Poorest will be hit hardest by Global Warming

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Poorest will suffer most from global warming</font size>
<font size="4">When the Earth gets a few degrees hotter,
inconvenience will give way to danger,
death and extinction of species</font size></center>

April 6, 2007 - 13:33
By: SETH BORENSTEIN

BRUSSELS, Belgium (CP) - Global warming's effects on daily life are here already, still more pesky than catastrophic. But a new authoritative scientific report says that when the Earth gets a few degrees hotter, inconvenience will give way to danger, death and extinction of species.

The poorest parts of the world, especially Africa and Asia, will be hit hardest, says the summary from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, issued Friday after a long, contentious editing session.

It is a message the authors of the report pounded home Friday before unveiling the 23-page document. The summary was the first part released of the full 1,572 page document written and reviewed by 441 scientists.

"Don't be poor in a hot country, don't live in hurricane alley, watch out about being on the coasts or in the Arctic, and it's a bad idea to be on high mountains with glaciers melting," Stanford University scientist Stephen Schneider, an author of the study, told The Associated Press.

This document, the second of four reports, tries to explain how global warming is changing life on Earth.

Even though some of the scientists' direst prose was toned down or lost, the panel's report was gloomy - with a bit of hope at the end.

Africa by 2020 is looking at an additional 75 to 250 million people going thirsty because of climate change, the report said. Deadly diarrhea diseases "primarily associated with floods and droughts are expected to rise" in Asia because of global warming, the report said.

But many changes to the report, made during a meeting of government negotiators from more than 120 countries, play down some of the dangers forecast by the authors - all eminent scientists.

"Many millions more people are projected to be flooded every year due to sea-level rise by the 2080s," the report said. "The numbers affected will be the largest in the mega-deltas of Asia and Africa while small islands are especially vulnerable."

The draft version proposed by scientists had said "hundreds of millions" of people would be vulnerable to flooding, rather than "many millions."

The final report also dropped any mention of the possibility that up to 120 million people are at risk of hunger because of global warming, referring instead to "complex localized negative impacts on small holders, subsidence farmers and fishers."

The first few degrees increase in global temperature will actually increase global food supply, but then it will plummet, according to the report.

An increase of just about one degree Celsius could mean "up to 30 per cent of the species at increasing risk of extinction," the report said. If the globe heats a few more degrees, that changes to "significant extinctions around the globe."

"The poorest of the poor in the world - and this includes poor people in prosperous societies - are going to be the worst hit," said Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the climate change panel. "People who are poor are least able to adapt to climate change."

But even rich countries, such as the United States, say the report tells them what to watch for.

The Canadian Red Cross said Friday the report confirmed its worst fears. It called on Canadians to dramatically increase their investment in disaster preparedness to help vulnerable communities mitigate against the consequences of global warming.

Reacting to the report, Liberal Leader Stephane Dion called on Prime Minister Stephen Harper to endorse the revised version of the Clean Air Act including its plan to have a carbon budget for Canada that will help the country honour its Kyoto commitments.

The head of the U.S. delegation, White House associate science adviser Sharon Hays, said a key message she is taking from Brussels to Washington is "that these projected impacts are expected to get more pronounced at higher temperatures. ... Not all projected impacts are negative."

Schneider said a main message is not just what will happen, but what already has started: melting glaciers, stronger hurricanes, deadlier heat waves, and disappearing or moving species.

It all can be traced directly to greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels.

"There is a discernible human influence on these changes" that are already occurring as threats to species, flooding, extreme events such as heat waves and hurricanes, said NASA scientist Cynthia Rosenzweig, a lead author on the chapter detailing what has happened.

Martin Parry, who conducted the closed-door negotiations, said with 29,000 sets of data from every continent, including Antarctica, the report firmly and finally established "a man-made climate signal coming through on plants, water and ice."

But many of the worst effects are not locked into the future, the report said in its final pages. Humans can build better structures, adapt to future global warming threats and can stave off many by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, scientists said.

"There are things that can be done now, but it's much better if it can be done now rather than later," said scientist and report author David Karoly of the University of Oklahoma.

And because carbon dioxide stays in the air for nearly a century, it will be decades before society sees that changes make a difference on global warming effects, scientists said.

"We can fix this," by investing a small part of the world's economic growth rate, said Schneider. "It's trillions of dollars, but it's a very trivial thing."

http://www.570news.com/news/international/article.jsp?content=w040645A
 

Fuckallyall

Support BGOL
Registered
This is such a crock of shit. Most of the poor suffer from the inavailability of energy. Haiti has been deforested for wood to cook and heat with, many sub-saharan countries cannnot keep medicines refrigerated, nor can they have closed housing (which keeps out disease carrying insects) because they cannot keep the interior cool, and so on. These conditions will continue to worsen because of the pressure to keep them underdeveloped via making energy more expensive, and hence, less accessible.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Latest Global Warming Report
Urges World to Begin Adapting</font size>

<FONT SIZE="4">The poor may be hit the hardest by climate changes,
IPCC report says; calls for stronger action</FONT SIZE></CENTER>

By Peter N. Spotts
Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
from the April 6, 2007 edition

Global warming is having a measurable effect on Earth's climate, including agriculture, freshwater resources, and plants and animals on both sea and land. These changes are expected to intensify as temperatures continue to rise.

Those are among the conclusions of a new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN-sponsored group of scientists. A summary of their findings released April 6 outlines climate changes and how researchers expect them to play out as warming continues. Their impact on society, the IPCC report says, will vary depending on the amount of actual temperature increase that occurs and humanity's capacity or ability to adapt to the changes.

"Not all of these effects are negative," notes Sharon Hayes, an official with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who headed the US delegation to the week-long meeting in Brussels where scientists and political delegations hammered out the summary's final wording. At least during the early part of the century, for example, crop yields in wetter parts of the mid- and high latitudes, including regions of Russia, Canada, and the US, are expected to rise.

But the report also makes clear that as temperatures rise, negative effects increase, Dr. Hayes adds. And the poorest countries, which contribute the least to global warming, are expected to face the biggest challenges in coping with it.

The report unleashed an immediate chorus of calls for the US to adopt a climate policy that includes mandatory controls on green-house gas emissions. John Connaughton, who heads White House Council on Environmental Quality, told reporters during a briefing April 6 that the Bush administration is pushing two programs that will accomplish the same end: a commitment to higher auto mileage standards and to replacing 20 percent of gasoline consumption with biofuels in the next decade.

But for many observers, that's not enough. Noting that the IPCC report comes on the heels of this week's US Supreme Court ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant, Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, said in a statement, "We need a mandatory climate policy in the United States" – one that, among other things, would directly control CO2 emissions.

A broad range of ways to adapt are available, the IPCC report says. But too little is being done to prepare for the disruptive effects a warmer world is expected produce. Most of the attention so far has focused on efforts to curtail emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, produced by human activity, such as emissions from coal-fired power plants. But the report notes that more emphasis must be placed on adaptation as well.

Efforts to encourage sustainable development can help countries improve their resilience. But the report notes that over the next 50 years, the regional effects of global warming could undermine efforts to achieve those development goals.

Scientists have outlined a range of effects that have already taken place; they vary depending on how regional climates respond to rising global average temperatures. But as scientists look ahead, broad patterns emerge. Among them:

Fresh-water resources. By the middle of the century, average river runoff is expected to increase by 10 to 40 percent in areas nearest the two poles and in some wet tropical areas. But it's expected to shrink by 10 to 30 percent in dry, mid-latitude regions as well as in dry tropical parts of the globe. Drought-prone regions are likely to expand their boundaries, while heavy snowfall and rainfall elsewhere raises the likelihood of more frequent and severe flooding.

Ecosystems. The report notes that if temperatures increase between 1.5 and 2.5 degrees C (2.7 to 4.5 degrees F.), 20 to 30 percent of the plant and animal species researchers have examined so far could become extinct.

Farming. Globally, food production overall improves if temperature increases locally remain with a 1 degree to 3 degree C range. Productivity is projected to fall if temperatures rise above that range.

Coastal areas. By 2080, millions of people are expected to be affected by floods because of sea-level rise, especially in regions with high land subsidence, such as the Louisiana coast, or regions in Asia and Africa with large, low-lying, heavily populated river deltas. Small islands, the report notes, are particularly vulnerable.

Human habitation. Cities and industries that sit along coastal areas or river flood plains are expected to face the largest challenges – especially in already poor countries. Even in wealthy nations the poorest people are likely to suffer most.

Public Health. The report sets out a mixed picture, with the heaviest effects falling on poor areas where health care services, sanitation, and sources of clean water already are scarce.

Researchers acknowledge that pegging the changes they see in specific physical and biological systems to global warming is difficult. Changes are being measured at a relatively small number of sites around the world. And they cover a relatively small number of ecological and physical systems.

Still, the report notes that out of 29,000 data sets contained in 75 studies regarding changes under way, 89 percent are consistent with what models project should happen as the world warms. And the warming patterns people are seeing regionally are consistent with broad distribution of temperature changes global-scale models.

Moreover, research over the past six year has allowed scientists to project the possible effects of warming more accurately based on each degree of temperature increase.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0406/p25s01-wogi.html
 

VegasGuy

Star
OG Investor
Fuckallyall said:
This is such a crock of shit. Most of the poor suffer from the inavailability of energy. Haiti has been deforested for wood to cook and heat with, many sub-saharan countries cannnot keep medicines refrigerated, nor can they have closed housing (which keeps out disease carrying insects) because they cannot keep the interior cool, and so on. These conditions will continue to worsen because of the pressure to keep them underdeveloped via making energy more expensive, and hence, less accessible.

It’s how you make the case man. You scare people with things they can't control or possibly understand. You do commercials putting the children in front of a symbolic global warming moving train as you, the person capable of protecting them, move out of its path, then scare the bejesus out of those who understand almost nothing about the world around them, the uneducated, ignorant poor folk, and get them to sign onto this bullshit cause knowing if they see it on TV or on the internet, they believe it without question.

The objective is to extract an unlimited flow of tax dollars into the pockets of the same group who brought you that other gold rush; the cure for everything via embryonic stem cells.

-VG
 
Top