This was a desperation shot and proved very little.
Brazil have a very basic problem; they do not have team speed, and if you have a team of fast players, who run right down their throat, they are trouble. If anyone has noticed, Brazil attack from the back; they build up by moving the ball from one side back to the other while bringing up their backline. When they find a seam on a wing, they overlap a fullback and cross the ball into the crowded middle where they use their superior ball skills to create opportunity in tight space. If you take the ball, and run up their middle, they are in trouble unless their powerful offside trap stops you. Zidane eliminated them in the 2006 World Cup simply by running up their gut.
The reason why teams fail to capitalise on the fundamentally flawed scheme Brazil employs is that most teams are so in awe of them and resort to playing the same football as they do, and thereby fall into the hands of Brazil.
Those who know better usually do not have the speed to exploit this flaw. France, however, which has employed a significant number of Africans or black people since 1986, has the speed to punish Brazil. It is for this reason that since 1986, Brazil has not beaten France in the World Cup. They are 0-3, starting with the game in Mexico City where Brazil were eliminated by France.
If Africans keep a disciplined backline, and challenge the midfield of Brazil with runs down the pipe, they will have a good chance of winning the game.
*Brazil does have fast players like Robinho and Ramires. Their speed, however, is not a part of Brazilian football, wherein they rarely stretch the field.