lobbyist-sculpted giveaway to the rich, Republican Majority Whip John Cornyn promoted on Twitter a column by Ryan Ellis, a registered bank lobbyist who has been working to influence the tax legislation and who has defended the provision.

More than a dozen Republican senators (along with their spouses) hold financial interests in over 30 real-estate-related partnerships — worth as much as $117 million in total. Most of the holdings are income-generating investments — and those holdings together produced between $2.5 million and $15.1 million in rent and interest income in 2016, according to federal records.

IBT first reported on the tax carve-out, which allows investors in “pass-through” entities, including real-estate partnerships such as LLCs and LPs, with few employees to deduct part of their income that passes through those partnerships. In response to IBT’s reporting, Republican Sen. Bob Corker, whose disclosure forms list up to $41 million in “pass-through” real-estate partnerships, claimed he did not know of the carve-out when he announced his support for the legislation on Friday, after previously casting the only Republican vote against the bill in the Senate, which did not then include the provision.

In the face of a Twitter-trending hashtag #CorkerKickback, Corker has been vociferously defended by Liam Donovan, a registered lobbyist for the construction and real estate industry who is lobbying Congress on tax reform and specifically on “pass-through rates,” according to federal records.

While Republicans have argued the House version of the bill contained the controversial provision, experts have told IBT the provision appeared in the legislation only after the bill was finalized during House-Senate Conference Committee deliberations.

“The mechanism is completely new and can’t be found in any prior version of the bill,” Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute of Economics and Tax Policy, previously told IBT.

Because the provision was added by the conference committee, it is “unlikely to have been fully priced into the revenue estimate, because the new provision was never subject to the benefits of crowdsourced analysis of all its implications,” University of Southern California law professor Edward Kleinbard told IBT.

Corker, the Senate’s fourth richest member in 2015, with an estimated net worth of over$69 million, reported the highest 2016 income from real-estate partnerships — up to $7 million — among GOP senators. His income came from three properties held by LLCs that together were worth as much as $35 million. Montana Sen. Steve Daines, whose estimated net worth was $14.4 million in 2015, reported earning between $485,000 and $4.2 million last year in rental income from eight properties managed by Genesis LLC. Daines, with Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, pushed for a more generous tax deduction for pass-through entities during the Senate tax bill process.

Other top earners were Johnson and Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, who earned as much as $2 million and $1 million, respectively, in 2016 from real estate pass-through vehicles.

Elaine Hatch, the wife of the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee who said Monday that he wrote the real-estate tax break and disputed IBT’s report that the provision had not been in previous versions of the bill, owns a stake in a real-estate LLC worth up to $500,000 that generated between $5,000 and $15,000 of income from rent/royalties, interest and capital gains in 2016.

Several of these senators were also top recipients of campaign cash from the real estate industry during the 2016 election cycle. Ohio Sen. Rob Portman’s campaign took in over $900,000 from real estate industry PACs and individuals; Johnson received roughly $780,000; and Georgia Sen. Johnny Isakson got $520,000 from the industry.

Beyond Republican senators, another major beneficiary of the provision could be President Donald Trump, who owns or directs over 560 companies, most of which are LLCs or LPs.

Some lawmakers’ holdings are in undeveloped parcels of land, and would not necessarily reap the provision’s tax benefits when the bill becomes law. However, the provision could provide a lucrative tax incentive to develop the holdings into income-generating properties in the future — the kind that could then take advantage of the tax change.

“Investments in land do not, in themselves, allow business owners to qualify for the pass-through deduction,” New York University law professor David Kamin, a former Obama administration official, told IBT. “The new provision is based on amounts of property that depreciate over time — like buildings. However, land can be combined with things like buildings in a business and then income from the land and other activities can get a preferential tax rate as a result.”

Democrats in recent days have seized on the provision — and its potential benefits to Republican lawmakers — in demanding the bill be halted.

“President Trump made several promises to the American people on tax reform, including the assurance that his tax proposal wouldn’t enrich people like him,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Tom Carper of Delaware told IBT in an emailed statement. “Unfortunately, Republicans are rushing through a tax plan that does indeed enrich the wealthiest people in our country, including business-owners like Mr. Trump. It’s regrettable and, frankly, shameful that my Republican colleagues are rushing ahead with their partisan tax bill despite the mounting questions and concerns about its provisions.”

senators-real-estate.png
All the above Senators voted for the final tax bill. Photo: IBT

UPDATE, 12/20, 6:25 p.m.: This article originally included Sen. John Barrasso on the list of senators affected by the provision. His office has said the lawmaker recently divested from pass-through entities. Data about Sen. John Hoeven has been revised to reflect that he recently divested from one partnership, and his farm rental properties would not currently benefit from the provision. After further reporting, additional Republican senators have been added, and the data has been revised to reflect these changes. The story also reflects that the Senate approved the bill Tuesday.
 
Should be ALL shouldn't it?

There is not ONE senator that got elected and left the Senate and didn't leave a millionaire.

*two cents*
 
There are many companies living off of raised investor capital for many years like Tesla. The government taxes your losses and profit. The tax on your losses will be greatly diminished with a lower tax rate greatly diminishing what you can carryforward into your profitable years.

This is something President Reagan should have done many years ago cutting the corporate tax rate and leaving the income tax rate high for the wealthy.
 
Last edited:
There are many companies living off of raised investor capital for many years like Tesla. The government taxes your losses and profit. The tax on your losses will be greatly diminished with a lower tax rate.

This is something President Reagan should have done many years ago cutting the corporate tax rate and leaving the income tax rate high for the wealthy.

The corporate tax rate has never been an issue. The effective corporate tax rate is round 28%.

Corporates brag about how they don't even pay corporate taxes. GE made this famous in the midst of the Bush/republican recession.

All the republican tax scam did was to give corporations even more profits. All of the loopholes they exploit have not been removed, so their effective corporate tax rate is now around an even lower 12%.

Corporate profits are already at record levels. US corporations are by far profiting most from this corporate windfall.

Corporations are under no obligation to use these profits they are getting from the lower tax rates to "bring back" jobs to the US. In fact, during the Obama administration, there was a proposal to give multinational corporations lower tax rates if the agreed to use the profits to bring back jobs to the US. Of course the republican congress obstructed and it never happened. The corporations objective is to buy back their own stock, pay out massive dividends, increase already obscene executive salaries and use the money to modernize their operations, which means more mechanization workers.

What should have been done is a thorough revamping of the tax code.

All corporate loopholes remove, such as depreciation allowances, client entertainment perks, etc.

And then if the tax rates need be lowered, at least have everything transparent.
 
How about House Members . . .

POLITICS
01/20/2018 09:23 pm ET

Paul Ryan Collected $500,000 In Koch Contributions Days After House Passed Tax Law


That’s peanuts compared with what the Koch brothers will save.


By Mary Papenfuss

Just days after the House passed its version of the federal tax law slashing corporate tax rates, House Speaker Paul Ryan collected nearly $500,000 in campaign contributions from billionaire energy mogul Charles Koch and his wife, according to a recent campaign donor report.

Koch and his brother David spent millions of dollars to get the tax law passed and are spending millions more in a public relations campaign in an attempt to boost support for the law, The Wall Street Journal reported.


Koch Industries, one of the largest private corporations in the nation, operates refineries and manufactures a variety of products. The new tax law — which slices corporate tax rates from 35 percent to 21 percent, slashes estate taxes and includes a special deduction for oil and gas investors — is expected to save the Koch brothers and their businesses billions of dollars in taxes.

Just 13 days after the tax law was passed, Charles Koch and his wife, Elizabeth, donated nearly $500,000 to Ryan’s joint fundraising committee, according to a campaign finance report filed Thursday.

Five other donors, including billionaire businessmen Jeffery Hildebrand and William Parfet, each contributed $100,000 in the last quarter of 2017, according to the records.

It looks like House Speaker Ryan is quickly being rewarded for passing this legislation that overwhelmingly benefits the Kochs and billionaires like them,” Adam Smith, spokesman for campaign finance reform nonprofit Every Voice, told the International Business Times, which first reported the Koch contributions.

The Koch donations were paid into Team Ryan, which raises money for the speaker, the National Republican Congressional Committee and a PAC run by Ryan. On the same day, Charles and Elizabeth Koch also each donated $237,000 to the NRCC.

The Koch brothers, worth an estimated $100 billion together, have become the gorillas of dark money contributions distorting American democracy since the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC lifted campaign contribution restrictions. The brothers are using their massive wealth to push a political agenda that’s the “most hard-line libertarian philosophy” in America, according to Jane Mayer, author of Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right.


Ryan has indicated that he won’t run again when his term is up this year, Politico reported, though he hasn’t made an official announcement. If he doesn’t run, his contributions would be redirected.


https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5a63ce41e4b0dc592a09697c


.
 
The corporate tax rate has never been an issue. The effective corporate tax rate is round 28%.

Corporates brag about how they don't even pay corporate taxes. GE made this famous in the midst of the Bush/republican recession.

All the republican tax scam did was to give corporations even more profits. All of the loopholes they exploit have not been removed, so their effective corporate tax rate is now around an even lower 12%.

Corporate profits are already at record levels. US corporations are by far profiting most from this corporate windfall.

Corporations are under no obligation to use these profits they are getting from the lower tax rates to "bring back" jobs to the US. In fact, during the Obama administration, there was a proposal to give multinational corporations lower tax rates if the agreed to use the profits to bring back jobs to the US. Of course the republican congress obstructed and it never happened. The corporations objective is to buy back their own stock, pay out massive dividends, increase already obscene executive salaries and use the money to modernize their operations, which means more mechanization workers.

What should have been done is a thorough revamping of the tax code.

All corporate loopholes remove, such as depreciation allowances, client entertainment perks, etc.

And then if the tax rates need be lowered, at least have everything transparent.

These statements may be true, but you have a choice between taxing corporations or income/capital gains. Since we lack the wealth, taxing income than lowering corporate taxes would be more beneficial to us. The neoliberals are trying to push corporate taxes.
 
Last edited:
These statements may be true, but you have a choice between taxing corporations or income/capital gains. Since we lack the wealth, taxes income than lowering corporate taxes would be more beneficial to us.

Your comment is unclear.

I say we should have more tax brackets. Say 5 or 6. Lumping those with incomes of $250,000/yr with those of $5 million/yr is not acceptable. And lumping incomes of $5 million/yr with incomes of over $100 million /yr is even more of a travesty.

There is a big difference between those earnings and their tax rates should reflect that.

Get rid of sheltering capital gains income. This is the main reason corporate CEO incomes have become obscene. They don't get paid in salary, they get paid in stock, which allows them to double dodge their tax obligations.
 
Back
Top