Tea Bagger Movement Not Racist? Judge for Yourself

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
National Tea Party Convention 02-05-2010

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sM-cEtUfJhI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sM-cEtUfJhI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>​

Literacy test
 
NTP = Ultra Right wing Conservatives.

They're trying to divide the vote to water down the democratic party.
 
Do these people understand that if there was mandatory testing, most of them wouldn't be allowed to vote?

Its interesting, as we watch pieces of the facade fall away from this movement, to discover some of the attitudes behind the front. I keep getting the feel that the anti-tax facade is camouflaging something disturbingly far-right. I strongly suspect that one reason the movement opposes central leadership is because it allows more people to coalesce around a foggy agenda. The more closely the movement is tied to personalities the more the underlying motivations, become clearer -- and the better we understand what these people really stand for.

QueEx
 
Its interesting, as we watch pieces of the facade fall away from this movement, to discover some of the attitudes behind the front. I keep getting the feel that the anti-tax facade is camouflaging something disturbingly far-right. I strongly suspect that one reason the movement opposes central leadership is because it allows more people to coalesce around a foggy agenda. The more closely the movement is tied to personalities the more the underlying motivations, become clearer -- and the better we understand what these people really stand for.

QueEx


Agreed. I would give them more credibility if they were such deficit hawks and as fervently anti tax when it's Republicans raising taxes and running up deficits.
 
The Tea Party movement was started by 9/11 Truthers and than picked up by the Ron Paul followers and now it has been hi-jacked by Neo-cons such as Beck, Palin, Hannity...etc:smh:.
 
The Tea Party movement was started by 9/11 Truthers and then picked up by the Ron Paul followers and now it has been hi-jacked by Neo-cons such as Beck, Palin, Hannity...etc:smh:.

Yep, add FoxNews, and Sarah Palin don't speak for us! Ron gives the full answer @ 2:36

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/je5u37NgiUY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/je5u37NgiUY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
c o m m e n t a r y

<font size="5"><center>Texas primary shows
Tea Party has a weak brew</font size>
<font size="4">

Primary results expose Tea Parties as all steam, no drink</font size></center>


Star-Telegram
By Bud Kennedy
March 2, 2010


When the Weatherford Tea Party conducted a noisy straw poll and rally last week, U.S. Rep. Kay Granger drew only 2.7 percent of the vote.

When Tuesday night was done and Republicans across three counties had voted, Granger was on her way back to Washington with close to 70 percent of the vote.

By all measures, the Tea Parties packed only watered-down punch. Even in two Texas House races where Tea Party and Project 912 groups helped spin the vile lies of well-financed special-interest groups, local incumbents rose like cream atop the cup.

Weatherford Tea Party co-founder Dawn Phillips King couldn't even believe that Granger, a Fort Worth Republican and seven-term incumbent, was drawing 69 percent of the early vote in Parker County and more than 70 percent overall.

"It's disappointing -- shocking," she said by phone. "Are you sure?"

Granger easily defeated Parker County anti-abortion candidate Mike Brasovan and north Fort Worth wholesale grocer Matthew Kelly.

State Reps. Todd Smith of Euless and Vicki Truitt of Keller, both Northeast Tarrant County natives, were on their way to defeating candidates backed by splinter Tea Parties, one of which openly promoted campaign attacks financed by Midland oil interests and Houston home builders.


<font size="3">Guess that tea wasn't so strong after all.</font size>

The Tea Parties' best chance for a victory was in Burleson, where candidate Darren Yancy was supposed to walk into the Texas Senate after incumbent state Sen. Kip Averitt came down sick and couldn't campaign. Yet Yancy self-destructed.

Voters learned he was suspended as an "untrustworthy" real estate agent by the Texas Real Estate Commission.

He had to explain suing Burleson and a local youth league for $500,000 over a baseball scrap.

He told radio listeners that ACORN wanted to defeat him and that he expects to get "national attention."

He called for shooting illegal immigrants at the border but said he's pro-life.

Oh, and he consistently misspelled Waco's McLennan County as McClennan. Voters were choosing Averitt in early returns.

Looks like the Tea Parties got iced.

Bud Kennedy's column appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays. 817-390-7538 Twitter @budkennedy


http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/03/02/2010024/primary-results-expose-tea-parties.html
 
<font size="5"><center>
Why This Conservative
Won't Be at Glenn Beck's Rally</font size>
<font size="4">

I understand why some black conservatives feel the need to
participate in the Restoring Honor event in Washington, D.C.
However, I have declined the invitation.</font size></center>


beckrally.jpg



Lenny_McAllister_speaking_in_2009.jpg

By: Lenny McAllister
August 27, 2010



It could have been an honor to attend. It would have been something to tell my grandchildren about one day. I could have said that I participated in a historic event -- Glenn Beck's Restoring Honor rally that will be a notable point in the story of the Tea Party movement in America.

Instead, I felt that I had a greater obligation to history -- the Aug. 28, 1963, "I Have a Dream" rally in Washington, D.C. -- than I had to being present in Washington, D.C., this Aug. 28.

For me, it was clear why I -- and perhaps many other black conservatives -- had to say no. I understand that there are some who will participate in the rally on Saturday. For example, anti-abortion Dr. Alveda King (niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.) will be one of the featured speakers.

The Frederick Douglass Foundation will attend the rally as "esteemed" guests, sitting on the speakers' stage, primarily in support of King. I get this. It is important that pro-life advocates grab advantageous platforms to address and eradicate the black genocide via abortion in our communities -- and since the political left is not willing to provide an opportunity to address these grievances, opportunities such as Saturday's will have to do.


<font size="4">Yet for me,</font size>

  • <font size="3">after former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's defense of Dr. Laura during the "n-word" controversy; and</font size>

  • <font size="3">Glenn Beck's feigned gratitude to "divine providence" for picking the Aug. 28 date,</font size>

<font size="3">. . . it just seems historically improper for most black conservatives to acquiesce to the spirit of this event, particularly as some of the principal personalities involved have long sidestepped the crisis in black America today -- the very issues that King spoke to back in Aug. 1963.</font size>


Glenn Beck is a media star who often quotes historians and politicians of the past, points to historical facts and figures, and implores his viewers to know more about the best of America's foundation and history-making events. He invites his audience to use this knowledge as inspiration to change America from the dangerous path that it is on. I concur with that general message,<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"> but I find it both paradoxical and duplicitous for a self-taught historian -- whose notable CPAC speech just months ago was full of great facts, quotes and figures from America's past -- to be so ignorant of the significance of Aug. 28, much less any speech on that date from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.</span>


<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">It seems dishonorable that a man who has called the first black president a racist (on his television show) and mocked the president and his daughters with racist dialect (on his radio show) should lead a rally on the anniversary of the greatest civil rights speech recorded, and on the very grounds where the epic speech was given in 1963.</span>

<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"><font size="3"> <center>It is dangerous to support a leader who believes that the diversity among
us should not be acknowledged and addressed, even as we see the further
widening of the gap between blacks and whites in America.

If Beck's presence on this anniversary contravenes the leadership of King
in many ways, the appearance by Palin mocks it. Any notion of "don't retreat,
reload" coming from the former vice-presidential candidate -- a phrase she proudly uttered in March soon after shots were fired into the office of Rep.
Eric Cantor, R-Va., during the tension over the health care vote -- is a callous
disregard of how King and many of his peers during the civil rights era left this
earth: at the hands of racists intent on "reloading" in order to "reclaim America."
</span></font size></center>


When Sen. John McCain was calming down the incendiary anti-Obama hatred during the 2008 presidential campaign, Palin stoked the fires, refusing to address inappropriate catcalls of "boy" and other racial vitriol. Throughout his struggles and his triumph as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, he exhibited leadership and grace to unify and advance America. Palin's actions have been choppy and biting, inconsistent and often polarizing -- a trend since she burst onto the national scene in 2008. Her actions do not signify leadership, and thus, I cannot and will not co-sign her irresponsibility with my presence onstage on Saturday.

Smaller government -- a basic tenet of the Tea Party movement that I concur with -- will never return to America without a bigger role for people, a role that is capable of touching blacks in Chicago at the same depth as whites in Kansas. Not enough of the Tea Party movement -- and many would say none of the Tea Party movement at all -- embraces unity outside of the friendly confines of its immediate supporters. Too many of its representatives, including most of the speakers on the stage, are incapable of winning the political middle, saving the destitute and making inclusive change. All of those things mattered to King.

What we need in America is unifying leadership. President Obama promised it as a post-partisan candidate and has not yet delivered as a very partisan president. The Republicans have not shown an ability to spark that connectivity across communities even as they garner momentum for November. People such as Palin, Dr. Laura, Rush Limbaugh and Beck have rallied conservatives effectively, but not Americans collectively.

I support conservatives, and I believe in the core Tea Party message. I support the good people of the movement across the nation. Yet I also know that there is an honor that must be restored through an acknowledgment of the problems that divide us, as well as the courage to heal through the differences that estrange us, especially during turbulent economic and social times. So that's why I said no.


Lenny McAllister is a syndicated political commentator and the author of an upcoming new edition of the bookDiary of a Mad Black PYC (Proud Young Conservative): The Obama Era, Part I (2008-2010). He will be featured on CNN Saturday Morning to provide commentary on the Washington, D.C., rallies on Aug. 28. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.



http://www.theroot.com/views/why-conservative-wont-be-glenn-becks-rally?page=0,1
 
<font size="5"><center>
Why This Conservative
Won't Be at Glenn Beck's Rally</font size>
<font size="4">

I understand why some black conservatives feel the need to
participate in the Restoring Honor event in Washington, D.C.
However, I have declined the invitation.</font size></center>


beckrally.jpg



Lenny_McAllister_speaking_in_2009.jpg

By: Lenny McAllister
August 27, 2010



It could have been an honor to attend. It would have been something to tell my grandchildren about one day. I could have said that I participated in a historic event -- Glenn Beck's Restoring Honor rally that will be a notable point in the story of the Tea Party movement in America.

Instead, I felt that I had a greater obligation to history -- the Aug. 28, 1963, "I Have a Dream" rally in Washington, D.C. -- than I had to being present in Washington, D.C., this Aug. 28.

For me, it was clear why I -- and perhaps many other black conservatives -- had to say no. I understand that there are some who will participate in the rally on Saturday. For example, anti-abortion Dr. Alveda King (niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.) will be one of the featured speakers.

The Frederick Douglass Foundation will attend the rally as "esteemed" guests, sitting on the speakers' stage, primarily in support of King. I get this. It is important that pro-life advocates grab advantageous platforms to address and eradicate the black genocide via abortion in our communities -- and since the political left is not willing to provide an opportunity to address these grievances, opportunities such as Saturday's will have to do.


<font size="4">Yet for me,</font size>

  • <font size="3">after former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's defense of Dr. Laura during the "n-word" controversy; and</font size>

  • <font size="3">Glenn Beck's feigned gratitude to "divine providence" for picking the Aug. 28 date,</font size>

<font size="3">. . . it just seems historically improper for most black conservatives to acquiesce to the spirit of this event, particularly as some of the principal personalities involved have long sidestepped the crisis in black America today -- the very issues that King spoke to back in Aug. 1963.</font size>


Glenn Beck is a media star who often quotes historians and politicians of the past, points to historical facts and figures, and implores his viewers to know more about the best of America's foundation and history-making events. He invites his audience to use this knowledge as inspiration to change America from the dangerous path that it is on. I concur with that general message,<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"> but I find it both paradoxical and duplicitous for a self-taught historian -- whose notable CPAC speech just months ago was full of great facts, quotes and figures from America's past -- to be so ignorant of the significance of Aug. 28, much less any speech on that date from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.</span>


<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">It seems dishonorable that a man who has called the first black president a racist (on his television show) and mocked the president and his daughters with racist dialect (on his radio show) should lead a rally on the anniversary of the greatest civil rights speech recorded, and on the very grounds where the epic speech was given in 1963.</span>

<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"><font size="3"> <center>It is dangerous to support a leader who believes that the diversity among
us should not be acknowledged and addressed, even as we see the further
widening of the gap between blacks and whites in America.

If Beck's presence on this anniversary contravenes the leadership of King
in many ways, the appearance by Palin mocks it. Any notion of "don't retreat,
reload" coming from the former vice-presidential candidate -- a phrase she proudly uttered in March soon after shots were fired into the office of Rep.
Eric Cantor, R-Va., during the tension over the health care vote -- is a callous
disregard of how King and many of his peers during the civil rights era left this
earth: at the hands of racists intent on "reloading" in order to "reclaim America."
</span></font size></center>


When Sen. John McCain was calming down the incendiary anti-Obama hatred during the 2008 presidential campaign, Palin stoked the fires, refusing to address inappropriate catcalls of "boy" and other racial vitriol. Throughout his struggles and his triumph as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, he exhibited leadership and grace to unify and advance America. Palin's actions have been choppy and biting, inconsistent and often polarizing -- a trend since she burst onto the national scene in 2008. Her actions do not signify leadership, and thus, I cannot and will not co-sign her irresponsibility with my presence onstage on Saturday.

Smaller government -- a basic tenet of the Tea Party movement that I concur with -- will never return to America without a bigger role for people, a role that is capable of touching blacks in Chicago at the same depth as whites in Kansas. Not enough of the Tea Party movement -- and many would say none of the Tea Party movement at all -- embraces unity outside of the friendly confines of its immediate supporters. Too many of its representatives, including most of the speakers on the stage, are incapable of winning the political middle, saving the destitute and making inclusive change. All of those things mattered to King.

What we need in America is unifying leadership. President Obama promised it as a post-partisan candidate and has not yet delivered as a very partisan president. The Republicans have not shown an ability to spark that connectivity across communities even as they garner momentum for November. People such as Palin, Dr. Laura, Rush Limbaugh and Beck have rallied conservatives effectively, but not Americans collectively.

I support conservatives, and I believe in the core Tea Party message. I support the good people of the movement across the nation. Yet I also know that there is an honor that must be restored through an acknowledgment of the problems that divide us, as well as the courage to heal through the differences that estrange us, especially during turbulent economic and social times. So that's why I said no.


Lenny McAllister is a syndicated political commentator and the author of an upcoming new edition of the bookDiary of a Mad Black PYC (Proud Young Conservative): The Obama Era, Part I (2008-2010). He will be featured on CNN Saturday Morning to provide commentary on the Washington, D.C., rallies on Aug. 28. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.



http://www.theroot.com/views/why-conservative-wont-be-glenn-becks-rally?page=0,1

Intellectual honesty:eek:. I'm glad that some black conservatives aren't just puppets. Too bad his voice won't reach most of the people who need to hear this and half the people that do hear this will make excuses or write him off.
 
"A Tea Party Foreign Policy"

BY RON PAUL | AUGUST 27, 2010

As one who is opposed to centralization, I am wary of attempts to turn a grassroots movement against big government like the Tea Party into an adjunct of the Republican Party. I find it even more worrisome when I see those who willingly participated in the most egregious excesses of the most recent Republican Congress push their way into leadership roles of this movement without batting an eye -- or changing their policies!

As many frustrated Americans who have joined the Tea Party realize, we cannot stand against big government at home while supporting it abroad. We cannot talk about fiscal responsibility while spending trillions on occupying and bullying the rest of the world. We cannot talk about the budget deficit and spiraling domestic spending without looking at the costs of maintaining an American empire of more than 700 military bases in more than 120 foreign countries. We cannot pat ourselves on the back for cutting a few thousand dollars from a nature preserve or an inner-city swimming pool at home while turning a blind eye to a Pentagon budget that nearly equals those of the rest of the world combined.

Our foreign policy is based on an illusion: that we are actually paying for it. What we are doing is borrowing and printing money to maintain our presence overseas. Americans are seeing the cost of this irresponsible approach as their own communities crumble and our economic decline continues.

I see tremendous opportunities for movements like the Tea Party to prosper by capitalizing on the Democrats' broken promises to overturn the George W. Bush administration's civil liberties abuses and end the disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A return to the traditional U.S. foreign policy of active private engagement but government noninterventionism is the only alternative that can restore our moral and fiscal health. I am optimistic, and our numbers are increasing!
 
And that relates to what, in this thread ? ? ?

QueEx

Thread title -
Tea Bagger Movement Not Racist? Judge for Yourself

First, as I've said many times, The Tea Party aint Beck, Palin & FoxNews. Independents, and some Dims want a complete withdrawal from the mideast. idk, maybe Obama doin the same thing to the left as Karl Rove did to the right!

2) Ron Paul gets a lot of credit for starting this tea party movement but even he didn't attend the Beck & Palin show.

3) When someone reads RP's Tea Party foreign policy, an objective thinker must come away with the opinion that this policy align's itself closer to the message of MLK's views on Vietnam.

Is it a racist view, Hell Na!
 
Thread title -

Ron Paul gets a lot of credit for starting this tea party movement but even he didn't attend the Beck & Palin show.

<font size="3">Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews ???

Where is your denouciation of the Beck, Palin & FoxNews Rally ???
</font size>

QueEx
 
Thread title -

First, as I've said many times, The Tea Party aint Beck, Palin & FoxNews. Independents, and some Dims want a complete withdrawal from the mideast. idk, maybe Obama doin the same thing to the left as Karl Rove did to the right!

2) Ron Paul gets a lot of credit for starting this tea party movement but even he didn't attend the Beck & Palin show.

3) When someone reads RP's Tea Party foreign policy, an objective thinker must come away with the opinion that this policy align's itself closer to the message of MLK's views on Vietnam.

Is it a racist view, Hell Na!

First, as I've said many times, The Tea Party aint Beck, Palin & FoxNews. Independents, and some Dims want a complete withdrawal from the mideast. idk,

I understand, but maybe others don't that your political and historical references begin on January 20, 1992.

maybe Obama doin the same thing to the left as Karl Rove did to the right!

Spoken like a true Hannity lover! post your evidence.

When someone reads RP's Tea Party foreign policy, an objective thinker must come away with the opinion that this policy align's itself closer to the message of MLK's views on Vietnam.

Maybe, but not for the same reasons. Paul is an isolationist, is views are based on tax policies. MLK's message at the time was in support of the emerging ex-colonial democracies of Africa and Asia, and the limited funds available to use on the welfare of those Americans in need.

Don't get it twisted!
 
bruh, post 7, in this thread. I didn't mention Beck but f*ck him & Limbaugh.

I asked where did YOU denounce the Beck, Palin & Fox Rally on August 28th. Post No. 7 above was made February 8th, long before yesterday's B, P & F Rally.

Also, you didn't bother to respond to the question: Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews ???

QueEx
 
I asked where did YOU denounce the Beck, Palin & Fox Rally on August 28th. Post No. 7 above was made February 8th, long before yesterday's B, P & F Rally.

Also, you didn't bother to respond to the question: Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews ???

QueEx

Also, you didn't bother to respond to the question:

Oh, you noticed his selective responses. But he can lurk in the background and come out when I make a typo.:hmm:
 
I asked where did YOU denounce the Beck, Palin & Fox Rally on August 28th. Post No. 7 above was made February 8th, long before yesterday's B, P & F Rally.

bruh, I support their 'right' to freedom of assembly. No need for me to denounce it, no matter how insensitive it may appear. There's no need to defend popular speech, it's unpopular speech that is protected in the 1st Amendment

Also, you didn't bother to respond to the question: Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews ???

QueEx

I didn't understand the question: Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews? :confused:
 
Oh, you noticed his selective responses. But he can lurk in the background and come out when I make a typo.:hmm:

its called "getback", remember when you checked me about the way I spelled theatre or theater. its over with in my eyes, I just saw oppurtunity
 
I didn't understand the question: Where is Beck's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews? :confused:

My apologies. You are more than correct. I made an error and read right through it!

The question should have read: Where is Paul's statement denouncing Beck, Palin & FoxNews? :confused:

QueEx
 
QueEx, Thought, anyone: Does anyone denounce MLK's niece (Alveda King) participating at Beck's rally?

Here

Nope. She's just like the rest of us in the country, in general, and here on BGOL, in specific: she has a navel.

QueEx
 
Tom is correct. You can't argue that those who are here illegally should be denied the right to vote, to eat, to my taxes, to your taxes. Nothing wrong and everything right about putting America and Americans first, without apology. Anyone who calls that racist needs to question whether they like this country to begin with.
 
Intellectual honesty:eek:. I'm glad that some black conservatives aren't just puppets. Too bad his voice won't reach most of the people who need to hear this and half the people that do hear this will make excuses or write him off.

Who is a puppet, the blacks who are conservatives or the blacks who are liberal? The real puppets are those credulous folks that follow someone blindly without any discernment. There are no absolutes that dictate blacks have to be credulous and walk lockstep with fools like Sharpton or others.
 
Who is a puppet, the blacks who are conservatives or the blacks who are liberal? The real puppets are those credulous folks that follow someone blindly without any discernment. There are no absolutes that dictate blacks have to be credulous and walk lockstep with fools like Sharpton or others.

The black people who sit there blindly supporting racist. Sharpton is foolish at times and out for himself but I don't see him supporting platforms that are anti black people.

Conservative or liberal, blacks first goal should be to eliminate racism and support equality for blacks. If fighting abortion, gays, taxes or etc. is more important to you than that, you need to wake up...:smh:
 
Reverend Al Sharpton
Speaking Category :
Black Heritage, Political Commentators, University Speakers

In Brief Bio :
African-American Preacher & Activist; Foremost Civil Rights Leader

Booking Fee Range :
$30,001 - $50,000 ( About Speaking Fees )

Speaker Travels From :
New York - NY, New York - NY


Sarah Palin

$75,000
First-Class airfare
"Deluxe" hotel accommodations
Chauffeur to and from event with SUV (or, in pinch, black Town Car)
Wooden lecturn
Two bottled waters
Bendy straws (for the waters)
Pen on which to scribble notes on her hand


Good work if you can get it but it's hard to believe they won't say anything for a buck.
 
source: Washington Post

Republican school board in N.C. backed by tea party abolishes integration policy


RALEIGH, N.C. - The sprawling Wake County School District has long been a rarity. Some of its best, most diverse schools are in the poorest sections of this capital city. And its suburban schools, rather than being exclusive enclaves, include children whose parents cannot afford a house in the neighborhood.

But over the past year, a new majority-Republican school board backed by national tea party conservatives has set the district on a strikingly different course. Pledging to "say no to the social engineers!" it has abolished the policy behind one of the nation's most celebrated integration efforts.

And as the board moves toward a system in which students attend neighborhood schools, some members are embracing the provocative idea that concentrating poor children, who are usually minorities, in a few schools could have merits - logic that critics are blasting as a 21st-century case for segregation.

The situation unfolding here in some ways represents a first foray of tea party conservatives into the business of shaping a public school system, and it has made Wake County the center of a fierce debate over the principle first enshrined in the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education: that diversity and quality education go hand in hand.

The new school board has won applause from parents who blame the old policy - which sought to avoid high-poverty, racially isolated schools - for an array of problems in the district and who say that promoting diversity is no longer a proper or necessary goal for public schools.

"This is Raleigh in 2010, not Selma, Alabama, in the 1960s - my life is integrated," said John Tedesco, a new board member. "We need new paradigms."

But critics accuse the new board of pursuing an ideological agenda aimed at nothing less than sounding the official death knell of government-sponsored integration in one of the last places to promote it. Without a diversity policy in place, they say, the county will inevitably slip into the pattern that defines most districts across the country, where schools in well-off neighborhoods are decent and those in poor, usually minority neighborhoods struggle.

The NAACP has filed a civil rights complaint arguing that 700 initial student transfers the new board approved have already increased racial segregation, violating laws that prohibit the use of federal funding for discriminatory purposes. In recent weeks, federal education officials visited the county, the first step toward a possible investigation.

"So far, all the chatter we heard from tea partyers has not manifested in actually putting in place retrograde policies. But this is one place where they have literally attempted to turn back the clock," said Benjamin Todd Jealous, president of the NAACP.

School Board Chairman Ron Margiotta referred questions on the matter to the district's attorney, who declined to comment. Tedesco, who has emerged as the most vocal among the new majority on the nine-member board, said he and his colleagues are only seeking a simpler system in which children attend the schools closest to them. If the result is a handful of high-poverty schools, he said, perhaps that will better serve the most challenged students.

"If we had a school that was, like, 80 percent high-poverty, the public would see the challenges, the need to make it successful," he said. "Right now, we have diluted the problem, so we can ignore it."

So far, the board shows few signs of shifting course. Last month, it announced that Anthony J. Tata, former chief operating officer of the D.C. schools, will replace a superintendent who resigned to protest the new board's intentions. Tata, a retired general, names conservative commentator Glenn Beck and the Tea Party Patriots among his "likes" on his Facebook page.

Tata did not return calls seeking comment, but he said in a recent news conference in Raleigh that he supports the direction the new board is taking, and cited the District as an example of a place where neighborhood schools are "working."

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]Beyond 'your little world'[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]
<!-- BREAK -->
[/FONT]The story unfolding here is striking because of the school district's unusual history. It sprawls 800 square miles and includes public housing in Raleigh, wealthy enclaves near town, and the booming suburbs beyond, home to newcomers that include many new school board members. The county is about 72 percent white, 20 percent black and 9 percent Latino. About 10 percent live in poverty.

Usually, such large territory is divided into smaller districts with students assigned to the nearest schools. And because neighborhoods are still mostly defined by race and socioeconomic status, poor and minority kids wind up in high-poverty schools that struggle with problems such as retaining the best teachers.

Officials in Raleigh tried to head off that scenario. As white flight hit in the 1970s, civic leaders merged the city and county into a single district. And in 2000, they shifted from racial to economic integration, adopting a goal that no school should have more than 40 percent of its students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches, the proxy for poverty.

The district tried to strike this balance through student assignments and choice, establishing magnet programs in poor areas to draw middle-class kids. Although most students here ride buses to school, officials said fewer than 10 percent are bused to a school to maintain diversity, and most bus rides are less than five miles.

"We knew that over time, high-poverty schools tend to lose high-quality teachers, leadership, key students - you see an erosion," said Bill McNeal, a former superintendent who instituted the goal as part of a broad academic plan. "But we never expected economic diversity to solve all our problems."

Over the years, both Republican and Democratic school boards supported the system. A study of 2007 graduation rates by EdWeek magazine ranked Wake County 17th among the nation's 50 largest districts, with a rate of 64 percent, just below Virginia's Prince William County. While most students posted gains in state reading and math tests last year - more than three-quarters passed - the stubborn achievement gap that separates minority students from their white peers has persisted, though it has narrowed by some measures. And many parents see benefits beyond test scores.

"I want these kids to be culturally diverse," said Clarence McClain, who is African American and the guardian of a niece and nephew who are doing well in county schools. "If they're with kids who are all the same way, to break out of that is impossible. You've got to step outside your little world."

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]'Constant shuffling'[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]

<!-- BREAK -->
[/FONT]But as the county has boomed in recent years - adding as many as 6,000 students a year - poverty levels at some schools have exceeded 70 percent. And many suburban parents have complained that their children are being reassigned from one school to the next. Officials blame this on the unprecedented growth, but parents blame the diversity goal.

"Basically, all the problems have roots in the diversity policy," said Kathleen Brennan, who formed a parent group to challenge the system. "There was just this constant shuffling every year." She added: "These people are patting themselves on the back and only 54 percent of [poor] kids are graduating. And I'm being painted a racist. But isn't it racist to have low expectations?"

As she and others have delved deeper, they've found that qualified minority students are underenrolled in advanced math classes, for instance, a problem that school officials said they've known about for years, but that strikes many parents as revelatory. Some have even come to see the diversity policy as a kind of profiling that assumes poor kids are more likely to struggle.

"I don't want us to go back to racially isolated schools," said Shila Nordone, who is biracial and has two children in county schools. "But right now, it's as if the best we can do is dilute these kids out so they don't cause problems. It sickens me."

In their quest to end the diversity policy, the frustrated parents have found some influential partners, among them retail magnate and Republican operative Art Pope

Following his guidance, the GOP fielded the victorious bloc of school board candidates who railed against "forced busing." The nation's largest tea party organizers, Americans for Prosperity - on whose national board Pope sits - cast the old school board members as arrogant "leftists." Two libertarian think tanks, which Pope funds almost exclusively, have deployed experts on TV and radio.

"We are losing sight of the educational mission of schools to make them into some socially acceptable melting pot," said Terry Stoops, a researcher at the libertarian John Locke Foundation. "Those who support these policies are imposing their vision on everyone else."

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]'Disastrous' results[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica]

<!-- BREAK -->
[/FONT]Things have not gone smoothly a<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=0 width="95%"><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=15>You may choose an icon for
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>s the new school board has attempted to define its vision for raising student achievement. A preliminary map of new school assignments did not please some of the new majority's own constituents. And critics expressed alarm that the plan would create a handful of high-poverty, racially isolated schools, a scenario that the new majority has begun embracing.

Pope, who is a former state legislator, said he would back extra funding for such schools.

"If we end up with a concentration of students underperforming academically, it may be easier to reach out to them," he said. "Hypothetically, we should consider that as well."

The NAACP and others have criticized that as separate-but-equal logic.

"It's not as if this is a new idea, 'Let's experiment and see what happens when poor kids are put together in one school,' " said Richard Kahlenberg, senior fellow at the Century Foundation, a think tank that advocates for economic integration. "We know. The results are almost always disastrous."

Many local leaders see another irony in the possible balkanization of the county's schools at a time when society is becoming more interconnected than ever.

"People want schools that mirror their neighborhood, but the bigger picture is my kid in the suburbs is connected to kids in Raleigh," said the Rev. Earl Johnson, pastor of Martin Street Baptist Church in downtown Raleigh. "We're trying to connect to the world but we're separating locally? There is something wrong."
 
source: examiner


Tennessee Tea Party tinkering with American history





The Tea Party of Tennessee wants to revise American history, cleaning it up so the founding fathers are not implicated in slavery and genocide. Indeed, the Tennessee Tea Party wants to pretend slavery and genocide is not part and parcel of the American experience.

Earlier this week Tea Party activists held a news conference, and met with lawmakers individually to present their list of demands for the 2011 legislative session.

Regarding education, the material they distributed said, “Neglect and outright ill will have distorted the teaching of the history and character of the United States. We seek to compel the teaching of students in Tennessee the truth regarding the history of our nation and the nature of its government.”

Oddly enough, the truth for Tea Partiers seems to entail the white washing of American history, including the removal of incidents of slavery and genocide from American textbooks.

Tea Party demands further stipulate:

“No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers, or the majority of citizens, including those who reached positions of leadership.”

No portrayal of minority experience? It would be laughable if these (white) guys weren't serious. Revising American history to conform to the Tea Party's twisted and confused agenda is not only bad for public education, it is also an immoral act that robs all Americans of their historical heritage, warts and all.








 
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3cLxQ4B23_g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:
Back
Top