Tariq Nasheed vs. Tucker Carlson 11/29

I see some people are negatively criticizing TN's appearance. If these people are Black, do you know what that means?

They're still not coded.

I could go into details, but I don't like to spend a whole lot of time writing extensive details in my post. Therefore; I will just state the gist.

The white supremacist media goes out their way to be sympathetic towards cacs who are psychopathic killers: he had a hard life; he was bullied as a youth.

TN flips the script and goes in the same angle they always go in by not immediately throwing this Black Somali under the bus: let's wait for all the facts to come out.

Yeah, we all here know that Black Somali was fucking deranged. But Tariq isn't going to violate the code and go on national television to throw another Black man under the bus - even if he is a fucking lunatic.

Black Man!

Stop being stupid!

Get with the program!

It's called a CODE of FUCKING CONDUCT!!!!

Could not agree more. Tariq did a great job being a guest on a segment that was supposed to make him look bad. He used their tactics against them. I just wish he would have brought up Dylan Roof when the whiteboy kept asking him about the guy being a terrorist. Would have loved to have seen the whiteboy's response.
 
I watched it twice and it the rewind button a few times. It was a good debate, whiteboy came out swinging but Tariq bodied his ass shortly thereafter.

I'm just waiting for all the facts to come in, cuz half the time the shit on TV is fake anyway. In the meantime, it's the cacs on Twitter that immediately started hollering BlackLivesMatter, trying to tie BLM to this Somalian dude. Tariq was responding to that. Typical cac bullshit.
Tariq turned the table by using the cac's same wording about waiting for the facts to come out. Tariq wasn't trying to debate dude, he was just there to let him know that Fox is full of shit.
 
I see some people are negatively criticizing TN's appearance. If these people are Black, do you know what that means?

They're still not coded.

I could go into details, but I don't like to spend a whole lot of time writing extensive details in my post. Therefore; I will just state the gist.

The white supremacist media goes out their way to be sympathetic towards cacs who are psychopathic killers: he had a hard life; he was bullied as a youth.

TN flips the script and goes in the same angle they always go in by not immediately throwing this Black Somali under the bus: let's wait for all the facts to come out.

Yeah, we all here know that Black Somali was fucking deranged. But Tariq isn't going to violate the code and go on national television to throw another Black man under the bus - even if he is a fucking lunatic.

Black Man!

Stop being stupid!

Get with the program!

It's called a CODE of FUCKING CONDUCT!!!!
raw
 
Suspexted is the same tho. If you're gonna do guerilla warfare go all the way guerilla. I guess this is why some in here saying not to even be in fox. But Tariq doesn't care about nine of y'all

No it's not. Proving someone to be racist is very hard, if not impossible. So you don't label someone a racist because it can lead to a weakness in your argument. As said repeatedly, it's chess not checkers.

Like right now, I suspect you're a hater of Tariq Nasheed.
 
Last edited:
This cac asked,

"Why would a white supremacist country import Africans in larger numbers and then pay for them to live here?" - Tucker Carson

3:48 mark
Damn it got to be for them to be programmed by so called higher education. I was in prison with a black from Uganda that was an exchange student. The brother is so black he is blue almost. But he hates whites with a passion. When you have lived off of praying day and night to break free from white supremacy it can change you. Especially when you know the truth and are forced to live a lie.
We as blacks that have wakened up some are like the ones in Africa that they have gotten rid of already.
 
I see some people are negatively criticizing TN's appearance. If these people are Black, do you know what that means?

They're still not coded.

I could go into details, but I don't like to spend a whole lot of time writing extensive details in my post. Therefore; I will just state the gist.

The white supremacist media goes out their way to be sympathetic towards cacs who are psychopathic killers: he had a hard life; he was bullied as a youth.

TN flips the script and goes in the same angle they always go in by not immediately throwing this Black Somali under the bus: let's wait for all the facts to come out.

Yeah, we all here know that Black Somali was fucking deranged. But Tariq isn't going to violate the code and go on national television to throw another Black man under the bus - even if he is a fucking lunatic.

Black Man!

Stop being stupid!

Get with the program!

It's called a CODE of FUCKING CONDUCT!!!!

Exactly. That's what I appreciated most about TN's appearance.

Flipping the script and giving sympathy towards the black victim of oppression.
 
I watched it twice and it the rewind button a few times. It was a good debate, whiteboy came out swinging but Tariq bodied his ass shortly thereafter.

I'm just waiting for all the facts to come in, cuz half the time the shit on TV is fake anyway. In the meantime, it's the cacs on Twitter that immediately started hollering BlackLivesMatter, trying to tie BLM to this Somalian dude. Tariq was responding to that. Typical cac bullshit.

If we're being honest, all sides wait to pounce on shit like this. SOME cacs were like :dance: when they found out it was a black guy just like SOME black folks would be like :dance: if it were a cac. It is what it is. No concern for victims, just talking points.

And people either make the talking points OR respond to them for their targeted audiences. No concern for victims on either side. SOME gun control folks are like :angry: that they couldn't eat of this one. :smh:
 
If we're being honest, all sides wait to pounce on shit like this. SOME cacs were like :dance: when they found out it was a black guy just like SOME black folks would be like :dance: if it were a cac. It is what it is. No concern for victims, just talking points.

And people either make the talking points OR respond to them for their targeted audiences. No concern for victims on either side. SOME gun control folks are like :angry: that they couldn't eat of this one. :smh:

Pouncing is white supremacy. Ever since they left the shores of Europe they've been pouncing.

And let's be further honest, death has become so normalized in media that people are now more concerned about the political agenda connected to the nature of the death. At this point you won't get everyone to stop and have a good cry every time somebody dies.

Yes, it's fucked up, but it's reality.

748089610f8b3d73ff3165f89263f795dbdd000d72737dd8c251bab155471e1d.jpg
 
I think Tariq did okay. But he's in the big league on Fox. These devils are crafty so you gotta bring your A game.

But yeah that import shit gotta make you think. When you import something its tools, assets, goods, etc so he already told you how he seems immigrants and their purpose.
 
Pouncing is white supremacy. Ever since they left the shores of Europe they've been pouncing.

And let's be further honest, death has become so normalized in media that people are now more concerned about the political agenda connected to the nature of the death. At this point you won't get everyone to stop and have a good cry every time somebody dies.

Yes, it's fucked up, but it's reality.

748089610f8b3d73ff3165f89263f795dbdd000d72737dd8c251bab155471e1d.jpg

You're right, it is political. Yeah, people die every single day, and folks try to get ahead off those deaths. Cats got to get paid every single day too. :yes: Business as usual. Hear something on the news, get that Twitter ready and just wait for information to make points and counterpoints to other opportunists making points.

Fuck anyone who takes part in that shit. A lot of scumbags trying to get paid and a lot of folks looking to get their follower count up. That's the world we live in.

This cat makes the tweet. Then gets on the show and says it's a statement, not an opinion. And then ends up calling the cop a hero all inside of two fucking minutes. :eek: He knows his target audience will skip past that and look to Tucker. He is pimping for real, and so is Tucker and the rest of the folks that get down like this.
 
Tucker is an ass an started the interview with an insult. That shouldn't have walked. But TAriq needs to increase his media views and be the foil for these bullshit shows
 
You're right, it is political. Yeah, people die every single day, and folks try to get ahead off those deaths. Cats got to get paid every single day too. :yes: Business as usual. Hear something on the news, get that Twitter ready and just wait for information to make points and counterpoints to other opportunists making points.

Fuck anyone who takes part in that shit. A lot of scumbags trying to get paid and a lot of folks looking to get their follower count up. That's the world we live in.

This cat makes the tweet. Then gets on the show and says it's a statement, not an opinion. And then ends up calling the cop a hero all inside of two fucking minutes. :eek: He knows his target audience will skip past that and look to Tucker. He is pimping for real, and so is Tucker and the rest of the folks that get down like this.

Well, I would have called the cop a hero if that shit actually went down like they say it did. Not every incident is about race. But the cacs man, they made it political. Any killing of a white police officer has a black thug, terrorist sand cac or rapist illegal narrative being attached to it by these cacs. Then Tariq points out their hypocrisy in a tweet, then here come Tucker trying to make Nasheed seem like a racist, which is typical cac behavior under a system of white supremacy.
 
Tariq shouldn't have done Fox News. There is no "win" on Fox News. All they wanted to do was show someone black with a Muslim sounding name "attacking " a white "hero" for killing a "terrorist".

For them no matter what it's win for their audience. He should subjugated his desire to appear on TV, and seen ANY appearance by blacks on Fox News for what it is: manipulation. No matter what he did or said they got a "win" for their audience.
 
Last edited:
We as a people have a long way to go. It's not about going on someone else's platform and winning a debate, it's about staying on code. That's like saying you can go to a comedy club, and out joke a comedian on stage, from the crowd. Tariq held his own and then clowned the white boy. As someone said earlier, the white boy threw some lobs that Tariq did not take advantage of, but practice makes perfect.
 
idk it's becoming zombie-ish but i guess it's human nature.

started slow, he should review the tape and get better at it.

got him towards the end and didn't feed the bullshit

missed 2 lob's - which is not me being SUPER CRITICAL OF HIM for those that don't want anyone to say anything critical at all.. just my opinion.

1 when he mentioned the guy running over the people making him a terrorist, he should have mentioned the white bitch who ran over 40 people in oklahoma and how she wasn't treated as a terrorist.
and the other was the importing of africans.
I'm with you on this kid. I immediately thought of the cac who killed those 9 people in that SC church. And thought Tariq was gonna hit with that and say he was clearly a domestic terrorist.
 
And again Fox news is for FOX NEW VIEWERS. All they wanted to do was up his face up there with a Muslim sounding name and a banner announcing he was a "BLACK LIVES MATTER" advocate (doesn't matter that he's not) and accuse him of irrationally not supporting a "hero cop" That is just what they did.

From their view point after they did that for THEIR AUDIENCE, they won. He let them do it; as far as I am concerned they played him like a fiddle. Because once they got what they wanted (him with a BLACK LIVES MATTER banner under his face ) they where DONE and they considered it a win. No argument he made mattered - getting off the zinger "suspected white supremacist" didn't matter: He got played. There is no reason EVER to appear and lend legitimacy to Fox News.

When they call you tell them : "I only do NEWS programs" and hang up. :itsawrap:
 
Wow, if I were Tariq I wouldn't go on Fox News. There's no need to discuss shit with them.

you would be surprised how many carbon rich aka melanin rich folks tune into fox, and start to believe that bullshit....

its good to have someone every now and then go on to give those people an alternative, so they can counter the racist talking points, constantly beating them upside the head...
 
but I havent been following this story, so we get a Somalian terrorist, and a white piglice officer a hero,

how is he a hero, he just pulled out his gun and shot somebody, a six year ol can do that....
 
No it's not. Proving someone to be racist is very hard, if not impossible. So you don't label someone a racist because it can lead to a weakness in your argument. As said repeatedly, it's checkers not chess.

Like right now, I suspect you're a hater of Tariq Nasheed.
Oh you don't have to suspect. I've stated very clearly, Tariq is not your friend. If there ever was an agent it would be him. I would dare say he comes from the Maulana karena school. Btw I do like Kwaanza lol


But as for calling someone "suspected" instead of calling them outright white supremacists sets up the same bullshit communication blockade. They will say "no I ain't" and he will say "yes you are" ad infinitum.


doesn't skip any steps I think his followers think it does. One thing dude is good at , is the manipulation of the English language , while on his own rants. And he's getting better at a few slick parlor tricks. I definitely wouldn't want to debate him live , cuz he misdirects w the best of em. Plus he's so damn funny, he can disarm anyone who doesn't see him coming. I liked him much better as the pimp/player guy and he still does that, so I tune in regualrly. But be gives NARE fucks about you who fancy yourselves in some Hidden colors movement. he's as fake as Farrakhan on the 80s.
 
but I havent been following this story, so we get a Somalian terrorist, and a white piglice officer a hero,

how is he a hero, he just pulled out his gun and shot somebody, a six year ol can do that....
Sheeyit you ever see a six year old deal w some kickback?
 
Oh you don't have to suspect. I've stated very clearly, Tariq is not your friend. If there ever was an agent it would be him. I would dare say he comes from the Maulana karena school. Btw I do like Kwaanza lol


But as for calling someone "suspected" instead of calling them outright white supremacists sets up the same bullshit communication blockade. They will say "no I ain't" and he will say "yes you are" ad infinitum.


doesn't skip any steps I think his followers think it does. One thing dude is good at , is the manipulation of the English language , while on his own rants. And he's getting better at a few slick parlor tricks. I definitely wouldn't want to debate him live , cuz he misdirects w the best of em. Plus he's so damn funny, he can disarm anyone who doesn't see him coming. I liked him much better as the pimp/player guy and he still does that, so I tune in regualrly. But be gives NARE fucks about you who fancy yourselves in some Hidden colors movement. he's as fake as Farrakhan on the 80s.

You can't deny that I suspect you're a hater or that a person is a white supremacist. You can reject the idea but you can't relieve my suspicion. Therefore, I can't be wrong.

As far as Tariq being fake, you're throwing out a lot of accusations. Care to share sources or is it all assumption?
 
Oh you don't have to suspect. I've stated very clearly, Tariq is not your friend. If there ever was an agent it would be him. I would dare say he comes from the Maulana karena school. Btw I do like Kwaanza lol


But as for calling someone "suspected" instead of calling them outright white supremacists sets up the same bullshit communication blockade. They will say "no I ain't" and he will say "yes you are" ad infinitum.


doesn't skip any steps I think his followers think it does. One thing dude is good at , is the manipulation of the English language , while on his own rants. And he's getting better at a few slick parlor tricks. I definitely wouldn't want to debate him live , cuz he misdirects w the best of em. Plus he's so damn funny, he can disarm anyone who doesn't see him coming. I liked him much better as the pimp/player guy and he still does that, so I tune in regualrly. But be gives NARE fucks about you who fancy yourselves in some Hidden colors movement. he's as fake as Farrakhan on the 80s.

If you still listen to Tariq like that, you know that he still engages in nigga shit.

These appearances can be the gift and the curse where one 1 minute collage of him going back and forth in hood pettiness can kill his brand and turn him off from black folk.

Imagine FOX starting off the interview with a chopped up segment with his liberal use of the words nigga and bitch. Or his not so flattering stories of how he dealt with women. Or his constant reference to bootyholes and dicksucking. Etc.

Even though he has the gift of gab, he's playing with fire. With the Cosby trial lurking, it will be interesting to see if they use him being a stanch defender of Cosby and all to the point he completely dismissed the obvious including the sworn admissions by Cos in a deposition.

There's a big difference between a few internet trolls labeling you a scumbag and a massive propaganda machine branding you one, a skill which Tariq him self has mastered ( coon train, Cristy, Boule bird ).

Or is that Tariq's grand plan?

And let's not dismiss what Tariq accomplished with Hidden Colors including giving some of our top scholars tremendous exposure while getting them paid in the process.
 
If you still listen to Tariq like that, you know that he still engages in nigga shit.

These appearances can be the gift and the curse where one 1 minute collage of him going back and forth in hood pettiness can kill his brand and turn him off from black folk.

Imagine FOX starting off the interview with a chopped up segment with his liberal use of the words nigga and bitch. Or his not so flattering stories of how he dealt with women. Or his constant reference to bootyholes and dicksucking. Etc.

Even though he has the gift of gab, he's playing with fire. With the Cosby trial lurking, it will be interesting to see if they use him being a stanch defender of Cosby and all to the point he completely dismissed the obvious including the sworn admissions by Cos in a deposition.

There's a big difference between a few internet trolls labeling you a scumbag and a massive propaganda machine branding you one, a skill which Tariq him self has mastered ( coon train, Cristy, Boule bird ).

Or is that Tariq's grand plan?

And let's not dismiss what Tariq accomplished with Hidden Colors including giving some of our top scholars tremendous exposure while getting them paid in the process.
I don't dislike Tariq. But in many aspects, he is extremely rough around the edges. What was his purpose for being on Fox News, again - to expose Tucker Carlson and Fox as racists? That's like going to a Ku Klux Klan rally with the agenda of exposing the Grand Dragon as racist to the Klan members in attendance.

They are not journalists at Fox. They're hacks and racist scum. Tariq was severely and remorselessly disrespected from Tucker Carlson's opening comment. WTF. Why was he THERE? Where is his self-esteem?
  1. Fox controls the narrative. They can and will interrupt and openly insult. They can cut him off at any time. They can go to commercial break on him. They can ruthlessly edit the segment. Then when they're through and his interview is over, they can destroy him on Fox by making him and his whole profile a "problem" that needs to be dealt with - and create all kinds of segments and panel discussions on other shows where they savage him and label him as a racist. This is what they did with Bill O'Reilly's rant equating murder with "black culture" (then Don Lemon on CNN picked up on it and co-signed). They can do all that and never let him back on the channel to defend himself.
  2. Tariq won over and "convinced" 0% of Fox's core audience.
  3. He completely missed the ball twice on the issue of America importing non-whites for financial gain by not immediately mentioning chattel slavery.
  4. Because of Tucker Carlson's constant insults and interruptions, Tariq's comments were reduced to blurted out soundbytes and half statements.
At least when Roland Martin debates racists, it's on his own show - on a Black network where Roland holds the power of control of the narrative, framing, editing, going to commercial breaks or even ending debates/interviews and kicking idiots off the show if necessary. Also (not directed at this debate), in Roland's debates he tends to be prepared with names, dates and places. People who constantly mention "receipts" do so because they have had a history of communicating via unsupported statements and unsubstantiated opinion - without receipts.

Those who have carried receipts from day one don't have a need to trumpet their ownership of them to the world.
 
Last edited:
I said in the original OSU attack post on here that everyone would get to their corners and have their hands on Twitter with talking points for their audiences. Just caring about race, religion, and weapons used. Shits already typed and they ready to hit enter. Fuck the victims. :smh:

I could only make it to the 2 minute mark of this bullshit. Tweet was stupid. Tucker is stupid. And this is the dumb shit that happens after these incidents. People trying to further their positions with their respective audiences. :eek: "it was just a statement, not my opinion" :hmm: Just stop the shit man. Wasn't this cat just teaching folks how to get pussy now he found a new hustle?

And fuck Tucker. He does the same exact shit for his target audience. Just had to call Tariq cowardly. Tweet was stupid, but that coward shit was aimed to appease his audience on FOX.

I swear people ain't shit. :smh:

So out of all the tweets on the web about the subject, faggot assed Carlson finds Tariq's the most offensive and calls him on?:rolleyes:

Clearly Tariq wanted to use the anvil sized platform of FOX for exposure because why bother with this stupid back and forth?

idk it's becoming zombie-ish but i guess it's human nature.

started slow, he should review the tape and get better at it.

got him towards the end and didn't feed the bullshit

missed 2 lob's - which is not me being SUPER CRITICAL OF HIM for those that don't want anyone to say anything critical at all.. just my opinion.

1 when he mentioned the guy running over the people making him a terrorist, he should have mentioned the white bitch who ran over 40 people in oklahoma and how she wasn't treated as a terrorist.
and the other was the importing of africans.

Could not agree more. Tariq did a great job being a guest on a segment that was supposed to make him look bad. He used their tactics against them. I just wish he would have brought up Dylan Roof when the whiteboy kept asking him about the guy being a terrorist. Would have loved to have seen the whiteboy's response.

No it's not. Proving someone to be racist is very hard, if not impossible. So you don't label someone a racist because it can lead to a weakness in your argument. As said repeatedly, it's checkers not chess.

Like right now, I suspect you're a hater of Tariq Nasheed.

If you still listen to Tariq like that, you know that he still engages in nigga shit.

These appearances can be the gift and the curse where one 1 minute collage of him going back and forth in hood pettiness can kill his brand and turn him off from black folk.

Imagine FOX starting off the interview with a chopped up segment with his liberal use of the words nigga and bitch. Or his not so flattering stories of how he dealt with women. Or his constant reference to bootyholes and dicksucking. Etc.

Even though he has the gift of gab, he's playing with fire. With the Cosby trial lurking, it will be interesting to see if they use him being a stanch defender of Cosby and all to the point he completely dismissed the obvious including the sworn admissions by Cos in a deposition.

There's a big difference between a few internet trolls labeling you a scumbag and a massive propaganda machine branding you one, a skill which Tariq him self has mastered ( coon train, Cristy, Boule bird ).

Or is that Tariq's grand plan?

And let's not dismiss what Tariq accomplished with Hidden Colors including giving some of our top scholars tremendous exposure while getting them paid in the process.

I don't dislike Tariq. But in many aspects, he is extremely rough around the edges. What was his purpose for being on Fox News, again - to expose Tucker Carlson and Fox as racists? That's like going to a Ku Klux Klan rally with the agenda of exposing the Grand Dragon as racist to the Klan members in attendance.

They are not journalists at Fox. They're hacks and racist scum. Tariq was severely and remorselessly disrespected from Tucker Carlson's opening comment. WTF. Why was he THERE? Where is his self-esteem?

  1. Fox controls the narrative. They can and will interrupt and openly insult. They can cut him off at any time. They can go to commercial break on him. They can ruthlessly edit the segment. Then when they're through and his interview is over, they can destroy him on Fox by making him and his whole profile a "problem" that needs to be dealt with - and create all kinds of segments and panel discussions on other shows where they savage him and label him as a racist. This is what they did with Bill O'Reilly's rant equating murder with "black culture" (then Don Lemon on CNN picked up on it and co-signed). They can do all that and never let him back on the channel to defend himself.
  2. Tariq won over and "convinced" 0% of Fox's core audience.
  3. He completely missed the ball twice on the issue of America importing non-whites for financial gain by not immediately mentioning chattel slavery.
  4. Because of Tucker Carlson's constant insults and interruptions, Tariq's comments were reduced to blurted out soundbytes and half statements.
At least when Roland Martin debates racists, it's on his own show - on a Black network where Roland holds the power of control of the narrative, framing, editing, going to commercial breaks or even ending debates/interviews and kicking idiots off the show if necessary. Also (not directed at this debate), in Roland's debates he tends to be prepared with names, dates and places. People who constantly mention "receipts" do so because they have had a history of communicating via unsupported statements and unsubstantiated opinion - without receipts.
Those who have carried receipts from day one don't have a need to trumpet their ownership of them to the world
.

IMOSES, U GET IT !
 
Back
Top