Republicans & Kash Patel Take Pro-Bestiality Stance

I understand that it is fun to pretend people you don't like fuck animals or support fucking animals (I guess) but you look like a moron being so wildly off.

Really wondering who is knowingly full of shit and who just believes any spin about people they don't like.
We heard you the first 17 times, Mr. Tijuana Donkey Show
 
I understand that it is fun to pretend people you don't like fuck animals or support fucking animals (I guess) but you look like a moron being so wildly off.

Really wondering who is knowingly full of shit and who just believes any spin about people they don't like.

We have a CokeHead in charge of "the Premier Law Enforcement Agency" of the world......

You are extending a football field of benefit of the doubt to a glorified podcaster now DIRECTOR OF THE FBI!

This dude said, "engaging on bestiality .eans they were forced to do it.

NO IT DOESN'T!!

WORDS MEAN THINGS!

They / he could've easily written it/ explained it as:

"We will no longer disqualify people forced to commit bestility."

The statement reads, ".... engaging in bestiality is no longer a disqualification."

Those 2 statements are not the same. And can be interpreted castly different ways.


This shit is wild

"In June, the FBI
reportedly issued an internal directive removing theft from an employer, sex solicitation, and
bestiality from the list of automatic hiring disqualification."



As long as you (were caught paying) paid for sex less than 3 times or stole from your employer over 3 years ago or engaged in bestiality under the age of 18......
You too can be an FBI agent
 
It's not that, it's about why have they lowered the standard, just like they lowered the standards for ice which has resulted in these shootings/killings for civil offences

Exactly, for an administration that claims to "be the best," has "so much winning" and anti-DEI .....

They sure are making a lot of concessions for mediocre (white) men!!

RFK is insane and nowhere near qualified for his job. Don had to sign exemptions for Kash patel and Pete Hegseth because they didn't meet the minimum requirements for their jobs. But the one requirement they did meet..... they'll do whatever drumpf tells them to..... fucking spineless, corrupt, bitches
 
Last edited:
It's not that, it's about why have they lowered the standard, just like they lowered the standards for ice which has resulted in these shootings/killings for civil offences

This is not lowering standards though. It’s fixing a dumb standard.
 
This is not lowering standards though. It’s fixing a dumb standard.

How exactly was it fixed?!

And if it was "fixed" effectively..... why was there a reply memo sent and then hearings on the "fix?"

They muddled the water on this standard, not cleaned it
 
How exactly was it fixed?!

And if it was "fixed" effectively..... why was there a reply memo sent and then hearings on the "fix?"

They muddled the water on this standard, not cleaned it

If someone is pimped as a child by someone who lets any sicko do anything to them, they should not be held accountable for what was done to them.

This measure fixes a previous standard that punished victims of sex crimes.

I hate Trump and think Patel is unqualified but criticism of this is largely dishonest and just about scoring cheap political points (and gullible people believing that spin).
 
I can see your point
If someone is pimped as a child by someone who lets any sicko do anything to them, they should not be held accountable for what was done to them.

This measure fixes a previous standard that punished victims of sex crimes.

I hate Trump and think Patel is unqualified but criticism of this is largely dishonest and just about scoring cheap political points (and gullible people believing that spin).
I can see your point on being exploited, but the beastiality clause is what was being questioned and being exploited as a kid is not the same as going out and giving the family dog

Maybe Patel should have explained that better
 
I can see your point

I can see your point on being exploited, but the beastiality clause is what was being questioned and being exploited as a kid is not the same as going out and giving the family dog

Maybe Patel should have explained that better

This is my point!!!

He didn't clarify shit with his explanation!

@Costanza

Kash said "applicants who engaged in bestiality, means they were victims."

WORDS MEAN THINGS!

Engaging in it, does not mean you're a victim or forced into it!

But also, did you read the memo?!!

This applies to people that have a bestiality conviction while under 18.......

DO "VICTIMS" TYPICALLY GET A CHARGE AND CONVICTION?!!

and this is a smoke screen to cover the fact that now prostitution charges (3 or less convictions are okay now) and employee theft (is ok if it was more than 3 years ago) standards have been lowered!! But DEI WAS THE PROBLEM!!

Standards were being "lowered" for hard working minorities, terrible. *(standards weren't lowered, just more roles had to be filled by minorities).


Standards actually being lowered for despicable/ deplorable cacs, well that's fine.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top