Sooooooooo found out I'm white (ancestry DNA results)

As some of you know, I've been searching through my ancestry for several months now.

I would tell everyone to not really trust the DNA results unless the person they are comparing you to is alive and in the data base. It's really common for Ancestry.com to tell people that, "You are connected to Henry the Eighth, and Alexander the Great"...etc, yet your DNA says that you're 78% Ghanaian, 6% Malawian and the rest Scottish.

When doing your ancestry focus on the records, that's where the accuracy will be (it's more work though). Most minorities will hit a wall around the 1800s. If you are white or part white, you can go all the way back to the 1600s or further, because white folks kept birth records. American Indians didn't keep records of births (they had an oral tradition). And, most African nations at that time didn't keep records either (again, the oral tradition).

In my case, I found a white slave owner named John Mims (born in 1803). He's my GGGGG-Grandfather. His records go back to the 15th century, and so does his white wife. But, his wife isn't kin to me. My line comes through him and a woman who's not named. It just say's "Enslaved."

So, I contacted several people who share common ancestor with me. And a woman from Oklahoma responded. She said that at one time, he was one of the largest land owners in Freestone, Texas and that he was a slave owner. And that the enslaved woman was a Comanche Indian.

So, that means we are Black (through Virginia and North Carolina {African Slave Trade}), Choctaw (through Louisiana), Comanche (through Texas), Apache (through Texas), and European (English and French). Which means I'm a mongrel.

You can figure all of that out through the "Paper Trail;" versus, you paying for the DNA and they tell you that you are a descendant of King David by way of Cleopatra. The only one I know who has a wide ranging ancestry line is Genghis Khan. Most of China and Mongolia can trace themselves back to him in some form or fashion, because of his many wive and children through conquest.
 
That's the thing with allot of areas. It takes other family members to update the records or whatever they use(database?). Like I said, pops used a different one and I guess other family members did some tracing with family/hospital records

my brother did some research awhile back, I been meaning to ask about ..... but I'm blackity black black, last name still 100% French ..... and a lot of my relatives can pass .....
 
As some of you know, I've been searching through my ancestry for several months now.

I would tell everyone to not really trust the DNA results unless the person they are comparing you to is alive and in the data base. It's really common for Ancestry.com to tell people that, "You are connected to Henry the Eighth, and Alexander the Great"...etc, yet your DNA says that you're 78% Ghanaian, 6% Malawian and the rest Scottish.

When doing your ancestry focus on the records, that's where the accuracy will be (it's more work though). Most minorities will hit a wall around the 1800s. If you are white or part white, you can go all the way back to the 1600s or further, because white folks kept birth records. American Indians didn't keep records of births (they had an oral tradition). And, most African nations at that time didn't keep records either (again, the oral tradition).

In my case, I found a white slave owner named John Mims (born in 1803). He's my GGGGG-Grandfather. His records go back to the 15th century, and so does his white wife. But, his wife isn't kin to me. My line comes through him and a woman who's not named. It just say's "Enslaved."

So, I contacted several people who share common ancestor with me. And a woman from Oklahoma responded. She said that at one time, he was one of the largest land owners in Freestone, Texas and that he was a slave owner. And that the enslaved woman was a Comanche Indian.

So, that means we are Black (through Virginia and North Carolina {African Slave Trade}), Choctaw (through Louisiana), Comanche (through Texas), Apache (through Texas), and European (English and French). Which means I'm a mongrel.

You can figure all of that out through the "Paper Trail;" versus, you paying for the DNA and they tell you that you are a descendant of King David by way of Cleopatra. The only one I know who has a wide ranging ancestry line is Genghis Khan. Most of China and Mongolia can trace themselves back to him in some form or fashion, because of his many wive and children through conquest.
Also, there's some software called: Ancestral Quest. It can help you keep track of the people that you place in your family tree.

I hear ya, but @nawlinsn931is white and not invited to the cookout

the-office-walk-away.gif


:lol:
 
As some of you know, I've been searching through my ancestry for several months now.

I would tell everyone to not really trust the DNA results unless the person they are comparing you to is alive and in the data base. It's really common for Ancestry.com to tell people that, "You are connected to Henry the Eighth, and Alexander the Great"...etc, yet your DNA says that you're 78% Ghanaian, 6% Malawian and the rest Scottish.

When doing your ancestry focus on the records, that's where the accuracy will be (it's more work though). Most minorities will hit a wall around the 1800s. If you are white or part white, you can go all the way back to the 1600s or further, because white folks kept birth records. American Indians didn't keep records of births (they had an oral tradition). And, most African nations at that time didn't keep records either (again, the oral tradition).

In my case, I found a white slave owner named John Mims (born in 1803). He's my GGGGG-Grandfather. His records go back to the 15th century, and so does his white wife. But, his wife isn't kin to me. My line comes through him and a woman who's not named. It just say's "Enslaved."

So, I contacted several people who share common ancestor with me. And a woman from Oklahoma responded. She said that at one time, he was one of the largest land owners in Freestone, Texas and that he was a slave owner. And that the enslaved woman was a Comanche Indian.

So, that means we are Black (through Virginia and North Carolina {African Slave Trade}), Choctaw (through Louisiana), Comanche (through Texas), Apache (through Texas), and European (English and French). Which means I'm a mongrel.

You can figure all of that out through the "Paper Trail;" versus, you paying for the DNA and they tell you that you are a descendant of King David by way of Cleopatra. The only one I know who has a wide ranging ancestry line is Genghis Khan. Most of China and Mongolia can trace themselves back to him in some form or fashion, because of his many wive and children through conquest.
Bruh that's what happened on my end. I'm not gone post my people on a porn board but yep white as hell from France. I didn't get that related to king such and such link. There's photos so we know it's correct but once it goes back to France that's where it ends.
 
Well don't bring food. If you want to bring anything just bring napkins, because we don't want your would famous green bean casserole.

5Lw.gif
Just for that y'all finna get this soggy nasty ass bread puddin and I'm starting the electric slide
 
ancestry DNA results and some other family history (come to find out 46% from Nigeria and Benin) some of my earliest ancestors are from France on pop's side. My great great great great great grandparents white as Elon. They helped build Louisiana coming straight from France (others were from Jamaica and Panama) so with that being said
:

Last names were St Martin and then changed to Martin. We're still getting results about the island side of the family. Moms side stops with Native American in Miss and then shoots to Nigeria as well.

Sorry for your loss.

Welcome to the FBI and law enforcement databases.
 
Last edited:
ancestry DNA results and some other family history (come to find out 46% from Nigeria and Benin) some of my earliest ancestors are from France on pop's side. My great great great great great grandparents white as Elon. They helped build Louisiana coming straight from France (others were from Jamaica and Panama) so with that being said
:

Last names were St Martin and then changed to Martin. We're still getting results about the island side of the family. Moms side stops with Native American in Miss and then shoots to Nigeria as well.


You do know the original European as well

As Asians all real kniggas

Caucazoids have no home they not even. Aryan or Caucasian bruh
 
You do know the original European as well

As Asians all real kniggas

Caucazoids have no home they not even. Aryan or Caucasian bruh
It's funny because the Aryan idiots(brotherhood, etc) don't realize that their "superior race" is not blond hair blue eyed but brown skinned Turks. Same with the real Dracula
 
That's actually nothing new. It's how sometimes fathers can take the rap for their sons
 
It's funny because the Aryan idiots(brotherhood, etc) don't realize that their "superior race" is not blond hair blue eyed but brown skinned Turks. Same with the real Dracula

Man listen.. that rabbit hole is deep as fuck.... abraham lincoln was a fuckin dark skinned mullato,

so dark in complexion.. his haters called him Abraham africanus or someshit like that....

when you start to uncover hidden history, as a REAL KNIGGA bruh you gonna get to a point like..

NO FUCKIN WAAAAY.. and when that happens nobody would ever fool you again..

there are No such things as pale face americans the only americans are

the Brown, reddish copper toned.. we are Organic Americans,

that african american shit is mind fuckery to steal our land from us!!!!

everytime a paleface calls himself american.

He is stealing OUR BIRTHRIGHT.

paleface could never be american, thats why they had five dollar indians,

and indian LEGALLY is another term for NEGRO/NI^^ER

NOT fucking MONGOLOID.. the so called indians were the so called african american

who are

THE ORGANIC AMERICANS... bruh once we claim that.. nobody could fuck with us..

that african american bullshit.,

a racist piece of chicken shit from south africa could come here, and call himself a fuckin

african american thats how cheap it is..

But an ORGANIC AMERICAN not enough MINDFUCKERY in the WORLD could make pale face

Organic ANY fuckin THING!!!!

dont get me started!!!
 
Man listen.. that rabbit hole is deep as fuck.... abraham lincoln was a fuckin dark skinned mullato,

so dark in complexion.. his haters called him Abraham africanus or someshit like that....

when you start to uncover hidden history, as a REAL KNIGGA bruh you gonna get to a point like..

NO FUCKIN WAAAAY.. and when that happens nobody would ever fool you again..

there are No such things as pale face americans the only americans are

the Brown, reddish copper toned.. we are Organic Americans,

that african american shit is mind fuckery to steal our land from us!!!!

everytime a paleface calls himself american.

He is stealing OUR BIRTHRIGHT.

paleface could never be american, thats why they had five dollar indians,

and indian LEGALLY is another term for NEGRO/NI^^ER

NOT fucking MONGOLOID.. the so called indians were the so called african american

who are

THE ORGANIC AMERICANS... bruh once we claim that.. nobody could fuck with us..

that african american bullshit.,

a racist piece of chicken shit from south africa could come here, and call himself a fuckin

african american thats how cheap it is..

But an ORGANIC AMERICAN not enough MINDFUCKERY in the WORLD could make pale face

Organic ANY fuckin THING!!!!

dont get me started!!!
If people only knew Jessie Jackson started that shit (African American) in the 80s
 
If people only knew Jessie Jackson started that shit (African American) in the 80s

jesse jackson shouldve been called JUDAS jackson, but you want to know the truth..

Jesse is really a gangsta bruh, he just used us and his gangsta

for himself,

jesse was bogarting the fuck out them wallstreet cacs,

they wanted NO smoke with jesse..

but jesse said fuck the people.. I want that bag...

and was punkin them cacs, fo self..

so fuck jesse fo that fo life,

he couldve really made a difference...all he cared about with his son which

is fine, but not at OUR expense...

well karma

got him and Ill leave it at that..
 
As some of you know, I've been searching through my ancestry for several months now.

I would tell everyone to not really trust the DNA results unless the person they are comparing you to is alive and in the data base. It's really common for Ancestry.com to tell people that, "You are connected to Henry the Eighth, and Alexander the Great"...etc, yet your DNA says that you're 78% Ghanaian, 6% Malawian and the rest Scottish.

When doing your ancestry focus on the records, that's where the accuracy will be (it's more work though). Most minorities will hit a wall around the 1800s. If you are white or part white, you can go all the way back to the 1600s or further, because white folks kept birth records. American Indians didn't keep records of births (they had an oral tradition). And, most African nations at that time didn't keep records either (again, the oral tradition).

In my case, I found a white slave owner named John Mims (born in 1803). He's my GGGGG-Grandfather. His records go back to the 15th century, and so does his white wife. But, his wife isn't kin to me. My line comes through him and a woman who's not named. It just say's "Enslaved."

So, I contacted several people who share common ancestor with me. And a woman from Oklahoma responded. She said that at one time, he was one of the largest land owners in Freestone, Texas and that he was a slave owner. And that the enslaved woman was a Comanche Indian.

So, that means we are Black (through Virginia and North Carolina {African Slave Trade}), Choctaw (through Louisiana), Comanche (through Texas), Apache (through Texas), and European (English and French). Which means I'm a mongrel.

You can figure all of that out through the "Paper Trail;" versus, you paying for the DNA and they tell you that you are a descendant of King David by way of Cleopatra. The only one I know who has a wide ranging ancestry line is Genghis Khan. Most of China and Mongolia can trace themselves back to him in some form or fashion, because of his many wive and children through conquest.

This.

They ain’t doing shit with your DNA but entering into a data base.

These DNA companies were founded by the Church of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) for them to easily complete their data bases (And make money). They have this thing of doing “Baptism’s” for every human being on Earth.

The Jews, Muslims and other religious groups including the Catholic Church has gotten on them about doing their baptism’s without their permission or authority.

It surprises me on how many Black folks are willing to submit their DNA samples to these companies, but refuse to take the Covid vaccine talking about the Tuskegee Experiment or some other conspiracy theory.
 
This.

They ain’t doing shit with your DNA but entering into a data base.

These DNA companies were founded by the Church of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) for them to easily complete their data bases (And make money). They have this thing of doing “Baptism’s” for every human being on Earth.

The Jews, Muslims and other religious groups including the Catholic Church has gotten on them about doing their baptism’s without their permission or authority.

It surprises me on how many Black folks are willing to submit their DNA samples to these companies, but refuse to take the Covid vaccine talking about the Tuskegee Experiment or some other conspiracy theory.
You don't believe the Tuskegee experiment happened?
 
Back
Top