Ron Paul: I Can Get You A Gallon of Gasoline For A Dime...

Lamarr

Star
Registered
Ron Paul Schools Bachmann on Gas Prices

When Michele Bachmann told the Wall Street Journal that she lays on the beach and reads Ludwig von Mises some libertarians perked up, but most of us saw it as a shameless appeal to the first wave of the Tea Party that campaigned for Ron Paul in 2008. Then when she promised $2/gallon gasoline we all rolled our eyes and understood she didn’t know the first thing about Austrian economics. But it’s only appropriate that Ron Paul, who probably mumbles more Mises in his sleep than Bachmann has ever read, be the one to school her. At the Reagan Library/MSNBC/Politico debate on Tuesday the good doctor said,

“I want to address the subject of two dollar gasoline because I can do much better than that. I can get you a gallon of gasoline for a dime... You can buy a gallon of gasoline today for a silver dime. A silver dime is worth three dollars and fifty cents. It’s all about inflation.”

It’s unfortunate that there isn’t a lot of time for detailed explanations in these debates but Ron Paul was absolutely right on this point. I can explain.

Before 1964 US dimes were made of silver. They weren’t the nickle plated copper we use today. Today’s dimes hold less melt value than the pennies in those days. At 90% purity a silver dime contains approximately 2.4g of silver. With today’s silver spot just peaking at $42/oz, and today’s average gas price around $3.66/gallon the price of a gallon of gasoline in silver dimes is about $0.12. That’s based on the melt value of the silver, not the collector value of the coin. So, Dr. Paul called it within $0.02. But measured against silver this is an historically low price for gasoline. In 1964, when silver dimes were still in circulation, the average price of gasoline was about $0.30/gallon. In real value we’re paying about half what we were in those days. So why does it seem so expensive? Well, Paul called it right again. It’s all about inflation.

The drafters of the US Constitution recognized the importance of honesty currency and they understood inflation, which is why they wrote,
“No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.” (Article I, Section 10, Paragraph 1, Clause 5)

People mistakenly believe that inflation is an increase in prices, but this is merely the side effect. Inflation is the increase in the money supply. Unable to fund this devastatingly expensive Federal Government, Congress long ago abandoned the stability of precious metals and embraced a fraudulent system of paper currency. This allows Congress to fund their projects without directly taxing their subjects. The dollar is no longer backed by any commodity. It derives its value from legal tender laws that obligate subjects to use it, in fact if you went around buying things with silver you might be declared an economic terrorist by the FBI. When the government borrows money the collateral on that loan is the future earnings of those subjects. In other words, the government is selling you, and the dollar is the receipt.

When Congress and the Federal Reserve increases the money supply (a.k.a. When they sell you) it dilutes the buying power of the money already in the economy. This means that the same number of dollars buy less goods. Prices rise. The buying power of that new money is stolen from the buying power of the dollar in your pocket. It’s an invisible tax that is built into the US monetary system. Increases in the price of oil usually indicate decreases in the buying power of money, not authentic market fluctuations.

The disparity between the $3.66 gallon of gasoline in today’s dollars and $0.12 gallon of gasoline in silver dimes is the degree to which we have already been sold to the government’s creditors. Since the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913 the buying power of the U.S. dollar has decreased 96%. Soon it will not be worth the paper it’s printed on, and this country will enter into the same economic crisis that toppled the Soviet Union. On the other hand, a silver dime will probably still buy a gallon of gasoline.
 
Paul should have saved this line for later in the debate when he could have had more time to explain himself instead of trying to cram it in at the end of a response to something else.

These programs shouldn't even be called a debate. In a true debate, a particular stance or take on an issue is posed to the participants & then they debate on that issue. That is not what we have. Instead it's a "production" where we have a scripted Q&A session where the mainstream media focuses its audience attention on the candidates they want the audience to choose (Romney & Perry in this case). The mediators asked Romney & Perry questions, while for the most part superficial & incapable of revealing hardly anything that would be of consequence to circumstances this country faces, that created the appearance that the primary election is truly a contest between only these two men. The rest of the questions were sprinkled out to the other partcipants to give the appearance that they are also involved in this election process. MSNBC did an especially poor job in hiding their true intentions since pretty much every question the rest of the candidates were asked, other than Huntsman at times, were questions where they were supposed to respond to something Perry said or did as governor.

Ron Paul performs really poorly in these "debates." His message is great & what he is trying to communicate is as well but he does a poor job in relaying this message to the average person who tunes into these debates. There is just way too much rambling & straying off topic. He ends up just sounding like he's going off on a rant; he does not portray a "presidential" image as they say. He also does a horrible job in attacking his opponents. Perry left himself wide open for a knock down punch when he tried to counterattack Paul by mentioning that Paul sent a letter to Reagan saying he, Paul, was considering leaving the party because of some of Reagan's actions as President. Paul responded by defending the letter & pointing out that the issue he had with Reagan was Reagan straying from the party's principles as he underdstood them. He didn't even do that great explaining this when defending himself. But the real problem is that he should have used this as an opportunity to tear into Perry by mentioning how Perry was a Democrat at the time & later worked for Al Gore's campaign for President in the '80s. He should have used this an opportunity to expose Perry as nothing more than a charlatan who calls himself a conservative but isn't truly a man of principle; just like most politicians.

That in turn could have been used as a roundabout attack on all the other contenders on the stage & allowed Paul to distinguish himself as the only person running who stays true to truly "small government" principles. That is after all what he's trying to run on.
 
The govt is suppose to be by the people and for the people if it doesn't work for us we are suppose to change it. I wonder how Ron Paul would feel if he had to explain everything he said and did I don't think he would like it very much. The govt is the enemy, we are suppose to hold it accountable. Because we have been derilect in our duty Ron Paul can go on national tv and say shit like 'I can get you a gallon of gasoline for a silver dime' and not worry about repercussion.
 
The govt is suppose to be by the people and for the people if it doesn't work for us we are suppose to change it. I wonder how Ron Paul would feel if he had to explain everything he said and did I don't think he would like it very much. The govt is the enemy, we are suppose to hold it accountable. Because we have been derilect in our duty Ron Paul can go on national tv and say shit like 'I can get you a gallon of gasoline for a silver dime' and not worry about repercussion.

You must not have read the article posted by the OP.
 
I read the post and Paul is probably right but the chances of anyone using a silver dime to buy gas is none. He shouldn't be allowed to make those kinds of outlandish statements without repercussion and that goes for everyone in public office. We have got to find ways to hold them accountable before its too late.
 
I read the post and Paul is probably right but the chances of anyone using a silver dime to buy gas is none. He shouldn't be allowed to make those kinds of outlandish statements without repercussion and that goes for everyone in public office. We have got to find ways to hold them accountable before its too late.

Paul was just making a point about inflation and how our government's monetary policy has been so detrimental. Maybe you didn't watch the debate & have no context as to when or why the statement was made in the first place.
 
Paul was just making a point about inflation and how our government's monetary policy has been so detrimental. Maybe you didn't watch the debate & have no context as to when or why the statement was made in the first place.

You really need to stop assuming. But to put things in context Nixon was forced to resign for ok-ing a office breakin now politicans can go on national tv and make inane out of context statements, as in there is no chance of us going back to the gold standard, like Paul's because people have low expectations of our leaders.
 
You really need to stop assuming. But to put things in context Nixon was forced to resign for ok-ing a office breakin now politicans can go on national tv and make inane out of context statements, as in there is no chance of us going back to the gold standard, like Paul's because people have low expectations of our leaders.

Nittie, we won't look to make transactions with gold or silver by "choice". It will be by "force", as our creditors demand payment in instruments of value, instead of paper currency created by the Federal Reserve.

So you're right, the Fed will not relinquish this power willingly but you are witnessing the world waking up to "fiat" currency.

Congress long ago abandoned the stability of precious metals and embraced a fraudulent system of paper currency.

Isn't it ironic that a barrel of oil costs the same as it did 50 years ago, when measured in gold or silver?

However, under this "fiat dollar" system, regardless of whether its the Pound, Euro or FRN, prices go up, up & up!

MM020211_2.gif
 
Last edited:
Nittie, we won't look to make transactions with gold or silver by "choice". It will be by "force", as our creditors demand payment in instruments of value, instead of paper currency created by the Federal Reserve.

So you're right, the Fed will not relinquish this power willingly but you are witnessing the world waking up to "fiat" currency.



Isn't it ironic that a barrel of oil costs the same as it did 50 years ago, when measured in gold or silver?

However, under this "fiat dollar" system, regardless of whether its the Pound, Euro or FRN, prices go up, up & up!

MM020211_2.gif


If Paul or anyone else had a plan for reducing inflation they would win in a landslide. Problem is no one has a realistic plan so Bank of America can layoff workers, keep the bailout money and still collect on debts lol. It's almost too unreal lol. We can do something about this if we stop looking for leaders and start looking for the courage to fight, hell it would probably be the most fun we had in years.
 
Back
Top