Republicans Enjoy Huge Lead Over Democrats in Midterms: Poll

:lol: Jesus. You really want that answer.
She wants him to say Trump so she can attack but it would expose her low level thought process more than anything else.

I don’t recall anyone crying about hash brown prices under Trump. COVID no better. Equity markets and crypto markets destroyed. Inflation highest it has ever been in my lifetime. Crime on the rise. Only LGBT and so-called white immigrants and Asians can claim a successful vote.
 
She wants him to say Trump so she can attack but it would expose her low level thought process more than anything else.

Lmao @ attack. Almost a full 24 hours before you typed this drivel I had already explained why I was asking.
 
Who was the better alternative period...other than those two?
Well, can we now admit that they both are fucking terrible?

Are the dems smart enough to move to the next?

They had 4 fucking years last time but they put all their focus and eggs on :eek2:"Russia" fuckery instead of grooming a candidate. Similar to how we go :eek2: "jan 6" now in an even worse macro picture with no clear and cohesive plan from democrats on shit that matters and unifying the far left with the moderates.

Folks might be paying $6 for gas with a recession and they ain't trying to hear no more 'better alternative' shit. Especially black folks who aren't on BGOL. You know, regular folks that ain't balling the fuck out.
 
who said she was lying? the bigger question in that regard is name the president in the last 100 years (1920 to 2020) those statements she made WOULDN'T apply to?

Evidently you're pushing back against what she's saying. Why not simply acknowledge what she's specifically saying is true?
 
If you don't vote for the Dems your family will be KILLED
-Camille
If you don't vote for them u ain't Black!
-Biden.
You sound like a republican
-forgot who said it lol

I did not say that. If you can't make a point without lying, or your reading comprehension is that bad, don't post.
 
Oh when you said that, it was only a hypothetical question?

It was hypothetical and I didn't say vote dem. I was trying to get him to tell me who he would vote for, Trump or Biden, if he HAD to choose. He refused to answer.
 
It was hypothetical and I didn't say vote dem. I was trying to get him to tell me who he would vote for, Trump or Biden, if he HAD to choose. He refused to answer.
Oh OK. Understood.
I know you D1s treat the situation as a life or death situation. So you can forgive me for making that connection.
 


Ugh...she's right! As hard as that pill is to swallow, she's right. Gun to my head I vote Joe Biden again, I just don't think we (us) can take another Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee and more conservative local judges. We got another thread talking about how nature in Yellowstone took out a whole damn road. We need someone that is more of an adult in the event another natural disaster occurs.
 
Ugh...she's right! As hard as that pill is to swallow, she's right. Gun to my head I vote Joe Biden again, I just don't think we (us) can take another Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee and more conservative local judges. We got another thread talking about how nature in Yellowstone took out a whole damn road. We need someone that is more of an adult in the event another natural disaster occurs.
:confused: :confused: :confused:
I'm not even trying to be facetious or snarky..

I'm not sure if I understand what you're trying to say here. At least in regards to the natural disaster.

For the Supreme Court, I believe , you think they're going to fuck up Black peoples lives right?
 
Evidently you're pushing back against what she's saying. Why not simply acknowledge what she's specifically saying is true?
not pushing back...you tagged me for a response and that response is :yawn::dunno::yawn:

Yet another oracle sounding the alarm but not actually DOING anything. With all her political experience and connections youd think she'd run for office and affect the change needed. Do you agree with that? hell I'd vote for her.
 
not pushing back...you tagged me for a response and that response is :yawn::dunno::yawn:

Yet another oracle sounding the alarm but not actually DOING anything. With all her political experience and connections youd think she'd run for office and affect the change needed. Do you agree with that? hell I'd vote for her.
She can't affect change because the system won't allow her or any politician to make real change. They know they have to follow the system once they get in. That's why I don't understand why y'all argue us down about whose better or worse lmao
 
She can't affect change because the system won't allow her or any politician to make real change. They know they have to follow the system once they get in. That's why I don't understand why y'all argue us down about whose better or worse lmao
because you offer no viable alternatives...just kvetching
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKF
:confused: :confused: :confused:
I'm not even trying to be facetious or snarky..

I'm not sure if I understand what you're trying to say here. At least in regards to the natural disaster.

For the Supreme Court, I believe , you think they're going to fuck up Black peoples lives right?

George W. handled Katrina better than Trump did with Puerto Rico. At the very least Bush had "competent" people in place that knew how to do their jobs. Trump just had people that would kiss his ass and then talk shyt about how bad they were at their job as he fired them??? BUT HE HIRED THEM!!!! The only way people get help is if they voted for him or not, or if the governor of that state is cool with him or not.

The Supreme Court fcuking up Black peoples lives...yes, but only in the sense of they aren't doing us any favors. Trump put two corporate loving justices and a ultra evangelical justice. None of them are or have done anything for black lives.

If you're all right with this type of governing, then I pray you live in a red state come 2024, cause Trump is coming and that orange bastard is coming like a pissed off Sith Lord
 
George W. handled Katrina better than Trump did with Puerto Rico. At the very least Bush had "competent" people in place that knew how to do their jobs. Trump just had people that would kiss his ass and then talk shyt about how bad they were at their job as he fired them??? BUT HE HIRED THEM!!!! The only way people get help is if they voted for him or not, or if the governor of that state is cool with him or not.

The Supreme Court fcuking up Black peoples lives...yes, but only in the sense of they aren't doing us any favors. Trump put two corporate loving justices and a ultra evangelical justice. None of them are or have done anything for black lives.

If you're all right with this type of governing, then I pray you live in a red state come 2024, cause Trump is coming and that orange bastard is coming like a pissed off Sith Lord
Ok I see.
Thank you for your taking time to respond.
 
George W. handled Katrina better than Trump did with Puerto Rico. At the very least Bush had "competent" people in place that knew how to do their jobs. Trump just had people that would kiss his ass and then talk shyt about how bad they were at their job as he fired them??? BUT HE HIRED THEM!!!! The only way people get help is if they voted for him or not, or if the governor of that state is cool with him or not.

The Supreme Court fcuking up Black peoples lives...yes, but only in the sense of they aren't doing us any favors. Trump put two corporate loving justices and a ultra evangelical justice. None of them are or have done anything for black lives.

If you're all right with this type of governing, then I pray you live in a red state come 2024, cause Trump is coming and that orange bastard is coming like a pissed off Sith Lord
boom.gif
 


You could have 100 Feinsteins and 435 Pelosis and never make progress to the left because they're not interested in doing anything but preserving their own status and power even at the expense of their constituents.

When Republicans are in power they are extremely aggressive about cementing their future ability to regain and maintain that power and they do it with single minded focus.

Voting is not going to fix the DNC.


The DNC has repeatedly told young people to go fuck themselves so you can't be surprised when they don't turn out to vote for some crusty old man who is going to preserve the status quo (which already sucks)

Like maybe we would be in a different spot if Obama had aggressively used his opportunity to close gitmo and enshrine federal abortion protections and pack the court, but he didn't, so here we are.

We have one regressive party and one status quo party and the regressive party wants more than anything to suppress the right to vote so please don't pretend that this is unexpected or surprising.


It is fixable, but the people in power don't want it fixed, so we have to make them fix it.
If that means prinarying basically every sitting democrat then we should do that.
 


You could have 100 Feinsteins and 435 Pelosis and never make progress to the left because they're not interested in doing anything but preserving their own status and power even at the expense of their constituents.

When Republicans are in power they are extremely aggressive about cementing their future ability to regain and maintain that power and they do it with single minded focus.

Voting is not going to fix the DNC.


The DNC has repeatedly told young people to go fuck themselves so you can't be surprised when they don't turn out to vote for some crusty old man who is going to preserve the status quo (which already sucks)

Like maybe we would be in a different spot if Obama had aggressively used his opportunity to close gitmo and enshrine federal abortion protections and pack the court, but he didn't, so here we are.

We have one regressive party and one status quo party and the regressive party wants more than anything to suppress the right to vote so please don't pretend that this is unexpected or surprising.


It is fixable, but the people in power don't want it fixed, so we have to make them fix it.
If that means prinarying basically every sitting democrat then we should do that.


Look, if you go into politics you're going to be building your portfolio. The shyts just a matter of time. The difference between the two parties is the DNC build their portfolio and throws a couple bucks to their base and does a bunch of photo ops. The RNC plays that long game. LASER FOCUSED! I am almost jealous of their tenacity.

Primarying people out is weird cause we just had a couple elections with Nina Turner in Ohio and Karen Bass in Cali. Where in Ohio they voted the usual DNC darling and in Cali they voted the former Republican, billionaire, nonagenarian white dude. We make the joke of white folks voting against their interest when we do the same damn thing!
 
Back
Top