September 11

How can u be proud, when ur own country betrays you? Fuck a CAC..great wake up call...power has NO boundaries..brah

Bruh, what are you talking bout? Who said anything bout being proud?? I posted 3 smh emojis and you concluded that I was proud?
 

The article below first published on September 11, 2011 is for critical thinking individuals. Most American sheeple are not critical thinkers. Their brains have literally been wiped of reality — as one would erase a computer hard drive with a seven-level wipe. The documented reality of the past is not accessible anymore — a new version of reality and memory has been projected via television into their Cerebrums; — they are afraid, tentative, bewildered, — unable to realize that two plus two does not equal five. The author below, methodically eviscerates the nauseating “media of mass distraction” propaganda surrounding the events of September 11, 2001; his brain has not been wiped. If you consider yourself to be in that shrinking minority of Americans who still believe in critical thinking —(Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How)— and have not become intellectually lazy, and a dupe with a nipple-bottle stuck-in-your-mouth receiving a toxic information cocktail fed-to-you by the corporate television media (CBS, FOX FAKE, NBC, CBS, CNN) — then this article is for you.



TVNews_Lies_org.jpg



You Only Believe the Official 9/11 Story Because?
You Don't Know the Official 9/11 Story!!


by Jesse Richard | September 10, 2015 | http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.ph...se-you-dont-know-the-official-911-story-.html


I don't believe the official story of 9/11 because I know the official story of 9/11!

During the past 10 years I have not met a single individual who, after doing research on the subject, switched from questioning the official narrative of the events of 9/11/2001 to believing the official narrative of those events.. It is always the other way around. Why do you think that is? There are good reasons for this, and I will try to explain this phenomenon right now.

The term "conspiracy theorist", perhaps the most misapplied description in our vernacular, is often used to describe 9/11 truthers. Perhaps that term does apply to a segment of the 9/11 truth movement. But in most cases a more accurate description of 9/11 truthers is probably "expert", or "scholar", or "researcher." You see, much of the doubt cast on the official narrative of the events of 9/11 has not come in the form of speculated accusations, or "theories." In fact, it has come in the form of questions that have been raised after a careful study of the official and undisputed events and details.

Ten years have passed since the infamous events of September 11th, 2001 took place, and the majority of people still don't know a damn thing about the actual details of that event. They don't know what was going on in the country with regard to our military that day. They don't know the history or the activities of key members of our government, defense establishment or intelligence community, on, or during the weeks, and in some cases the years leading up to that day. They don't know what took place during or immediately following the events of that day. And they don't know what actions were taken by those key people following that event.

As is the case with so many issues, people tend to stand strong and argue a position or voice an opinion about an event like 9/11. But, when questioned about the many details surrounding that event they have no answers. They are clueless. And they are, in the end, dumbfounded.
I can not tell you how many times I have discussed the events of 9/11 with an outraged citizen who can not believe that I would "accuse our own government" of such a terrible thing as conducting a false flag operation, only to hear the phrase "no, I did not know that, is that true?" repeated over and over as I "educate" them about those little things called DETAILS. I can not count the pale-faced stunned looks on people's faces as I exposed them to some of the "official facts" they never suspected, and never knew. I have walked away from many a confrontation with newly educated "patriotic Americans", only to worry about whether or not they would again resume breathing correctly.


They would never do such a thing

A common start and end to any intelligent discussion about the events of 9/11 is prefaced by the assumption that no American would betray his or her country by allowing or conducting an attack on the American people. Well, the people who take this position know nothing about history, let alone human nature. They also don't know about the public positions, declarations, speeches and published documents written by the people who ran our nation on that day.

False flag operations have taken place for generations, in this nation and nations around the world. Many of these operations have been exposed, but proof of many of these activities is probably hidden away in secret documents that may one day come to light. You can however, start your exploration on the topic by researching one plan for American self-inflicted terrorism that became public, Operation Northwoods. Do I detect my first "I did not know this, is it true?" May I suggest you also peek into the neoconservative teachings of the principles involved in running our nation at the time of the "new Pearl Harbor" that took place in 2001.

But the 9/11 Commission did not find anything wrong

I can not believe how many people do not know the genesis or mission of the 9/11 Kean Commission. From the initial appointment of one of America's most nefarious political figures as its original leader, Henry Kissinger, - to its executive director whose area of expertise and education were in the creation and maintaining of public myths, Philip D. Zelikow,- people have no idea as to who comprised or what the mandate was for this commission.

To give you some kind of idea as to why the "findings" of this commission can NOT be used to back up any talking points on the topic of 9/11, let me remind you what the official task of this commission was. The Kean Commissions was told to document the official story and make national security recommendations based on that story. The only information that was to be included in the official report had to match the official story. If any one member of the committee objected to any testimony or finding, that piece of information was to be left out of the report For some examples of this you can talk to the thousands of people who became 9/11 truthers as a result of their testimony being omitted from and contradicted by the final report.

Start with the WTC worker credited with being the last man out of the WTC William Rodriguez. See if he can tell you why, after being invited to the White House and meeting with George W. Bush, his testimony about witnessing explosions in the sub basement of the WTC moments prior to the first plane hitting the building was omitted from the Kean report. And for more details you can read David Ray Griffin's book called The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions. It pretty much translated the Kean report into a stack of rather harsh and useless toilet paper. Are the "I did not know this, is it true?" responses piling up yet?

Are you even qualified to discuss the issue?

What people don't understand when discussing issues like 9/11 is that not everyone is qualified to join the discussion, let alone impose an "opinion" on the topic. 9/11 is not really a topic that is open to opinion. The conclusion you draw from the facts are open to opinion, but what many people don't realize about the 9/11 truth movement is that its opinions are based on facts, and grounded in the reality that its members know more of the facts than the average person. If you have a discussion with a doctor about medicine your opinions and views on the subject don't exactly merit the same consideration as do those of a group of physicians..

Similarly, someone like me (and many 9/11 truthers), has the equivalent of 3 PhD's on topics such as 9/11. I am a full time journalist. I research this kind of stuff every single day and I have been doing so since 2003. Not everyone is qualified to debate me on an issue like 9/11. We can discuss it. You can ask a great number of questions and perhaps inform me about aspects of the issue of which I am not aware. But you can't impose your "opinions" on me, nor can you do that to a majority of 9/11 truthers. And by the way, when it comes to opinions vs. facts, facts win. FOX News watchers don't seem to be able to grasp this concept.

People have to realize that what separates the unsuspecting mainstream masses from the 9/11 truth movement are factual information and details. Forget the claims and accusations. You don't need to go that far to understand that there is something fishy going on here. Just look at the official body of evidence. It's all there and it will make your head spin.

Don't listen to the accusations, just examine the evidence.You'll understand so much if you really take a good look. In time, if you do your research thoroughly you may just compile a list of suspects, as have many of the 9/11 truthers. I have. But we are not there yet. We really have enough official evidence to lead to quite a few criminal indictments, and I am not kidding about this. But for now let's just talk about the facts and hope that some day we will have the real answers declared by juries in courtrooms. Chances are that many truthers would be proven correct in their accusations - but again, for now, just look at the facts and understand that there are a lot of questions that need to be answered. And, find out that it's okay to say, "I did not know this, is it true?"

So, are you qualified to take part in a discussion with a 9/11 truther?

If you don't know about the "coincidental" military drills taking place on September 11, 2001, or about the interesting little political cabal known as PNAC or the Project for a New American Century, or if you don't know what WTC7 is, or the 1,500 plus architects and engineers who have serious questions about how and why it dropped like a pancake on 9/11, or if you don't know about the fact that up until his supposed murder, the FBI did not list Osama bin Laden as wanted for the events of 9/11 because, in their own words, they had no proof of his involvement, then you are not qualified to enter a discussion about the event. You have a lot of homework to do before you can chime in. So on you go...study...but finish this article first. I'll bet the ranch that you'll be saying, over and over, "I did not know this, is it true?"

Why don't we accept the official story?

Here is a question that you should really think about. Don't just chime in with your own uninformed opinion because I am going to give you the answer to this question; the real honest answer. Why do you think I, Jesse Richard, founder of TvNewsLIES.org, have drawn the conclusion that the official narrative of the events of 9/11 is a crock? The answer to that is this...I did not always feel that way. As a matter of fact ,within hours of the event I emailed to all my friends a blistering attack on Islamic fundamentalism. And while some things that happened that day, or did not happen that day, (and week I should say,) seemed odd, I was not immediately suspicious of the "story" being told on TV about the event.

It took me almost two years before I saw enough "official" information to make me realize that there was something, actually many things, that were very wrong. I came across so many disturbing, yet official and undisputed facts that I started asking others about it. Most people did not know what I was talking about. Nobody knew the details. So your answer is this...I don't believe the official story because I know the official story! I don't believe the conclusion, and the little tale of 19 buffoons overtaking our national defense all by themselves. The official position on that by the way, is that they, the FBI, have no proof of the identity of the so-called hijackers or that there were any hijackers at all. They are not listed on the passenger lists, but you would not know that.

BUT...the official story and facts are what made me realize something was very wrong with the public perception of what took place that day, and who was responsible for what took place that day. The official story, when accepted and believed, morphs by any logic into a total and absolute fabrication!

So if you believe the conclusion to the official story, you had better know that story from start to finish. Don't approach this the way the Kean Commission approached it, by starting out accepting the explanation as truth. Study the events, study the officially acknowledged body of evidence and study the people who told you the story in the first place...and I bet it won't be long before you have as many questions as do I about that infamous day and about the people who control our government. And, of course, you'll be saying, "I did not know this, is it true?"

Okay, then, who really was behind the attacks on 9/11?

9/11 truthers make the mistake of starting their discussions with conclusions...I am not doing that. All I am saying is that there are a lot of questions about what happened that day that are not answered by the official conclusion or explanation. I would like some answers that add up. I did the math myself and I have my own "theories", but I am a journalist, and I deal in the facts, not the fables.

The official story, as fed to the American public is filled with unsupported and implausible explanations designed to convince a gullible public that they should ask no questions and trust their leaders to take revenge on those who hated us for our freedom. Volumes can be, and have been written about so many of them. For the most part, you have not read any of them.

In this article, I've posed many questions and have provided links to their answers - so that you will more clearly understand that there is SO much we have not been told about the attacks that took place a decade ago. But, those facts are the tip of a very well hidden iceberg, because there are so many questions that still remain unanswered.

So, I will end this article with a sampling of the questions that must be answered, or in the very least, investigated by impartial truth seekers.. They must NOT be ignored, or accepted simply because they were offered to a frightened nation by an administration defined by its lies. They are legitimate questions, based on legitimate suspicions. They are not, for a single moment, conspiracy theories"

1. Why did the news agencies report that WTC 7 collapsed almost 1/2 hour before it did, even though it was not hit by a plane, only had a few floors on fire, and gave no indication that it was in any serious danger?

2. Why do we still believe the tale of the 19 hijackers when so many of the accused hijackers showed up ALIVE within days? And why do we still believe the fable of the 19 hijackers when the FBI admitted that they are not sure about either the identity of the hijackers or if there were any hijackers at all?

3. Why was WTC 7 rebuilt, reopened and reoccupied with no press attention? Wouldn't this be an important victory in American resolve and perseverance?

4. Why were the NORAD rules changed for the first time several weeks prior to 9/11, taking responsibility/authority for shooting down hijacked planes away from NORAD military command for the first time in its history, and given to a civilian, Donald Rumsfeld, and then returned to NORAD the day after 9/11?

5. Why would hijackers planning on attacking NY and Washington DC drive from Florida, pass both DC and NY, and drive all the way to Maine and hinge this huge operation on a connecting flight from Maine to Boston, where we are told they hijacked their plane? Why wouldn't they fly out of any of the airports that are visible from their targets, like Newark, La Guardia or JFK...or even some of the smaller local airports that would have given them a clear easy path to their target and reduce the amount of time that our air defense systems would have to stop them?

6. Who placed all of those put options on the airlines just prior to the event, as if they knew that the stock prices on those specific airlines would lose a huge amount of value?

7. Why did George W. Bush's Secret Service detail not rush the president to safety when it was evident that the nation was under attack? If the nation was under attack, and they did not know the scope of the attack, and the president's location was known, how did they not worry about being attacked in Florida?. Why did they act as if they knew that there was no threat? And why, when our nation was under attack, did the president not rush into action? If you say he was concerned about upsetting the children, you are the ultimate apologist. He could have told them that his mommy was on the phone and he had to see what she wanted. Our county was supposedly being attacked and he/they waited 20 minutes before they moved. This is the smoking gun of smoking guns.

8. Why did the FBI never list Osama bin Laden as being wanted for 9/11? Actually, we know this one...because they admitted that they had no evidence linking him to the event.

9. Why was their molten metal flowing under the wreckage of the WTC for months? No jet fuel can melt metal, and nothing explainable could melt that much metal and keep it hot enough to remain molten for a month.

10. How did a passport of one of the so called hijackers make it through the huge fireball and end up on the street?

11. Why have photos from the 80+ cameras confiscated at the Pentagon never been released?
Why did the airplane that supposedly crashed at Shanksville vaporize so that nothing remained, not bodies, not luggage, not metal, - nothing - for the first time in aviation history? However, we are told that even though the plane vaporized at Shanksville, a hand-written note from a hijacker was found.

Of course, there are so many more. We deserve the answers. We deserve the right to ask these questions in public forums like the corporate media....who will not touch them with the proverbial ten foot pole. We have gate keepers on the Internet who actively ridicule and dismiss anyone who dares to raise these questions. Will you be one of them? Or, after really thinking about them, will you hope that one day, when we know what went on before, during and after the attacks on 9/11, - we can all say: "I did not know this, but I'm now absolutely convinced that it is true."

Think about it...it's really time to think about it.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



YOU MUST WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW


This video should be broadcast immediately following the next SUPER BOWL so that 100 million Americans would see it, but that will never happen. The unanswered question remaining after you watch this video is What evil cabal of nefarious individuals successfully plotted and succeeded in planting explosives in World Trade Center 7 & most likely in WTC1 and WTC2, murdering over 3,000 people??????????????

Was 9/11 an updated "Operation Northwoods" false flag operation??????





 
It does show the power and control they have over the masses and the world. It is the same with the electric car. They say that they are concerned about the atmosphere but outlawed the electric car.
 

The article below first published on September 11, 2011 is for critical thinking individuals. Most American sheeple are not critical thinkers. Their brains have literally been wiped of reality — as one would erase a computer hard drive with a seven-level wipe. The documented reality of the past is not accessible anymore — a new version of reality and memory has been projected via television into their Cerebrums; — they are afraid, tentative, bewildered, — unable to realize that two plus two does not equal five. The author below, methodically eviscerates the nauseating “media of mass distraction” propaganda surrounding the events of September 11, 2001; his brain has not been wiped. If you consider yourself to be in that shrinking minority of Americans who still believe in critical thinking —(Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How)— and have not become intellectually lazy, and a dupe with a nipple-bottle stuck-in-your-mouth receiving a toxic information cocktail fed-to-you by the corporate television media (CBS, FOX FAKE, NBC, CBS, CNN) — then this article is for you.


"by Jesse Richard | September 10, 2015 "
220px-Jesse_Richards%2C_photo_by_Charles_Thomson.jpg


"During the past 10 years"
:hmm:

"Ten years have passed since the infamous events of September 11th, 2001"


How about getting some dates correct on his own shit.
 
"by Jesse Richard | September 10, 2015 "
220px-Jesse_Richards%2C_photo_by_Charles_Thomson.jpg


"During the past 10 years"
:hmm:

"Ten years have passed since the infamous events of September 11th, 2001"


How about getting some dates correct on his own shit.

The article was originally written in 2011 the repost was 2015
 
controlled demolition, tower 7. missile strike on the pentagon. control the media...control the narrative.

I've said this I don't know how many times, they don't comprehend. :dunno:

Just so happened AHC (American Heroes Channel) did a special on 9/11 yesterday. WTC 7 was demolished because it received damaged. Plus the building was determined to be unstable. BTW the firemen weren't allowed to enter that area until WTC7 was demolished.
 
Last edited:
The article was originally written in 2011 the repost was 2015

Why didn't the writer of the repost write the original post date?
Why is the new author trying to take credit for an old article as if new?
How are "Jesse Richard" and "Reggie" related?
Is it the same writer?
Is the writer credible?
And is that writer tryng to masquerade as a film producer?
If not, then what are the writers credentials' when it comes to information gathering? (Google, News reports of what people heard?, etc)
How much does each click tvnewslies.org gets from fastclick.net, which is all over that link?

Further, I had the wrong picture. The picture above is of Jesse Richards, Journalist.

The picture below is of Jesse Richard, blogger
s-richard.jpg


Here is a link no one will read if they have made up their mind on wtc7
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
 
"by Jesse Richard | September 10, 2015 "
220px-Jesse_Richards%2C_photo_by_Charles_Thomson.jpg


"During the past 10 years"
:hmm:

"Ten years have passed since the infamous events of September 11th, 2001"


How about getting some dates correct on his own shit.
Jesus. You niggas here are just stupid. I don't understand how you niggas can't deduce ANYTHING at all! First, it clearly says this article was first published in 2011. Second, if it didn't say that, how hard would it be to figure out that this was an old article? I'm not being funny here, I'm fucking concerned. It seems like every god damn person on this site is fucking beyond stupid.

Now... as for that article.. I fucking hate bullshit articles like that. He said 95% fluff and 5% opinion. He said absolutely nothing in the majority of that stupid ass article.

Finally, how can we take a so called expert journalist seriously when he doesn't know the difference between their, there, and they're? Seriously??

(9. Why was their molten metal flowing under the wreckage of the WTC for months? No jet fuel can melt metal, and nothing explainable could melt that much metal and keep it hot enough to remain molten for a month.)
 
Jesus. You niggas here are just stupid. I don't understand how you niggas can't deduce ANYTHING at all! First, it clearly says this article was first published in 2011. Second, if it didn't say that, how hard would it be to figure out that this was an old article? I'm not being funny here, I'm fucking concerned. It seems like every god damn person on this site is fucking beyond stupid.

It's the source you trust? They can't even get their own site in order.
Can't keep their own house clean? Can't keep their own facts straight.

Click on the link. What it says the original was posted in 2011? Not in the article. Only buddy boy above. They are keeping the site hot and fresh for those click points.

You don't have to be concerned except within yourself.
You want to beLieve something so badly, that you will not find fault here.
 
Last edited:
Its the source you trust? They can't even get their own site in order.
Can't keep their own house clean? Can't keep their own facts straight.

You don't have to be concerned except within yourself.
You want to beleive something so hard, that you will not find fault
here.
Lol... ok.
 
peace

Now just analyze the evidence b4 establishing & saying who did actually what they did & why

Take it for what it's worth

 
The article was originally written in 2011 the repost was 2015

Why didn't the writer of the repost write the original post date?
Why is the new author trying to take credit for an old article as if new?
How are "Jesse Richard" and "Reggie" related?
Is it the same writer?
Is the writer credible?
And is that writer tryng to masquerade as a film producer?
If not, then what are the writers credentials' when it comes to information gathering? (Google, News reports of what people heard?, etc)
How much does each click tvnewslies.org gets from fastclick.net, which is all over that link?

Further, I had the wrong picture. The picture above is of Jesse Richards, Journalist.

The picture below is of Jesse Richard, blogger
s-richard.jpg


Here is a link no one will read if they have made up their mind on wtc7
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html



Why is "older version" so "afraid, tentative & bewildered"??????
The original article

You Only Believe the Official 9/11 Story Because?
You Don't Know the Official 9/11 Story!!
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.ph...se-you-dont-know-the-official-911-story-.html
was published TEN years after September 11, 2001 which is September 11, 2011
Every year since it is reposted at TV_NEWS_LIES.org on September 11 with the author Jesse Richard revising the first sentence to reflect the current year.
If you click the link above, the first sentence will read "During the past 15 years" which reflects the fact that it is now 2016 which is 15 years since 9/11
Now who the fuck is Reggie?? There is no Reggie associated with this article, where the fuck did that come from??? The authors name is Jesse Richard and has been that, unchanged since his site premiered way before 9/11.

s-richard.jpg

Editor, TvNewsLIES.org - Host TVNL Radio

TvNewsLIES.org is on of the premier Internet resources exposing the massive deception perpetrated by the American corporate media on the American public. By examining how media deception works TvNewsLIES.org's editor, Jesse Richard, has established that the American corporate media is in fact the tool used by the ruling elite to shape public opinion.

The events of September 11th serve as the prime example of how the controllers of the corporate media distract the public and hide the crimes witch they commit. Without a legitimate news media democracy can not survive. Jesse Richard proposes that we render the ruling elite's weapons of mass deception useless by education the public about the techniques of media deception.

Unless one is suffering from permanent cognitive dissonance or due to an unseen subconscious fear, lack the fealty to engage in critical thinking— a malady most associated with people living in totalitarian regimes (Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, North Korea) — then one can look objectively at the peer reviewed scientific evidence and quickly see that the U.S. Government official '9/11 Story ' is Complete Bullshit.

Read about Operation Northwoods which was approved by the U.S military Joint Chiefs of Staff. Operation Northwoods entailed the murder of hundreds, perhaps thousands of US citizens by the U.S. military— a "false flag" operation— in order to create a pretext to justify a full scale American military invasion of Cuba. President John F. Kennedy as Commander In Chief, killed the nefarious plot.

Government elites lie.
There is nothing benevolent about today's U.S. Military/ Industrial/ Espionage/ PSYOPS complex;
America is an Empire, it's about power & control. According to the elites, the American people's role are to be $$$$$ ignorant consumers, NOT critical thinking citizens. Too many Americans have decided that being ignorant consumers is-just-fine; and, whatever they see on corporate television media "must be true".

The person below is who the corporate television media allows to question America's 2016 POTUS candidates. The corporate media pays this person $25,000,000 a year

Zy5hxm1SY0x-0mfcxvb-Sy0YSi4E-R1gC7kL0cBYe9A.jpg





9/11: 15 Years Of A Transparent Lie

paul_craig.jpg

Paul Craig Roberts is the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Reagan.Roberts is a former editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, the Scripps Howard News Service, and a columnist for Investor’s Business Daily. Dr. Roberts is listed in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in the World, The Dictionary of International Biography, Outstanding People of the Twentieth Century, and 1000 Leaders of World Influence

by Paul Craig Roberts | September 10, 2016
|http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/09/10/911-15-years-of-a-transparent-lie-paul-craig-roberts/

There are many conspiracy theories about 9/11. The US government’s own explanation of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory in which a few Saudi Arabians outwitted the American national security state. Little doubt that many of the more imaginative conspiracy theories were created for the purpose of stigmatizing any skepticism, no matter how well reasoned and supported, of the official story.


When thinking about 9/11, it is important to differentiate expert opinion from improbable explanations.


Among the expert opinion are 2,600 structural engineers and high-rise architects who comprise Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth and have written to Congress asking for a real investigation, Firefighters for 9/11 truth, Pilots for 9/11 truth, physicists and chemists who analyzed the dust from the twin towers and report finding reacted and unreacted materials used in controlled demolitions, and former government officials who understand that a security failure as great as 9/11 would have produced an immediate and exacting investigation.


These groups of qualified and experienced people say that the official story of 9/11 is false. Architects, engineers, and scientists say that the official story is physically impossible. Firefighters and WTC maintenance personnel say that there were numerous explosions within the towers and that the first explosions were in the sub-basements prior to the buildings being hit by airplanes. Experienced military and civilian pilots say the maneuvers of the aircraft are beyond the capability of the alleged hijackers. Both co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission and the legal counsel have written books in which they have said that information was withheld from the Commission, that the US government lied to the Commission, and that the Commission was set up to fail


In other words, the hard evidence simply does not support the official story.


We know that the official story is false. We don’t know who is responsible or the purpose the event was intended to serve. However, circumstantial evidence strongly supports suspicion of the neoconservatives whose high positions in the government would have enabled them to succeed with a false flag attack and to delay and divert any investigation until the official story was set in stone. We also know from the “dancing Israelis” that elements in the Israeli government had advance notice of the attack as Israeli agents were set up ready to film the destruction of the twin towers.


Neoconservative position papers written in the 1990s called for “a new Pearl Harbor” in order to launch Washington’s wars for hegemony, first in the Middle East. These position papers signaled out Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Libya for attack prior to the event of 9/11. None of these countries had anything whatsoever to do with the official story of 9/11 that blames Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda, a jihadist group set up by Washington in the 1970s to resist the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.


None of these countries had jihadist governments. Iran has a muted form of Islamic law, but Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Assad in Syria headed secular governments. Yet, neoconservatives falsely claimed that Saddam Hussein had “al-Qaeda connections.” This lie and the lie that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that threatened the US were used to invade Iraq under the 9/11 banner. Then the rationale for the invasions changed. 9/11 dropped away, and the “war on terror” and “bringing democracy” took its place.


From my quarter century in Washington, it is clear to me that if such an event as 9/11 had actually happened for the reason given, the White House, Congress, and media would have been screaming for explanation of how a few Arabs outwitted the entire US National Security State—all 16 US intelligence agencies, the security agencies of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel, the National Security Council, Air Traffic Control, and airport security four times in one hour on the same day. Instead the government refused any inquiry for one year until most of the evidence was destroyed. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/09/government-hid-destroyed-911-evidence.html That a few Arabs defeated US national security would be the greatest humiliation ever inflicted on a superpower, but no one was held responsible. This tells me that 9/11 was a State Crime Against Democracy.


9/11 was used by the US government to launch wars that have destroyed in whole or part seven countries, killing millions of peoples and producing millions of refugees. 9/11 was also used to create an American police state, which is a far greater threat to freedom and democracy than Muslim terrorism.




2c2b503058e50134ba9e005056a9545d.gif
 
Last edited:
Every year since it is reposted at TV_NEWS_LIES.org on September 11 with the author Jesse Richard revising the first sentence to reflect the current year.

So, every year, someone goes in and changes the article.
Every year. For what real purpose?
The current year is reflected on eveyone's PC, and normally,
writers leave their articles untouched with the original date
and original substance in the article.


If you click the link above, the first sentence will read "During the past 15 years" which reflects the fact that it is now 2016 which is 15 years since 9/11
Now who the fuck is Reggie?? There is no Reggie associated with this article, where the fuck did that come from??? The authors name is Jesse Richard and has been that, unchanged since his site premiered way before 9/11


The site's dates for the linked article don't line up.

15 years after 2011 is 2016, yes. Then why is the date 10 SEPTEMBER 2015 in the post?

Yes, who the fuck is REGGIE?!!!! That's what I want to know too!!!

svku1e.png


Maybe the site has been infiltrated by some group??
Can it be trusted anymore??
 
Last edited:
can't wait the day till the footage of people placing demo charges in those towers surfaces.
Yeah... they planned it perfectly,
except for the actual act!
That 747 just disappearing INTO the Pentagon is what gets me...
and PEOPLE JUST EAT IT ALL UP
LOL​
 
Ya'll remember Lisa and Todd Beemer I think?
The ONLY person from flight 93 they hailed as a hero
SMH​
 
For blacks Jonestown is like a model of what we were born in. A world designed to keep the black man from being himself. Jim had always told his followers that I will be your God until you realize that you are God. But the job was to keep you from realizing that or being yourself. 911 proves how much control individuals have over themselves. Money and power is programmed to be kept away from real blackness.
They have always rewarded themselves for the worship of war in our face. They have always been rewarded for destroying real blackness and the earth. We are still paying taxes, going to their schools etc. while all they got to do is keep the control.
We were not able to do anything about South Africa, Libya, Rwanda, New Orleans, etc. Bush committed war crimes that caused the death of hundreds of thousands of people and he gets 6 digit figures to make speeches. Same with the Clintons. Keep the masses use to being poor and them use to having money, power and control. There job is to full the dream of the one ruling. It is like they are saying their job as a man is to mate with the ladies and the masses of gay devils can mate like men and women as compensation for helping to promote their empire. They are looked at as still gays because their manhood is controlled by them. Their is no way that a grown man can tell another grown man what to do unless he controls him. That is the type of world we are born into. Just like the slaves were born and raised to obey the master.
 
Back
Top