So far Clinton wins NH with 39%, Obama at 37%
- Thread starter femmenoire
- Start date
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
This is one of those times where a breath of fresh air is seriously needed. Hillary been playing politic shake-n-bake so long she don't know which way is up.
Obama has fewer (hopefully) allegiances and favors he's going to have to repay.
I think that alone is enough for me, even if I didn't really agree with most of his agenda.
This is one of those times where a breath of fresh air is seriously needed. Hillary been playing politic shake-n-bake so long she don't know which way is up.
Obama has fewer (hopefully) allegiances and favors he's going to have to repay.
I think that alone is enough for me, even if I didn't really agree with most of his agenda.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
i'm sure it will be when obama wins..
You cant fuck my day up up
i'm sure it will be when obama wins..
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
I highly doubt Obama is going to be next president. After all the supposed crooked shit that took place in this country, expecting the first black man to be a president of the USA, I really don't see it. Hillary would be even worse I think.
I highly doubt Obama is going to be next president. After all the supposed crooked shit that took place in this country, expecting the first black man to be a president of the USA, I really don't see it. Hillary would be even worse I think.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
The dems have NOT called NH yet. Obama has gained another percentage point while Hillary is still holding steading. Things can change very quickly for hill...
The dems have NOT called NH yet. Obama has gained another percentage point while Hillary is still holding steading. Things can change very quickly for hill...
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
True scratch that 1 - 1 comment.
The dems have NOT called NH yet. Obama has gained another percentage point while Hillary is still holding steading. Things can change very quickly for hill...
True scratch that 1 - 1 comment.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
You right man.. kinda like it's fucked up that people are voting for Hillary because she's a woman or her husband was the president.
You right man.. kinda like it's fucked up that people are voting for Hillary because she's a woman or her husband was the president.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
The polls were bullshit ploys by the media
CNN and most of these networks obviously want Hillary to win
Some people in NH figured Obama would win handily and probably didn't even bother going out to vote
WTF is up with this shit.. Fuck them polls that were predicting a double digit victory for Obama
Still 47% and its not over until its over...
The polls were bullshit ploys by the media
CNN and most of these networks obviously want Hillary to win
Some people in NH figured Obama would win handily and probably didn't even bother going out to vote
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
Folks don't get sad or mad if obama loses to Hilary in NH. The race is not over. It mean's that he's in a race. It makes the score 1-1.
Folks don't get sad or mad if obama loses to Hilary in NH. The race is not over. It mean's that he's in a race. It makes the score 1-1.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
Seriously
The same self defeatist kneegrows that were doing everything to downplay Obama's win in Iowa are now quick to dig his grave and say it's already over for him
Seriously
The same self defeatist kneegrows that were doing everything to downplay Obama's win in Iowa are now quick to dig his grave and say it's already over for him
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
I would hire her
if that ass is fat
she can bend over and install my memory
thats bullshit and you know it
I would hire her
if that ass is fat
she can bend over and install my memory
Re: So far Clinton leads with 39%, Obama at 37%
women were polled before and after that event...there was an 8 point jump in women who said they would vote for Hillary after that crying event
women were polled before and after that event...there was an 8 point jump in women who said they would vote for Hillary after that crying event
Re: So far Clinton leads with 39%, Obama at 37%
women were polled before and after that event...there was an 8 point jump in women who said they would vote for Hillary after that crying event
women were polled before and after that event...there was an 8 point jump in women who said they would vote for Hillary after that crying event
Re: So far Clinton leads with 39%, Obama at 37%
broads stick together
I told y'all
women were polled before and after that event...there was an 8 point jump in women who said they would vote for Hillary after that crying event
broads stick together
I told y'all
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
It' will interesting to see how Hillary supporters rationalize this. They know she has too much baggage to win against John McCain. If McCain wins we'll be in Iraq for 30yrs. They still voted for her knowing McCain will allow citizenship to Immigrants. In essence they voted to hand the White House and their future over to a republican than vote for a Black man. smh
It' will interesting to see how Hillary supporters rationalize this. They know she has too much baggage to win against John McCain. If McCain wins we'll be in Iraq for 30yrs. They still voted for her knowing McCain will allow citizenship to Immigrants. In essence they voted to hand the White House and their future over to a republican than vote for a Black man. smh
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
The only problem is that it in Hillary's case she has:
1-been politically active for the greater part of her life
2-did at least try to be an active first lady (to whatever degree of credence one chooses to assign it)
3-has served successfully for 2 terms in the U.S. Senate
4-traveled the globe extensively on the peripheral towards the goal of diplomacy (again to whatever degree of credence one chooses to assign)
The point is she has as much experience as anyone her age should be expected to have when seeking a role of this nature (aside from active military experience). Would she be a better president than her husband? Probably not. I would ask in turn though why should she have to be? Based on her experience (which a lot of folk seem eager to rework into a liability) and proposals she should be given a chance. Every time I hear a rebuttal to this argument it begins and ends with a personal attack on her character, looks...etc.....which to me are nonfactors if ever there was one (unless we are deciding on a prom king/queen).
Back to my man's point.....if your wife had the relative experience Hillary has she would damn well know how to boot up the laptop and prolly a bit more (remember 20-30 years of solid training, trial and error, back seat driving...etc) The example is thus valid but inapplicable.
You have a good point.
The only problem is that it in Hillary's case she has:
1-been politically active for the greater part of her life
2-did at least try to be an active first lady (to whatever degree of credence one chooses to assign it)
3-has served successfully for 2 terms in the U.S. Senate
4-traveled the globe extensively on the peripheral towards the goal of diplomacy (again to whatever degree of credence one chooses to assign)
The point is she has as much experience as anyone her age should be expected to have when seeking a role of this nature (aside from active military experience). Would she be a better president than her husband? Probably not. I would ask in turn though why should she have to be? Based on her experience (which a lot of folk seem eager to rework into a liability) and proposals she should be given a chance. Every time I hear a rebuttal to this argument it begins and ends with a personal attack on her character, looks...etc.....which to me are nonfactors if ever there was one (unless we are deciding on a prom king/queen).
Back to my man's point.....if your wife had the relative experience Hillary has she would damn well know how to boot up the laptop and prolly a bit more (remember 20-30 years of solid training, trial and error, back seat driving...etc) The example is thus valid but inapplicable.
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
She served a whole whopping one more term than Obama in the Senate.
big deal
she traveled?
whoopty fucking doo
none of that shit matters
you have a host of people from those you appoint to military and civil professionals that remain more or less constant administration to administration that advise you on those things.
She served a whole whopping one more term than Obama in the Senate.
big deal
she traveled?
whoopty fucking doo
none of that shit matters
you have a host of people from those you appoint to military and civil professionals that remain more or less constant administration to administration that advise you on those things.
Obama will take Michigaan easily
Keep Hope Alive!!
Re: So far Clinton leads with 40%, Obama at 36%
^^^So what "experience level" does Hillary Clinton have exactly? Being the former First Lady doesn't exactly qualify someone to b president regardless of how charismatic Bill Clinton may have been in office.
I'll never understand why so many black people could be so blindly enamoured of Bill Clinton that they'd be willing to throw away the first opportunity to really initiate genuine change in American/world politics for the first time in modern history.
Barak Obama represents something totally new and untainted by prior political misdemeanour and the guy has been more or less consistent from the get go unlike the other flip-floppers he's running against.
Voting for Obama shouldn't be a black vs white thing.
It should be a common-sense vs nonsense thing.
Peace.
^^^So what "experience level" does Hillary Clinton have exactly? Being the former First Lady doesn't exactly qualify someone to b president regardless of how charismatic Bill Clinton may have been in office.
I'll never understand why so many black people could be so blindly enamoured of Bill Clinton that they'd be willing to throw away the first opportunity to really initiate genuine change in American/world politics for the first time in modern history.
Barak Obama represents something totally new and untainted by prior political misdemeanour and the guy has been more or less consistent from the get go unlike the other flip-floppers he's running against.
Voting for Obama shouldn't be a black vs white thing.
It should be a common-sense vs nonsense thing.
Peace.
Similar threads
