i'm am by NO means an expert on the UFC. i'm not even a casual fan. beyond a couple names of fighters that i've actually watched, the UFC doesn't really hold my interest.
my question is this: wasn't the ORIGINAL UFC much better? no weight classes? gladiator style tournament? groin shots OK?
i think it was. because if the actual intent was to pit STYLES and DISCIPLINES against one another, it presents a TRUE test of the fighter and his respective discipline to defeat all comers.
the failure of the original UFC, IMO, was poor logistics. fighters dropping out DURING the tournament resulted in the bizarre practice of replacement fighters entering mid-tournament fresh and rested, while the other competitors had already battled.
poor bracketing resulted in tremendous mismatches, and drop outs resulted in disappointment. but the 'solution' of the 'super-match' (royce gracie v. ken shamrock's 2nd matchup OUTSIDE the actual tournament) was also a miserable failure. a 35 minute draw, booed by the fans at the conclusion.
not coincidentally, without those 2 marquee names IN the tournament, it resulted in dan severn securing the UFC 'title'.
another problem with current UFC is the switch over to the 'rounds' system. again, instead of letting the fighters' skills and conditioning decide the outcome, the UFC constrained the fighters (specifically grapplers, wrestlers and bjj practitioners) by implementing a 'round' system which would stand the fighters up and make them start all over again. this was done solely for the benefit of the fans, who prefer a stand up fight and a T/KO by strike, and not for the sport or the fighters.
i say go back to the old way.
end of rant.
my question is this: wasn't the ORIGINAL UFC much better? no weight classes? gladiator style tournament? groin shots OK?
i think it was. because if the actual intent was to pit STYLES and DISCIPLINES against one another, it presents a TRUE test of the fighter and his respective discipline to defeat all comers.
the failure of the original UFC, IMO, was poor logistics. fighters dropping out DURING the tournament resulted in the bizarre practice of replacement fighters entering mid-tournament fresh and rested, while the other competitors had already battled.
poor bracketing resulted in tremendous mismatches, and drop outs resulted in disappointment. but the 'solution' of the 'super-match' (royce gracie v. ken shamrock's 2nd matchup OUTSIDE the actual tournament) was also a miserable failure. a 35 minute draw, booed by the fans at the conclusion.
not coincidentally, without those 2 marquee names IN the tournament, it resulted in dan severn securing the UFC 'title'.
another problem with current UFC is the switch over to the 'rounds' system. again, instead of letting the fighters' skills and conditioning decide the outcome, the UFC constrained the fighters (specifically grapplers, wrestlers and bjj practitioners) by implementing a 'round' system which would stand the fighters up and make them start all over again. this was done solely for the benefit of the fans, who prefer a stand up fight and a T/KO by strike, and not for the sport or the fighters.
i say go back to the old way.
end of rant.