What’s the reasoning
States warn SNAP benefits may stop in November if government shutdown continues
- Thread starter Mask
- Start date
there wasnt a reason. i've had no accidents, no tickets. i've only had the policy 2 months.
Now all of a sudden they wanna increase the policy by $400 a month? Nah....aint happening.
I called them to cancel the policy....and they were like...."there's a $26 cancellation fee".
Like a give a fuck. I'd rather pay that $26 to cancel than an extra $400 to stay with u mufuckas.
Then i just signed up online with Geico and got full coverage for both vehicles for $244 a month.
I guess i got a taste of what people are about to experience with their Obamacare in a few months.
Them fucks acting like insurance is a product that’s being imported and is affected by tariffs
I guess a lot of people getting their car repo'd is shrinking the pool btw who is the carrier?
Sounds like State Farm or AllState.
A $395 jump is crazy
Kemper
Federal judge orders Trump administration to pay SNAP benefits out of contingency fund
The ruling came one day before funding for SNAP, more commonly known as food stamps, was set to lapse.A Rhode Island federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. Department of Agriculture to distribute money owed to recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program "as soon as possible," just one day before funding for SNAP was set to lapse.
U.S District Judge John McConnell's ruling from the bench came shortly after another federal judge in a separate case said that the Trump administration's plan not to pay out SNAP benefits beginning on Nov. 1 due to the ongoing federal government shutdown was "unlawful" but stopped short of ordering the Trump administration to disperse funds.
Ruling in favor of a group of cities and community organizations that sued over the cuts, McConnell said that the USDA must fund SNAP using money in a contingency fund. But, he added that if the department finds that the money in the contingency fund is insufficient, then the agency must use other funding sources to make those payments.
“There is no doubt that the six billion dollars in contingency funds are appropriated funds that are without a doubt necessary to carry out the program’s operation,” McConnell said in his oral ruling. “The shutdown of the government through funding doesn’t do away with SNAP. It just does away with the funding of it. There could be no greater necessity than the prohibition across the board of funds for the program’s operations.”
McConnell added, “there is no doubt, and it is beyond argument, that irreparable harm will begin to occur if it hasn’t already occurred in the terror it has caused some people about the availability of funding for food for their family."
McConnell addressed the Trump administration's argument that contingency funds might be needed for other reasons in the near future, like in the aftermath of a hypothetical hurricane.
"It’s clear that when compared to the millions of people that will go without funds for food versus the agency’s desire not to use contingency funds in case there’s a hurricane need, the balances of those equities clearly goes on the side of ensuring that people are fed,” the judge said.
CONTINUED:
Federal judge orders Trump administration to pay SNAP benefits out of contingency fund
The ruling came one day before funding for SNAP, more commonly known as food stamps, was set to lapse.
www.nbcnews.com
Federal judge orders Trump administration to pay SNAP benefits out of contingency fund
The ruling came one day before funding for SNAP, more commonly known as food stamps, was set to lapse.
www.nbcnews.com
Similar threads
