Russia Requests Military and economic aid from China

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Russia requests military and economic aid from China

Russia has asked for military equipment and economic aid from China in the weeks since Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his forces to invade Ukraine, several news outlets reported Sunday, citing U.S. officials familiar with the matter. It was not immediately clear what weapons Moscow requested. National security adviser Jake Sullivan is scheduled to travel to Rome on Monday to meet with his Chinese counterpart. Sullivan told CNN he would communicate to Beijing "that there will absolutely be consequences for large-scale sanctions evasion efforts" by any country. Russia and China have openly increased their cooperation under Western pressure over human rights abuses and other matters, and President Xi Jinping of China has stood by Putin as Russian forces invade Ukraine.

THE WASHINGTON POSTTHE NEW YORK TIMES
 
Russia requests military and economic aid from China

Russia has asked for military equipment and economic aid from China in the weeks since Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his forces to invade Ukraine, several news outlets reported Sunday, citing U.S. officials familiar with the matter. It was not immediately clear what weapons Moscow requested. National security adviser Jake Sullivan is scheduled to travel to Rome on Monday to meet with his Chinese counterpart. Sullivan told CNN he would communicate to Beijing "that there will absolutely be consequences for large-scale sanctions evasion efforts" by any country. Russia and China have openly increased their cooperation under Western pressure over human rights abuses and other matters, and President Xi Jinping of China has stood by Putin as Russian forces invade Ukraine.

THE WASHINGTON POSTTHE NEW YORK TIMES

This a trick, they wanted to get the U.S. on record threatening sanctions against China; NATO decides to give MIG fighter jets to Ukraine, they can retaliate since under similar circumstances you have expressed a similar intent. If we had more competent leadership, they would have remained silent and taken action discreetly against China.

This is a perfect example of what I have to deal with on a daily basis. The U.S. need to remain on the sidelines and do nothing. The days of imposing devastating sanctions are over.

This fraudster Zelenskyy is addressing Congress now in Russian, even though he speaks perfect English.



There is a conflict of interest between Biden and him which the media should expose, clouding his decisions that could result in a nuclear exchange. He helped get Biden elected by entrapping President Trump, leading to his impeachment.
 
There is a conflict of interest between Biden and him which the media should expose, clouding his decisions that could result in a nuclear exchange. He helped get Biden elected by entrapping President Trump, leading to his impeachment.
Conflict? Stated more succinctly, the conflict is _________________ ???

.
 
Conflict? Stated more succinctly, the conflict is _________________ ???

.



Biden is now giving military aid directly after Putin warned them. Verbal communication is not working which is the same phenomena I have experienced, you should not need to have your country bombed out before you get the message.

They want to create a pretext for war with Russia, provoking them into attacking a NATO country.

Russia is not going to respond to any military aid immediately, they are going to collect evidence on the damage it has caused and respond accordingly.
 
Cointelpro Doctrine:

This doctrine deals with small, militarily weak, or developing economies. Yes you are a sovereign country, but your overt signs of allegiance can put you in the crosshairs of superpower. Your proximity to a Tier 1 country (China, Russia, Europe, U.S.)can cause problems. We have seen this play out with Cuba which almost led to a nuclear war with Russia and Syria strong ties with Russia.

What are signs of allegiance or disobedience?

1. Joining similar military alliances to defend against their enemies _ NATO (Allegiance).
2. Mimicking the economic policy of that country. If they impose sanctions or ban trade, than you must follow a similar policy (Allegiance).
3. Hosting the military of superpower that is hostile to another that is close proximity to your country (Disobedience).

russia-cuba-missiles-us-treaty.jpg


4. Conducting trade with a country that a super power is trying to cripple economically (Disobedience)
5. Meeting with the political leadership for high level discussion to 'improve' relationship on your soil while a Tier 1 in close proximity has expressed hostility towards the country.

It is a points system, if you score high enough, these countries might get acted on real quick. Ukraine/Nazis tried to show allegiance to the West, which backfired leading to the conflict we have now.
 
Last edited:
276136706_10160175060862042_4097719413733428321_n.jpg


A Russian lawmaker has reportedly demanded that America return the state of Alaska to his country.

Speaking on an evening talk show on Sunday, Oleg Matveychev, a member of the Russian parliament, listed off his country’s future demands, according to reports. “We should be thinking about reparations from the damage that was caused by the sanctions and the war itself, because that too costs money and we should get it back,” Matveychev reportedly said. “The return of all Russian properties, those of the Russian empire, the Soviet Union and current Russia, which has been seized in the United States, and so on.”

In addition to the entire state of Alaska, he also asked for Fort Ross, located in California, as part of his requested “return of all Russian properties.” The United States' acquisition of Alaska from the then Russian Empire had happened back in 1867.

Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy responded to Matveychev’s comments, saying, “Good luck with that.” :D
 
China's military is bulking up its helicopter fleet. Here's how it could use its new helos against Taiwan.
Benjamin Brimelow
Mar 15, 2022, 6:35 AM

Chinese helicopters over Beijing

Chinese helicopters on parade over Beijing, September 3, 2015. Xinhua/Liu Junxi via Getty Images
  • China's rapid military modernization has stoked concerns that Beijing could soon try to seize Taiwan.
  • China's new high-end weaponry would be central to that effort, especially its growing helicopter fleet.
  • Here's how Beijing might use those helicopters against Taiwan, and how Taiwan can defend against them.
Get a daily selection of our top stories based on your reading preferences.

Email address


By clicking ‘Sign up’, you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

China's rapid military modernization and rising tensions across the Taiwan Strait have stoked concerns that Beijing could soon try to seize the self-ruled island.
The high-end weaponry that China has displayed in recent years, such as long-range missiles and a dizzying array of warships, would be central to such a campaign.
But China's military has also added a considerable number of helicopters that would likely play an integral role in an attack on Taiwan.
In December, the US Naval War College's China Maritime Studies Institute released a report describing the threat China's growing helicopter fleet poses to Taiwan and how Taiwan can defend against it.

Attack helicopters
China navy frigate Z-9 helicopter sailors

A Z-9 naval variant aboard a Chinese navy frigate. US sailors are boarding the ship before a counter-piracy exercise in September 2012. US Navy/MCS2 Aaron Chase
The attack helicopter force of the People's Liberation Army's ground force — the PLA Army, or PLAA — has grown dramatically over the past decade.
In 2011, the PLAA fielded some 136 attack and reconnaissance helicopters in two variants. It now has three variants and a force totaling about 504 helicopters.
The first and oldest of these are the roughly 234 Z-9s. Adopted in 1994, the Z-9 is a licensed-built military variant of the French Eurocopter AS365.
The Z-9 has two small pylons able to carry up to eight anti-tank or air-to-air missiles, or two pods with rockets or machine guns. A naval variant can also carry a torpedo. Some variants feature a nose-mounted camera.

China's first domestically developed attack helicopter, the Z-10, is a considerable upgrade. Adopted officially around 2012, it has two small wings with two hardpoints each, allowing it to carry 16 anti-tank or air-to-air missiles or four rocket pods.
China army Z-10 Z-19 helicopter

Chinese military Z-10 and Z-19 helicopters during an aerobatic display at the China Helicopter Exposition in Tianjin, September 9, 2015. REUTERS/China Daily
The Z-10 also has a 23 mm nose gun with a camera synced to the gunner's helmet, allowing the gunner to aim just by looking at targets. Recent Z-10 variants have an upward exhaust, reportedly reducing its frontal infrared signature.
Chinese state media says a typical Z-10 loadout is eight air-to-ground missiles and two rocket pods. State media claims that a Z-10 can, in a single sortie, destroy at least six enemy tanks and that a standard group of four Z-10s is able to "wipe out" three tank companies.
About 150 Z-10s are believed to be in service, and some have already been seen in Taiwan's air defense identification zone.

The newest model, the Z-19, is a reconnaissance and light attack helicopter. It has a tandem-seat setup like the Z-10 but is actually more like the Z-9, as demonstrated by its enclosed helicopter tail rotor design, which reduces noise and vibrations.
The Z-19 has two hardpoints on two small wings that can carry 16 anti-tank or air-to-air missiles or four rocket or gun pods. It has a camera but no nose-mounted cannon.
Some recent Z-19 models have millimeter-wave fire-control radars mounted in domes above their rotors, similar to American AH-64D Apache Longbow helicopters. About 120 Z-19s are believed to be in the PLAA's inventory.
Transportation and lift
Chinese PLA military Z-8 helicopter

A Chinese military Z-8 helicopter at a PLA Air Force Aviation Open Day in northeastern Jilin province, October 17, 2019. STR/AFP via Getty Images
Two models make up the bulk of the PLAA's transportation and lift helicopter force: the Z-8 and the Mi-17. A third model, the Z-20, entered service only recently.

First adopted for the Chinese navy in the mid-1970s, the Z-8 is a licensed-built variant of the French Aérospatiale SA 321 Super Frelon. Able to carry 27 fully armed troops, it has two side doors and a rear ramp that allows soldiers to be deployed quickly.
The Z-8 can also carry loads of more than 3 tons, such as small vehicles or artillery pieces. More recent variants, like the Z-8L, are slightly larger and can carry even more weight. Some 111 Z-8s are in service with the PLAA today.
The workhorse of PLAA's transport and lift fleet is the Russian-designed Mi-17, which China adopted in the 1990s because the US refused to sell it more Sikorsky S-70C-2s, the civilian variant of the UH-60 Blackhawk, following China's deadly crackdown on protests in Tianamen Square. The PLAA now has about 278 Mi-17s in service.
Harbin Z-20/UH-60 Black Hawk

A Chinese Harbin Z-20, right, and a US UH-60 Black Hawk. China Military, REUTERS/David Mdzinarishvili
The Mi-17 also has two side doors and a rear loading ramp, can carry more than 30 troops, and can lift about 3 tons. It can also be fitted with wings that have three hardpoints for missiles and rocket pods.

The newest transport model, the Z-20, appears largely based on the UH-60 Blackhawk but with one less helicopter blade. Adopted in 2019, it is a more modern design featuring fly-by-wire technology. It can carry 12 to 15 troops.
Adopted in 2019, only around 24 Z-20s are believed to be in service, though more are undoubtedly on the way.
A number of Z-20 variants are in development, including a missile-carrying model, one capable of aerial-refueling, and even a stealth version that may draw on China's study of the US helicopter that crashed during the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound.
How China would use them
Chinese air force special operations troops

Chinese Air Force special airborne operations troops during a drill in China, March 3, 2015. Xinhua/Huang Hui
According to the report, the Chinese could use their helicopters two ways: in a conventional full-scale air assault or in an unconventional and limited air assault tailored for a long-term fight.

In both cases, the helicopter assaults would happen in conjunction with amphibious landings, though those operations would mostly be meant to pull Taiwan's troops toward its coasts and away from the island's interior.
The first scenario would involve using all or most of the PLAA's helicopters at the same time to seize key targets deep inside Taiwan as quickly as possible.
The helos would cross the Taiwan Strait following a massive bombardment meant to level as much of the island's defenses as possible. Key targets for assault groups could include the Presidential Office Building, Taipei Songshan and Kaohsiung airports (identified as "crown jewels" in the report), Taoyuan Airport and Taichung Airport, and military bases and harbors. Chinese paratroopers would also likely be involved to fill in any gaps.
The report estimates that despite losses to combat and attrition, the PLAA could "optimistically ... plan for four total cross-strait insertions in the first 24 hours," and, assuming proper maintenance and crew swaps, "keep the helicopters flying all day."

The second scenario would be on a considerably smaller scale, with multiple waves of helicopters assaulting Taiwan over a longer period.
China Mi-17 military helicopter soldiers

A Chinese military helicopter arrives to evacuate troops from Tangjiashan Lake in southwest China's Sichuan province following an earthquake, May 31, 2008. STR/AFP via Getty Images
The first wave, made up of older Mi-17s, would likely be a one-way trip. By attacking similar targets, they could force the Taiwanese to expend most of their anti-air capabilities and effectively reveal their defenses. Later waves of more modern Chinese helos would then attempt to take out those defenses.
Though the helicopters in the latter scenario would face much higher attrition, not needing to make a return flight would allow the PLAA to stage those helicopters farther from China's coast. That would help conceal the buildup from satellites, which may have greater appeal for Beijing after the weeks of coverage documenting Russia's military buildup around Ukraine.
The report says the PLAA is "at best a decade away" from being able to carry out either scenario, noting that its overall number of helicopters is much lower than what would be needed for such operations and that it has a lack of experience with helicopters and a low level of interoperability among its forces.

The report also notes that Taiwan has some advantages as the defender. Its terrain limits where attacking helicopters could land and the routes they could take, which means Taiwan could tailor the location and capabilities of its defenses.
Taiwan could also practice defending against these specific scenarios, which the authors say would send "clear signals" that Taipei is thinking about what Beijing could throw at it.
 
Russia requests military and economic aid from China


AND . . .

Russia ‘using weapons smuggled by Iran from Iraq against Ukraine’

Iraqi militias and others say undercover networks being used to supply materiel such as RPGs and anti-tank missiles to Russia


The Guardian
Bethan McKernan in Kyiv and
Vera Mironova in Lviv
Mon 11 Apr 2022
Bavar-373 air-defence missile system



Russia is receiving munitions and military hardware sourced from Iraq for its war effort inUkraine with the help of Iranian weapons smuggling networks, according to members of Iranian-backed Iraqi militias and regional intelligence services with knowledge of the process.

RPGs and anti-tank missiles, as well as Brazilian-designed rocket launcher systems, have been dispatched to Russia from Iraq as Moscow’s campaign has faltered in the last month, the Guardian has learned.

An Iranian-made Bavar 373 missile system, similar to the Russian S-300, has also been donated to Moscow by the authorities in Tehran, who also returned an S-300, according to a source who helped organise the transport.

Using the weapons-trafficking underworld would signal a dramatic shift in Russian strategy, as Moscow is forced to lean on Iran, its military ally in Syria, following new sanctions triggered by the invasion of Ukraine.

The developments also have huge implications for the direction and volume of trade in the international weapons trafficking business.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...e-war-brings-no-obvious-route-to-end-fighting
Iraq has hosted US and western troops since the 2003 overthrow of Saddam Hussein, and the US has trained and supplied various Iraqi army and special forces units to defend the Baghdad government against insurgencies. After two decades of war, the country is awash with weaponry.

Much of it has passed legally into the hands of Iran-backed Shia militias, which are opposed to the US presence in the country, but since 2016 have been officially incorporated into the Iraqi armed forces as part of the fight against Islamic State.

Known for their efficiency in dismantling Islamic State’s “caliphate” – and for their brutal treatment of Sunni civilians – these groups have become powerful actors in Iraq’s security establishment.

RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) and anti-tank missiles in the possession of Hashd al-Shaabi, the most powerful Shia militia umbrella, were transported to Iran through the Salamja border crossing on 26 March, where they were received by the Iranian military and taken on to Russia by sea, said a commander of the militia branch that controls the crossing.

Ḥashd al-Shaabi also dismantled and sent in pieces two Brazilian-designed Astros II rocket launcher systems, known in Iraq as the licence-built version Sajil-60, to Iran on 1 April, according to a source within the organisation.

“We don’t care where the heavy weapons go [because we don’t need them at the moment],” one Hashd al-Shaabi source said. “Whatever is anti-US makes us happy.”

Three cargo ships capable of carrying such loads – two Russian flagged and one Iranian flagged – crossed the Caspian Sea from Iran’s port of Bandar Anzali to Astrakhan, a Russian city on the Volga delta, within the timeframes outlined.

“What the Russians need in Ukraine right now is missiles. These require skill to transport as they’re fragile and explosive, but if you are committed to doing it, it’s possible,” said Yörük Işık, an Istanbul-based maritime affairs expert. “It’s also not the kind of activity that would be picked up by satellite imagery as they can be transported in large boxes and regular shipping containers.”

Mohaned Hage Ali, a fellow at the Carnegie Middle East Center, said: “That kind of sophisticated weaponry [rocket launcher systems] would make a big difference on the ground in Ukraine. Ḥashd al-Shaabi controls much of the border region with Iran, which would make this transaction easier.

“Other countries such as China are having to be very careful about giving weapons to Russia now, given the new sanctions situation. And Iran, as part of that axis, wants to make sure Russia doesn’t lose ground in this conflict.

“If the Putin regime is destabilised that has huge implications for Iran, particularly in Syria, where Damascus is dependent on Russian air support and Russia coordinates to avoid direct conflict between them and Israel.”

Extensive economic sanctions imposed on Moscow by western nations since the 24 February invasion have included bans on dual-use goods – items with a civilian and a military purpose – such as spare parts for vehicles and certain types of electronics and optical devices, as well as items with obvious military uses.

Russian manufacturers have reportedly been hit hard by the new restrictions, with Ukraine saying that the country’s main armoured vehicle plant, as well as a tractor factory, have run out of parts for making and repairing tanks.

Revised western estimates are that 29 of Russia’s original battalion tactical groups are now “combat non-effective” from an invading force that is estimated at 125 battalions – which is about 75% of Russia’s total army - in the six-week-old “special military operation”.
Military supplies depleted on both sides but Russia retains advantage
Read more

The significant losses have yielded few gains: Moscow for now appears to have abandoned its initial attempt to seize the capital, Kyiv, instead drawing down and repositioning its ground forces for a renewed assault on the Donbas region, in the south-east of the country.

Airstrikes and artillery assaults are expected to continue on the cities of Kharkiv and Mykolaiv as well as the besieged port of Mariupol.

Last week, the Ukrainian intelligence services accused Georgia of helping Russia receive sanctioned military materiel, in another potential sign of the scale of the Kremlin’s new efforts to use international smuggling networks to aid its campaign in Ukraine.

Georgian special services received instructions from the country’s political leadership not to interfere with smuggling channels from “east Asia” designed to circumvent new western sanctions, Kyiv’s intelligence directorate said in a statement.

Georgian officials said the Ukrainian claims were baseless. Relations between the two post-Soviet nations have sharply deteriorated since the conflict broke out over the pro-Russian government in Tbilisi’s refusal to impose economic sanctions on Moscow.

US officials have also said that Russia has asked China for military-grade weapons and aid in support of its Ukraine operation.

Russian ally Serbia took the delivery of a Chinese anti-aircraft system in a secretive operation over the weekend, the Associated Press reported, amid western concerns of an arms buildup in the Balkans at the same time as the war in Ukraine which could threaten the fragile peace in the region.


.
 
I was laughing how China and Russia will intentionally steal intellectual property than ban some spyware IT product coming from the U.S or manipulate the U.S. into doing it. Russia was blocked from using some spyware IT product from the West which they anticipated probably, than passed some law saying it legal to violate their IP. China did this with Huawei 5G technology used at towers where much of the IP came from Western companies, than baited the U.S. into responding.

This is a dog whistle to other countries and not them looking to gain an economic advantage. They are taking your IP because you have been caught and wanted to let you know why your banned discreetly.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

They probably caught them doing something and are blackmailing the U.S., it would destroy the auto and tech industry in the U.S. if it came out.

China did another one recently where they banned foreign PC within the government, 50 million plus, right before some event where President Biden and some Senators were discussing manufacturing and fighting back against the Chinese stealing innovation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top