Take That Bill O'Reilly: Franken To Be Declared Senate Victor In Minnesota!

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
Bill O'Reilly, Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch will be burning up over this! :lol:

franken-0343.jpg

source: Huffington Post

MINNEAPOLIS — The state Canvassing Board was poised to certify the results of the recount in Minnesota's grueling Senate election in Al Franken's favor _ but that doesn't mean the race is definitely over.

The board was to meet Monday and was expected to declare which candidate received the most overall votes from nearly 3 million ballots cast. The latest numbers showed Franken, a Democrat, with a 225-vote lead over Republican Sen. Norm Coleman, who led Franken on election night.

But after the announcement, there will be a seven-day waiting period before an election certificate is completed. If any lawsuits are filed during that waiting period, certification is conditional until the issue is settled in court.

Lawyers for both campaigns have laid the groundwork for lawsuits through public comments and legal maneuvering. In recent weeks, as Franken clung to a small lead, Coleman's lawyers promised a lawsuit over their claim that some ballots duplicated on election night wound up being counted twice in the recount.

The Coleman campaign also has a petition pending before the state Supreme Court to include 650 ballots that it says were improperly rejected but not forwarded by local officials to St. Paul for counting.

The court has not said when it would rule in that case.

New York Sen. Charles Schumer, who until recently was the head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said Sunday that Franken had won the election.

"While there are still possible legal issues that will run their course, there is no longer any doubt who will be the next Senator from Minnesota," Schumer said. "With the Senate set to begin meeting on Tuesday to address the important issues facing the nation, it is crucial that Minnesota's seat not remain empty, and I hope this process will resolve itself as soon as possible."

Sen. John Cornyn, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, called Schumer's comments premature and troubling, since Schumer is the new chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, which has jurisdiction over contested elections.

"Senator Schumer will likely play a key role in determining who ultimately assumes this Senate seat," Cornyn said. "Pre-judging the outcome while litigation is still pending calls into question his ability to impartially preside over this matter when it comes before the Committee, as it most certainly will."

Coleman's term as senator officially expired Saturday.

Senate Republican leaders have said the chamber shouldn't seat Franken until all legal matters are settled, even if that drags on for months.

Franken campaign spokesman Andy Barr said in an e-mail Sunday: "In terms of future planning, we're taking it one step at a time. The next step is the canvass board's meeting tomorrow, where we have every expectation they will declare that Al won the election."
 
Why let the people decide when you have committees?

source: StarTribune.com

Senate recount: Franken's on top; Coleman to sue

By PAT DOYLE and PATRICIA LOPEZ , Star Tribune

Last update: January 5, 2009 - 5:36 PM

The state Canvassing Board certified final results this afternoon in Minnesota's marathon U.S. Senate race, but that won't end the battle between Democrat Al Franken and Republican Norm Coleman, whose Senate term ended on Saturday.

Moments after the board certified that Franken had eked out 225 more votes than Coleman, attorneys for Coleman said they would file a lawsuit within 24 hours.

Minnesota law prohibits the state from issuing a certificate of election until such a court case is resolved, which, as of today, leaves Minnesota with a single senator as Congress prepares to convene Tuesday and embark on a fast run of massive legislation to deal with the nation's financial meltdown.

Coleman forces said they were mindful of the consequences of a prolonged election contest, but said that the results were "invalid and unreliable."

Secretary of State Mark Ritchie was careful to note that the board's action did not declare Franken the winner but certified the final tally of a recount that has gone on for more than six weeks.

"This process isn't at the end," said Coleman attorney Tony Trimble. "It is now just at the beginning."

While the Coleman campaign takes issue with several aspects of the recount, key to its case is what the campaign views as disparate treatment of rejected absentee ballots in varying counties, along with votes for Franken that the GOP side insists were "double-counted." The campaign contends this happened in cases when duplicate ballots were made for originals that couldn't be machine-counted.

"There can be no recount that is accurate or valid when 654 potentially valid absentee votes remain disenfranchised and when some votes are counted twice," Trimble said. Despite earlier praise for the work of the Canvassing Board, Trimble said today that "there can be no confidence in the current results of the United States recount."
 
I find it so interesting that there has been little support or commentary from the DNC. Also amazing that this is STILL dragging on.
 
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/Aen7OY6cTvQ[/FLASH]

:lol::lol:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OLh_rdjf7d4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OLh_rdjf7d4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fpOSgT-osHk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fpOSgT-osHk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

A LIAR?
 
source: Politico

GOP dead set against 59th Dem

By MANU RAJU | 2/14/09 6:03 PM EST

Having just seen what President Barack Obama can do with 58 Democrats in the Senate, Republicans are more determined than ever to keep him from getting a 59th.

Especially if the 59th is Al Franken.

Franken, the former comedian, leads Republican Norm Coleman by 225 votes in a “Groundhog Day” of an election that dawned more than three months ago and shows no signs of ending soon.

Which is exactly how Senate Republicans want it. The National Republican Senatorial Committee held a ritzy fundraiser for Coleman in Washington this week, helping him raise the money he needs to keep his legal challenges alive through a trial and then a lengthy legal process if he loses.

How long should Coleman hold out?

“However long it takes,” says Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who chairs the NRSC.

“I encourage him to see it through the end,” Cornyn said Thursday. “He feels like he owes it to the voters of Minnesota and his colleagues here. He realizes how important retaining that seat is to us.”

The Democrats know how important the seat is — and they accuse the GOP of prolonging Coleman’s legal fight just to keep it empty.

“It’s clear that national Republicans see the vacancy in Minnesota as one of the few arrows in their quiver to obstruct Democrats in the Senate from getting real change passed,” said Eric Schultz, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

With 58 Democrats in the Senate — technically 56, plus Independents Joe Lieberman and Bernie Sanders — Obama was able to push through a $787 billion economic recovery plan by picking up just three Republican votes: Sens. Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter. With Ted Kennedy unable to vote because of his health issues, he needed all three of them.

If Franken becomes the 59th senator to caucus with the Democrats, the GOP knows that Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will be able to railroad legislation through the Senate by picking off a single Republican moderate.

So while Coleman’s gone — having neither won nor lost yet, he can’t return to his old seat and has been booted from his Capitol Hill office — his friends in the party are doing everything they can to keep him in the game. At this week’s NRSC fundraiser, PAC hosts paid $5,000 each; individual hosts had to pony up $2,300 apiece, and attendees paid between $500 and $1,000 to attend.

Republicans turned out in force. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has already maxed out to Coleman’s effort, giving $10,000 from his PAC, including $5,000 at the fundraiser – and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) has given the maximum as well, according to a source familiar with the fundraiser.

Other Republican senators who contributed the $10,000 maximum limit include Mike Crapo of Idaho, Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the third-highest ranking Republican in the Senate. Republican Sens. James Inhofe of Oklahoma and Charles Grassley of Iowa each contributed $5,000, while Collins chipped in another $2,000 and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska donated $1,000, the person said.

Cornyn said Coleman said Coleman has raised $5 million since election day – and that even that isn’t enough.

Republicans insist that they’re simply helping a colleague fight to make sure that all the votes are counted.

Franken has been taking steps — mocked by the GOP — to make it look like his victory is in hand. He discussed potential committee assignments with Reid and repeatedly made the rounds in Washington, where he was this week for policy briefings and meetings with current and former Senate staffers.

Reid has said definitively that Coleman will “never, ever” serve in the Senate again. But he said earlier this week that he will wait until the trial ends to decide whether the Senate should use its constitutional authority to seat Franken.

That’s probably a moot point. The GOP has promised to mount a filibuster — which would require 60 votes to overcome — if Democrats attempt to seat Franken before Coleman exhausts his legal remedies.

Democrat Amy Klobuchar also is eager for it to end. Being the lone Minnesota has been a “challenge,” she told Politico, saying her home-state office has been flooded with phone calls and said her staff has seen its casework double in size.

“Every day I say it will be resolved in a month — then the day changes and I say the same thing,” Klobuchar said.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Rules and Administration Committee that would oversee a dispute in the Minnesota Senate race, expressed confidence that Franken would win the case within a month.

“I would doubt anything is going to change,” Schumer said. “I’d say the odds are very, very, very high that Franken is the winner.”

Schumer wouldn’t say what Democrats would do if Coleman loses then appeals, saying “he’s been appealing and appealing and appealing.”
 
source: Boston Herald

Franken tries to pare Coleman list in Minn. case

By Associated Press
Tuesday, February 24, 2009

ST. PAUL, Minn. — One by one, Democrat Al Franken’s attorneys cast doubt todayover the viability of uncounted absentee ballots that Republican Norm Coleman wants included in the Minnesota Senate race tally.

The methodical push against potential Coleman votes underscores the narrow gap separating the two candidates. Franken entered the election trial, now in its fifth week, 225 votes ahead.

Three judges presiding over Coleman’s lawsuit were left to ponder a critical question: Does someone become registered when they submit a voter form or on the date their active voter status is reflected in a statewide voter database?

Franken lawyer David Lillehaug worked to show that nearly 80 ballots that Coleman believes should count were properly rejected. All were initially declined because the voter’s witness was deemed unqualified.

Under Minnesota law, absentee ballots must be signed by a witness, who, among other things, verifies the voter got a blank ballot. The witness must be a registered voter as well.

In almost every case, Lillehaug got Minnesota elections director Gary Poser to conclude that the witness’ registration wasn’t in effect at the time of the signature on a fellow voter’s ballot.

Therefore, Poser told the court, the ballot was properly rejected.

Most of the ballots in question were from solidly Republican Carver County, which the Coleman campaign has said had one of the more unforgiving approaches to absentee ballot mistakes.

Coleman’s list of rejected absentee ballots that he’s trying to include has shrunk throughout the trial, and now hovers around 2,000. Franken’s move was aimed at reducing it more; meanwhile, the Democrat is pushing to add 1,600 sealed absentee ballots.

While the judges stressed the importance of the witness requirement in an earlier ruling, they didn’t entirely settle the matter raised Tuesday. They must still decide whether witnesses can fulfill their obligation by certifying their registration on or before Election Day.

Franken’s lead lawyer, Marc Elias, said Minnesota law places a stiff burden on absentee voters.

"Minnesota gets the right to set the rules for absentee balloting and they have set a high bar as this court has recognized in several rulings," he told reporters during a court recess. "The Supreme Court has said previously that absentee voting is a privilege and is not a right, and if you want to engage in that privilege you have to clear all these hurdles."

Coleman attorney Ben Ginsberg argued for leniency. He pointed out that most local elections offices don’t bother to verify the registration status of witnesses. Minneapolis, he noted, didn’t reject a single ballot for an unqualified witness.

"If those votes are not legal, there are thousands of illegal votes in the current count," Ginsberg said outside the courtoom after Lillehaug’s examination of Poser. "If those votes are not included, then different standards for precisely the same ballot were used in different jurisdictions. Both are fatal infirmities if you want the people of Minnesota to have faith in this election."

In court, Coleman lawyer Joe Friedberg elicited testimony from Beltrami County Auditor-Treasurer Kay Mack that drove home the judges’ dilemma. Mack’s staff researches the registration status of absentee voters and their witnesses. She said the county allows ballots if the witness is registered when the status check is done — even if that effective date is after the voter actually signs the ballot.

"Just as long as when you check they are a registered voter, that’s sufficient?" Friedberg asked.

"Correct," Mack answered.

Meanwhile Tuesday, 30 voters petitioned the state Supreme Court in hopes of getting their previously rejected absentee ballots counted. They are represented by an attorney that helped other Franken supporters get their ballots into the mix.
 
source: New York Times

Franken Had Most Votes, Court Says

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: April 13, 2009
ST. PAUL (AP) — A special Minnesota panel of three judges from three separate courts has ruled that Al Franken, a Democrat, won the most votes in his 2008 Senate race against an incumbent Republican, Norm Coleman.

The ruling on Monday is not expected to be the final word in the case because Mr. Coleman previously announced plans to appeal to the State Supreme Court. He has 10 days to do so.

That appeal could mean a delay of several more weeks in seating Minnesota’s second senator.

After a statewide recount and a seven-week trial, Mr. Franken is 312 votes ahead. He gained more votes from the election challenge than Mr. Coleman, the candidate who filed it.

The state law Mr. Coleman sued under merely required three judges to determine who got the most votes and is therefore entitled to an election certificate. That certificate is being held up pending appeal.
 
source: TPM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CijP19XIV5Y&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CijP19XIV5Y&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>​

Pawlenty: I'll Certify Franken's Election -- If There's No Order Against It From A Federal Court

By Eric Kleefeld - June 3, 2009, 5:22PM

This is the sort of thing that gets people wondering whether Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) will actually sign a certificate of election for Al Franken -- as he's said he would do -- once the Minnesota Supreme Court hands down its expected ruling in Al's favor.

Pawlenty appeared this afternoon on the Neil Cavuto show, and Cavuto observed that Pawlenty's decision to not run for a third term, which many people see as a possible lead-up to a presidential campaign in 2012, also frees him up to fight for Norm Coleman. Pawlenty denied that he would behave in such a manner -- but he did point out some possible circumstances that could hold things up further

"So you could be signing a certificate that would turn that Senate seat over to the Democrat Al Franken?" Cavuto asked. "And that would probably not suit you well."

"Well, I hope not, but you know I have to follow the law," Pawlenty responded. "You know, Neil, if the Minnesota Supreme Court says, 'You sign the certificate' -- and there's not an appeal or some other contrary direction from a federal court -- you know, that's my duty."

The big question here on everyone's minds, when Pawlenty brings up the possibility of a federal court intervening to stop a Franken certification -- which the national GOP leadership has openly called for doing -- is what exactly he might mean by this. Is he playing a sort of wink-wink, nudge-nudge, and subtly asking for this to occur? Or is he simply saying he'll follow the law however it works out, and then innocently listing all the possible permutations?
 
source: Huffington Post

Minnesota Decision: Al Franken Won, Supreme Court Says

ST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state's long-running Senate race.

The high court rejected a legal challenge from Republican Norm Coleman, whose options for regaining the Senate seat are dwindling.

Justices said Franken is entitled to the election certificate he needs to assume office. With Franken and the usual backing of two independents, Democrats will have a big enough majority to overcome Republican filibusters.

Coleman hasn't ruled out seeking federal court intervention.

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said the earliest Franken would be seated is next week because the Senate is out of session for the July 4th holiday.

Coleman's appeal hinged largely on whether thousands of absentee votes had been unfairly rejected by local election officials around the state.

The unanimous court wrote that "because the legislature established absentee voting as an optional method of voting, voters choosing to use that method are required to comply with the statutory provisions."

They went on to say that "because strict compliance with the statutory requirements for absentee voting is, and always has been required, there is no basis on which voters could have reasonably believed that anything less than strict compliance would suffice."
 
Back
Top