As I pointed out previously, in Samsung's Note series, which is the handset we're talking about, there was one other time a Roman numeral was used: the Galaxy Note 2. Seven Note generations and one radical redesign later, Samsung copied Apple's Roman numeral"X" branding for their own flagship handset plain and simple.Samsung has used roman numeral in the past on multiple devices before Apple which doesn't matter to me at all. You're the one who said Samsung is copying apple and I simply pointed out that Samsung has a past of using roman numerals years before apple. Motorola first release Moto X back in September 2014 and released a moto x second, third and fourth generation of the brand name each year until 2017 so by your position on the branding didn't apple copy Motorola? The point is simply that apple didn't invent roman numerals. Y’all hardcore apple-dumplings think apple invented everything that they place in a commercial when it has already been done before.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Of course Apple didn't invent Roman numerals. Was that even necessary for you to point out? lol
Anyway, your using Motorola as evidence of previous Roman numeral numbering in branding doesn't apply .
Motorola never used the "X"as a Roman numeral but as a letter - just like the Moto C, Z, M, E, etc. Nice try.
Apple used Roman numeral X in 2017 for the iPhone X to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the manufacture of the iPhone.
Samsung's current iteration is the Note 9, soon to be followed by the Note X (10).
"Apple-dumplings" made me

I prefer the Apple ecosystem, but I don't knock people for preferring Android and I'm not delusional enough to think Apple never copied things from Samsung. The hardcore Fandroids get so touchy when it's pointed out Samsung copies Apple too. The fact is both companies have copied each other for years, and both have innovated as well. In the end, their competitiveness has resulted in great devices for the consumers.
Last edited:


