The Democratic Guide to Maintaining and Gaining More Power!

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
Be liberal/progressive, be aggressive. Don't apologize for being so!


<param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://embed.crooksandliars.com/v/MTgwOTEtMzk3MjA?color=C93033" quality="high" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="336" name="clembedMTgwOTEtMzk3MjA" align="middle" quality="high" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed></object>​

source: Mother Jones

Progressive Ann McLane Kuster Cruises to Victory in NH

Some liberals are celebrating the victory of Christine O'Donnell in Delaware's GOP Senate primary, hoping that her candidacy will hand the seat to Democratic candidate Chris Coons. But elsewhere, progressives have a primary victory of their own to cheer. In the Democratic primary to replace Rep. Paul Hodes in New Hampshire's second congressional district (Hodes is running for the Senate), liberal-backed Ann McLane Kuster clobbered more conservative Katrina Swett. (Swett committed the ultimate crime in progressive-land: she was the co-chair of Joe Lieberman's presidential campaign.) Kuster was backed by major pro-choice groups, who worried that Swett could not be trusted on abortion rights issues. That mattered. But the race was also a chance for liberals to flex their political muscles.

Kuster was supported by all the big progressive activist groups—especially Howard Dean's Democracy for America (DFA) and the Progressive Change* Campaign Committee (PCCC). I recently spoke to PCCC's Adam Green about the race. He said Kuster's win showed "maturity" in the progressive movement's ability to affect primaries. "A few years ago blogs would raise small amounts of money for candidates but not really have an ongoing relationship with their campaign," Green said. "But now we're at a point where we're helping campaigns find staffing, run cutting edge online campaigns, and also raise a ton of money online from lots of people." There's no doubt PCCC had an impact on the race: it mobilized its 2,800 New Hampshire members to assist her campaign, it helped her find her communications director, and it raised around $100,000—real money in a primary contest—for Kuster. The candidate called the organization a "real partner."

Liberal groups haven't won all their primaries this year. Their candidate in Arkansas, Lt. Gov. Bill Halter, lost to incumbent Sen. Blanche Lincoln in June. But they've notched some important victories. Joe Sestak beat party-switcher and White House-backed Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary. Liberal- (and Daily Kos-)backed candidate Manan Trivedi (a doctor and Iraq war vet) won a tough House primary race against a more conservative, self-funding opponent in May and will face incumbent GOP Rep. Jim Gerlach in the fall. The night Trivedi won—May 18—Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway beat a more conservative opponent for the Democratic Senate nomination in that state. And on June 22, liberal favorite Elaine Marshall beat establishment-backed Cal Cunningham (the pick of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee) for the Dem Senate nomination in North Carolina.

The real question, of course, is whether any of these progressive candidates can win in November. Swett attacked Kuster during a debate as unelectable and too progressive. She'll certainly have a hard race against former Rep. Charlie Bass—if he can survive a tough primary race of his own. (Swett would have had trouble with Bass, too.) But Green, unsurprisingly, thinks his group picked the right horse. "A lot of people have been saying Democratic voters don't vote for a progressive candidate because they can't win," he says. "We want to prove that wrong in 2010." He sure picked some year to test that proposition.

UPDATE: Reshma Saujani, who ran a Wall Street-backed campaign challenging incumbent New York Rep. Carolyn Maloney from the right, lost badly on Tuesday night. That should probably count as another victory for liberals.

*This originally said Congressional. That was wrong. Sorry.
 
Be liberal/progressive, be aggressive. Don't apologize for being so!
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::

Yes keep it up!! This will be a cake walk.
Funniest shit I've heard in a long time.



liberals14.jpg
 
Last edited:
Be liberal/progressive, be aggressive. Don't apologize for being so!
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::

Yes keep it up!! This will be a cake walk.
Funniest shit I've heard in a long time.



liberals14.jpg

=============================================================

Its funny how YOUR not rebuked here for YOUR language but then again your "Momma" is here to keep you safe and sound here in the politics thread...why don't you come "outside the yard" and play with us. Enjoyed your protected status here, if you ever post outside of this department I will eat your right wing a$$ up!


:angry::angry::angry:
 
=============================================================

Its funny how YOUR not rebuked here for YOUR language but then again your "Momma" is here to keep you safe and sound here in the politics thread...why don't you come "outside the yard" and play with us. Enjoyed your protected status here, if you ever post outside of this department I will eat your right wing a$$ up!


Either you didn't read the rules; or you don't take them seriously; or you think I don't take them seriously. Either way, take a few days to think about it.

QueEx
 
Either you didn't read the rules; or you don't take them seriously; or you think I don't take them seriously. Either way, take a few days to think about it.

QueEx

You showed him brother!
Fight the power! Put them Lib's in their place!
 
New name with same IP. Same old rules and if you don't play by them = same old results.

QueEx
 
Be liberal/progressive, be aggressive. Don't apologize for being so!
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::

Yes keep it up!! This will be a cake walk.
Funniest shit I've heard in a long time.
liberals14.jpg

===============================================================
Haha Yeah, I hear you brother! Do as WE SAY NOT as WE DO!
 
New name with same IP. Same old rules and if you don't play by them = same old results.

QueEx

And?

Your first wrong assumption is that deceit is being used?
You don't have to reason with them progressive rabble rousers!
Reason doesn't matter to a gorilla, he just does what he wants to.
 
So that I am clear. I banned your ClarkKent user name for 3 days for intentional violation of the rules. Using the same IP address, you returned as Harold Ford. My point, if you violate the rules using the new name, I will also ban that name, only this time I will increase the time period. If you insist upon violating the rules, I will take more drastic measures.

As I stated before, your comments, etc., are welcomed -- but the personal insults are not. If you want to turn a poster's words upside down and shake them, its okay with me. Just don't come with the personal attacks

Got it ???

QueEx
 
So that I am clear. I banned your ClarkKent user name for 3 days for intentional violation of the rules. Using the same IP address, you returned as Harold Ford. My point, if you violate the rules using the new name, I will also ban that name, only this time I will increase the time period. If you insist upon violating the rules, I will take more drastic measures.

As I stated before, your comments, etc., are welcomed -- but the personal insults are not. If you want to turn a poster's words upside down and shake them, its okay with me. Just don't come with the personal attacks

Got it ???

QueEx


I never admitted to such a thing Big Boss.
I don't know what your talking about. All I know is I am a team player and I believe in you guys politics. I read clark kents comments and I didn't take them as if they were a personal attack. He simply used a cuss word,not UNLIKE your friend Gunner. Why HIS word s are permissible, and Kents not I guess a persons logic can't alway be understood,But hey,it is just my opinion.

I am not getting buck with you sir because I, as a blue dog and closet conservative,totally understand about following the letter of the law. There is no fair just right.

I know from what you did to him you are quick to make an example out of folk who do not match your politics. I think as of yet I haven't broken any of your edicts, so there really isn't a reason to keep addressing me personally, or to talk with such a chip on your shoulder. It leads me to think of a personal investment in this..

Now,I can't speak for Clark kent but it reasons to assume that he will address you and personally challenge you to a spirited defense of YOUR politics in a forum where YOU won't be able to stiflie and censor him based on your dogmatic whimsy.Sometimes sleeping dogs should lie.

Till then please allow me to fight the liberal media bias with you all!
 
Back
Top