The Congressional Black Caucus

Greed

Star
Registered
Congressional Black Caucus' Legislative Conference

President Bush Is 'Our Bull Connor,' Harlem's Rep. Charles Rangel Claims
By MEGHAN CLYNE - Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 23, 2005

WASHINGTON - Comparing President Bush to the Birmingham, Ala., police commissioner whose resistance to the civil rights movement became synonymous with Southern racism, Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday of the president: "George Bush is our Bull Connor."

Mr. Rangel's metaphoric linkage of Mr. Bush to the late Theophilus "Bull" Connor - who in 1963 turned fire hoses and attack dogs on blacks, including Martin Luther King Jr., demonstrating in favor of equal rights - met with wild applause and cheering at a Congressional Black Caucus town hall meeting, part of the organization's 35th Annual Legislative Conference.

Yesterday's town hall meeting was a highlight of the four-day conference, which today will feature an anti-Iraq-war forum with a roving, protesting anti-war mother, Cindy Sheehan; a prominent New York black activist, the Reverend Al Sharpton, and a former president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Kweisi Mfume. The conference culminates in a gala tomorrow evening.

Mr. Rangel, a Democrat who has represented Harlem for almost 35 years, spent his portion of yesterday's forum reminiscing about the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, and calling on his audience to undertake similar action today, inciting them to "revolution" after the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina and particularly its impact on indigent blacks in the Gulf Coast region.

The storm, he said, showed that "if you're black in this country, and you're poor in this country, it's not an inconvenience - it's a death sentence." Denouncing Mr. Bush for waging "a war that we cannot win under any stretch of our imagination" instead of providing for those devastated by the hurricane, Mr. Rangel left his audience with a parting thought.

"If there's one thing that George Bush has done that we should never forget, it's that for us and for our children, he has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all," the congressman said.

A White House spokesman, Kenneth Lisaius, said: "I don't think we would dignify any such inflammatory comments with a reaction."

Joining Mr. Rangel as town hall participants were Senator Clinton, a Democrat of New York; Senator Obama, a Democrat of Illinois; an entertainer and left-leaning activist, Harry Belafonte, and the conference's two cochairmen, Rep. Danny Davis, a Democrat of Illinois, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat of Texas.

Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama arrived at the Washington Convention Center together yesterday, prompting the town hall forum's moderator and a Harvard law professor known for litigating slavery reparations, Charles Ogletree, to quip: "I just keep having in the back of my mind this bumper sticker that says 'Clinton-Obama' - I don't know why." Mr. Ogletree's suggestion was met with widespread, enthusiastic applause.

Before a similarly appreciative audience, and after exhortations that she stay in Washington "as long as possible," Mrs. Clinton urged support for her Senate legislation creating a "9/11 Commission"-style body to investigate what went wrong in the Katrina response and to oversee the rebuilding effort. She repeated her concern, cited in recent speeches, that "it is not confidence building that the first contracts issued went to Halliburton on a no-bid contract."

Mrs. Clinton, who seeks re-election to her Senate seat next year and is widely believed to be a potential presidential candidate in 2008, also discoursed on how Hurricane Katrina demonstrated the need for a more expansive federal government. Strategists and political analysts have said the national Democratic Party in 2006 and 2008 will likely seize on Katrina in an attempt to discredit the limited-government philosophies of Republicans, hoping to identify them as dangerous and inadequate for addressing massive national disasters.

"I believe that one of the great challenges we face is how we're going to define the role of government in the 21st century," Mrs. Clinton said yesterday. "And there are those, it won't surprise you, who want government to be limited to doing very few things, mostly national defense."

"Obviously, at a time where there are real dangers and threats, we have to be vigilant," Mrs. Clinton added. "But America must be strong at home in order to be strong around the world. And I don't believe that strength comes from turning our backs on what has been happening, and Katrina helped to sharpen the focus for many Americans and people around the world about issues that many of us have known about and worked on for a long time."

Saying that "we were embarrassed in front of the entire world that we didn't do the kind of job that people expect America to do to take care of Americans first and foremost," Mrs. Clinton urged Democrats later: "I don't think we should cede the moral high ground to anyone who tries to put forth a private moral agenda and ignore what is the most important part of what we are called to do, which is to do unto others as we would have them do unto us."

The senator was joined in offering advice to her party by Mr. Belafonte, who spoke of the Democratic Party as being "ravaged," wondering openly whether there was anything of the institution to save. The performer, a former civil rights activist, was flanked by Senators Clinton and Obama, who smiled and nodded as he excoriated Democrats and Republicans alike for their negligence toward blacks.

The "eradicating poverty" town hall meeting had several hundred in attendance at the Washington Convention center yesterday, and according to Caucus leaders, another 100,000 listened to the politicians' remarks over a live Web cast.

http://www.nysun.com/article/20495
 
Last edited:
Re: Congressional Black Caucus' 35th Annual Legislative Conference

Damn. A post about the CBC on the same day that southpaw returned to the board.

QueEx
 
Re: Congressional Black Caucus' 35th Annual Legislative Conference

Greed said:
President Bush Is 'Our Bull Connor,' Harlem's Rep. Charles Rangel Claims
By MEGHAN CLYNE - Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 23, 2005

WASHINGTON - Comparing President Bush to the Birmingham, Ala., police commissioner whose resistance to the civil rights movement became synonymous with Southern racism, Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday of the president: "George Bush is our Bull Connor."

Mr. Rangel's metaphoric linkage of Mr. Bush to the late Theophilus "Bull" Connor - who in 1963 turned fire hoses and attack dogs on blacks, including Martin Luther King Jr., demonstrating in favor of equal rights - met with wild applause and cheering at a Congressional Black Caucus town hall meeting, part of the organization's 35th Annual Legislative Conference.

Yesterday's town hall meeting was a highlight of the four-day conference, which today will feature an anti-Iraq-war forum with a roving, protesting anti-war mother, Cindy Sheehan; a prominent New York black activist, the Reverend Al Sharpton, and a former president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Kweisi Mfume. The conference culminates in a gala tomorrow evening.

Mr. Rangel, a Democrat who has represented Harlem for almost 35 years, spent his portion of yesterday's forum reminiscing about the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, and calling on his audience to undertake similar action today, inciting them to "revolution" after the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina and particularly its impact on indigent blacks in the Gulf Coast region. Instead of focusing on economic development, they want blacks to march with picket signs. I guess we can't do anything for ourselves, we need whiteys help.

The storm, he said, showed that "if you're black in this country, and you're poor in this country, it's not an inconvenience - it's a death sentence." Denouncing Mr. Bush for waging "a war that we cannot win under any stretch of our imagination" instead of providing for those devastated by the hurricane, Mr. Rangel left his audience with a parting thought. Fema didn't come and rescue any of the white peoples who live in suburban New Orleans. White suburban New Orlean has a higher death toll as a percentage of total population than the black city of New Orleans.

"If there's one thing that George Bush has done that we should never forget, it's that for us and for our children, he has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all," the congressman said.

A White House spokesman, Kenneth Lisaius, said: "I don't think we would dignify any such inflammatory comments with a reaction."

Joining Mr. Rangel as town hall participants were Senator Clinton, a Democrat of New York; Senator Obama, a Democrat of Illinois; an entertainer and left-leaning activist, Harry Belafonte, and the conference's two cochairmen, Rep. Danny Davis, a Democrat of Illinois, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat of Texas.

Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama arrived at the Washington Convention Center together yesterday, prompting the town hall forum's moderator and a Harvard law professor known for litigating slavery reparations, Charles Ogletree, to quip: "I just keep having in the back of my mind this bumper sticker that says 'Clinton-Obama' - I don't know why." Mr. Ogletree's suggestion was met with widespread, enthusiastic applause.

Before a similarly appreciative audience, and after exhortations that she stay in Washington "as long as possible," Mrs. Clinton urged support for her Senate legislation creating a "9/11 Commission"-style body to investigate what went wrong in the Katrina response and to oversee the rebuilding effort. She repeated her concern, cited in recent speeches, that "it is not confidence building that the first contracts issued went to Halliburton on a no-bid contract."

Mrs. Clinton, who seeks re-election to her Senate seat next year and is widely believed to be a potential presidential candidate in 2008, also discoursed on how Hurricane Katrina demonstrated the need for a more expansive federal government. Strategists and political analysts have said the national Democratic Party in 2006 and 2008 will likely seize on Katrina in an attempt to discredit the limited-government philosophies of Republicans, hoping to identify them as dangerous and inadequate for addressing massive national disasters.

"I believe that one of the great challenges we face is how we're going to define the role of government in the 21st century," Mrs. Clinton said yesterday. "And there are those, it won't surprise you, who want government to be limited to doing very few things, mostly national defense."

"Obviously, at a time where there are real dangers and threats, we have to be vigilant," Mrs. Clinton added. "But America must be strong at home in order to be strong around the world. And I don't believe that strength comes from turning our backs on what has been happening, and Katrina helped to sharpen the focus for many Americans and people around the world about issues that many of us have known about and worked on for a long time."

Saying that "we were embarrassed in front of the entire world that we didn't do the kind of job that people expect America to do to take care of Americans first and foremost," Mrs. Clinton urged Democrats later: "I don't think we should cede the moral high ground to anyone who tries to put forth a private moral agenda and ignore what is the most important part of what we are called to do, which is to do unto others as we would have them do unto us."

The senator was joined in offering advice to her party by Mr. Belafonte, who spoke of the Democratic Party as being "ravaged," wondering openly whether there was anything of the institution to save. The performer, a former civil rights activist, was flanked by Senators Clinton and Obama, who smiled and nodded as he excoriated Democrats and Republicans alike for their negligence toward blacks.

The "eradicating poverty" town hall meeting had several hundred in attendance at the Washington Convention center yesterday, and according to Caucus leaders, another 100,000 listened to the politicians' remarks over a live Web cast.

http://www.nysun.com/article/20495

Why do blacks continue to vote these idiots in office. Its time to get some new blood in there. These guys keep on reliving the 60's. :smh:


Michael Brown for mayor of DC
Cory Booker for mayor of Newark
 
Re: Congressional Black Caucus' 35th Annual Legislative Conference

Southpaw said:
Why do blacks continue to vote these idiots in office. Its time to get some new blood in there. These guys keep on reliving the 60's. :smh:


Michael Brown for mayor of DC
Cory Booker for mayor of Newark
Good question. This board is full of people from NY; why don't you pose the question directly to them -- they are in the best position to know ???

QueEx
 
Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation
by Roland S. Martin, Chicago Defender
September 15, 2006

For the last four years I've traveled to Washington, D.C. to participate as a panelist or moderator of a workshop during the annual legislative conference put on by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation.

An annual event for the last 36 years, the four-day confab brings together thousands of people, namely African Americans, to meet with the Black members of Congress and discuss a wide variety of issues in the various "brain trusts" and seminars that are offered. Washington, D.C. hotels are packed, entertainers and celebrities blow through for a ton of receptions and parties, and attendees go back full of bubbly, food and lots of conversation.

And nothing ever really gets accomplished.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I have a great time. Being able to converse on a panel dealing with marriage and money, as well as talking to nearly 200 young leaders, was wonderful. We shared great ideas and got a chance to dialogue, but does the conference ever produce any lasting change for Black America? Nope.

A lot of this isn't the fault of the attendees. My position is that you always make the best of a situation for you and keep on moving. The problem? The repeated failure of leadership by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation to fully understand what to do with the thousands of people who attend.

Between last year's legislative conference and this year's event, I didn't receive one email related to any public policy we discussed last year. The purpose of the caucus foundation is to "focus on education, public health, economic development and African Globalism. CBCF is the premier organization that creates, identifies, analyzes and disseminates policy-oriented information critical to advancing African Americans and people of African descent towards equity in economics, health and education."

So what's up with the lack of communication? I have no clue who gets their email blasts and public policy positions. You would think that those who have attended past events would at least get regular updates on bills that relate to the overall mission of the group.

Then again, why should I expect to get an email blast when the effort isn't even made to drive the thousands of attendees to the U.S. Capitol to meet with their elected leaders? The way I see it, when you register, they would print on your name tag your U.S. House representative and the two U.S. senators where you hail from (Be honest, a lot of us have no clue who represents us in Congress). That way, when you visited the Hill, you would meet with your rep first and then visit with others.

But the foundation must make this possible by setting aside one day to call on members of Congress. My suggestion? Make it Thursday. Members of Congress get out of town on Friday, so send folks to Capitol Hill on Thursday morning to drive home the agenda of Black America.

Other groups do it. The NAACP, Delta Sigma Theta and Alpha Kappa Alpha sororities do variations of this, so you would think that the foundation affiliated with the 43 Black members of Congress would have this figured out.

Not.

And what about those great sessions? If you didn't a chance to travel to D.C., at least make them all available as podcasts. It's cheap and easy, and folks all over the world could benefit from the great information that is disseminated.

Lastly, send the attendees home with a real agenda. This year's theme was "Changing Course, Confronting Crises, Continuing the Legacy." Fine. But when I got on the plane Sunday, I didn't have a list of initiatives and talking points that reflect the agenda leading up to the next gathering. How can you speak of a "Black Agenda" but never present one?

This has often been the failure of many organizations - and not just those led by African Americans. We are the "meetingest" folks in the world, but what is accomplished out of these gatherings? Is there a collective agenda that is advanced, worked on and implemented?

I've shared my frustrations with multiple members of Congress, including Reps. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Mel Watt, D-N.C. (the outgoing and incoming chairs of the CBC) last year.

What happened? nothing.

I'm not holding my breath expecting next year to be any different. And that's a shame.

But at least the chocolate cake at Morton's Steakhouse was good. That was about the only thing I savored the whole weekend.

Roland S. Martin is executive editor of the Chicago Defender. He can be reached at rmartin@chicagodefender.com.

http://www.chicagodefender.com/page/local.cfm?ArticleID=6991
 
Re: Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

People like Rangel only have one gear. You keep hoping that the CBC would have some explosive report that would spread across the landscape and lift Black people to the next level. Teaching not only to grow in a new direction but to quit living our lives like we are in the 50's.

Bull Connor? That's the problem with "establishment" old guard. They are no longer building their constituency but using our history to keep their government jobs. Bull Connor? How long are you gonna sing that song? That peice of shit has been dead for over 30 years. When are you gonna put a period on that speech and get your arms around were we are today? Time for him to step down.

-VG
 
Re: Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

<font size="5"><center>
Cleaver chosen to lead
Congressional Black Caucus</font size></center>



art9408nar.jpg

Congressman Emanuel Cleaver



Chicago Defender
November 18, 2010


WASHINGTON (AP) — Kansas City-area Congressman Emanuel Cleaver has been elected the leader of the Congressional Black Caucus.

The Kansas City Star reported Thursday that Cleaver will lead 42 members who all won their re-election campaigns. Two incoming Republicans also are black and one has indicated he might wish to join the caucus.


Cleaver says the Congressional Black Caucus and the White House will not always share the same policy agendas.


Cleaver this month was re-elected to a fourth term in Congress from a district that includes parts of Jackson and Cass counties. He is a former Kansas City mayor.


http://www.chicagodefender.com/article-9408-cleaver-chosen-to-lead-congressional-black-caucus.html
 
Re: Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

<font size="3"> Two incoming Republicans also are black and one has indicated he might wish to join the caucus.</font size>


<font size="4">Memo to the New Black Republicans in Congress:</font size>
By: Lenny McAllister, November 12, 2010


<font size="3">
There's a lot to celebrate in the election of Reps. Allen West and
Tim Scott. Even though they represent predominantly white con-
stituencies, they have an opportunity to play historic roles on
behalf of black America</font size>



TIM-ALLEN-400_0.jpg

Newly elected congressmen Allen West and Tim Scott


By: Lenny McAllister
November 12, 2010


Dear Congressmen-elect,

You don't know me. I don't live in either of your districts, but -- as an American, a Republican and a black man -- I think we have enough common interests for you to lend me an ear for a few minutes.

I know that there has been a lot of talk about the two of you making it into the House of Representatives. I was proud of your efforts, from the primary season to your victories in November. As a Frederick Douglass Republican, I paid a lot of attention to your progress during the election cycle. I know the obstacles you faced, from the initial doubts about your legitimacy to the issues that all candidates generally encounter. I know that people expected you to fall off the path or lose to better-known candidates. Yet you won, and I am glad for it, along with many other Americans.

You won because of your dedication to the voters in your district. As candidates running in mostly white districts, you could not make race a dominant issue in your campaigns. That was a good winning strategy. What I want to talk to you about now, though, is not campaigning but, rather, leadership.

Your districts will expect you to be humble civic servants who reflect their wishes in Washington. However, I would also argue that in your tenure as leaders on Capitol Hill, race will be an unavoidable element of the equation.

You have a choice, gentlemen: You can be footnotes in American history or you can play historic roles in tomorrow's America. Black people in America need you to become historic civic servants who will also advocate on their behalf as we work to lift America out of the problems that keep us mediocre internationally -- in education, employment and health care -- all issues that impact black America negatively.

There are rumors that you may not join the Congressional Black Caucus, in part because it has been a grossly partisan and left-leaning organization, often regardless of how that stance may adversely affect its African-American constituents. I urge you to accept membership in the organization. Your inclusion can move us toward a common agenda for African Americans that unites us in a search for peace and prosperity and that gets past the partisanship that keeps America unfulfilled.

FULL MEMO
 
Re: Another wasted opportunity by the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation

<font size="3"> Two incoming Republicans also are black and one has indicated he might wish to join the caucus.</font size>


<font size="4"> For black caucus, race can't be the only factor</font size>
By Terry Smith, Philadelphia Inquirer, November 17, 2010

<font size="3">For black caucus, race can't be the only factor
But admitting conservatives suggests that it is.</font size>



tim-scott-thumb-400xauto-13935.jpg


Rep.-elect Tim Scott (R., S.C.). The Congressional Black Caucus has
said it would admit him and another conservative.


Philadelphia Inquirer
By Terry Smith
November 17, 2010


Imagine if Philadelphia's Rep. Chaka Fattah petitioned for membership in the House's Tea Party Caucus. The caucus is dedicated to promoting "Americans' call for fiscal responsibility, adherence to the Constitution, and limited government," and it consists of some of the House's most conservative members. Fattah is African American and liberal.

It would not be at all unreasonable for members of the Tea Party Caucus to reply that Fattah's membership would play no constructive role in a group so ideologically incompatible with him. Would the Tea Party Caucus' response be any less reasonable if Fattah were white? Of course not.

So why did the Congressional Black Caucus - a group composed predominantly of some of the most liberal members of Congress - invite into its ranks last week two newly elected, Tea Party-backed, black conservatives? Solely because of their shared race.

The black caucus' decision to admit Reps.-elect Tim Scott of South Carolina and Allen West of Florida perpetuates a harmful caricature of black politics. This caricature leads white voters to the mistaken belief that black voters cast their ballots for black candidates simply because they are black. And it has led to Supreme Court rulings that treat black voters solely as a racial group, despite abundant evidence that they are a political group that faces discrimination based on race.

Consider Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele or any other black conservative who has run against a moderate or liberal white opponent. How successful were they in attracting black votes? Such black conservatives will forlornly admit that they lost the black vote handily despite sharing a race with those voters.

Indeed, there is no instance in post-Reconstruction congressional or major statewide elections in which black voters have preferred a black conservative to a more liberal white opponent. Blacks vote based on ideology - just as white voters will say they are doing when they vote overwhelmingly for white candidates.

If black voters choose ideology over race, why is the Congressional Black Caucus doing the opposite? Rep.-elect Scott has unequivocally embraced the tea-party platform and said he may not want to join the black caucus. And the voluble West has implied that the Congressional Black Caucus represents a "monolithic voice that continues to talk about victimization and dependency in the black community." Views like these are hardly the basis for a working partnership with the black caucus.

The sad irony of what the Congressional Black Caucus has done is that it may inadvertently validate the Supreme Court jurisprudence that once threatened the electoral success of caucus members - and will likely do so again when it comes to next year's congressional redistricting. The court has cautioned that redistricting cannot be performed with race "predominantly" in mind. Yet it is only by stereotyping black voters' preferences as racial, while treating white votes for white candidates as presumptively political decisions, that the court is able to subject majority black and Latino congressional districts to extraordinary scrutiny.

In elevating race over ideology, the black caucus is only feeding the court's and others' misapprehension of black politics as racial rather than ideological.

If the black caucus decided to politely exclude Scott and West on ideological grounds, it would not mean revisiting its past decisions to exclude white progressives such as Tennessee's Steve Cohen. As a progressive political group that has historically been discriminated against because of the race of its members, blacks share a unique bond and common struggles that they should commune around.

As long as white voters, the U.S. Supreme Court, and even the Congressional Black Caucus continue to lose sight of the true meaning of black politics, misunderstandings and missteps like the invitations to Scott and West will persist.



Terry Smith is a professor at DePaul University College of Law and an expert on voting rights and election law. He can be reached at tsmith81@depaul.edu.


http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/108609219.html
 
Back
Top