blogs.nasa.gov
You know they have to look through those pictures carefully to make sure we don’t see something that we don’t need to see if you get my drift
There’s an estimated 200 Billion different galaxies in space. Think about that. Especially since each galaxy has hundreds of millions and some billions of planets in them.
30? There are EASILY more than one hundred in that image a few posts above yours
The whole of reality, our universe, used to be compressed into a space smaller than a beachball. I imagine the expansion wasnt perfectly uniform. Plus supermassive blackholes probably create gravity wells, similar to the penny drop experiment you see in science museums or in your sink when you pull the drain plug to let out the water
My mistake, I forgot you got your doctorate from Trump University . Carry on.
James Webb Space Telescope Archives - NASA Science
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope #UnfoldTheUniverse Art Challenge
Show us how you believe the Webb telescope will #UnfoldTheUniverse by creating art. Share a picture or video of you and your creation with the hashtag #UnfoldTheUniverse for a chance to be featured on NASA’s website, social media channels, and the Webb telescope's historic launch broadcast.www.nasa.gov
The cosmic weather
yes it would be other galaxies just like that but thats not the just of the image that image like the other telescope they had there was from a square blank area they pointed the cam at ans seen tons of galaxies heres the pic
each thing in this picture is a different distance from the observer. One point may be 20 light years from you, another may be 2000. From where you're looking though, they're next to each other. This is that x 1000.
man a thousand
Yes they are stars. Anything that has that lil 6 pointed array around it is a singular light source, i.e., a star.
Space is in 3d so some of the stars that appear to be close to each other on the X-Y-axis may be thousands of light-years on the Z-axis but when you view them on a 2d print they appear to be on the same plane. Also, keep in mind some of what appear to be big ass stars are clusters of galaxies so what appears to be two stars can actually be a close-by star that appears to be on the same plane as a cluster of stars (galaxy) that is thousands of light-years away. So by this, it is impossible to get an accurate sense of the depth of photons hitting a sensor and then converted into a 2d image.
Here is a better explanation of why those stars seem clumped up like that. Basically, the night sky should not be dark at all, that is if the universe was not expanding and if the speed of light wasn't finite. But being that it is, with the naked eye we see so much darkness, however with the Hubble and now the Webb space telescope, more of the photons that are usually lost or cannot be seen due to expansion and the photons not being able to reach the naked eye are not magnified allowing them to shine through the dark veil of space which these specks of magnified light often appear to be the same size due to us not being able to accurately differentiate the difference between a large star and a really bright small star, giving the illusion that they are all clumped together on relatively the same plane.
