Home
Philadelphia Eagles
Sam Bradford is the Worst Quarterback in Football
OCTOBER 20TH, 2015
RAJIV BAIS0 COMMENTS470
(Photo by
Deadspin)
As
Philadelphia Eagles fans celebrate the team’s NFC East division lead at 3-3 after beating the divisional rival
New York Giants 27-7 on Monday night, they will have to temper down their enthusiasm as they travel to Charlotte to play the 5-0
Carolina Panthers this Sunday evening. When a team has a quarterback that has only been benefited by excuses in the past and whose attributes keep getting pushed by arrogant critics who speak to us as if we never knew that 1+1 = 2, a concern must arise.
The alleged franchise quarterback, Sam Bradford, was supposed to be an upgrade over Nick Foles and Mark Sanchez and carried attributes that you want in a franchise quarterback. A strong arm that throws the ball with touch and accuracy and, if kept upright, he can help your team win. Plus, he is a Rookie of the Year award winner, an award that Vince Young once won. How can anyone turn that down?
The question should be, “what was so good about him in the first place?”
He was a mediocre signal caller that lacked toughness in the pocket and only put up decent stats in 2013 due to inferior competition or circumstances that were in garbage time or involved no pressure.
Philadelphia, meet the fake franchise quarterback that was not even handed a job in St. Louis even before being traded to your city, “Sam Bradfraud.” Even though,
Rams head coach Jeff Fisher said that “Bradfraud” had a say in the idea of Frank Cignetti being moved from quarterbacks coach to offensive coordinator, Fisher told the quarterback that he would have to compete for his starting job in 2015.
That does not sound like a franchise quarterback to me. To fully prove this sentiment, his Rookie of the Year award was based on an intellectually lazy media that placed him on a fake pedestal resulting from him playing on a 7-9 Rams team in 2010 that was 1-15 in 2009.