Sea Levels Rising Fast on U.S. East Coast

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<IFRAME SRC="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/06/120625-sea-level-rise-east-coast-us-science-nature-climate-change/" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/06/120625-sea-level-rise-east-coast-us-science-nature-climate-change/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Interesting article. FYI, Holland Island, which is featured in the article, was totally abandoned by 1922 becasue of the surrounding land rising. The cause given was post glacial rebound. Judging by AGW theory, this could not have been caused by AGW.
 
Interesting article. FYI, Holland Island, which is featured in the article, was totally abandoned by 1922 becasue of the surrounding land rising. The cause given was post glacial rebound. Judging by AGW theory, this could not have been caused by AGW.


The oceans are political.
 
No, you are. I am being factual. You should try it sometimes. You might learn something.


Facts? Site your oil industry sources.

source: National Geographic



• Average temperatures have climbed 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degree Celsius) around the world since 1880, much of this in recent decades, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

• The rate of warming is increasing. The 20th century's last two decades were the hottest in 400 years and possibly the warmest for several millennia, according to a number of climate studies. And the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) reports that 11 of the past 12 years are among the dozen warmest since 1850.

• The Arctic is feeling the effects the most. Average temperatures in Alaska, western Canada, and eastern Russia have risen at twice the global average, according to the multinational Arctic Climate Impact Assessment report compiled between 2000 and 2004.

• Arctic ice is rapidly disappearing, and the region may have its first completely ice-free summer by 2040 or earlier. Polar bears and indigenous cultures are already suffering from the sea-ice loss.

• Glaciers and mountain snows are rapidly melting—for example, Montana's Glacier National Park now has only 27 glaciers, versus 150 in 1910. In the Northern Hemisphere, thaws also come a week earlier in spring and freezes begin a week later.

• Coral reefs, which are highly sensitive to small changes in water temperature, suffered the worst bleaching—or die-off in response to stress—ever recorded in 1998, with some areas seeing bleach rates of 70 percent. Experts expect these sorts of events to increase in frequency and intensity in the next 50 years as sea temperatures rise.
• An upsurge in the amount of extreme weather events, such as wildfires, heat waves, and strong tropical storms, is also attributed in part to climate change by some experts.
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://news.discovery.com/earth/sea-level-rise-endangers-east-coast-120626.html" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://news.discovery.com/earth/sea-level-rise-endangers-east-coast-120626.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
I understand that a scientific theory tends to always adjust/change with time.

So stick your wet finger in that electoral socket and see if the scientific theory of electrocution adjust/change with time.

You don't even know what a talking point is.
 
I guess Wikipedia and The Johns Hopkins Press, as well as the Baltimore Sun are Oil industry resources. And these scientists in the public Dole are real neutral all the time.;)


NASA and NOAA, government agencies, where the oil industry get their data.

I guess they are too political since the lives of astronauts and sailors rely on them.

Of course extending dependence on oil makes the oil in dusty neutral.
 
NASA and NOAA, government agencies, where the oil industry get their data.

I guess they are too political since the lives of astronauts and sailors rely on them.

Of course extending dependence on oil makes the oil in dusty neutral.

As usual,you did not answer, but dodge. The cowardice of your thought pattern is once again in full bloom.

NASA readings are one of the sources of the confirmation of post glacial rebound.

You cannot prove otherwise, so you run to ad hominem attacks.
 
As usual,you did not answer, but dodge. The cowardice of your thought pattern is once again in full bloom.

NASA readings are one of the sources of the confirmation of post glacial rebound.

You cannot prove otherwise, so you run to ad hominem attacks.

Site the passage.
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18978483" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18978483">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 


UN Warning: The impacts of global warming are
likely to be "severe, pervasive and irreversible"



<iframe width="780" height="1500" src="http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26810559" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Back
Top