The First President was BLACK?

troublexxx

wannabe star
Registered
Has anyone ever heard of John Hanson?? When you google him, most of the times it will come up as a white man.. and it will also display as him being the first president.... But, John Hanson was actually black, and in fact the first president of the United States, well what it was then, with the colonies.

How f'ed up is this that, John Hanson's picture is on the back of the 2 dollar bill, with other congress men, He sits in the middle, wearing a gray wig as they did in those days. But this same picture which is also in the White House, doesn't have John Hanson sitting there... Keep in mind that the 2 dollar bill was also discontinued, check this link for more detail....

http://www.dickgregory.com/index_hanson.html

It's real contraversial, but hey what's the real truth, even if it were 100% true.. do you think the you know who, would cover it, like so many other things??
 
troublexxx said:
Has anyone ever heard of John Hanson?? When you google him, most of the times it will come up as a white man.. and it will also display as him being the first president.... But, John Hanson was actually black, and in fact the first president of the United States, well what it was then, with the colonies.

How f'ed up is this that, John Hanson's picture is on the back of the 2 dollar bill, with other congress men, He sits in the middle, wearing a gray wig as they did in those days. But this same picture which is also in the White House, doesn't have John Hanson sitting there... Keep in mind that the 2 dollar bill was also discontinued, check this link for more detail....

http://www.dickgregory.com/index_hanson.html

It's real contraversial, but hey what's the real truth, even if it were 100% true.. do you think the you know who, would cover it, like so many other things??

Before you get clowned, the real truth is that this story is pure bullshit. A black president at a time when blacks were still slaves? Be serious! Even if it were true, do you really think "they" could keep it a secret. And why would they want to? If they appointed him, why hide it? See? It makes no damn sense.

There were two men by the same name and some people get them confused. It's that simple.

If a black man was appointed to a high office at that time, it would have been "head of de kitchen". That's about it.

I used to have mad respect for Dick Gregory, but now, that simp is on some serious shit. :smh:
 
Black Cobra said:
Before you get clowned, the real truth is that this story is pure bullshit. A black president at a time when blacks were still slaves? Be serious! Even if it were true, do you really think "they" could keep it a secret. And why would they want to? If they appointed him, why hide it? See? It makes no damn sense.

There were two men by the same name and some people get them confused. It's that simple.

If a black man was appointed to a high office at that time, it would have been "head of de kitchen". That's about it.

I used to have mad respect for Dick Gregory, but now, that simp is on some serious shit. :smh:



Well, he coud ov been one ov da first great American Coons boss...


but in all seriousness, like black cobra stated.....this is all bullshit.
 
Black Cobra said:
Before you get clowned, the real truth is that this story is pure bullshit. A black president at a time when blacks were still slaves? Be serious! Even if it were true, do you really think "they" could keep it a secret. And why would they want to? If they appointed him, why hide it? See? It makes no damn sense.

There were two men by the same name and some people get them confused. It's that simple.

If a black man was appointed to a high office at that time, it would have been "head of de kitchen". That's about it.

I used to have mad respect for Dick Gregory, but now, that simp is on some serious shit. :smh:


yep

Black John Hanson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hanson_%28politician%29

White John Hanson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hanson
 
Black Cobra said:
Before you get clowned, the real truth is that this story is pure bullshit. A black president at a time when blacks were still slaves? Be serious! Even if it were true, do you really think "they" could keep it a secret. And why would they want to? If they appointed him, why hide it? See? It makes no damn sense.

There were two men by the same name and some people get them confused. It's that simple.

If a black man was appointed to a high office at that time, it would have been "head of de kitchen". That's about it.

I used to have mad respect for Dick Gregory, but now, that simp is on some serious shit. :smh:


i think people really need to do some research on Moors... and you just said that if it was true do you think they could hide it... hell yea they could you wanna know why because Dick Gregory just stated some facts and you off rip clown.. you are so fuggn brainwashed to think that blacks have always been sub-par in this country that you woudlnt believe the truth if George Washington told you hisself..

havent you heard that the easiest way to hide soemthing from a group of people is in plain view...

but to the thread starter... just keep doing research you will know more than these cooning azz lames any day... they are jus baffled that you didnt post any porn that some knowledge and a little bit of history that wasnt in their school books so they dont believe it...

if i said Fore Score and seven years ago... i bet right off rip they knew that was Abe Lincoln... but if i said.. Up you might race you can accomplish what you may... .......... i bet they draw a blank.... that was marcus garvey
 
What the fuck is wrong with people who just automatacally buy into any old nonsense someone throws at 'em (just because it makes 'em feel good)?? Even the obvious "facts" can't disuade them. There's more than enough real, legit (and fascinating) African-American history to discover and analyze, as opposed to just lazily spreading absurd, wishful-thinking internet rumors and myths.

;smh:
 
Blunt said:
What the fuck is wrong with people who just automatacally buy into any old nonsense someone throws at 'em (just because it makes 'em feel good)?? Even the obvious "facts" can't disuade them. There's more than enough real, legit (and fascinating) African-American history to discover and analyze, as opposed to just lazily spreading absurd, wishful-thinking internet rumors and myths.

;smh:

STFU you idiot. Dude was just ASKING A QUESTION, "what's the real truth?". He made no definate statements on whether it was true or not. Learn how to spell automatically before you attempt to clown.

Save your Black Male hating for another thread. Ass-clown.
:smh:
 
Okay,
Here we go again. This topic has been presented numerous times on BGOL and we still have simps who deny their own history. Yes, the first President of these United States was black and his name was John Hanson. He was a Moor (bet you fools don't even know who they were/are). He was the first president under the articles of confederation which preceeded the constituion. He appointed George Washington as the General of the army during the revolutionary war. He also was a main player in strategizing for the war. He also had a part in the writing of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Surely you don't believe that ol' Thomas wrote the declaration by himself while he was on his honeymoon (yes, he'd just gotten married) do you? John Hanson was not the only black man/ Moor running things. Look up the Treaty of Peace and Friendship which is an agreement between the Europeans and Moors who owned this land before they got here. The constitution, declaration are coded with several benefits given only to Moors. This was by design. Here's something else you may not know, only Moors can actually own property in the U.S. The rest of you can only own the legal description and warranty deed. That's why the Guvment can take your shit at will. I might explain that more later....it'll go over some of yall's heads. Back to John Hanson, he single handedly saved the revolution from mass dessertion when the troops stormed the capital demanding their pay. The white cowards jetted and left him holding the bag. Hanson ordered that the men each be paid their salary in silver (there was no paper (fake) money then). The men didn't riot and returned to battle. John Hanson is also on the back on the two dollar bill. He is sitting in the middle in the President's chair. Black people need to shut the fuck up until they know what they're talking about. We believe everything the white man tells us about our history and we're so brainwashed that we don't even want to believe the truth when its right in front of us. :hmm:
 
djswank said:
Okay,
Here we go again. This topic has been presented numerous times on BGOL and we still have simps who deny their own history. Yes, the first President of these United States was black and his name was John Hanson. He was a Moor (bet you fools don't even know who they were/are). He was the first president under the articles of confederation which preceeded the constituion. He appointed George Washington as the General of the army during the revolutionary war. He also was a main player in strategizing for the war. He also had a part in the writing of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Surely you don't believe that ol' Thomas wrote the declaration by himself while he was on his honeymoon (yes, he'd just gotten married) do you? John Hanson was not the only black man/ Moor running things. Look up the Treaty of Peace and Friendship which is an agreement between the Europeans and Moors who owned this land before they got here. The constitution, declaration are coded with several benefits given only to Moors. This was by design. Here's something else you may not know, only Moors can actually own property in the U.S. The rest of you can only own the legal description and warranty deed. That's why the Guvment can take your shit at will. I might explain that more later....it'll go over some of yall's heads. Back to John Hanson, he single handedly saved the revolution from mass dessertion when the troops stormed the capital demanding their pay. The white cowards jetted and left him holding the bag. Hanson ordered that the men each be paid their salary in silver (there was no paper (fake) money then). The men didn't riot and returned to battle. John Hanson is also on the back on the two dollar bill. He is sitting in the middle in the President's chair. Black people need to shut the fuck up until they know what they're talking about. We believe everything the white man tells us about our history and we're so brainwashed that we don't even want to believe the truth when its right in front of us. :hmm:


preach pimpin.. my goodness try to instill some black pride in these mutts... cause like i said.. they believe everything that read in US History class...

and for every1 that knows nothin about Moors... look up Noble Drew Ali..
 
Rukus said:


i think people really need to do some research on Moors... and you just said that if it was true do you think they could hide it... hell yea they could you wanna know why because Dick Gregory just stated some facts and you off rip clown.. you are so fuggn brainwashed to think that blacks have always been sub-par in this country that you woudlnt believe the truth if George Washington told you hisself..

havent you heard that the easiest way to hide soemthing from a group of people is in plain view...

but to the thread starter... just keep doing research you will know more than these cooning azz lames any day... they are jus baffled that you didnt post any porn that some knowledge and a little bit of history that wasnt in their school books so they dont believe it...

if i said Fore Score and seven years ago... i bet right off rip they knew that was Abe Lincoln... but if i said.. Up you might race you can accomplish what you may... .......... i bet they draw a blank.... that was marcus garvey


I have no clue to the truth or validity of the OP's statments, but I'm glad you brought up the Moor's. I just started reading about them and I'm amazed at what is being hidden from Black America.Wikipedia Link
 
troublexxx said:
Has anyone ever heard of John Hanson?? When you google him, most of the times it will come up as a white man.. and it will also display as him being the first president.... But, John Hanson was actually black, and in fact the first president of the United States, well what it was then, with the colonies.

How f'ed up is this that, John Hanson's picture is on the back of the 2 dollar bill, with other congress men, He sits in the middle, wearing a gray wig as they did in those days. But this same picture which is also in the White House, doesn't have John Hanson sitting there... Keep in mind that the 2 dollar bill was also discontinued, check this link for more detail....

http://www.dickgregory.com/index_hanson.html

It's real contraversial, but hey what's the real truth, even if it were 100% true.. do you think the you know who, would cover it, like so many other things??
the first and last black president? come on now lets get real. is this supposed to give us po' black men some self esteem? many of us are doing okay in overcoming this white supremist nation without bullshit stories.

why is our real history being overlooked?
 
Rukus said:


preach pimpin.. my goodness try to instill some black pride in these mutts... cause like i said.. they believe everything that read in US History class...

and for every1 that knows nothin about Moors... look up Noble Drew Ali..

I never knew anything about the Moors, Olmecs, etc until I started doing research for my degree. I now hold a doctorate in history with a concentration in ancient civilizations. Some of the things I could tell people about their own history, especially blacks, would blow their minds and piss them off because they've been fooled all this time. The first slaveowners in America were Moors and guess who they owned? Whites. The Moors taught them about slavery. Lerone Bennett has a book entitled "they came before Columbus" that every black man should read. The Moors are the reason why the Government hasn't done anything else to help rebuild New Orleans. The whole state of Louisiana with the exception of a area 300 yards square (the French Quarters) belong rightfully to the Moors. This is why the only area to receive government funding to fix up was the french quarters. The U.S. can't do shit on private property. i found this out during my reasearch. This is also why Lousiana can't get any profits from offshore oil drilling while Texas, Mississippi, Alabama all do. The Moors don't own the seas so they can't claim the profits. This is all stated in the Treaty I mentioned earlier. Learn as much as you can young brothers...for your own good. During your research maybe you'll find out why our money is called "fiat" (fake) money. Boy that info will really blow your minds. :hmm:
 
djswank said:
I never knew anything about the Moors, Olmecs, etc until I started doing research for my degree. I now hold a doctorate in history with a concentration in ancient civilizations. Some of the things I could tell people about their own history, especially blacks, would blow their minds and piss them off because they've been fooled all this time. The first slaveowners in America were Moors and guess who they owned? Whites. The Moors taught them about slavery. Lerone Bennett has a book entitled "they came before Columbus" that every black man should read. The Moors are the reason why the Government hasn't done anything else to help rebuild New Orleans. The whole state of Louisiana with the exception of a area 300 yards square (the French Quarters) belong rightfully to the Moors. This is why the only area to receive government funding to fix up was the french quarters. The U.S. can't do shit on private property. i found this out during my reasearch. This is also why Lousiana can't get any profits from offshore oil drilling while Texas, Mississippi, Alabama all do. The Moors don't own the seas so they can't claim the profits. This is all stated in the Treaty I mentioned earlier. Learn as much as you can young brothers...for your own good. During your research maybe you'll find out why our money is called "fiat" (fake) money. Boy that info will really blow your minds. :hmm:
cracka propaganda.^^^^^^^


none of my ancestors are moors. why do we feel the need to select "certain" groups to edify to feel that we have rich history. Egypt is another example. we always carefully select what were "proud" of.
 
djswank said:
I never knew anything about the Moors, Olmecs, etc until I started doing research for my degree. I now hold a doctorate in history with a concentration in ancient civilizations. Some of the things I could tell people about their own history, especially blacks, would blow their minds and piss them off because they've been fooled all this time. The first slaveowners in America were Moors and guess who they owned? Whites. The Moors taught them about slavery. Lerone Bennett has a book entitled "they came before Columbus" that every black man should read. The Moors are the reason why the Government hasn't done anything else to help rebuild New Orleans. The whole state of Louisiana with the exception of a area 300 yards square (the French Quarters) belong rightfully to the Moors. This is why the only area to receive government funding to fix up was the french quarters. The U.S. can't do shit on private property. i found this out during my reasearch. This is also why Lousiana can't get any profits from offshore oil drilling while Texas, Mississippi, Alabama all do. The Moors don't own the seas so they can't claim the profits. This is all stated in the Treaty I mentioned earlier. Learn as much as you can young brothers...for your own good. During your research maybe you'll find out why our money is called "fiat" (fake) money. Boy that info will really blow your minds. :hmm:

honestly playa.. i dont think alot of them can really handle the truth.. that is why they deny it when it is given to them... like the deal with money being fake.. hell in the Constitution it states clearly that legal tender is silver and gold... not this paper shyt they trickin daily..

dayum the real truth is a mutha fugga... but like i have always been told.. there are 2 things you can do with the truth.. accept it or reject.. but no matter what it is always the truth...
 
Rukus said:


preach pimpin.. my goodness try to instill some black pride in these mutts... cause like i said.. they believe everything that read in US History class...

and for every1 that knows nothin about Moors... look up Noble Drew Ali..

The Noble Drew Ali is an interesting person, I studied the Noble Drew Ali and I believe his movement wasn't necessarily based on historical fact but myth meant to uplift African people in America. The Noble Drew Ali believed that African Americans are not the descendants of West Africans/ Central Africans but the descendants of Moors from Morrocco. Were there Moors in America before the Europeans got here? Possibly, but majority of us are not the descendants of them we are the descendants of West and Central Africans.

The Moorish Science Temple Movement was a great movement meant to instill pride in our people. The Noble Drew Ali taught our people that we should not think low of ourselves because at one point and time African people conquered parts of Europe and brought civilization to them. Historically its not entirely fact, its myth but are all myths bad? NO its meant to inspire.
 
Last edited:
Ballatician said:
The Noble Drew Ali is an interesting person, I studied the Noble Drew Ali and I believe his movement wasn't necessarily based on historical fact but myth meant to uplift African people in America. The Noble Drew Ali believed that African Americans are not the descendants of West Africans/ Central Africans but the descendants of Moors from Morrocco. Were there Moors in America before the Europeans got here? Possibly, but majority of us are not the descendants of them we are the descendants of West and Central Africans.

The Moorish Science Temple Movement was a great movement meant to instill pride in our people. The Noble Drew Ali taught our people that we should not think low of ourselves because at one point and time African people conquered parts of Europe and brought civilization to them.


ok if you do a lil more studyin on Noble Drew Ali.. you will kno that he was at the 1928 Pan American Conference in Havana, Cuba (representing Moorish Nationals) and as was Secretary of State Hughes (representing the United States Of America) and the mandate for the land masses of North, South and Central America was given solely to the Moors.. adn this was done by the people who live on those lands... cause they recognize Moors as sovereign people indigenous to the land... not the "NATIVE AMERICANS" that books say were here first...

but it is good that you did do research on the man.. alot of people never heard of him and his path...
 
Ballatician said:
The Noble Drew Ali is an interesting person, I studied the Noble Drew Ali and I believe his movement wasn't necessarily based on historical fact but myth meant to uplift African people in America. The Noble Drew Ali believed that African Americans are not the descendants of West Africans/ Central Africans but the descendants of Moors from Morrocco. Were there Moors in America before the Europeans got here? Possibly, but majority of us are not the descendants of them we are the descendants of West and Central Africans.

The Moorish Science Temple Movement was a great movement meant to instill pride in our people. The Noble Drew Ali taught our people that we should not think low of ourselves because at one point and time African people conquered parts of Europe and brought civilization to them. Historically its not entirely fact, its myth but are all myths bad? NO its meant to inspire.

Who gave the Noble Drew Ali a mandate?

When I searched what you mentioned all I get are websites from the Moorish folks, can you find any other sources besides Moorish articles?

Its cool to get the Moorish perspective but I would also like to read articles from the perspective of the people who gave the mandate to the Noble Drew Ali.

Not many people know about The Noble Drew Ali because his life was mysterious, he died fairly young.
 
Rukus said:


ok if you do a lil more studyin on Noble Drew Ali.. you will kno that he was at the 1928 Pan American Conference in Havana, Cuba (representing Moorish Nationals) and as was Secretary of State Hughes (representing the United States Of America) and the mandate for the land masses of North, South and Central America was given solely to the Moors.. adn this was done by the people who live on those lands... cause they recognize Moors as sovereign people indigenous to the land... not the "NATIVE AMERICANS" that books say were here first...

but it is good that you did do research on the man.. alot of people never heard of him and his path...
Who gave the Noble Drew Ali a mandate?

When I searched what you mentioned all I get are websites from the Moorish folks, can you find any other sources besides Moorish articles?

Its cool to get the Moorish perspective but I would also like to read articles from the perspective of the people who gave the mandate to the Noble Drew Ali.

Not many people know about The Noble Drew Ali because his life was mysterious, he died fairly young.
 
J Storm said:
This website here Clears up the whole Black First President MISTAKE

http://gtomessiah.com/gtomessiah_site/hanson.html

Nice post.

All the dudes in this post calling people sheep..

please explain this that J Storm just posted.

"The American Colonization Society collection, a group of material related to African American emigration to Liberia, contains thirty daguerreotypes of Liberian government officials and other colonists. The sitters include Joseph Jenkins Roberts, the first president of Liberia; his wife, Jane Roberts; Stephen Allen Benson, Secretary of the Treasury under Roberts; and Edward W. Blyden, who became a prominent educator in Liberia. Five images have the name of the photographer, Augustus Washington, stamped on their brass mats. Washington was a black daguerreotypist who operated a studio in Hartford, Connecticut, until November 1853 when he moved to Liberia. An additional eleven images, housed in identical brass mats and preservers, were also most likely taken by Washington." Source http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/daghtml/dagscope.html

LETS RUN DOWN SOME FACTS

FACT: President John Hanson Was Born in 1721 and died in 1783.

FACT: Daguerreotypes was invented by French artist and inventor Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre who was born in 1789 and died in 1851

FACT: The daguerreotype, a photograph produced on a silver-coated copperplate treated with iodine vapor, was developed with J. Nicéphore Niepce and ceded to the Academy of Sciences in 1839.

FACT: The photo of the Daguerreotype of Senator John Hanson was taken between 1856 and 1860



*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention that didn't exist until 1839?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention when the inventor was not even born yet?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken between 1856 and 1860



The Nuwaubian Leader even went as far as to say that there is a Black man on the back of a 2 dollar bill and that the Black man was President John Hanson, I have disproved this urban legend,
 
eewwll said:
Nice post.

All the dudes in this post calling people sheep..

please explain this that J Storm just posted.

"The American Colonization Society collection, a group of material related to African American emigration to Liberia, contains thirty daguerreotypes of Liberian government officials and other colonists. The sitters include Joseph Jenkins Roberts, the first president of Liberia; his wife, Jane Roberts; Stephen Allen Benson, Secretary of the Treasury under Roberts; and Edward W. Blyden, who became a prominent educator in Liberia. Five images have the name of the photographer, Augustus Washington, stamped on their brass mats. Washington was a black daguerreotypist who operated a studio in Hartford, Connecticut, until November 1853 when he moved to Liberia. An additional eleven images, housed in identical brass mats and preservers, were also most likely taken by Washington." Source http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/daghtml/dagscope.html

LETS RUN DOWN SOME FACTS

FACT: President John Hanson Was Born in 1721 and died in 1783.

FACT: Daguerreotypes was invented by French artist and inventor Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre who was born in 1789 and died in 1851

FACT: The daguerreotype, a photograph produced on a silver-coated copperplate treated with iodine vapor, was developed with J. Nicéphore Niepce and ceded to the Academy of Sciences in 1839.

FACT: The photo of the Daguerreotype of Senator John Hanson was taken between 1856 and 1860



*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention that didn't exist until 1839?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention when the inventor was not even born yet?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken between 1856 and 1860



The Nuwaubian Leader even went as far as to say that there is a Black man on the back of a 2 dollar bill and that the Black man was President John Hanson, I have disproved this urban legend,


Haven't you heard of camera obscura.

LOL

Just kidding. People just want to have revisionist history that makes them feel good.

It is a sad thing, but it is reality, and Black people aren't the only ones to do this. Europeans and Asians have been doing it for eons. So, I figure we should have the same allowances as other have. Still, it is kind of wack to do it.
 
All I have to say is good job, i never heard of this kat, well maybe i did, i did hear bout a black guy writting the D.O.I. but wasn't in the picture

But, now i have something else to look forward into now.

On here something may not be the truth at first but somebody will clear it up for you, you just have to take what you want to believe and run with it, just hope it be the real/whole truth
 
Last edited:
troublexxx said:
How f'ed up is this that, John Hanson's picture is on the back of the 2 dollar bill, with other congress men, He sits in the middle, wearing a gray wig as they did in those days. But this same picture which is also in the White House, doesn't have John Hanson sitting there... Keep in mind that the 2 dollar bill was also discontinued, check this link for more detail....

Not TRUE, the 2 Dollar Bill is not discontinued, its just printed in low numbers. Also Thats not John Hanson in the back, its Robert Morris.
closeup2.jpg


http://gtomessiah.com/gtomessiah_site/2dollarbill.html
 
Sangria said:
cracka propaganda.^^^^^^^


none of my ancestors are moors. why do we feel the need to select "certain" groups to edify to feel that we have rich history. Egypt is another example. we always carefully select what were "proud" of.

The Moors were represented in all African nations. The Moors were not just from the Moroccan country but came from the large area surrounding Morocco also. They spread out throughout the various continents and took their knowledge of mathematics, science etc with them. Qiute frankly, whether you want to consider yourself one or not, all people of color can trace their roots to the Moorish people, even west Africa. Europeans, the people we call white, are also descendants of Moors. The Moors conquered what we call Europe many centuries ago and were the rulers. They used white women as concubines. The children of these concubines are the ancestors of today's "white" people. Genetically speaking, true white people, anglo-saxons, are blond, blue eyed, with transparent (white)skin. Brown ,black, red, hair etc. are negroid features. So even the Europeans are "mutts". Most of your true anglo saxons are of Norway and Finland. In fact, the British royal coat of arms has references to the Moorish leaders.

As for the John Hanson controversy, be careful of your source of information and their motives. It doesn't take much effort to confuse truth, especially when people have already been taught to disbelieve anyway. Most of you brothers saw this one guy's opinion and said done deal. While his article was interesting, he only makes a good case to those who don't know better. He distorts facts plain and simple. The only truth in his article is that their is no true "picture" to look at. Cameras had not been invented yet. Thats convenient for the naysayers. However, when you do real research, not just internet searches, you will find that John Hanson was indeed a black man and yes he did run this country. Believe what you will because at this point, it really doesn't matter. Peace :hmm:
 
and if he was black... what fucking difference would it make?

white folks have been altering and changing history to suit their wants/needs since they learned how to steal, kill, and rob cultures and entire civilizations.

you think they're worried about this guy?

YOU better worry about the ignorant fuck in the white house right now before you get drafted to fight in his oil war.
 
djswank said:
As for the John Hanson controversy, be careful of your source of information and their motives. It doesn't take much effort to confuse truth, especially when people have already been taught to disbelieve anyway. Most of you brothers saw this one guy's opinion and said done deal. While his article was interesting, he only makes a good case to those who don't know better. He distorts facts plain and simple. The only truth in his article is that their is no true "picture" to look at. Cameras had not been invented yet. Thats convenient for the naysayers. However, when you do real research, not just internet searches, you will find that John Hanson was indeed a black man and yes he did run this country. Believe what you will because at this point, it really doesn't matter. Peace :hmm:

Then bring out the real research that shows he's a black man. I'm interested in finding out...
 
eewwll said:
Nice post.

All the dudes in this post calling people sheep..

please explain this that J Storm just posted.

"The American Colonization Society collection, a group of material related to African American emigration to Liberia, contains thirty daguerreotypes of Liberian government officials and other colonists. The sitters include Joseph Jenkins Roberts, the first president of Liberia; his wife, Jane Roberts; Stephen Allen Benson, Secretary of the Treasury under Roberts; and Edward W. Blyden, who became a prominent educator in Liberia. Five images have the name of the photographer, Augustus Washington, stamped on their brass mats. Washington was a black daguerreotypist who operated a studio in Hartford, Connecticut, until November 1853 when he moved to Liberia. An additional eleven images, housed in identical brass mats and preservers, were also most likely taken by Washington." Source http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/daghtml/dagscope.html

LETS RUN DOWN SOME FACTS

FACT: President John Hanson Was Born in 1721 and died in 1783.

FACT: Daguerreotypes was invented by French artist and inventor Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre who was born in 1789 and died in 1851

FACT: The daguerreotype, a photograph produced on a silver-coated copperplate treated with iodine vapor, was developed with J. Nicéphore Niepce and ceded to the Academy of Sciences in 1839.

FACT: The photo of the Daguerreotype of Senator John Hanson was taken between 1856 and 1860



*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention that didn't exist until 1839?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken by an invention when the inventor was not even born yet?
*

How is it Possible for a man (President John Hanson) who died in 1783 to have his picture taken between 1856 and 1860



The Nuwaubian Leader even went as far as to say that there is a Black man on the back of a 2 dollar bill and that the Black man was President John Hanson, I have disproved this urban legend,

Thank you for laying this out...I have to CONSTANTLY explain this to the Willie Lynch myth lovin' people. The first prez to be photographed was Jackson (as an old ex-president). Before then, only paintings were done.
 
djswank said:
Okay,
Here we go again. This topic has been presented numerous times on BGOL and we still have simps who deny their own history. Yes, the first President of these United States was black and his name was John Hanson. He was a Moor (bet you fools don't even know who they were/are). He was the first president under the articles of confederation which preceeded the constituion. He appointed George Washington as the General of the army during the revolutionary war. He also was a main player in strategizing for the war. He also had a part in the writing of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Surely you don't believe that ol' Thomas wrote the declaration by himself while he was on his honeymoon (yes, he'd just gotten married) do you? John Hanson was not the only black man/ Moor running things. Look up the Treaty of Peace and Friendship which is an agreement between the Europeans and Moors who owned this land before they got here. The constitution, declaration are coded with several benefits given only to Moors. This was by design. Here's something else you may not know, only Moors can actually own property in the U.S. The rest of you can only own the legal description and warranty deed. That's why the Guvment can take your shit at will. I might explain that more later....it'll go over some of yall's heads. Back to John Hanson, he single handedly saved the revolution from mass dessertion when the troops stormed the capital demanding their pay. The white cowards jetted and left him holding the bag. Hanson ordered that the men each be paid their salary in silver (there was no paper (fake) money then). The men didn't riot and returned to battle. John Hanson is also on the back on the two dollar bill. He is sitting in the middle in the President's chair. Black people need to shut the fuck up until they know what they're talking about. We believe everything the white man tells us about our history and we're so brainwashed that we don't even want to believe the truth when its right in front of us. :hmm:
Anyone can talk out their asses, verify with sources or you're just an elaborate troll
 
Larrikin said:
Anyone can talk out their asses, verify with sources or you're just an elaborate troll
You illiterate dumbass! Did you even understand anything I wrote? You're basically asking me to show you some magical internet site that will explain it all. Didn't I just tell you that the internet is not a credible source for researching truth? It has taken me almost 12 of the 18 years I've been researching data to come up with the truth and you think I can expalin it to you on a porn forum? :angry: Get off the computer and go find documents! The Library of congress is a good start if you're smart enough to know where to look. There's a room in Liberty Hall in Philly that has a wealth of information but you can only get in there with proper clearance. You have to be a Moor with identification to access the room. In that room are several documents that will back up everything I've stated. I may try to post some of the docs here but, they are not for everyone to see. On second thought, fuck you! Get off your ass, stop talking out your ass and go find the info yourself. You probably won't understand what you read even if you did locate the documents. Ignorance is bliss and there's a lot of happy motherfuckers in this thread. I'm out. :hmm:
 
djswank said:
You illiterate dumbass! Did you even understand anything I wrote? You're basically asking me to show you some magical internet site that will explain it all. Didn't I just tell you that the internet is not a credible source for researching truth? It has taken me almost 12 of the 18 years I've been researching data to come up with the truth and you think I can expalin it to you on a porn forum? :angry: Get off the computer and go find documents! The Library of congress is a good start if you're smart enough to know where to look. There's a room in Liberty Hall in Philly that has a wealth of information but you can only get in there with proper clearance. You have to be a Moor with identification to access the room. In that room are several documents that will back up everything I've stated. I may try to post some of the docs here but, they are not for everyone to see. On second thought, fuck you! Get off your ass, stop talking out your ass and go find the info yourself. You probably won't understand what you read even if you did locate the documents. Ignorance is bliss and there's a lot of happy motherfuckers in this thread. I'm out. :hmm:

oh shit... you spazzing out :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
djswank said:
You illiterate dumbass! Did you even understand anything I wrote? You're basically asking me to show you some magical internet site that will explain it all. Didn't I just tell you that the internet is not a credible source for researching truth? It has taken me almost 12 of the 18 years I've been researching data to come up with the truth and you think I can expalin it to you on a porn forum? :angry: Get off the computer and go find documents! The Library of congress is a good start if you're smart enough to know where to look. There's a room in Liberty Hall in Philly that has a wealth of information but you can only get in there with proper clearance. You have to be a Moor with identification to access the room. In that room are several documents that will back up everything I've stated. I may try to post some of the docs here but, they are not for everyone to see. On second thought, fuck you! Get off your ass, stop talking out your ass and go find the info yourself. You probably won't understand what you read even if you did locate the documents. Ignorance is bliss and there's a lot of happy motherfuckers in this thread. I'm out. :hmm:
I didn't say post a link. I said post a verifiable source, be it a book or established source of information (not wikipedia or some schmos website). The fact that all your sources are some secret books you need special clearance for makes me believe even further you're full of shit. :lol:
 
Back
Top