Jimmy the greek was talking about slave breeding to create better slaves. He broke the code and paid the price. Had he said genetics he would have been alright.
But what he lying on the experiments and selective breeding those crakkas was doing ?
“The black is a better athlete to begin with because he’s been bred to be that way, because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back, and they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs and he’s bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the Civil War when during the slave trade’n the big… the owner… the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have big black kids see…”
As the 2012 London Olympic Games approach, controversial statements from a former gold medalist are turning heads when it comes to the black athletes.
Michael Johnson, the 4-time Olympic Gold Medal winning sprinter, is standing by his assertion that black athletes are superior in competition when it comes to sports as a result of their slave descendants.
In his “proof is in the pudding” comments, Johnson said:
“All my life I believed I became an athlete through my own determination, but it’s impossible to think that being descended from slaves hasn’t left an imprint through the generations.
Difficult as it was to hear, slavery has benefited descendants like me — I believe there is a superior athletic gene in us.
Over the last few years, athletes of Afro-Caribbean and Afro-American descent have dominated athletics finals. It’s a fact that hasn’t been discussed openly before. It’s a taboo subject in the States but it is what it is. Why shouldn’t we discuss it?”
Snyder would later express regret for his comments, saying “What a foolish thing to say.” In context, was it that foolish?
History taught us that slave masters would bred their strongest slaves with the most fertile childbearing female taker.
So here we are again discussing the same issue and this time, an actual athlete, a black Olympic sprinter, is saying the same thing.
Snyder’s comments and Johnson’s comments weren’t meant to be racist, even though it’s coming off that way. The point is, the data and what we’ve seen when it comes to black and white athletes makes their argument viable.
Larry Bird is no doubt one of the greatest NBA players to lace them up; his drive and heart of a champion will never be questioned, but he wasn’t the greatest athlete with the best athleticism, he made up for it by being a great shooter, passer and defender. Everyone knows he wasn’t the fastest or strongest person on the court, but he was the toughest.
That “imprint,” as Johnson put it, I believe still exists. Just look at the top two 2012 NFL draft pics, Robert Griffin III and Andrew Luck, both sure to be impactful quarterbacks, but as far as athleticism, everyone would agree that Griffin is superior in that category, and his numbers at the NFL combine would prove that. Luck however, is a better passer, decision maker and fits the mold of your typical everyday quarterback.
Griffin has been compared to the more agile and speedier QB’s such as Michael Vick and Cam Newton, who depend on their athleticism and their ability to out run linebackers, elude defensive ends, and fly by cornerbacks, which is what makes them superstar athletes.
Now, I don’t know if there is a “superior athletic gene,” but what I do know is that when I look at the athleticism of black athletes throughout history, from Jesse Owens to LeBron James, it’s clear that their athletic ability is why they are so dominant in their fields and why they far surpass their white counterparts.
https://globalgrind.com/1858058/mic...der-black-better-athlete-shaka-griffith-blog/
He said more than that....lol.
The interview was a setup too....Go up to somebody who is drinking and then get offended because what is said isn't artful. ROFLROFL.....ask a drunk and question and act surprised when drunk answers