Something tells me they do not have enough votes for the supreme court nominee

So what is he was guilty of targeting black seniors and assaulting them with his HS buddies.

Should that be ignored because it was so long ago ? I mean he was a teenager right ?

What if he burned crosses on black families lawns because they moved on his block when he was a teenager ?

All im saying is that, an allegation should not derail someone without concrete proof or at least being confirmed by others. Is this something that has been reported in the past? Or this is the first time it has been mentioned?
 
Back
Top