That's the most important one.
And the premise is wrong.
If the players will be retaliated against for"their bravery" and won't be on a roster next season.
Then they wasted their opportunity at any sort of power and their punishment will come during the offseason after that have played the remainder of this season and made the owners money.
Their move should have been now during the season where their actions would/could have both financial and actual effects.
They will be made examples of for symbolic actions. What is needed is rebellion and that would require disobedience that effects the ability of the games to make money.
as for them losing money......there is no movement without sacrifice.
IMO even players who don't agree would be wise to support the effort as it would have been now that the players show strength and resolve which in turn can/would result in a stronger position within the league.Better CBA, stronger union ,better protections.